Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)delv
published in(发表于) 2013/10/29 7:44:50
Shenzhen reform in senior high school entrance examination

The past two days, on the reform of college entrance examination, networking on popular keywords. Yesterday, Beijing announced the reform of college entrance examination programme, language, English scores "one up, one down", triggered a heated public. Shenzhen recently exposed by 2015 under the revised policy views, will incorporate moral study subjects, organized by the district departments of education, school visits, moral failure, high school may not be accepted. Prior to this, in order to give great importance to ideological and moral education in schools, Shenzhen Bureau proposes the inclusion of moral tests, attracting many objection by parents and teachers.

Despite the "exams" became "investigation", but "the moral no qualified high school can not accept" was subject to user's question, a Netizen named "@ Lu Yaming," says, "first of all, what is moral connotation? Second, the who standards developed? How to assess? If people into personality digestion instrument? "According to Nanfang daily

"Something to say"

Yue Guotao: standards of how to decide? Teachers will be death sentence comment please?

Chevalierx: moral character can also be quantified? Standards are?

Method of deep margin: it's very easy to think of "use of a stick"?

@ North style: opinion: morality is important to do first. Point is, study of the ideological and moral? Children are shaped, so early to characterize its moral difference right?

Huang Zhuguo lawyer: even kids made a mistake, so it's just can continue to deprive him of the right to education?

_ Five more: moral decision is a piece of paper?

Single closed affair: "ourselves"?

Lin Chuan-big foot and the Hendersons: blatant retrogression!

Man Yau-Southwest friends: is moral dissatisfaction could suggest the next step, not be allowed to marry?

(Original title: moral substandard schools don't accept? )

　　近两日，关于中高考改革，成为网上网下的热门关键词。昨天，北京公布中高考改革方案，语文、英语分值“一升一降”，引发了公众的热议。深圳也于近日公开了2015中考政策意见修订稿，将思想品德纳入考察科目，由各区教育部门、学校组织考察，思想品德不合格者，高中学校可不予录取。此前，为了让各大学校重视思想品德课，深圳教育局拟将思想品德列入中考，引来不少家长和老师的异议。

　　尽管由“考”变成了“考察”，但“思想品德不合格高中校就可以不录取”还是遭到网友的质疑，网友“@陆亚明”说，“第一，思想品德的内涵是什么？第二，标准谁制定？如何评核？会不会因此变成个性消解的工具？”据南方日报

　　【有话要说】

　　岳国涛：标准如何判定？老师一句评语就可定生死吗？

　　chevalierx：思想品德也能够量化？标准是谁？

　　深客法缘：这很容易让人想到“欲加之罪，何患无辞”？

　　@江北风采：个人认为：思想品德很重要，要做事先做人。关键是思想品德咋考？孩子的一切都是可再塑造的，这么早给其定性品德差合适吗？

　　黄柱国律师：即便孩子犯了错，难道就能以此剥夺他继续受教育的权利吗？

　　五_更：思想品德就是靠一张纸决定的？

　　独关风月：这也“政审”？

　　林川-大脚八：明目张胆的倒退！

　　君子攸往-西南得朋：是不是可以建议下一步道德不达标者，不准结婚？

(原标题：思想品德不合格学校可以不录取？)

赞