Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2013/11/14 3:12:23 Ordinance petition 3 prepared by the delegate of Guangdong University controversy
Three copies of a proposed draft of the draft regulations of the letters and calls of Guangdong Province throwing many innovative systems design
Guangdong provincial people's Congress delegate College Guangdong provincial petition regulations draft regulations prepared by the proposal unveiled yesterday, the provincial people's Congress invited specialist assessment will be held, 3 universities 3 proposal submitted reviews "brick". 3 p k Fusion will form the draft of the programme, will be held on November 19 at the 12 session of the Standing Committee of the 5th meeting of first instance.
Soliciting three proposals have thrown a lot of innovative institutional design, in yesterday's meeting raised many controversies. Sun Yat-sen University research group presented the newly established above county level people's Congress Working Committee on petition, complaint to major facts are not clear to set up a Commission of inquiry on the specific. Jinan University Research Group recommended hearing system of petition. Subject group of Guangdong University of foreign studies considered open petition system and information-sharing mechanisms should be established.
This regulatory proposal assessment initiative. Wang Bo, Director of the Working Committee of Guangdong provincial people's Congress law introduction, text drafted by the provincial people's Congress on University quality were assessed. This assessment will invite legislative consultants, courts, procuratorates, public security, complaint letters and calls departments, representatives of the people participating over more than 40 persons. Assess the justification for 1 and a half days.
Creativity on "joint visit"
In recent years, mass ' applying for an increase in the number, frequency, response to this phenomenon, and in soliciting expert advice in reference to the basic theory of the representative action, creatively put forward the "joint visit" concept. According to mass ' applying characteristics of common appointments to receive visits, visits to attend, elected representatives, representatives of people's origin, effectiveness, replace, and the effectiveness of mutual visits and other aspects of specification. From effective regulation on many people to visit the program, effective control of the group plans to petition, steer it through the program in a legal framework to address or resolve the individual visit, reducing the impact and scope.
In addition, recommended the establishment of major petition joint petition case system. Some petition cases difficult in matters involving cross-sector, cross-regional coordination, should establish a regular or not regular joint meetings of the major case of petition letters and calls System. Also recommended the establishment of complaint letters and visits a follow-up assessment mechanisms. The petition of the people's Congress at all levels and bodies shall regularly evaluate the work of letters and calls, and to publish the results. Number of complaint letters and visits shall not be a performance based primarily on evaluation work of letters and calls.
Expert reviews
Xu Song (legislative consultants, lawyers): on the basis of the petition of the State Council regulations, specific program requirements for mutual visits to address mass ' applying for an effective solution to the problem raised.
Wang Jinsha (legislative consultants, the provincial Academy of social sciences, Institute of law, the original researcher): mutual visits are not widely understood, expert so exhaustively provided for in the draft of the representatives elected, representative of the civil procedure law have never been so detailed.
Research Group of Sun Yat-sen University proposal
New visits work Committee of the NPC
Scholars believe that at present for China's petition system is conservative and radical factions, radicals on the proposed visits work Committee under the NPC, founded on a petition to the people's Congress Centre, the departments responsible for specific offices of letters and calls of complaint letters and visits system.
Sun Yat-sen University research group identified in the proposal above county level people's Congress set up the petition Committee, lead the national people's Congress at the same level within the statutory terms of reference, the executive authorities, the courts, the public prosecutor's Office the work of letters and calls of complaint reporting agencies. Standing Committee of selection at all levels in relation to the major complaint of the facts are not clear, based on similar petition Committee's recommendations, according to decide to establish a Commission of inquiry on the specific.
Sun Yat-sen University experts draft devotes a full chapter to provision violated the order. Article 43rd-cited articles 44 and disrupting the work of letters and calls is clearly defined order and jeopardize public safety, violation of personal rights and property rights, violation of the order of social administration.
Zhu Sui (Vice Chairman of the NPC internal and Judicial Affairs Committee): violated the order requires special train. Now giving everyone a headache dilemma is the order of letters and calls, cannot rely on the public security organs to maintain law and order, but should work together to create a legal atmosphere of the whole society.
Subject group of Guangdong University of foreign studies proposal
Pilot social assistance fund of letters and calls System
Guangdong University of foreign studies proposal pointed out that State organs at all levels should make full use of existing network resources, a sound information system of letters and calls, timely registration of complaint, petition inadmissible, as well as the processing of entry. Established principles petition public, hearing system for sound important complaint and petition processing results to the general public for the first time. After the petition for review, review, in addition to involving State secrets, personal privacy, and other materials should be available to the public for letters and calls.
Guangwai Vice President Shi Youqi said the problem of complaint letters and visits Essentia is the preventive work of letters and calls, and prevent the occurrence of complaint from its source, therefore, significant design decision making risk assessment mechanism of letters and calls.
Also provided for the establishment of a social assistance fund of letters and calls System. Draft description in the pointed out that, current my existing various rescue exists legal pursuant to insufficient, set dispersed, underfunded, problem, Guangdong can first first try, established for local party of unified of social rescue system, specification rescue of object, and standard, and amounts, and program,, insisted social rescue of fair and efficiency, both can in must degree Shang protection victims of lawful rights and interests of, and cannot free took throughout social of taxpayers of money for "accident people" pay, thereby helps achieved petition prevention.
Expert voices
Ling Qiman (Provincial High Court Vice President): risk assessment of letters and calls from the complainant's point of view, but from the perspective of State authorities.
Venue focus
Right relief features are deprecated?
YES VS NO
Legislative advisory expert Professor Blunt's utopian, people still need relief right now, we should perfect relief.
Petition for relief features are weakening as the biggest points of contention. Assessment meeting, the ideal and reality of the fierce collision, some legislative advice expert Professor Blunt's utopian, people still need relief right now, we should perfect relief.
Research Group of Sun Yat-sen University believes that the petition of citizen's political participation in the way, rather than the right to seek legal remedy approach. Letters and visits from the people about the power of supervision rather than dispute resolution and remedies, complaint letters and calls to resolve the issue was not a substantive right how to allocate and how to remedy, but authorities in the allocation of rights and remedies in the course of unlawful and wrongdoing. Jinan University Research Group also introduced legislation positioning features, weakening to intensify the supervision on relief features.
Pointed out by many experts who have experience in work of letters and calls: now letters and calls function mismatches and petition to return to the party and the masses bridge location.
Consultant, Guangdong provincial people's Congress legislation Academy, Professor Wei Huateng believes that supervision function cannot be placed too much emphasis on participatory democracy, the people still want to petition for relief features. Even weakened, nor when the time comes, is to improve the right remedy. Letters should be a supplement to the inadequate system of administrative reconsideration and litigation. Many experts believe that the letters and complaints as a function of right relief can't stop.
Quantitative assessment criteria for letters and calls?
N O
Some grass-roots courts, only 2 letters a year indicator, in order to resolve the complaint letters and visits, the sentence not sentenced, the case can't close the interference of the law involved in a lawsuit petition concerned is large.
Recent media reports said State municipalities will no longer engage in nationwide rankings, notification of letters and calls, Jinan University in Guangdong Province local legislative base research, evaluation and advisory services in drafting the regulations for letters and calls of Guangdong Province (expert opinions) more in line with the policy, submitted a proposed draft of the school to ban to petition case number and income interview in proportion to performance evaluation.
"Number of complaint letters and visits as criteria for performance appraisal, prone to local government for achievements, honors, trying every way to reduce the petition, including interceptors, greatly undermined the legitimate rights and interests of the complainant. "Participation in the drafting of the Jinan University law school Associate Professor Gao Xuan said, reduces the number of letters and calls, but the matter has not been fundamentally solved petition, cumulatively, incurs no rules, no time limit, out of order and appealing.
"Some lower courts, only 2 letters a year indicator, in order to resolve the complaint letters and visits, the sentence not sentenced, the case can't close the interference of the law involved in a lawsuit petition concerned is large. "Legislative Wai lun law firm consultant, Guangdong provincial people's Congress Zeng Xuezhi, the Executive Director also said that letters should be treated in a scientific manner, not only to digital assessment.
Gao Xuan said that standardize the petition visit behavior, optimize the performance evaluation mechanism, and has designed a separate chapter in the draft "petition." From the Government, the public prosecutor's Office, courts and other characteristics of different systems, requires the competent departments in the assessment petition led the development of the system, the provincial people's Congress Standing Committee overall grasp. Final draft for operability and considerations of a general nature, this chapter is not included.
While system evaluation standards vary, legislative experts is a common principle---not design himself by handling organs themselves, nor by a higher evaluation, but to the complainant, the public and social organizations, by them to assess handling efficiency and social effects. "Grade can even use", Gao Xuan believed that can strengthen and promote the work of letters and calls from a different angle.
Limit the rights of the complainant?
NO
View was expressed clearly cannot stop visiting, interceptors, so make sure you visit people's rights.
For the complainant also became brick focus on rights protection. Suggested draft reasonably restrict citizens ' right to petition, some experts pointed to a proposed draft legislative starting point should be safeguarding complainant's rights and does not limit or prevent this right. Office of the provincial public security Department Political Commissar Deng Jianwei also noted that the proposal violated the order of the chapters is mainly aimed at provisions of the complainant, this area lacks Executive and staff from owes on a balanced portfolio. Provincial people's Congress, the Office of the Deputy Inspector of Zhong Huanxin that expressly cannot stop visiting and interceptors, stopped visiting interceptors and holds the legal responsibility for the consequences caused to ensure drains clear of letters and calls to ensure that visiting rights.
People in the episode scary?
Chinan launches new concept---mutual visits made to the draft, after successful registration accepted, more of the complainant can be visited at a specified time and place.
In recent years, "mass appeal," local government "scared," one word, provoking sensitive nerve. Many local government petition dealing with group events are specially developed contingency plans, once gathered more than a certain amount, the relevant departments are standing by.
"The people in the episode scary, this notion must change. "Chairman of the provincial people's Congress education, said Liang Wanli, see mass ' applying tension, like math, which condemned. "With ' bottom line thinking, ' does not occur as long as ' vandalism ', should make people reflect the aspirations, County Government, even after the gate can also be specifically set aside an area to provide them with ' Sun '".
In the petition regulations, which provides brief: how people used to visit the form to present a common complaint, should elect representatives the number of representatives shall not exceed 5 people. Jinan University, expert opinions, creatively at home on "joint visit" this concept, reservations accepted, elected representatives, representatives of the joint visits of the validity of, how to replace representatives detailed rules, acts of procedural norms visits, control intensification of mass ' applying.
"In essence, mutual visits and mass ' applying for there is no difference between these two concepts, but mass petitions cannot be a legal concept, but the policy language, common visits is a legal concept. "Jinan University Associate Professor Gao Xuan said that in reality, the regulations lack of maneuverability for letters and calls, many letters people are reluctant to elect representatives in this case there is no other way to deal with it.
Cum out of the draft a special section, defining joint visits. Mutual visits by appointment accepted manner, shall be registered by the complaint reporting institutions accepted. Reservation is successful, can be visited at a specified time and place. Among them, more than 10 people must elect representatives who represent not more than 5 persons. Representatives elected by the joint visits to voluntary, agreed by the two-thirds above. 30th representative cannot be, end of letters and calls, visits people may make complaint separately. Draft also stipulates that the representatives during the petition process change, waiver petition request must obtain the joint visits of the representative agrees.
Who petition question who is in charge?
YES
Who produced the petition issue, would have to take responsibility, now so many letters and calls questions, few of people petition "buried".
"Petition of who issues, would have to take responsibility, now so many letters and calls questions, few of people petition ' buried '. "Yesterday's seminar, the Deputy Secretary-General of the Shenzhen Municipal Party Committee, municipal complaint letters and visits Bureau Lin Chaojin said, hopes the new regulations for letters and calls of Guangdong Province seized from its source, the establishment of" who is in charge of who's in charge "the responsibility system.
Lin Chaojin said that the letters blaming the status quo is now exists, departments feel that they have come to the end of the legal procedure, "appealing to ordinary people, after petitions are letters and complaints Bureau". In actual operation, the petition question what to do with, and there is no uniform process, concluded there is no standard. Lin Chaojin said that solve real-world problems, sell or to relevant authorities, competent authorities through policy instruments, in order to fundamentally solve the issue of letters and calls.
On the responsibility, letters and complaints Bureau Director Huang Suping, haizhu district, Guangzhou City look it should establish a major petition issues of accountability. Deputy Chairman of the provincial people's Congress Secretary Zhu Sui believes that a proposed draft of dereliction of duty staff should be increased in terms of administrative responsibility.
Leaders receiving visitors? Leadership approval letters and calls?
Petition the Secretary says he often encounters a "plaintiff" and "defendant" instructions here, is in a quandary.
Leader visits has also become a participating specialist brick objects. A proposed draft of the 3 universities alike not to lead in receiving visitors from specific provisions. Sun Yat-sen University research group, currently on a complaint instructions depends mainly on leadership, leadership became "petition the Commissioner". To diminish the petition as a social control function of resolving conflicts. Joint petition system and therefore does not require leaders to visit system, a proposed draft letters and complaints Bureau inspectors supervising the work of letters and calls of the functions transferred to the people's Congress of the Committee.
Only mass meetings on behalf of Huang Bihong also indicated that he did not agree with the leaders personally supervising. Because not everyone can get the instructions of the leadership, which can result in unfairness. Provincial people's Congress, the Office of the Deputy Inspector of Zhong Huanxin petition of 10 years as a Secretary, said he often encounters a "plaintiff" and "defendant" instructions here, is in a dilemma, headed party committees at all levels must be clear that the Government authorities on the draft recommendation tendentious comments on complaint No. Instructions of the leadership of detrimental to the work of letters and calls. May even be prone to corruption.
Legislative consultants, the Legislative Affairs Office of the provincial government the original Inspector Li Huanan opposed it. View state letters and complaints section 5th under the people's Governments at and above the county level people's Government heads of departments should be yuepi important letters, received an important visit, listen to the complaint reporting handling Office report to address outstanding issues in the work of letters and calls. Guangdong conflicting local rules cannot petition the State Council regulations. In reality, receiving visitors from the leadership is more than a relief channel.
Interview: the South reporter Xue NI Yi Huang Huo Yao trainee reporters correspondent Ren Xuan
Research Group of Jinan University proposal
(Original title: three copies of the letters and calls of Guangdong Province Ordinance draft proposal thrown out many innovative systems design)
三份《广东省信访条例》草案建议稿 抛出多项创新性制度设计
广东省人大委托高校起草的《广东省信访条例》法规草案建议稿昨日亮相，省人大常委会邀请各方专门召开评估会，就3所高校提交的3份建议稿点评“拍砖”。这3份方案P K融合后将形成草案，将于11月19日在省十二届人大常委会第5次会议上一审。
三份建议稿都抛出了很多创新性的制度设计，在昨日会上引发诸多争议。中山大学课题组提出新设县级以上人大常委会信访工作委员会，对重大事实不清的信访事项可成立特定问题调查委员会。暨南大学课题组建议信访听证制度。广东外语外贸大学课题组认为应该建立信访公开制度和信息共享机制。
此次法规建议稿评估会系首创。广东省人大常委会法工委主任王波介绍，省人大常委会要对高校起草的文本质量进行评估。本次评估会邀请了立法咨询专家、法院、检察院、公安、信访部门、群众代表等40多名相关人士参会。评估论证时间为1天半。
创造性提出“共同走访”
近些年来，我国群体性上访事件数量增多，频率加快，针对这一现象，暨大在专家建议稿中参照代表人诉讼的基础理论，创造性地提出了“共同走访”概念。根据群体性上访的特点在共同走访预约受理、共同走访的参加、推选代表人、代表人的产生、行为效力、更换，以及共同走访处理的效力等方面进行规范。从程序上有效规范多人走访，有效控制群体性上访的计划，引导其在合法框架内通过程序予以解决，或者化解为个人单独走访，减低影响程度和范围。
此外，建议建立重大信访案件信访联席会议制度。在部分信访案件涉及跨部门、跨区域的事项难以协调时，应建立定期或者不定期的重大信访案件的信访联席会议制度。同时建议建立信访后续评估机制。各级人大常委会及各信访机构应当定期对信访工作进行评价，并公布结果。信访数量不得成为评价信访人员工作绩效的主要依据。
■专家点评
徐嵩(立法咨询专家，律师)：在国务院《信访条例》的基础上，具体化了共同走访的程序要求，对于解决群体性上访的难题提出了有效的解决方案。
王金沙(立法咨询专家，省社科院法学研究所原研究员)：共同走访还没有广为了解，专家稿中如此详尽地规定了代表的推选，民诉法的诉讼代表都没有这么详尽。
中山大学课题组建议稿
人大新设信访工作委员会
学界认为，目前对于中国信访体制存在保守与激进两派观点，激进派就建议在人大下设信访工作委员会，建立以人大信访为中心、各部门信访为具体负责办事机构的信访体制。
中山大学课题组的建议稿明确提出要在县级以上人大常委会设立信访工作委员会，在法定职责范围内领导同级人大常委会、行政机关、法院、检察院信访工作机构的信访工作。各级人大常委会对选区内有关重大事实不清的信访事项，可以根据同级信访工作委员会的建议，依法决定成立特定问题调查委员会。
中山大学的专家稿中用一整章对信访秩序进行规定。其中第四十三条和四十四条用列举式的方法明确界定了扰乱信访工作秩序的行为以及妨害公共安全、侵犯人身权利与财产权利、妨害社会管理秩序的行为。
朱穗生(省人大内务司法委员会副主任委员)：信访秩序问题需要专列。现在让大家头疼难办的就是信访的秩序问题，不能单靠公安机关来维持秩序，而是应该各方面一起努力，全社会营造法治氛围。
广东外语外贸大学课题组建议稿
试点信访社会救助基金制度
广东外语外贸大学建议稿指出：各级国家机关应充分利用现有网络资源，健全信访信息系统，及时登记信访事项，录入信访受理以及办理情况。确立信访公开原则，健全重要信访事项听证制度，将初次信访处理结果向社会公开。信访复核、复核后，除涉及国家秘密、个人隐私，其他信访材料应向社会公开。
广外副校长石佑启称解决信访问题的治本之策是做好信访的预防工作，从源头上防止信访事项的发生，因此设计了重大决策信访风险评估机制。
另外还规定了设立信访社会救助基金制度。草案说明中指出，当前我国现行各种救助存在法律依据不足，设置分散，资金不足等问题，广东可以先行先试，建立适合本地方的统一的社会救助制度，规范救助的对象、标准、数额、程序等，坚持社会救助的公平和效率，既能在一定程度上保护受害人的合法权益，又不能随意拿整个社会的纳税人的钱为“肇事人”买单，从而有助于实现信访预防。
■专家声音
凌祁漫(省高院副院长)：信访风险评估没有从信访人的角度考虑，而是从国家机关的角度考虑。
会场焦点
权利救济功能是否应弱化？
有的立法咨询专家直言教授们太理想化了，现在老百姓仍需权利救济，应完善救济。
信访的救济功能是否要弱化成为最大的争议点。在评估会上，理想与现实激烈碰撞，有的立法咨询专家直言教授们太理想化了，现在老百姓仍需权利救济，应完善救济。
中山大学课题组就认为信访是公民政治参与的途径，而非寻求法律上权利救济的途径。信访是人民对权力的监督而非纠纷解决与权利救济，信访要解决的问题并非实体权利如何分配和如何救济，而是权力主体在分配权利和救济过程中是否有违法和不当行为。暨南大学课题组也同样提出立法定位上要强化监督功能、弱化救济功能。
现场不少有信访工作经验的专家也指出：现在的信访功能错位，信访要回到党和群众联系桥梁的位置上。
省人大立法咨询专家、广东行政学院教授韦华腾认为，不能过于强调民主参与监督功能，群众仍然希望信访有救济功能。即使是弱化，仍也未到时候，应该是完善权利救济。信访应该是对行政复议、诉讼制度不足的补充。不少专家认为，信访作为权利救济的功能不可能一下子停下来。
以信访数量作为考核标准？
有的基层法院，一年只有2个信访指标，为了化解信访，该判刑的不敢判刑，该结案的不敢结案，涉法涉诉信访的干扰很大。
近日有媒体报道称，国家对各省市将不再搞全国范围的信访排名、通报，暨南大学广东省地方立法研究评估与咨询服务基地起草的《广东省信访条例(专家意见稿)》的思路与该政策颇为一致，该校的建议稿提出要禁止以信访案件数量和息访比例进行绩效考核。
“以信访数量作为绩效考核的标准，容易出现地方政府为了政绩、荣誉，想尽一切办法来减少信访，包括跨地区截访等，极大损害了信访人的合法权益。”参加起草工作的暨南大学法学院副教授高轩表示，看起来信访数量减少了，但信访的事项没有根本解决，累积下来，会造成无规则、无期限、无序的上访。
“有的基层法院，一年只有2个信访指标，为了化解信访，该判刑的不敢判刑，该结案的不敢结案，涉法涉诉信访的干扰很大。”省人大立法咨询专家、广东伟伦律师事务所执行主任曾学智也表示，要以科学的态度对待信访，不能仅仅以数字考核。
高轩表示，对于规范信访的接访行为，优化绩效考核机制，暨大意见稿中曾单独设计过一章“信访评估”。从政府、检察院、法院等不同系统的特点出发，要求主管部门在本系统内牵头制定信访评估办法，由省人大常委会总体把握。但最后出于可操作性和草案整体性的考虑，没有将这一章列入。
尽管各系统考核标准不尽相同，立法专家们还是设计了共同的原则———不能由信访机关自己评价自己，也不能由上级评价，而是交给信访人、公众和社会组织，由他们来评价信访效率、社会效果。“甚至可以采用打分的方式进行”，高轩认为，这样也可以从另一个角度加强和促进信访工作。
限制信访人权利？
有代表认为要明确规定不能拦访、截访，要保证来访人的权利。
对于信访人的权利保护问题也成为了拍砖重点。有的建议稿提出合理制约公民信访权，一些专家直指建议稿的立法出发点应该维护信访人的权益，而不能限制或者制止这方面权利。省公安厅办公室政委邓建伟也注意到中大建议稿的信访秩序一章主要是针对信访人的规定，对行政机关及工作人员这一方面比较欠缺，从比重上来说欠平衡。省人大常委会办公厅副巡视员钟焕新认为要明确规定不能拦访、截访，拦访截访并造成后果要追究法律责任，保证信访渠道畅通，保证来访人权利。
老百姓一集中就可怕？
暨大意见稿推出新概念———共同走访，成功登记受理后，多个信访人可在规定的时间和地点进行走访。
近年来，“群体性上访”成为各地政府“谈虎色变”的一个词，挑动着敏感的神经。不少地方政府专门制定了处置群体性上访事件的应急预案，一旦聚集人数超过一定数量，各相关部门即严阵以待。
“老百姓一集中就可怕，这个观念一定要转变过来。”省人大教科文卫委主任委员梁万里表示，看到群体性上访就紧张，好像不得了了，这种观念要不得。“要有‘底线思维’，只要不发生‘打砸抢’，就应该让老百姓反映诉求，甚至以后市县政府大门口还可以专门划出一块区域，让他们‘晒’意见”。
在《信访条例》中，对此规定比较简略：多人采用走访形式提出共同的信访事项的，应当推选代表，代表人数不得超过5人。而在暨南大学专家意见稿中，则在国内创造性地提出“共同走访”这一概念，对共同走访的预约受理、推选代表、代表的行为效力、如何更换代表等作了详细规定，从程序上规范多人走访的行为，控制群体性上访的激化。
“从实质上来讲，共同走访和群体性上访这两个概念是没有区别的，但群体性上访不能是法律概念，而是政策性的语言，共同走访是一个法律概念。”暨南大学副教授高轩说，在现实中，信访条例的规定缺乏可操作性，很多信访人不愿推举代表，这种情况下又没有别的途径去处理。
暨大意见稿中拿出了专门的一节，对共同走访作出界定。共同走访采用预约受理的方式进行，须经信访工作机构登记受理。预约成功后，就可在规定的时间和地点进行走访。其中，10人以上必须推选代表人，代表不超过5人。代表人由共同走访人自愿推选，经2/3以上同意。若30日内无法产生代表人，信访终结，走访人可另行单独提出信访事项。意见稿中还规定，代表人在信访过程中变更、放弃信访请求，必须取得被代表的共同走访人同意。
谁产生信访问题谁负责？
谁产生的信访问题，就要承担责任，现在这么多的信访问题，没有几个人为信访“埋过单”。
“谁产生的信访问题，就要承担责任，现在这么多的信访问题，没有几个人为信访‘埋过单’。”昨日讨论会上，深圳市委副秘书长、市信访局局长林超金表示，希望新制定的广东省信访条例从源头上抓起，建立“谁主管谁负责”的追责制度。
林超金说，现在存在信访怪现状是，部门觉得自己已经走完了法律程序，“上访是老百姓的事，上访后是信访局的事”。在实际操作中，信访问题怎么处理，并没有统一的流程，结案也没有标准。林超金说，解决实际问题，还是要相关主管部门出手才行，主管部门通过政策手段，才能从根本上解决信访问题。
在责任追究上，广州市海珠区信访局局长黄素平就认为应该建立重大信访问题倒查责任制。省人大内司委副主任委员朱穗生认为，建议稿中应当要增加对失职人员的行政责任追究条款。
领导大接访？领导批示信访？
有信访局长说自己常遇到“原告”和“被告”的批示都来了，真是左右为难。
领导大接访也成为了与会专家拍砖的对象。3所高校的建议稿中不约而同都没有对领导接访进行具体的规定。中山大学课题组表示，目前对信访的处理主要靠领导批示，领导成了“信访专员”。要削弱信访作为化解矛盾的社会治理功能。因此没有规定领导人接访制度和信访联席制度，建议稿还将信访局督查督办的功能转移给了人大常委会的信访工作委员会。
会议中唯一一名群众代表黄碧虹也表示不赞同领导亲自督办。因为不是每个人都能拿到领导的批示，这样会导致不公平。省人大常委会办公厅副巡视员钟焕新当了10年的信访局长，他说自己常遇到“原告”和“被告”的批示都来了，真是左右为难，建议草案要明确各级党委政府机关领导对信访事项不准提出有倾向性的意见。领导的批示对信访工作不利。甚至有可能容易产生腐败行为。
立法咨询专家、省政府法制办原巡视员李华南持反对意见。认为国务院的信访条例第5条就规定了各级人民政府、县级以上人民政府各工作部门的负责人应当阅批重要来信、接待重要来访、听取信访工作汇报，研究解决信访工作中的突出问题。广东的地方性法规不能与国务院信访条例相冲突。在现实当中，领导接访是多了一条救济渠道。
采写：南都记者薛冰妮 黄怡 见习记者 霍瑶 通讯员 任宣
暨南大学课题组建议稿
(原标题：三份《广东省信访条例》草案建议稿 抛出多项创新性制度设计)
赞