Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)hpmailerpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/17 9:00:47 Website： judicial reform to ensure that legally independent and impartial exercise of judicial power
Xinhuanet, Beijing, November 15 (reporters Chen Fei and and Yang Weihan and and Zou Wei)-released 15th CPC Central Committee on several major issues of comprehensive reform of the decision explicitly required, "the reform of the judicial system, promote the following local courts and procuratorates over the uniform administration of the province, establishing appropriate separation and Division system of jurisdiction to ensure consolidation of State laws are implemented correctly. ”
"This shows that the Party Central Committee has made efforts to resolve the judicial system under question, more emphasis on reform of top design. "By law, Chinese Academy of social sciences researcher Ji Xiangde said, for a long time judicial setting and administrative divisions of China set the high degree of overlap, the courts, the public prosecution service personnel is highly dependent on local, so local interference with the prosecution and trial of the case easier, affecting a fair hearing of the case.
Professor Chen Weidong of Renmin University law school, in an interview with reporters, noted that the judicial reform is to address the constraints of Justice mainly two institutional obstacles: one is localizing the judicial, and second, the administration of Justice.
"This reform is expected to exceed. "Chen Weidong said that although is managing change in the way it is systemic change. Of course it's going to take more concrete measures to follow up and implement the system.
"Over at the local courts and procuratorates, do not rely on local, Justice of the judiciary on a case which is guaranteed to be a major promotion. "Chen Weidong have confidence in the reforms.
Ji Xiangde also look forward to reform. He said, "should be cut off the courts in the areas of property associated with a local, comprehensive reform of the judicial system. Local authorities should not interfere with judicial process in various ways. ”
Chen Weidong also noted that "for a long time, courts and procuratorates in handling cases in the course of specific contractors contractors, the President of the Court, the public prosecutor's Office Prosecutor and other components of the CRIC, the Inspection Committee will determine patterns. This mode of administration of justice issues, and influence the course of Justice. ”
Decision stated that "reform of the system of the Judicial Committee, perfecting the presiding judge, the plenum case handling responsibility system, judge trial referee, responsible for. Clear orientation of courts function, regulating the relationship subordinate courts civil trial supervision. ”
"The undertaker from cases led to judicial authorities who have tubes, and misjudged the problem, it is difficult to determine the person responsible, it's hard to accountability. "Chen Weidong believes that to change this situation, launched the case handling responsibility system reform, promote sponsored accountability and accountability of the Prosecutor of the presiding judge.
新华网北京11月15日电(记者陈菲、杨维汉、邹伟) 15日公布的《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》明确要求，“改革司法管理体制，推动省以下地方法院、检察院人财物统一管理，探索建立与行政区划适当分离的司法管辖制度，保证国家法律统一正确实施。”
“这表明党中央下了大力气解决司法体制问题，更加重视改革的顶层设计。”中国社科院法学所研究员冀祥德说，长期以来，我国司法设置和行政区划设置高度重合，法院、检察院人财物高度依赖地方，使得案件的公诉和审理容易受到地方干扰，影响案件公正审理。
中国人民大学法学院教授陈卫东在接受记者采访时指出，这次司法改革主要是解决制约司法公正的两大体制性障碍：一是司法地方化，二是司法行政化。
“这次改革有望突破。”陈卫东说，虽然只是管理方式的改变但却是制度性的变革。当然这还需要更加具体的制度措施予以跟进、落实。
“地方法院、检察院的人财物，不依赖地方，这对于保证司法机关公正办案是重大促进。”陈卫东对改革充满信心。
冀祥德对改革也充满期待。他说：“应当切断法院在人财物等方面同地方的关联，全面改革司法预算制度。地方部门也不应该以各种方式干预司法过程。”
陈卫东还指出，“长期以来，法院、检察院在办案过程中存在具体承办人承办，法院院长、检察院检察长等组成的审委会、检委会讨论决定的模式。这一模式存在司法行政化的问题，影响司法公正。”
决定指出，“改革审判委员会制度，完善主审法官、合议庭办案责任制，让审理者裁判、由裁判者负责。明确各级法院职能定位，规范上下级法院审级监督关系。”
“从案件承办人到司法机关领导谁都管，而出了办错案等问题，却难以确定责任人，很难追究责任。”陈卫东认为，要改变这个状况，就要推出办案责任制的改革，推行主审法官责任制和主办检察官责任制。
赞