Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)操作成功
published in(发表于) 2013/3/21 2:09:59
To save his mother or wife Please see the ultimate answer!

To save his mother or wife? Please see the ultimate answer!
Mother and wife drowning at the same time, can only save one, who will you save?
This topic is very popular, whether should be some brain rot woman the test man love her standards.
In fact, this moral dilemma, learned some knowledge of the ethics can be easily answered.
You can put forward two kinds of answer from ethics Angle.
A kind of ethics is the motivation, namely Kant argued that the so-called moral behavior, must meet two requirements: the universality and the utilitarian. According to this principle, his wife and his mother are the same people, not to who are more valuable as the basis of save, because both of them should be saved. In the case of can only save one, also must abandon the utilitarian considerations, otherwise it is immoral. Due to save people, then, is an emergency, so as to facilitate easy to consider the fundamental factors. As a result, save to Easy to save first.
Another is the ethics that bentham's utilitarianism claims. Emergency rescue action of utility, the first is to save is successful, the second is more save. If you could only save one, then consider the largest utility is successfully delivered to a person. Have talent have the value of life. To successfully deliver to a person, of course, main is to consider who is the most easy to save. Save the easiest way to save the people, even without success, also is the utility maximization. On the other hand, if save first difficult to save, is likely to be difficult to save have no save, easy saving should be saved without saving, that's the biggest utility loss. So, even if from the utilitarianism ethics consideration, also should save the most easy to save.
Whether motivation ethics or Results the ethical, should be Save to easy to save.
However, women's rights activists insist to save his wife.
Old niang is actually a woman! Who is in trouble a woman? Is a woman!
Why women's rights activists for women? ! Because of women's rights activists brain-dead, no reason, reading half impassability, return eloquent.
But also because of women's rights activists don't take oneself when people, but as a special species, when oneself as his price goods.
So-called save the wife do not save the old niang, illogical and contradictory. And, of course, this may be most of the Chinese level!
(
救老娘还是老婆？请看终极答案！
母亲和妻子同时溺水，只能救一个，你会救谁？
这个题目非常非常普及，竟然成为一些脑残女人考验男人是否爱她的标准。
其实，这个道德两难状态，学过一点伦理学知识，就能轻易回答。
可以从伦理学角度提出两种回答。
一种是动机伦理学，即康德的主张认为，所谓道德行为，必须符合两个要求：普适性和非功利性。根据这个原理，老婆和老娘都同等是人，不能以谁更有价值作为救人的依据，因为两个人都应该得救。在只能救一个的情况下，也必须抛弃功利考虑，否则就是不道德的。那么，由于救人是紧急事件，所以当以方便容易为考虑的根本因素。因此，先救容易救的。
另一种是结果伦理学，即边沁的功利主义主张。紧急救人行动的功利，首先是要救人成功，其次是多救人。如果只能救一个，那么最大的功利考虑就是要成功地救到一个人。有人才有生命的价值。要成功地救到一个人，当然主要是考虑谁最容易救。救最容易救的人，即使没有成功，也是功利最大化的。反之，如果先救比较难救的，很可能难救的没救成，容易救的本来应该得救也没有救，这就是最大的功利损失了。因此，即使从功利主义伦理学考虑，也应该救最容易救的。
无论是动机伦理，还是结果伦理，都应该救容易救的。
然而，女权份子硬说要先救老婆。
其实老娘也是女人啊！谁在难为女人？是女人！
女权份子为何难为女人？！因为女权份子脑残，完全没有理智，读书半通不通，还振振有词。
还因为女权份子不把自己当人，而是当成特殊的物种，当自己当成待价而沽的性商品。
所谓救老婆不救老娘的说法，逻辑不通，自相矛盾。当然，这可能是大多中国人的水平吧！
)

赞

If you have any requirements, please contact webmaster。(如果有什么要求，请联系站长)




QQ:154298438
QQ:417480759