Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2013/11/14 2:58:35 Battle of the experts group of celebrities ’ hometown
Beijing, November 13 (upper guanyun) recently, a "study on Cao Cao's family's DNA" message burned hot. According to media reports, studies, Fudan University, took the bozhou unearthed two ancient teeth, and conclusions drawn, tooth's owner was Cao Cao's uncle grandfather. Bozhou officials interpreted as strong evidence of Cao Cao was in bozhou city people. Discovery of Cao Cao's Tomb in Henan, Henan provincial Institute of cultural relics and archaeology with a authoritative doubt DNA archaeology by, refusing to take Cao Cao's Tomb remains identification. In this regard, doubt it would set off a new round of "celebrity culture" controversy?.
"Battle of the celebrity culture": from historical figures to fictional characters
In recent years, the domestic history of the battle of the celebrity culture can be described as "smoke", play the celebrity card, history and culture seem to be a short cut to local tourism economy.
According to the people's daily overseas edition reported, Anlu, Hubei and Sichuan jiangyou's Li Bai's hometown of battle, even go to court another great poet Qu Yuan has also suffered a similar embarrassment, seat of Zigui, Hubei province because the origin of Dragon Boat Festival and Tomb of Qu Yuan and Jiangsu Suzhou salvos; Cao Cao has caused a greater debate in 2010. Henan provincial cultural heritage Bureau announced in Beijing, high profile, West Village found the tombs of the Eastern Han dynasty Tomb of Cao Cao in Anyang, which sparked a nationwide controversy relates to the authenticity, integrity and academic atmosphere.
As the protection of traditional cultural philosophy taking hold, "battle of the celebrity culture" began to evolve from historical figures to contend for some mythical characters in novels, like Nu Wa, Hua Mulan, Ximen, then turn again, "Guo Jing Huang Rong". According to the Chongqing business daily reported that the city of Xiangyang, Hubei Province will establish small North Plaza "carve a couple" statue, is expected to completed in late August. According to the official description, statue of Guo Jing Huang Rong total cost of 1 million Yuan, in the Eagle-shooting heroes, "battle of Xiangyang," as the prototype, trying to show the cultural charm.
Minister of culture CAI had said in an interview with the Beijing News and other media, never correct achievements view in some places, and negative effects in the market, driven by cultural protection to "deviate".
Expert: mining Hall of resources cannot be obsessed
Turning to the "battle of the celebrities ' hometown" opinion, media jingyishan in the Beijing times wrote that, "Cao Cao's DNA" identification before although in bozhou city and Anyang respond differently to their intentions exactly – waving the banner of the ancients, Rodeo tourism economy, "Hall of Valor" boom, rigorous academic insight it is difficult to cool down.
"I think this makes no sense, I strongly oppose. "Honorary President of the China Society of cultural relics Expert Committee members Xie chensheng, national historical and cultural city in the name" battle of the celebrity culture, "said that" the mining Hall of resources cannot be obsessed.
Some scholars, "battle of the celebrities ' hometown" image is called "cultural eating the old" that culture itself is an accumulation and inheritance, and their descendants should not be in a "culture" of the flag attached to the coat of an ancient culture and learn from today's economic interests.
However, was also put forward different views. Think obsessively to historical truth should be maintained, but for cultural industries in particular, cultural consumption, it is not necessary to maintain a culture of cleanliness. As long as the celebrity image positive, both virtual and the fact that they exist, are a significant cultural resource, it is entirely possible for industrialization.
For the "celebrity culture" rather than developing the spirit of celebrities
Academic research on celebrities ' hometown is controversial is a natural phenomenon, but when such a dispute linked to the interests, when the famous historic resource exploration and "develop" it seems to be departing from the cultural orbit.
Heritage is a national collective memory carrier. Some experts said, the hometown of battle looks like cultural struggle, but is interest dispute. Cultural resources such as interests competing for celebrity weights, is surely a distortion of traditional culture and hype. Culture is a respect for the spirit, are not used to tarnish the destruction. Treats the ancient relics, fear is the most important and most urgent protection, development of appropriate, should also be designed to more people the opportunity to share. Economic development is not a main function of the heritage sites.
In fact, when profit impulse "heritage conservation" chips to achieve their economic interests and political achievement of alienation, departed from the culture of public justice. When culture to Exchange into reality when the interests and considerable achievements, heritage body has the aura of history and cultural dignity immediately fades.
Scholar Li Dianyuan bashu culture in Chengdu daily reporters, said before, a lot of places competing for the Hall of Valor, mainly driven by tourism. Li Dianyuan believes that "celebrities ' hometown bias" is a syndrome of the times. Instead of competing for "celebrity culture", rather than developing the spirit of celebrities.
(Original title: "Cao Cao's DNA identification" heightened scrutiny: recreate celebrity battle of the hometown? )
中新网11月13日电(上官云)近日，一则“曹操家族DNA研究”的消息被炒的火热。据媒体报道，复旦大学研究时，取了亳州出土的两颗古人牙齿，进而得出比对结论，牙齿主人是曹操叔祖父。这被亳州官方解读为，有力证明了曹操是亳州人。而在曾发现曹操墓的河南，河南省文物考古研究所方面以DNA考古权威性存疑为由，拒绝拿曹操墓遗骸做鉴定。对此，外界质疑，这是否又掀起了新一轮的“争名人故里”之争？。
“名人故里之争”：从历史人物到虚拟人物
近年来，国内的历史名人故里之争可谓“硝烟弥漫”，打名人牌、历史文化牌似乎成为一个地方发展旅游经济的捷径。
据人民日报海外版报道，湖北安陆和四川江油的李白故里之争，竟然闹上了公堂；另一位大诗人屈原也遭遇了类似尴尬，屈原墓所在地湖北秭归因为端午节起源问题一度与江苏苏州大打口水仗；曹操则在2010年引起了一场更大的争论。河南省文物局在京高调宣布，安阳西高穴村发现的东汉墓葬为曹操墓，从而引发了一场关乎真伪、诚信与学术风气的全国性争论。
随着传统文化保护理念深入人心，“名人故里之争”渐渐从争历史人物演变为争一些子虚乌有的小说人物，如女娲、花木兰、西门庆，后来又轮到了“郭靖黄蓉”。据重庆商报报道，湖北襄阳市小北门广场将设立“射雕情侣”雕像，预计8月底落成。据官方介绍，郭靖黄蓉雕像总耗资100万元，以《射雕英雄传》中“襄阳大战”为原型，力图展现文化魅力。
文化部部长蔡武此前在接受新京报等媒体采访时曾表示，一些地方从不正确的政绩观出发，在市场负面作用的推动下把文化保护搞得“走偏”。
专家：挖掘名人资源不能走火入魔
在谈到对“名人故里之争”的看法时，媒体人敬一山在新京报撰文指出，在“曹操DNA”鉴定面前，虽然亳州和安阳反应不同，可它们意图如出一辙——打着古人旗号，圈地搞旅游经济，“争名人故里”的热潮，靠缜密的学术识见一时很难冷却。
“我觉得这种做法没有任何意义，我坚决反对。”中国文物学会名誉会长、国家历史文化名城专家委员会委员谢辰生此前在提起“名人故里之争”时说，“挖掘名人资源不能走火入魔。
曾有学者将“名人故里之争”形象的称为“文化啃老”，认为文化本身是一种积累和传承，后人不应打着“文化”的旗号依附在古文化的皮毛上，汲取今天的经济利益。
然而，也有人提出不同意见。认为对历史应该保持真相的洁癖，但对于文化产业特别是文化消费，则没有必要保持文化的洁癖。只要该名人的形象积极向上，那么无论虚拟还是事实存在，都是一笔巨大的文化资源，完全可以进行产业化开发。
争夺“名人故里”不如弘扬名人精神
学术研究领域对名人故里存在争议本属正常文化现象，可当这种争议与利益挂钩，当对历史名人资源的发掘与“开发”就似乎开始偏离文化轨道。
文物是一个民族共同的记忆载体。有专家表示，故里之争貌似文化之争，实则是利益之争。把名人等文化资源作为利益争夺的砝码，无疑是对传统文化的一种扭曲和炒作。文化是用来尊重发扬的，不是用来玷污破坏的。对待古人遗存，最重要的是敬畏，最急迫的是保护，适当的开发，也应该是为了更多人有机会分享。发展经济不是文物遗迹的主要职能。
其实，当逐利冲动下“文物保护”异化为攫取经济利益和政绩的筹码，就背离了公共文化的要义。当文化古迹用以兑换成多少现实的利益和可观的政绩时，文物身上所具有的历史光环和文化尊严就会立刻褪去。
巴蜀文化学者李殿元之前在接受成都日报记者采访时表示，现在很多地方争夺名人故里，主要还是受到旅游经济的驱动。李殿元认为，“名人故里情结”是一种时代综合征。与其争夺“名人故里”，不如弘扬名人精神。
(原标题：“曹操DNA鉴定”被热炒：将再现名人故里之争？)
赞