Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)归海一刀
published in(发表于) 2013/11/14 3:12:39
People respond to the Chinese become electives is respect for the individual

Beijing authorities wide nets, November 14 (Xinhua Xiaoyuan) aspect ratio, according to voice of the news reports, in College, do you love to learn Chinese? Your Chinese course in College? Do you think College Chinese lessons on how to attract you? In recent days, cancel the compulsory elective courses to the University, people's University, makes everyone rethink these issues.

Thing is controversial because Beijing, high profile statements at the time greatly improved language tests, the college entrance examination scores, as a leading Humanities University, why make such a choice?

Flash point, is a graduate of the school in an article posted online a little more slowly, people of the internationalization of the University. CCTV reporters interview with the author of this article.

At the Renmin University campus, students used University, also known as Han. Although this man recently was "hit hard", but behind the students, there are:

Boy: I think that compulsory schooling is necessary, turned it into an elective is not going to work, because the show is not emphasis on college Chinese.

Female student: I think the school could be considered one's class, more freedom for everyone, I really want to learn this course students, also will continue to choose elective course.

Published on the Internet a little more slowly: Renmin University Renmin University the internationalization of postgraduate seniors Wang Kun, naturally, "Wuhan" as well.

In late October, a student at the renren, status, said a teacher told him, later University does not, and how much the teacher is very depressed. Everybody will know the news, were also identified, said University really did not have. Until the end of October, the school and the Dean's Office has responded, University next semester elective course. It is a process, because our message is not symmetrical.

Wang Kun says, precisely because it cannot be full and detailed answer, only the title of the article misconceptions:

Wang Kun: because you canceled the Chinese, English is still look like that, so we assume this is a means of internationalization? Now I feel that they may be a bit misunderstood.

But for college Chinese course, Wang Kun's attitude is very clear:

Wang Kun: College Chinese courses, it is basic and not interested in expanding class, can't say they don't want on the up, it is the base, were required.

Wang Kun, College, won't open course, is a matter of principle:

Wang Kun: when you open a course, actually showing this school on this course or of a particular aspect of an identity, this is more significant than the course itself.

For students, the courses do not, is a matter of attitudes:

Wang Kun: a lot of people think so, to stage Chinese is not based at a University. I wanted to ask who hold these views now, lets you write 800-word essay will be scratching his head, wrote a letter to others simply can't write the letterhead, your language education is successful, please?

Of course, not everyone supported the views Wang Kun. The dilemma facing University, is very illustrative. Earlier this year, the Hubei Provincial College Chinese Research Association published a survey of college Chinese course results. 91 universities, 40% will not be listed as a required course of college Chinese, class is gradually decreasing.

College Chinese became the only two credits of elective courses, because looking for work do not require language rating, named as the title research on Chinese, so, in the view of some, in college language it doesn't work.

Wang Kun: this is a fickle phenomenon in society as a whole, this is not our national people's Congress, or University of this one thing, but to our entire society to reflect on, on some issues, we were too utilitarian, a lot of things have to work quickly or be sure works for me, I'm going to do.

Interview at the end of this 90-born lad, said such things:

Wang Kun: I would like to get some of you thinking, collision, contending that some of the thinking process, differences, because there are only differences, there will only be consensus. I think this thing out, quite a large number of people at least get renewed attention in college Chinese course for the community, as well as other colleges and universities, to focus on this thing, because concerns itself, is a way of promoting problem-solving.

Recently, the Renmin University student news release on the Web, through communication and consultation, next semester, the NPC will continue to set up Chinese language courses at the University, classified to the category of elective courses, courses for 2 credits. Later responded by saying yesterday the school, College Chinese class is not equal to the mother-tongue education, compulsory elective teaching does not mean weakening, the reform will further promote mother-tongue education in college Chinese teaching.

School authorities also said, the purpose of the reform is to respect individual differences in students ' learning to meet the diverse learning needs of students. Make such adjustments, not about "internationalization", but only because students ' enthusiasm for this course is not high, multiple curriculum evaluation ranking only second from the back.

Enthusiasm is not high to take? We attach importance to the Chinese language teaching, on teaching methods, teaching methods, we find causes of low student enthusiasm and thus improve it?

College Chinese from compulsory to optional, what schools do not pay attention to mother-tongue teaching, students do not care about learning in the mother tongue? College Chinese course reform would weaken education in their mother tongue? To solve these problems, head of the publicity Department of the University of the people, the school will hold a press conference in the near future, media and public opinion of these queries, respond and answer them all.

(Original title: people's Congress became elective in Chinese questioned responded that respect individuals)

　　央广网北京11月14日消息(记者肖源)据中国之声《新闻纵横》报道，大学期间，你爱学汉语么？你的大学开设汉语课么？你认为大学汉语课应该怎么上才吸引你呢？近日，中国人民大学取消《大学汉语》必修课改为选修课一事，让大家重新思考这些问题。

　　事情之所以引起争议就在于北京等地高调声明将在中考、高考时大幅度提升语文分值之时，作为顶尖的人文社科类高校，为何却作出这样的选择呢？

　　而事情的爆发点，则在于该校一名研究生在网上发布的一篇文章《慢一点，人民大学的国际化》。中央台记者日前专访了这篇文章的作者。

　　在中国人民大学的校园里，学生们习惯地将大学汉语，简称为大汉。尽管这个大汉最近有点再遭“重创”，但力挺它的学生，不在少数：

　　男学生：我觉得必修是有必要的，把它改成选修是不行的，因为显示的是对大学汉语的不重视。

　　女学生：我觉得学校可能是考虑选哪个老师的课，给大家更多的自由度，我觉得真正想学这门课的同学，即使变成选修课也还是会继续选的。

　　在网络上发布《慢一点：人民大学的国际化》一文的人民大学研究生一年级学生王昆，自然也在“挺汉派”之列。

　　10月中下旬，一个学生在人人网上发了状态，有一个老师跟他说，以后大学汉语没有了，然后这个老师很苦闷如何如何的。大家就知道了这个消息，也确认了，学校说大学汉语真没有了。一直到10月底，学校和教务处又有回应了，大学汉语在下学期变成选修课。它是个过程，因为我们的消息不对称。

　　王昆说，正是由于无法得到学校正式而详细的解答，才有了文章标题中的误解：

　　王昆：因为你把汉语取消了，英语还是那个样子，所以我们就认为这是不是国际化的一种手段呢？现在我觉得个人可能有点误解学校。

　　但对于大学汉语这门课，王昆的态度很明确：

　　王昆：大学汉语这类课程，它是基础性的而不是兴趣拓展类的，不能说不想上就不上，它是基础，必须上。

　　在王昆看来，对高校而言，开不开这门课，是原则问题：

　　王昆：当你开设某一门课的时候，实际上表现出这个学校对这门课程或某一方面的一种认同，这个要比课程本身意义更重大。

　　对学生而言，上不上这门课，则是态度问题：

　　王昆：很多人就这么认为，到大学阶段汉语已经不是基础了。那我想问持这些观点的人：现在让你写800字的作文就要挠头，给别人写一封得体的信笺都写不了，你的语文教育是成功的吗？

　　当然，并不是所有人都支持王昆的观点。大学汉语目前所面临的窘境，就很能说明问题。今年年初，湖北省大学语文研究会公布了大学语文课程现状调查结果。在91所高校中，将大学语文列为必修课的不到40%，课时也在逐渐减少。

　　因为大学语文成了一门只占两个学分的选修课，因为找工作不要求汉语等级，因为评职称不考汉语，所以，在一些人看来，在大学学语文，没用。

　　王昆：这是整个社会一个浮躁的现象，这不是我们人大或大学汉语这一门课的事情，而是我们整个社会都要反思的，在某些问题上我们是不是太功利了，很多事情就一定得很快起效或者一定对我有用我才去做。

　　采访结束时，这位90年出生的小伙子，说了这么一番话：

　　王昆：我想让大家有些思考，在思考的过程中有一些碰撞、争鸣、差异，因为只有差异，才会有共识。我觉得这件事情出来，至少让相当大一部分人重新关注了大学汉语这门课，让社会，以及其它高校，也来关注这个事儿，因为关注本身，就是推动问题解决的一种方式。

　　近日，中国人民大学学生会在网上发布消息称，经过沟通协商，下个学期人大将继续开设大学汉语课程，归入选修课类别，课程为2学分。校方昨天最新回应称，大学汉语课不等于母语教育，必修变选修不等于弱化教学，大学语文教学的改革将进一步提升母语教育。

　　校方还表示，改革的目的在于尊重学生学习的个体差异，满足学生多样性的学习需求。之所以做出如此调整，无关乎“国际化”，而只是因为学生对这门课的热情一直不高，多次课程测评的综合排名都仅在倒数第二位。

　　热情不高是否就要转为选修？既然我们重视汉语教学，我们是否能在教学方式、教学方法上找到学生热情不高的原因进而改进它？

　　大学汉语从必修课沦为选修，到底是学校不重视母语教学，还是学生不重视母语学习？大学汉语课改，会不会弱化母语教育？针对这些问题，人民大学宣传部门的负责人表示，学校将会在近期召开新闻发布会，就媒体及舆论的这些质疑，一一作出回应与答复。

(原标题：人大汉语沦为选修引质疑 回应称是尊重个体)

赞