Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2013/11/14 3:14:12 Responsibility system of Guangdong proposed major problem checking of letters and calls
The letters and calls of Guangdong Province Ordinance (draft) recently sent for approval
After several rounds of research, with letters and visits from the masses, the grass-roots discussion of petition workers, experts and scholars, the "regulations for letters and calls of Guangdong Province" got "prototype"-cum-big, large, wide legislative base has three universities to the petition submitted by the provincial people's Congress of Guangdong Province, respectively Regulation (soliciting expert advice). 13th, the provincial Standing Committee of experts once again, letters and visits from the masses, the heads of relevant departments to "soliciting expert advice" a legislative assessment. Deputy Director of the provincial people's Congress, Xiao Zhiheng, Lei Yulan, Chen Xiao-chuan, Huang yebin attended assessment. Provincial people's Congress law will in the near future, the introduction of the Working Committee of the Guangdong provincial petition regulations (draft), and sending the 12 session of the Standing Committee of the Fifth Conference on November 19 trial of "".
Yangcheng evening news reporter Huang Lina
Complaint reporting law
Speaking of variety in the work of letters and calls "strange situation", participation in demonstration of grass-roots cadres of letters and calls have sighed: "amazing than fiction hundreds of times". A fairly typical case--
A female complainant, the 90 's of the last century in the provinces bank deposit a hundred thousand of dollars. However, when you open an account, she misspelled a word in the name. A few years later, she checked the deposit, because the account name and ID do not match, replies that she does not have such deposits to the banks. She therefore believed that the Bank "swallowing" his money, ended up starting more than 20 years of petitioning.
Although the occurrence of this complaint in the provinces, but because she bought a house in a city of the PRD, is "hanging", in accordance with the principle of territorial management of petition, also became a city of the PRD's letters; the city reflected in the coordination of cross-province simply cannot afford to solve her problems. For more than 20 years, she went to Beijing to petition over more than 200 times. Petition of the city institutions are required to send staff to get her back, "administrative expenses of up to millions of dollars, goes far beyond her complaint amount of money involved, but I can't because the problem has been solved, so neither way. ”
Ultimately, this complaint at the State Bureau for letters and calls involved in figuring out, authorities also agreed to compensate her for the principal and interest on deposits, personal letters and calls to spend a total of more than 1 million Yuan. But she also raised millions in compensation claims. "Results thing froze again. ”
Many grass-roots cadres have made of letters and calls, the current contents of petition regulations in practice tends to "wall" is not workable, do not, and coupled with a lot of fear as, dare, as the executive authorities, the complainant repeated petitions, visits and other "border", there is no "law" caused complaint cannot be solved, it is difficult to end.
Urgent need to crack the top five pain points
Which is the work of letters and calls of Guangdong urgent legislative solution of issues, problems? Provincial people's Congress Law Committee Director Wang Bo said, according to the results of research, seminars, summed up the five largest pain points:
--The petition issue is too broad. This through lawsuits, arbitrations, administrative reconsiderations and other legal channels to resolve contradictions and disputes, appealing to the masses as a complaint requires party committees and Governments to address, causing excessive expansion of right relief system functions.
--Prevention of deficiencies at the source. Major matters of improper decisions, improper implementation of administrative acts, the judicial enforcement issues such as injustice, not a strong sense of service to the people, raises many social conflicts.
Channel petition--not enough flow. Channel flow of letters and calls of the administrative departments, resulting in many letters and calls were unaware of or directly to the right of the authorities in dealing with its problems petition request petition the Agency. Law-related judicial channel flow involved in a lawsuit, because of high legal threshold, problem solving, cost, time, resulting in letters and visits from the masses "petition do not believe law", was involved in a lawsuit by a large number of law-related issues into a complaint.
--Receiving visitors from inadequate specifications. Some of letters and visits from staff receiving visitors enough specifications, preliminary interviews early responsibility, lead-department responsibility, and petition packages fail to fulfil responsibilities responsible for complaint handling. Center for grass-roots work of letters and calls wrong, attention stopped to visit interceptors stability maintenance work of letters and calls, and insufficient attention to protecting their legitimate interests.
There was confusion--violated the order. Collective petition, repeated petitions, Leapfrog, visit wrapped around an interview and other visits occurred, affected the normal work of letters and calls, or even cause mass incidents.
1
Bill preliminary thoughts
In response to these difficulties, draft a preliminary idea of the Bill and to find:
--A clear function and positioning of letters and calls. Made clear in the proposed regulations, letters and calls of citizens, legal persons and other organizations involved in the management of public affairs, supervising State organs shall perform their duties in an important way, is in close contact with the masses of the country, accept supervision by the masses is an important channel.
--Improve the v visit separation system. Proposed Ordinance to petition the State Council regulations on against visiting separation for further refinement and additions, clearly, government departments and the people's Congress, the courts, the public prosecution service within their respective petition inadmissible, according to law shall be enforced by lawsuits, arbitrations, administrative reconsiderations and other matters of legal solutions for further refinement and clarity to inadmissible cases, made clear.
--Smooth channels of complaint letters and visits and law-related channels involved in a lawsuit. Through the improvement of receiving visitors from the platform, including online, raised letters and visits from people in the local complaint and inquiries complaint handling; enhanced letters and lawsuits, arbitrations, administrative reconsiderations and other statutory channels converge; strengthening the legal aid work, reducing the cost of rights through legal channels.
--Code for receiving visitors. Refine the complaint reporting procedures, methodologies, clear letters and complaints handling requests and petitioning of the staff responsibilities and obligations; for problematic complex complaint, to be addressed, including through petition hearing; specification review, petition for review and verification procedures, ending complaint according to the law, establishing accountability, the Organizer handling responsibility system of accountability, a major problem checking of letters and calls.
--Norm violated the order. On petition activities in the disrupt public order, and against public security of acts for further refinement; clear provides police organ of scene disposal measures, on petition in the occurred of disrupt public order, and against public security of acts and violation rally March demonstrations law of acts, for effective of scene disposal; specification petition matters of made, clear provides on collective visits, and repeat visits, and leapfrog visits, acts of processing measures.
--Strengthening prevention at source. Perfect major matters of decision-making mechanism, establish and improve the mass comment collection system and major issues risk assessment system to ensure scientific decision-making; institutional mechanisms for comprehensive protection by law and impartial administration of Justice, through law enforcement and judicial oversight, and correct violations; establishing and perfecting the contradictions and disputes investigation and mediation systems and diversified dispute resolution mechanisms on a regular basis, facilitate the administrative reconsideration, mediation, arbitration, litigation, and other dispute resolution avenues.
12 session of the Standing Committee of the Fifth Conference next week
A number of local regulations will be submitted for consideration
Yangcheng evening news reporter Huang Lina, correspondents reported Ren Xuan: recently, the 12 session of the Standing Committee of the 15th meeting of the Directors held in Guangzhou. Meeting by the Standing Committee Director Huang Longyun, Deputy Director Xiao Zhiheng, Lei Yulan, Zhou Tianhong, Chen Xiao-chuan, Chen Jixing, and Huang yebin, Secretary-General Chen Yikui attended the meeting. Provincial Vice Governor Lin shaochun, provincial court, the provincial procuratorate, special committees of the provincial people's Congress, the Standing Committee and the responsible comrades of the Office of the Working Committee to attend the meeting.
Meeting conveyed and studied the national people's Congress Standing Committee Legislative Conference, research on Guangdong's follow up comments. Provincial people's Congress Standing Committee Director Huang Longyun pointed out that, in conjunction with the Guangdong's five-year legislation plan, protect the Organization, responsibilities, timing and progress of the "four implementation", strengthen society's orderly participation of legislative work and further deepen democracy, scientific legislation promoting Guangdong's five-year legislation plan and legislative tasks successfully completed in 2014.
This officer decided that the 12 session of the Standing Committee of the Fifth Conference held in Guangzhou in November 19-21st, duration of 3 days. Recommends agenda for: considered Guangdong Province anti-smuggling integrated regulations (draft modified II version) under, and Guangdong Province unemployment insurance regulations (Amendment draft modified version) under, and Guangdong Province environmental protection regulations (Amendment draft modified version) under, and Guangdong Province petition regulations (draft) under, and Guangdong Province road transport management regulations (Amendment draft modified version) under, and Guangdong Province administrative approval management supervision regulations (draft modified version) under, and Guangdong Province information promotion regulations (draft) under, and Guangdong Province social science universal regulations (draft) ; Reviewing regulations on management of civil air defense of Guangzhou, and Zhuhai city, the Zhuhai city people's Congress Standing Committee concerning the annulment of decisions of the Fire Services Ordinance.
(Original title: major petition letters and calls of Guangdong province recently sent for approval of the Bill issue checking responsibilities)
《广东省信访条例(草案)》近日将送审
经过几轮调研，与信访群众、基层信访工作者、专家学者的座谈，“广东省信访条例”终于有了“雏形”——中大、暨大、广外三个高校立法基地已分别向省人大常委会提交了《广东省信访条例(专家建议稿)》。13日，省人大常委会再次组织专家、信访群众、相关部门负责人对“专家建议稿”进行立法评估。省人大常委会副主任肖志恒、雷于蓝、陈小川、黄业斌出席评估会。省人大常委会法工委将于近期出台《广东省信访条例(草案)》，并送11月19日召开的十二届人大常委会第五次会议“一审”。
羊城晚报记者 黄丽娜
信访工作有法难依
说起信访工作中的各种“怪现状”，参与论证的基层信访干部纷纷感叹：“比小说精彩几百倍”。其中一个案例相当典型——
有一位女信访人，上世纪90年代在外省银行存入十几万元。但在开户时，她把名字中的一个字写错了。几年后，她去查这笔存款，因为开户名与身份证不相符，银行答复她没有这笔存款。她因此认为银行“吞”了自己的钱，于是开始了长达20多年的上访。
虽然这宗信访事项发生在外省，但由于她在珠三角某市买了房，是“空挂户”，按照信访属地管理的原则，也就成了珠三角某市的信访户；可该市根本无力跨省协调解决她所反映的问题。20多年来，她前往北京信访多达200多次。每次该市信访机构都必须派工作人员去接她回来，“光这些行政开支就高达几百万元，远超她信访事项涉及的金额，但因为问题一直解决不了，所以谁都没办法。”
最终，这宗信访事项在国家信访局介入后搞清楚了，相关部门也同意赔偿她的存款本息、个人信访花费等总计100多万元。可她却又提出过亿元的赔偿要求。“结果事情又僵住了。”
很多基层信访干部都提出，目前信访条例规定的内容在实际中往往会“碰壁”，不具有可操作性，执行不了；再加上很多行政机关怕作为、不敢作为，对信访人重复上访、闹访等“越界”行为，没有“依法办理”，造成信访事项解决不了、难以终结。
亟须破解五大难点
广东的信访工作到底有哪些问题、难点亟待立法解决？省人大常委会法工委主任王波表示，根据调研、座谈的结果，总结出了五大难点：
——信访问题过于宽泛。一些本应通过诉讼、仲裁、行政复议等法律途径解决的矛盾和纠纷，上访群众都作为了信访事项要求党委、政府解决，造成信访制度的权利救济功能被过度扩张。
——源头预防有所欠缺。存在重大事项决策欠妥、行政行为实施不当、司法执法活动不公、为民服务意识不强等问题，引发了很多社会矛盾。
——信访渠道不够畅通。行政主管部门的信访渠道不畅通，导致很多信访人不了解，也无法直接向有权处理其问题的主管部门的信访机构提出信访请求。涉法涉诉的司法渠道不畅通，由于法定门槛高、解决问题成本大、时间长，造成信访群众“信访不信法”，让大量涉法涉诉事项变成了信访事项。
——接访工作不够规范。部分信访工作人员接访行为不够规范，初信初访责任、牵头部门责任和信访包案责任人的信访事项办理责任不落实。基层信访工作中心错位，重视拦访截访等信访维稳工作，而对维护群众合法利益重视不够。
——信访秩序时有混乱。集体上访、重复上访、越级走访、闹访缠访等行为时有发生，影响了正常的信访工作秩序，甚至引发群体性事件。
条例草案初步思路
针对这些难点，条例草案稿提出了初步思路以对症下药：
——明确信访的功能和定位。建议在条例中明确，信访是公民、法人和其他组织参与管理社会公共事务、监督国家机关依法履行职责的重要途径，是国家机关密切同人民群众联系、接受人民群众监督的重要渠道。
——完善诉访分离制度。建议在条例中对国务院信访条例关于诉访分离的规定作进一步细化和补充，明确人大、政府及其工作部门、法院、检察院各自的信访受理范围，对依法应当通过诉讼、仲裁、行政复议等法定途径解决的事项作进一步细化和明确，对不予受理的情形作出明确。
——畅通信访渠道和涉法涉诉的渠道。通过完善网上接访平台等方式，方便信访人在当地提出信访事项和查询信访事项办理情况；强化信访与诉讼、仲裁、行政复议等法定渠道的衔接；强化法律援助工作，降低当事人通过司法途径维权的成本。
——规范接访工作。细化信访工作程序、方式，明确信访办理工作要求和信访工作人员的职责、义务；对于疑难复杂的信访事项，通过信访听证等方式予以解决；规范信访复查、复核和核查程序，依法终结信访事项；建立首办责任制、主办单位办理责任制、重大信访问题倒查责任制。
——规范信访秩序。对信访活动中扰乱公共秩序、危害公共安全的行为作进一步细化；明确规定公安机关的现场处置措施，对信访中发生的扰乱公共秩序、危害公共安全的行为以及违反集会游行示威法的行为，进行有效的现场处置；规范信访事项的提出，明确规定对集体走访、重复走访、越级走访等行为的处理措施。
——强化源头预防。完善重大事项决策机制，建立健全群众意见征集制度和重大事项风险评估制度，确保科学决策；完善保障依法行政和公正司法的体制机制，通过行政执法监督和司法监督，及时纠正违法行为；建立健全矛盾纠纷定期排查调处制度和多元化纠纷解决机制，畅通调解、行政复议、仲裁、诉讼等各种纠纷解决渠道。
省十二届人大常委会第五次会议下周举行
多部地方法规将提交审议
羊城晚报讯 记者黄丽娜、通讯员任宣报道：日前，省十二届人大常委会第十五次主任会议在广州召开。常委会主任黄龙云主持会议，副主任肖志恒、雷于蓝、周天鸿、陈小川、陈继兴、黄业斌，秘书长陈逸葵出席会议。省政府副省长林少春，省法院、省检察院、省人大各专门委员会、常委会工作委员会及办公厅的负责同志列席会议。
会议传达并学习了全国人大常委会立法工作会议精神，研究广东的贯彻意见。省人大常委会主任黄龙云指出，要结合广东五年立法规划，保障组织、责任、时间、进度的“四落实”，加强社会对立法工作的有序参与，进一步深化民主立法、科学立法，推动广东五年立法规划与2014年的立法任务圆满完成。
本次主任会议决定，省十二届人大常委会第五次会议于11月19日-21日在广州举行，会期3天。建议议程为：审议《广东省反走私综合治理条例(草案修改二稿)》、《广东省失业保险条例(修订草案修改稿)》、《广东省环境保护条例(修订草案修改稿)》、《广东省信访条例(草案)》、《广东省道路运输管理条例(修订草案修改稿)》、《广东省行政审批管理监督条例(草案修改稿)》、《广东省信息化促进条例(草案)》、《广东省社会科学普及条例(草案)》；审查《广州市人民防空管理规定》、《珠海市人民代表大会常务委员会关于废止〈珠海市消防条例〉的决定》。
(原标题：广东省信访条例草案近日送审 重大信访问题拟倒查责任)
赞