Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)左
published in(发表于) 2013/11/13 7:12:08
Director of the Department of environmental protection was charged with taking bribes more than once table-call witnesses at Court framed

Yesterday, the original Director of Department of environment supervision centers in North China inspection three Li Xuezhi alleged bribery case, municipal second Intermediate Court of second instance.

In September this year, Xicheng court trial with Li Xuezhi more than 360,000 yuan in bribes and sentenced to 12 years ' imprisonment.

After the sentencing, prosecutors believe that judgment to more than 1.9 million yuan in bribery charges have not been identified, is an error of fact, challenged. Li Xuezhi felt that his innocence, has appealed.

　First instance

1.95 million dollars charged for insufficient evidence

　　First instance court held that the payments could not be determined in nature, involve factual is unclear or inconsistent with the evidence

The case during the hearing, prosecutors allege, in April 2009, Li Xuezhi was responsible for the transfer of persons to visit cadre in Qinhuangdao city environmental protection Bureau Liu visits the mobilization process, deliberately delayed the cadre assessment, delays in the investigation process, to respond to "reporting" from accepting cash from Liu 186,000 yuan.

In January 2011, Li Xuezhi advantage convenience in Xinxiang city, Henan province, the new Asian-African paper Group Corporation in the course of on-site verification, without pretext of stoppage of production for rectification, accepting cash from song, the company's Chairman, more than 1.9 million, and more than 34,000 worth of Samsung W799 phone 5. Zhihou, Li Xuezhi deposited 1.45 million Yuan illicit money, "Li Xue" (indeed, on his own) bank account.

In addition, prosecutors allege, and Li Xuezhi in Qi County, Anyang City, Henan province, Xinxiang city, as well as wastewater treatment plant emissions verification, and reorganization unit to buy cosmetics or punishment for the pretexts, either individually or in partnership with his brother-in-law Liu xiaoqing (at large), to local environmental protection departments have requested more than 180,000 yuan and goods such as tea sets, commemorative coins (with a value of more than 12,000 yuan).

Xicheng Court of first instance finds that prosecutors allege Li Xuezhi receive or ask for cash from the song, and successively the fact that cell phones, put on evidence cannot determine the nature of payments, this allegation unclear facts, insufficient evidence, not found. Li Xuezhi bribes of 20,000 yuan to Qi County environmental departments, put it on and does not match the evidence, and the charges were not substantiated.

Xicheng Court on charges of taking bribes in the first instance sentenced Li Xuezhi sentenced to 12 years, found that bribes amounting to more than 360,000 yuan.

After sentencing, the prosecution protested.

Li Xuezhi maintains his innocence, has appealed.

　Trial

Counsel requested money appearing in court failed

　　Call it important witnesses, and has had many applications for court to answer the witness "on business"

Yesterday during the second trial, the prosecution still insisted on a trial of the three accused.

"The indictment alleges all content not substantiated. "Li Xuezhi was excited, even crying, pleaded not guilty in court, prosecutors allege, related to Liu and song for debts or borrowing money. In addition, cosmetics involved he doesn't charge "just help Liu xiaoqing-to sell". "Qi County Environmental Protection Department's 20,000 yuan was not the proceeds of bribes, and has subsequently submitted in a timely manner."

Li Xuezhi Xiong z first summoned the prosecution raised charges for defence counsel involved in the Qinhuangdao municipal environmental protection Bureau officials testified in court. Court says "this person on a business trip."

"Ryu is a material witness, the first instance, we apply 3 times, want the Court to summon Liu to testify, but the responses received were Liu on a business trip. "Xiong z said this before the trial, written application he asked Liu appeared in the reply but the same. Also requested the Tribunal to obtain "Li Xue" account information, the Court did not give a clear answer.

"The evidence is not clear, just enter the Court debate not appropriate, we request adjournments. "Xiong z this requirement without court consent.

Therefore, in the arguments that followed, Xiong z reply not to challenge the prosecution's allegations.

In the meantime, Li Xuezhi suddenly covered her face with both hands and choked up.

　Focus

1.9 million Yuan bribes or are borrowing

　Defendant says ious attested by party sign it is copied on the

In Court yesterday, both the prosecution and the main contradictions of the focus around the new song ya paper Chairman "to" Li Xuezhi 1.9 million yuan in cash and mobile phone.

　Witness

Defendant too less 400,000 yuan

Prosecution evidence showed that on January 13, 2011, Li Xuezhi team entered the new ya paper checks. Inspection, Li Xuezhi felt that the new ya paper with sewage problems. Xinya paper the same day by the local environmental protection departments require rectification and stoppage of production for rectification.

New song ya paper the President to testify, to "support" the prosecution.

Chairman song testified that family genealogy request, he was in the same year, January 18, twice in different locations to the family genealogy of 400,000 yuan in cash and 5 mobile phones. But family genealogy too little money, raised another $ 3 million worth of demand, and this is leading to. The Board decided "it had to give him the money, companies are now nearly 3 billion of assets, such as less than 3 million are likely to be killed, shutdowns caused direct economic losses of more than 2 million a day, enterprises and 3 million gamble not worth it".

On January 23, song took 1.5 million yuan in cash to Beijing to meet Li Xuezhi.

Song said that Beijing didn't see "great leadership", only a "lean figure, wearing a scruffy" man. He was also asked to sign a "guarantee", enterprises no longer pollute the environment. Subsequently, Li Xuezhi 1.5 million cash from his car taken away.

Prosecutors protested, considered that this involved a sum of more than 1.9 million Yuan, the facts are clear, the evidence fully, "Li Xuezhi refund afterwards is to cover up the crime, does not affect the determination of the crime of accepting bribes". In addition, Li Xuezhi take the form of deliberately exaggerating problems and serious consequences, who take bribes of 20,000 yuan Qi County, Henan province environmental protection departments. After returning to Beijing and will hand over the money, but declined to specify the source of money so that money could not be returned to the people, also refused to return on their own. Knowingly returned the money after being investigated, arrested for corruption charges. These allegations of dirty money, are not identified by the Court of first instance.

The defendant

Witness accused of perjury

Honor, Li Xuezhi patting the Chair rap song "is framed and false testimony" and that song has said the money was "borrowed" and "borrowing" as evidence.

Li Xuezhi argues that song gave him 400,000 yuan, was commissioned to help handle the Beijing Hukou. Due account is not done and he is ready to hand over 400,000 yuan to the song. When two people meet in Beijing, song, begging him, taking it brought 1.5 million Yuan and avoid being "a production stoppage and rectification", if you do not accept, "businesses will be not saved." Thus, "helpless", he secured the two lent money a total of 1.9 million dollars to his brother-in-law Liu xiaoqing, song said, "lean body" to strangers.

Li Xuezhi said, "borrowing", prosecutors believe that borrowing books is provided by Li Xuezhi, and cannot provide the original, only the carbon copy, does not have the identification of the handwriting and the writing time of condition should not be used as evidence.

Song also said that he hasn't seen borrowing books, much less sign, above the signature should be copied.

In addition, lawyer Xiong Zhi and Li Xuezhi said, was accused of loan transfer of personnel to the environmental protection Bureau of Qinhuangdao cadre Liu bribe 186,000 yuan is not a fact, there is evidence that borrowing relationship, its "testimony cannot be trusted".

"I just felt wronged. "Li Xuezhi said that he felt he was playing.

Prosecutors protested the proposed Court commuted or remanded, Li Xuezhi appeal acquittals – the case in court have not been sentenced.

This version of manuscript writing/Beijing News reporter Zhang Yuxue pictures/Beijing News reporter Wang Guibin

(Original title: Director of the Department of environmental protection-related bribery case Court of second instance)

　　昨天，环保部华北督查中心督查三处原处长李学智涉嫌受贿案，二审在市二中院开庭。

　　今年9月，西城法院一审以李学智受贿36万余元，判处其有期徒刑12年。

　　宣判后，检方认为，判决中对190余万元受贿指控未被认定，属事实错误，提出抗诉。李学智则认为自己无罪，也提起上诉。

　　■ 一审

　　195万元指控证据不足

　　一审法院认为无法确定款项性质，涉及事实不清或与证据不符

　　该案一审时，检方指控，2009年4月间，李学智负责对调任人选进行考察，在对秦皇岛市环保局干部刘某考察调动的工作过程中，故意推迟干部测评时间，拖延考察进程，以接到“举报信”为由，先后从刘某处收受现金18.6万元。

　　2011年1月，李学智利用职务便利，在河南省新乡市新亚纸业集团股份有限公司现场核查过程中，私自以停产整顿为借口，先后从该公司董事长宋某处收受现金190万元及价值3.4万余元的三星W799型手机5部。之后，李学智将145万元赃款存入“李学才”(实为其本人)的银行账户。

　　另外，检方指控，李学智在河南省安阳市、新乡市以及鹤壁市淇县污水处理厂进行排污核查中，又以给检查组购买化妆品或处罚整顿为借口，单独或伙同其妹夫刘晓庆(在逃)，先后向当地环保部门索要18万余元及茶具、纪念币等物品(价值1.2万余元)。

　　西城法院一审认为，检方指控李学智先后从宋某处收受或索要现金及手机的事实，因在案证据无法确定款项性质，该笔指控事实不清、证据不足，不予认定。李学智向淇县环保部门索贿2万元的事实，与在案证据不符，指控也不成立。

　　西城法院一审以受贿罪判处李学智有期徒刑12年，认定其受贿数额为36万余元。

　　宣判后，检方抗诉。

　　李学智坚称自己无罪，也提出上诉。

　　■ 庭审

　　律师要求送钱人出庭未果

　　称其为重要证人，并曾多次申请；法院回答证人“在出差”

　　昨日二审开庭时，检方仍坚持在一审时的三项指控。

　　“起诉书指控的内容全部不属实。”李学智很激动，甚至痛哭，当庭表示不认罪，称检方指控中，有关刘某和宋某的钱也为欠款或借款。另外，涉及的化妆品他根本没有收取，“只是帮助刘晓庆进行推销”。“淇县环保部门给的2万元并非其索贿所得，且事后已及时上交单位”。

　　李学智的辩护律师熊智提出传唤检方第一项指控中涉及的秦皇岛市环保局干部刘某出庭作证。法庭称“此人在出差”。

　　“刘某是重要证人，一审时，我们就3次提出申请，希望法院能传唤刘某出庭作证，但得到的答复均是刘某在出差。”熊智说，此次开庭前，他又书面申请要求刘某出庭，但给予的答复相同。此前还提出要求法庭调取“李学才”的账户信息，法院也未给出明确答复。

　　“证据都未搞清楚，就直接进入法庭辩论不合适，我们要求休庭。”熊智的此要求，未获法庭同意。

　　因此，在随后的法庭辩论中，熊智未针对检方的指控进行答辩。

　　其间，李学智突然用双手捂住脸，哽咽起来。

　　■ 焦点

　　190万元是受贿还是借款

　　被告人称有借条为证；当事人表示上面签字是复印的

　　昨天庭审中，控辩双方主要的矛盾焦点围绕在新亚纸业董事长宋某“给”李学智的190万元现金及手机上。

　　证人

　　被告人嫌40万元少

　　检方证据显示，2011年1月13日，李学智带队进入新亚纸业检查。检查后，李学智认为新亚纸业有排污问题。新亚纸业当天被当地环保部门要求停产整顿和限期整改。

　　新亚纸业董事长宋某出庭作证，“支持”检方。

　　董事长宋某作证说，在李学智的要求下，他于同年1月18日、19日，分两次在不同的地点给李学智送去40万元现金和5部手机。但李学智嫌钱少，提出再要300万元的要求，并说明这钱是领导要的。董事会认为“这钱得给他，企业目前近30亿的资产，如不出300万有可能被整死，停产一天造成的直接经济损失就达200多万，企业拿300万与30亿赌不划算”。

　　同年1月23日，宋某带着150万元现金到北京见了李学智。

　　宋某称，在北京没见到“大领导”，只见到一个“身材比较瘦、穿着邋遢”的人。他还被要求签署一份“保证书”，承诺企业不再污染环境。随后，150万现金被李学智从其车上取走。

　　检方抗诉时认为，这一笔190余万元涉案款，事实清楚，证据确凿充分，“李学智事后退钱是为掩盖犯罪，并不影响受贿罪的认定”。另外，李学智采取故意夸大问题及严重后果的方式，借机向河南省鹤壁市淇县有关环保部门索贿2万元。虽然回京后将钱上交，但拒绝说明钱款来源，使单位无法将钱退还相关人员，也拒绝自行退还。在知晓被调查后才将钱款退回，涉嫌受贿罪。而上述指控赃款，均未被一审法院认定。

　　被告人

　　证人诬陷作伪证

　　庭上，李学智拍着椅子斥责宋某“完全是诬陷，在作假证”，并称宋某所说的钱是“借款”，有“借款书”为证。

　　李学智辩称，宋某给他的40万元，是委托帮忙办理北京户口。因户口没有办成，他正准备将40万元退给宋某。在北京两人见面时，宋某哀求他收下带来的150万元，避免企业被“停产整顿”，如果不收，“企业就会不保”。于是，“无奈之下”，他作保，将两笔钱共190万元借给了自己的妹夫刘晓庆，即宋某所说的“身材比较瘦”的陌生人。

　　针对李学智所说的“借款书”，检方认为，借款书是李学智提供的，且无法提供原件，只有复写本，不具备鉴定笔迹和书写时间的条件，不应作为证据使用。

　　宋某也表示，他没有见过借款书，更没有在上面签字，上面的签字应该是复印上去的。

　　另外，李学智及律师熊智均称，被指控借人事调动向秦皇岛环保局干部刘某索贿18.6万元也不是事实，有证据证明二人有借款关系，其“证言不可信”。

　　“我就是觉得自己特委屈。”李学智说，他觉得自己被人玩了。

　　检方抗诉建议法院改判或者发回重审，李学智上诉要求宣告无罪——此案当庭未作宣判。

　　本版稿件采写/新京报记者 张玉学 本版图片/新京报记者 王贵彬

(原标题：环保部一处长涉贿案二审开庭)

赞