Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2013/10/30 11:11:26 Experts suggested the Inheritance Act range of video Wills should be included in the form
Experts suggested amending the law of succession clearly "oral will" dead time at the same time –
Video will be legalized
Legal evening news (reporter Wang Hong intern Mei Shuang) the Inheritance Act range in the form of video Wills should be included in a will, in keeping with the code of civil procedure. On October 26, Professor Long Yifei law civil law and commercial law studies in Beijing put forward at the meeting, we should perfect the existing law of succession.
Long Yifei Professor at Renmin University, Taiwan's present the Inheritance Act was enacted in 1985, as established in the planned economy era, legislative technology limited, principle of making the legislation too, this should keep pace with the.
Now people can easily use a variety of electronic devices to record events, and made into a music video, video will be more comprehensive and to reflect the real will of the testator. The code of Civil Procedure Act had been "audiovisual" as types of evidence, therefore the Inheritance Act range in the form of video Wills should be included in a will.
In addition, the law of succession should also be written will confirm the print made from the effect. Notation for wills and allograph will, in addition to by hand should also be allowed to print the testator used as paper, of course to be autographed, and indicate the year, month, and day.
Professor Long Yifei presented, use oral wills shall be regulated. Oral wills under the existing law of succession in "necessity" to use, and does not explicitly provide that "necessity" specific types, as well as in judicial practice of "necessity" criteria for identification of difficult to master. In addition, nor require oral wills dead time.
Recommends that the specific provisions of the inheritance law, natural persons in the event of traffic accidents, wars, natural disasters and other situations, nor books, allograph by notarization, video recordings or form a will, verbal wills can be established. Verbal wills shall be indicated by two or more witnesses testimony, written records made from the witnesses, indicate the year, month, day, and signed by a witness.
The aforementioned "necessity" after disarmament, since the testator otherwise from the date of the testator, after 30th, oral will fail, in order to improve the operability of oral wills established rules.
专家建议修改《继承法》 明确“口头遗嘱”失效时间 同时——
录像遗嘱应合法化
法制晚报讯(记者 汪红 实习生 梅双) 《继承法》应当将录像遗嘱列入遗嘱形式的范围，以与《民事诉讼法》保持一致。10月26日，龙翼飞教授在北京市法学会民商法学研究会上提出，应完善现行《继承法》。
中国人民大学龙翼飞教授介绍，我国现行《继承法》于1985年颁布，由于制定于计划经济时代，受到立法技术上的局限，使得立法过于原则化，现在应该与时俱进。
现在人们能够非常方便地使用各种电子设备来记录事件，并制作成音视频资料，而视频更能全面地反映遗嘱人的真实意志。《民事诉讼法》已经将“视听资料”列为证据类型的一种，因此《继承法》应当将录像遗嘱列入遗嘱形式的范围。
此外，《继承法》还应确认采用打印方式制成的书面遗嘱的效力。对自书遗嘱和代书遗嘱的书写方式，除用手写方式外还应允许立遗嘱人采用打印成纸质的方式，当然要本人亲笔签名，并注明年、月、日。
龙翼飞教授提出，口头遗嘱的使用范围须进行规范。现行《继承法》规定口头遗嘱须在“危急情况”下使用，而未明确规定“危急情况”的具体种类，以至司法实践中对“危急情况”的认定标准难掌握。另外，也没规定口头遗嘱失效时间。
建议《继承法》可以具体规定，如自然人在遭遇自然灾害、战争、重大交通事故等情况下，又无法用公证、自书、代书或录音录像形式设立遗嘱的，可以设立口头遗嘱。口头遗嘱应当有两个以上的见证人在场见证，由见证人制成书面记录，注明年、月、日，并由见证人签名。
前述“危急情况”解除后，自遗嘱人能够用其他方式立遗嘱之日起，经过30日，口头遗嘱失效，以便提高设立口头遗嘱规则的可操作性。
赞