Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2013/11/14 3:07:45 Henan Public Security Bureau in response to the abolition of the crime detection rate indicator
--Reform of Henan Public Security Bureau in response to controversies
Xinhuanet, Zhengzhou, November 14 (reporter Li Lijing)-recently, the Henan provincial public security Department announced the further strengthening and improvement of the criminal law enforcement efforts of ten steps to effectively preventing the wronged and misjudged cases, by repealing "detection rate" indicators, such as, preventing the wronged and misjudged cases.
Move out, immediately drew public attention. The view was expressed that the "target detection rates is contrary to the objective law, correct it well! "; Also suggested that" detection rate "promotion of basic-level public security departments to solve, with indisputable positive, cancel" detection rate "indicators, such as would lead to tailor-made slack ... ...
With plenty of questions about the public, reporters 13th interview with Henan provincial public security Department, the relevant departments.
Introduction background why? Implementation of Central regulations for public security legal backbone and observations
Henan Provincial Public Security Bureau Deputy Chief of legal Corps Hua Liebing told reporters that the aim was "for the full implementation of the spirit of Central politics and Law Committee and the Ministry of public security files, solve the prominent problems existing in the practice of public security law enforcement, further strengthen and improve the work of handling criminal law enforcement, and earnestly safeguard the people's legitimate rights and interests and further enhance the civilian police concept, effectively preventing the wronged and misjudged cases of law enforcement for the people to ensure that strictly regulate just and civilized law enforcement. ”
In recent years, with she Xiang, Zhao zuohai was news media exposure and by the judicial authorities to rectify, triggering a wider appeal against wronged and misjudged cases, strengthening of Justice.
In 2010, the Central politics and Law Committee and the Ministry of public security has issued provisions requesting the cancellation of "detection rate" appraisal, public security departments across the country also introduced corresponding provisions, and gradually fade in the later work "detection rate" and so on.
August 2013, the Central politics and Law Committee and the Ministry of public security has issued the provisions relating to the issue of effectively preventing the wronged and misjudged cases notified (the commissar (2013), 27th) and the further strengthen and improve the work of handling criminal law enforcement to prevent the wronged and misjudged cases notified (through word [2013)). Proposed to establish a sound scientific and rational performance appraisal system, in line with judicial rules on a case, not one-sided pursuit of detection rates, arrest, prosecution rates, conviction rates and other indicators.
On October 23, 2013, repeatedly seek the views of the province and organized on the basis of public security legal discussion on the business backbone, the ten measures of Henan provincial public security department.
Cancel "detection rate" can you prevent wronged and misjudged cases? "Combination of boxing," circumvention
According to reports, the ten measures that exist already in police work, such as "specification for investigation", formerly of Henan Provincial Public Security Bureau also called on major criminal cases () asked to synchronize audio and video recording, this time expanding the scope to "all criminal cases", and to standardize this work. Some are raised for the first time, such as "effective protection of lawyers ' rights", "push through online enforcement cases" and "strengthen law enforcement system construction" and so on.
Hua Liebing said that preventing the wronged and misjudged cases, not just removing the "detection rate" indicators such as avoiding, needs to run through the public security organ handling cases from start to finish. So, this Henan Province Police Office introduced of ten items measures is set "combination fist", respectively including "specification investigation forensics work", and "strong introduced online law enforcement case", and "strictly cases legal audit checks", and "practical guarantees lawyer practice industry right", and "regulation highlight law enforcement problem", and "full implementation law enforcement responsibility tenure provides", and "strengthened law enforcement system construction", and "established law enforcement management long-term mechanism", and "strengthened law enforcement quality evaluation results using", and "full upgrade law enforcement main capacity".
Would be entirely negative "detection rate"? Dialectic view
Hua Liebing believes that preventing the wronged and misjudged cases is the eternal pursuit of the judiciary. But the system is dead, real-life vary. In his view, the ten measures can be said and cannot be completely eliminated wronged and misjudged cases. He said that there is no detecting system in the world is perfect.
An old working term in front of public security police said that Henan province from 2004 began to advocate the "homicide", the crime detection rate for checking an indicator of basic-level public security work. After the introduction of this system, public security authorities in Henan province crime rate and yearly increase, the current case detection rate rose by about five years ago the 2004 per cent in 2004, and gradually rose to per cent in 2007, the deterrent of police major crimes strengthened public satisfaction of social public security organs have been raised.
During the wronged and misjudged cases in Henan, there are objective reasons, some of which are one-sided pursuit of "detection rate" of subjective factors. However, those wronged and misjudged cases of objective and subjective reasons, and therefore, in 2004, had happened before. Such as the famous "Zhao zuohai case", took place in 1999.
By repealing "detection rate" after evaluating how? "Public satisfaction" was pushed to the front
Ten items measures introduced Hou, Henan Province police sector will no longer issued "detained number", and "incidence number", and "detection rate", and "back check rate", not science, and not reasonable evaluation indicators, no longer to "detection rate" "arrest number", and "sued number", and "back check rate", indicators got ranked informed, instead of, is established to specification law enforcement mainly line, and to masses satisfaction for main target, and to the sector participation for based, and to information examination for main means of science performance evaluation system.
Although no longer handed down "a detection rate" indicators, but in the new inspection system, "detection rate" will remain on an examination of the criminal investigation department parameter. Meanwhile, Hua Liebing believes that although no longer mention "detection rate", but the new inspection system on "public satisfaction" assessment, will spur grass-roots working units continues to take seriously the case, more effort to solve the case. "After all, combating crime, maintaining law and order are the subject of police operations. ”
Ten steps to provision site to conduct a site survey of all criminal cases, and under interrogation the suspects, technical investigation, crime scene investigation, inspection and other operational requirements, rely on the capacities of modern science and technology, enhancing the scientific evidence.
Started to implement the online law enforcement cases. Cases in provincial and municipal integration the integrated platform of police investigation and supervision system in law enforcement handle, no case transfer outside the system, no cases of violation of the approval procedure excision of information to ensure real-time, comprehensive monitoring of all cases on the Internet in all aspects, quality online case-by-case examination of the case. Evaluation unit wronged and misjudged cases during the year, classified as law enforcement quality standard unit directly.
Hua Liebing said, at present, they are ten steps to perfect the rules accordingly. The handling of criminal cases by public security authorities in Henan province a (polling) lines of synchronized audio and video recording regulations, the enforcement regime under the three-year plan is in place, the joint provincial laws, safeguarding and inspection, the Division developed the rules regulating lawyers ' participation in a number of provisions of criminal procedure is being prepared. He said, as they gradually improved and refined, will do a better job of public security.
——河南公安厅回应改革争议
新华网郑州11月14日电 (记者李丽静)近日，河南省公安厅出台《关于进一步加强和改进刑事执法工作 切实防止冤假错案的十项措施》，废除“破案率”等指标，防止冤假错案。
此举一出，立即引起舆论关注。有人认为，“破案率指标的确有违客观规律，纠正得好！”；也有人认为，“破案率”促进基层公安部门破案，具有不容否定的积极意义，取消“破案率”等指标，会导致公安人员懈怠……
带着公众的诸多疑问，记者13日采访了河南省公安厅相关部门。
出台背景为何？落实中央相关规定征求公安法制骨干意见
河南省公安厅法制总队副总队长华列兵告诉记者，此举的目的是“为全面落实中央政法委和公安部文件精神，解决公安执法实践中存在的突出问题，进一步加强和改进刑事执法办案工作，切实维护人民群众合法权益，进一步提升民警执法为民理念、切实防止冤假错案的发生，确保严格规范公正文明执法。”
近年来，随着佘祥林、赵作海等案被新闻媒体曝光并被司法机关纠正，引发社会各界广泛呼吁防范冤假错案，加强司法公正。
2010年，中央政法委和公安部就曾出台规定，要求各地取消“破案率”等考核指标，全国各地公安部门也出台了相应的规定，并在后来的工作中逐步淡化“破案率”等指标。
2013年8月，中央政法委和公安部先后下发《关于印发〈关于切实防止冤假错案的规定〉的通知》(中政委〔2013〕27号)和《关于进一步加强和改进刑事执法办案工作切实防止冤假错案的通知》(公通字［2013〕19号)。提出建立健全科学合理、符合司法规律的办案绩效考评制度，不能片面追求破案率、批捕率、起诉率、定罪率等指标。
2013年10月23日，在多次征求全省意见并组织公安法制业务骨干研讨的基础上，河南省公安厅的十项措施出台。
取消“破案率”能防止冤假错案吗？出“组合拳”规避
据介绍，十项措施有些早已存在于公安工作中，比如“规范调查取证工作”，以前河南省公安厅也要求，对重大刑事案件讯(询)问过程要同步录音录像，这次则将范围扩大到“所有刑事案件”，并对这项工作进行了统一规范。有一些则是首次提出，比如“切实保障律师执业权利”、“强力推行网上执法办案”、“加强执法制度建设”等。
华列兵说，防止冤假错案，不是仅仅取消“破案率”等指标就能避免的，需要贯穿于公安机关办案的全过程。所以，这次河南省公安厅出台的十项措施是一套“组合拳”，分别包括“规范调查取证工作”、“强力推行网上执法办案”、“严格案件法律审核把关”、“切实保障律师执业权利”、“整治突出执法问题”、“全面落实执法责任终身制规定”、“加强执法制度建设”、“建立执法管理长效机制”、“强化执法质量考评结果运用”、“全面提升执法主体能力”。
是否完全否定“破案率”？应辩证看待
华列兵认为，防止冤假错案是司法机关的永恒追求。但制度是死的，现实生活千差万别。他认为，十项措施可以说并不能完全杜绝冤假错案的产生。他说，世界上没有任何一种案件侦破制度是完美的。
一位长期在公安战线工作的老民警说，河南省从2004年开始提倡“命案必破”，将破案率做为考核基层公安工作的一项指标。这一制度出台后，河南省公安机关的破案率逐年提升，现行命案侦破率由2004年前的60%左右上升到2004年的93.42%，并逐步上升到2007年的96.21%，公安机关对恶性犯罪的威慑力加强，群众对公安机关的社会满意度也相应提高。
期间，河南产生过冤假错案，有些是客观原因造成的，有些确实存在片面追求“破案率”的主观因素。不过，这些主客观原因以及因此产生的冤假错案，在2004年之前也曾发生过。比如著名的“赵作海案”，就发生在1999年。
废除“破案率”后如何考评？“群众满意度”被推至台前
十项措施出台后，河南省公安部门将不再下达“刑事拘留数”、“发案数”、“破案率”、“退查率”等不科学、不合理考评指标，不再以“破案率”“批捕数”、“起诉数”、“退查率”等指标搞排名通报，取而代之的，是建立以规范执法为主线、以群众满意为主要目标、以各部门参与为基础、以信息化考核为主要手段的科学绩效考评体系。
虽然不再下达“破案率”指标，但在新考核体系中，“破案率”仍将是对刑侦部门的一项考核参数。同时，华列兵认为，虽然不再提“破案率”，但新考核体系中对“群众满意度”的考核，将无形中鞭策基层办案单位继续认真办案、全力破案。“毕竟，打击犯罪、维护治安是公安部门的主体业务。”
十项措施规定，所有刑事案件的现场均要进行现场勘查，要根据审讯犯罪嫌疑人、技术侦查、现场勘查、检验鉴定等工作需要，切实依靠现代科学技术全面提高科学取证能力。
强力推行网上执法办案。所以案件一律在省市一体化警综平台执法办案与监督系统中办理，严禁案件在系统外流转，严禁违反报批程序删改案件信息，确保在网上实时、全面监督所有案件的各个环节，案件质量网上逐案考核。考评年度内发生冤假错案的单位，直接评定为执法质量不达标单位。
华列兵说，目前，他们正在完善十项措施的相应细则。《河南省公安机关办理刑事案件讯(询)问同步录音录像工作规定》、《执法制度三年规划》已经出台，联合省法、检、司等机关制定《关于保障和规范律师参与刑事诉讼若干规定》的细则正在制定中。他说，随着这些制度的逐步完善和细化，公安工作一定会做得更好。
赞