Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)hpmailerpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/17 8:59:23 Requirement calculation of pollution load of China from the beginning of the industrial revolution in the US and Europe against
South reporter Sun Ying from Poland Warsaw, including China and Brazil raised in 130 countries, to build the future emission limits calculated amount of pollution from the industrial revolution onwards. United States, the European Union rejected directly.
Australia and Canada also expressed disapproval. Brazil heads of delegation said that developing countries continue efforts to join this discussion. "We believe that historical responsibility should be taken into account. ”
"History of emissions is very important, because global warming is the result of long-term accumulation of greenhouse gases. We must not forget the historical responsibilities, "the Deputy Head of the Chinese delegation Su Wei said.
Developing Nations say emissions because developed countries have for 200 years, they should bear the greatest responsibility. Developed countries were of the view that accountability for past poor countries can avoid the emission of an excuse.
All new agreements must be reached in 2015, 2020. This new agreement should include all countries to reduce emissions. In 1997, the Kyoto Protocol, only developed countries set a legal obligation to reduce.
Worst part is, the "most affected by climate change, is the least of those countries, like the Philippines, they are not doing anything wrong, but they assume the worst consequences of other emissions. "World Resources Institute Director Jennifer m organ says.
At yesterday's Conference, Japan announced 2020 emission targets to 2005 emissions targets 3., equivalent to 3.1% in 1990, based on an increase. This apparent "regressed" trigger catcalls. In rankings of world carbon dioxide emissions, Japan ranked fifth. Four years ago, Japan have said 2020 emissions will decrease of 1990.
Japan claims that this "change" due to its disabled nuclear power. From March 2011, the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power crisis since Japan original 50 nuclear power plants all stops, undergo security checks; it can only rely on traditional oil as an energy source.
Japan denounces n g o first jumped. Civil society organizations, "climate action network" Japan Director k IM ikoH Irata directly represents "very, very disappointed" and said "the introduction of new emission reduction targets, completely without any public participation and discussion. "Japan head of WWF am n aoyuki y agishi said" the world needs now is decisive, immediate improvement of emission reduction targets, rather than lower it. ”
Climatic analysis of m arionV iew eg expert pointed out that, even if the plant to remain shut down, according to their calculations, combined with conventional oil and new energy technologies, Japan can still be better than 1990 emissions 17% per cent.
(Original title: demand calculation of pollution load from the beginning of the industrial revolution, China)
南都讯 记者孙莹 发自波兰华沙 包括中国和巴西的130个国家提出，要建立未来排放限制，污染量应从工业革命起开始计算。美国、欧盟直接表示拒绝。
澳大利亚和加拿大也表示不赞同。但巴西代表团团长说，发展中国家仍然努力把这种计算方式加入到讨论中。“我们认为历史责任应该被计算在内。”
“历史上的排放量很重要，因为全球暖化正是由长期积累的温室气体引起的。我们不能忘记历史责任，”中国代表团副团长苏伟称。
发展中国家称，因为发达国家已经排放了200年，他们应当承担最大的责任。发达国家则认为，追究过去是穷国用来避免减排的借口。
各国必须在2015年达成新的减排协议，在2020年实施。这个新的减排协议应该包括所有国家。而1997年的京都议定书，只对发达国家设定了法律上的减排责任。
糟糕的是，“受气候变化影响最大的，是那些排放最少的国家，比如菲律宾，他们没有做错任何事，但他们承担了别人排放的最糟糕的后果。”世界资源研究所总监Jennifer M organ说。
在昨日的大会中，日本宣布，2020年排放目标为比2005年排放量减排3 .8%，相当于在1990年基础上增加3.1%。这一明显的“退步”引发嘘声一片。在世界各国的二氧化碳总量排放榜上，日本名列第五。四年前，日本曾表示2020年排放将比1990年减少25%。
日方宣称，做出这一“改变”缘于其停用核电。从2011年3月福岛核电危机至今，日本原有的50座核电站全部停转，接受安全检查；因此只能依赖传统石油作为能源。
日本N G O首先跳出来声讨。民间组织“气候行动网络”的日本总监K im ikoH irata直接表示“非常、非常失望”，称“这个新减排目标的出台，完全没有经过任何公众参与和讨论。”日本WWF负责人N aoyuki Y am agishi称，“现在世界需要的是果断、立即提高减排目标，而不是降低。”
气候分析专家M arionV iew eg指出，即使关闭核电站，根据他们的计算，合并使用传统石油和新能源技术，日本仍然可以比1990年减排17%-18%。
(原标题：中国要求污染量计算从工业革命开始)
赞