Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)hpmailerpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/17 9:00:57 Wuhu， Anhui， people’s livelihood projects being questioned for profit a lift by levying land
Wuhu, Anhui Province, as part of "project first,"-the train station Plaza East project, collected by the Jinghu District Government housing coming to an end. Meanwhile, relevant departments and "nail House" mired in tired of action: 27 remaining in the collection object, more than 20 people the institution of administrative proceedings, namely the Jinghu District Government in Wuhu City Planning Bureau to court. These "mingaoguan" there is no winning. Still, lawyers found that is imposed by the decision of the District Government's initial public report of planned red line graph, than a red City Planning Board for planning permission more than 120,000 square meters, the purpose is unknown.
-Introduction
Is imposed by the expansion of the station house
The morning of November 1, Wuhu new zhongji auto parts city next to the train station, a demolished last facade of a House, graffiti, property, "Wang Yiwei," and "expropriation". 63 years old Wang Kaikui hauling a bag of litigation materials, went to the door open lock, inside a routine check.
In 2007, the Siamese Wang Kaikui bought this two-story storefront for rent after. For convenience, titling his son Wang Yiwei's name. But Wang could not anticipate that auto parts after 4 years will be assessed as a whole.
Charged by the Government on the grounds that the expansion station. The economy of Wuhu, in East China's Anhui Province is second, having said that,, completed in 1983, the station is small and decorated in disrepair.
On March 6, 2011, the NDRC official approval of Wuhu railway station project construction of the project, Ning an intercity railway (Nanjing, Anqing) plans to open 2014. Wuhu city, as previously planned, the new railway station will be the largest node in the line. On September 28 that year, Jinghu District Government in the name of project (2011) is imposed by the decision.
According to the plans of publicity, the new base within the overall planned red line auto parts city.
Although the Jinghu District Housing levy that charge announcements posted on Park Bulletin Board and levy on houses, but a lot of collection objects, after shops, they are not living here, and have had no known collection of dynamic, until May 2012, expropriation compensation decisions the Government service.
Compensation and resettlement programmes of the Government, Wang Kaikui, 15 does not seem fair. "The price three times, the last are more than 8,000 yuan. And neighboring markets the same facade, was twenty thousand or thirty thousand Yuan per square meter level. We are all one or two storey commercial and relocation of shops, but it is 5 floors. "Wang Kaikui said.
These 15 were later hugs, Wang Ling engaged Beijing lawyers administrative lawsuits. On July 17, 2012, Wang Yiwei, by the 15 people for expropriation procedure illegal, groups of the Jinghu District Government to court, requested according to law made by it (2011) is imposed by the housing decision.
-Litigation
More than "mingaoguan" without a case in favour of
Wuhu intermediate people's Court, the 15 Joint litigation case specifies three mountain Court. Jinghu District Government argued that its collection purposes, the program is legitimate. In court, the plaintiff and the defendant to produce evidence, in the end, on December 27, 2012, the Court of first instance ruled that 15 plaintiffs dismissed the claims.
Results in the first instance, Wang Ling to counsel to be expected. In addition to insist that government procedures illegal, and Wang Ling pointed out that the trial has a defect.
15 take the appeal. Wuhu intermediate people's Court of second instance before the sentencing, the law firm where Wang Ling invited well-known Ying Songnian, a Professor of administrative law, Jiang Mingan, Yu Lingyun, Wang Xi zinc and 5 specialists such as Shen Kui, Wang Yiwei, 15 people "mingaoguan" case to argue. Finally, the Group of experts gives "-related decision is imposed by law" and "expropriation compensation-related decisions which illegal" two legal opinions, the Group of experts was submitted to the Court. Eventually, the second trial upheld.
While these cases and the other 5 people with joint action is also under way. Agent Nanjing lawyer Qiu Jianjun, the case was introduced, levied 5 plaintiffs each hold 2 industrial plants within the scope of the red line of title. In court, they point out that in Wuhu City Planning Council approved the program illegal, asked the Court to sentence them to withdraw to Wuhu city construction investment co of the planning permit for construction.
Despite a trial, and II trial results are support Wuhu Planning Council, a trial judgement also is pointed out that has its administrative acts Shang of "defects", said: "Wuhu NDRC in no accused issued site submissions under of premise Xia, that made project reply, turn accused to Wuhu construction investment limited issued construction with to planning license under, accused of license acts in time order Shang exists defects. ”
According to press reports, in addition to the above, there are other collection objects of administrative lawsuit, up to now, no winning cases.
-Investigations
Red lines, and area saving changes
While losing the lawsuit, Wang Ling was on "railway station planning how much" hot pursuit, to apply and the Wuhu City Planning Bureau information publicly.
Wuhu city, according to media reports, railway station area of 250,000 square meters of area project. In 2011, the Commission for development and reform, investment in Wuhu City (2011), was specifically mentioned in the files, total construction area is about 250,000 square meters.
On May 3, in Wuhu City Planning Bureau responded to the Wang Ling. Wuhu railway station, February 10, 2012, issued by the Council of the planning permit for construction project shows that project covers an area of 322,000 square metres, with red lines.
On November 4, the Jinghua times, levied from Jinghu District Housing Office to verify, is imposed by the station project with a total area of 443,000 square. Is in conformity with the Jinghu District Government to impose decisions on September 28, 2011. Which red lines, closing phrase is September 20, 2010, cover the Planning Bureau official seal in Wuhu. Charge is imposed by the destroyed statuary, the area inside the red line is the 443,000 square meters.
Comparison of two red lines, significant differences can be seen: the planning permit drawings than the collection of drawings by decision, much less a "generous". In the previous diagram, auto parts city, only some of the buildings were incorporated into the latter picture, auto parts city, the whole range is included in the red line.
Were included with "generous", there is a 4-storey building project "wide world of travel gifts", the building holds 4 years ago shut down when dismantling scaffolding. Investor Renjie Zhou zhe dealers. Renjie Zhou said through his investment, to go through formal procedures to take the building, but when completed in 2009 was about to, the Government suddenly informed the suspension.
"Last year, the Government requisition compensation decisions, 205 million compensation fee, but all along I saw results, haven't seen a detailed evaluation report. "Renjie Zhou said that the company's own assessments should be paid more than 700 million Yuan, after the inconclusive administrative review, the company sued the District Government request to revoke its expropriation compensation decisions, after losing in the first instance, is now in its second trial.
More "generous" how to understand? Wang Ling's analysis is that Government in people's livelihood project "a ride collection." "If commercial exploitation, then there is no reason to impose. "He said.
Levy, attached to the red line graph, Wuhu City Planning Bureau a written note: "according to Wuhu railway station area planning through research, agreed scope as shown the red for the first phase project of the demolition related formalities. ”
Differences for line charts, the destroyed statuary and sent Deputy Mayor of Jinghu district, they strictly according to the Municipal Planning Board approve the levy is imposed by the scope of the red line, no hyper-planned red line.
Deputy Director of the City Planning Bureau of abalone is said, to the Jinghu District Government is to facilitate the placement of their investigation, according to relevant laws and regulations, the figure is not the premise of imposed housing and, therefore, is imposed by the specific behavior has nothing to do with planning departments.
Levy "generously" plan in the future, none of the Jinghu District Government in Wuhu City Planning Bureau explained.
-Challenge
Levy is a lift dump land
In fact, the Wuhu railway station area planning, there is also a "2.5 square kilometers (2.5 million square meter)" argument, it is the indigenous planning area of the station project 10 times.
The Wuhu Journal reported on December 25, 2009: "municipal leading group for the construction of railway projects to preliminary design review of the Wuhu railway station area ... ... Wuhu railway station area planning covers 2.5 square kilometers. "Reported on June 3, 2010, on the station expansion project, the" relevant responsible comrades of municipal development and Reform Commission told Xinhua that around the new train station will also build a 2.5 square kilometers (2.5 million square meter) core of CCP. ”
Wuhu city development and Reform Commission, 2011 is also mentioned in the document: "in Wuhu railway station building at the core of the project, yijiang Road North, in the East and as far south as Burnt Sienna Hill Road, West to Central Road, Shandong Road North to the Red cast, about 2.5 square kilometres. "Jinghu district is imposed by the Housing Office on August 11, 2011 project expropriation compensation scheme of the railway station District project (draft for soliciting opinions), on" scope "made explicit reference to the" 2.5 km. "
Destroyed statuary explained that the compensation package is not a formal document, and described in 2.5 square kilometers is roughly the size of the road, not the actual scope.
Head of the publicity Department of Wuhu municipal party Committee, said: by communicating with the City Planning Bureau, the municipal development and Reform Commission, the two departments were not issued on "2.5 square kilometers" of official documents.
Although no clear planning, central railway station and 2.5 km wide economic formats, more or less controlled by the Government. This is imposed by the beyond the red line, through attracting investment into the Wuhu Zhang Liming of Zhejiang merchants built a commercial Plaza, having completed most of the decorating, but not investment. Zhang Liming said the Mall was ordered to shut down in 2009, related departments then have not issued a pre-sale permit and acceptance, their dilemma.
In this regard, sent Deputy District Chief said that cities have control.
It is understood that the Wuhu railway station project (East square) phase of the project in 2012, was identified as the first key projects in Wuhu city. "How central train station will be planned" issue, journalists contact Jinghu District Government, the construction of key projects in Wuhu city administration and planning of Wuhu, has been answered.
Wang Ling queried, the expropriation of land in Wuhu railway station project for reserve, pending land profits in the future. When the foil request, he asked the railway station East square around the land-planning purposes. Wuhu City Planning Bureau replied: "I will combine in the future hub of unified planning, not currently available. ”
Xinhua reporter Li Xianfeng
(Original title: Wuhu first works were referred to as "a ride collection")
安徽芜湖，为配合“市一号工程”——火车站东广场项目，由镜湖区政府承担的房屋征收进入尾声。与此同时，相关部门和“钉子户”却陷于诉讼之累：在剩余27位征收对象中，20多人提起行政诉讼，分别将镜湖区政府和芜湖市规划局告上法庭。这批“民告官”案尚无一起胜诉。虽如此，律师却发现，区政府最初公示的征收决定所附规划红线图，却比市规划局规划许可的红线图多出12万余平方米，用途不明。
□征房
扩建火车站引房屋征收
11月1日上午，芜湖火车站旁的新中基汽配城，一栋被拆得七零八落的门面房上，涂写着产权人“王懿伟”和“征收”字样。63岁的王开奎拎着一袋子的诉讼材料，走到卷帘门前打开锁，进屋例行检查。
2007年，王开奎买下这套两层楼的连体店面，后用于出租。为图方便，产权登记在其子王懿伟名下。但老王没能预料，整个汽配城4年后会被征收。
政府征收的理由是扩建火车站。芜湖市的经济在安徽省排第二，虽如此，1983年建成的火车站却站房狭小、装修破旧。
2011年3月6日，芜湖市发改委正式批复火车站站区枢纽工程的立项建设，宁安城际铁路（南京到安庆）计划2014年年底开通。按芜湖市此前规划，新火车站将成为该线最大的节点站。当年9月28日，镜湖区政府以枢纽工程为名做出（2011）6号征收决定。
据公示的规划图，新中基汽配城整体处于规划红线内。
虽然镜湖区房屋征收办称，征收公告曾张贴在园区宣传栏和征收房屋上，但很多征收对象表示，商铺出租后，他们不在此处居住，因此一直不知征收动态，直到2012年5月份，政府的征收补偿决定书送达。
政府的补偿和安置方案，在王开奎等15人看来并不公平。“三次作价，最后一次是8000多元。而周边市场同样的门面房，都是每平米两三万元的水平。我们都是一、二层的商业房，但异地安置的商铺，却是5层。”王开奎说。
这15个人后来抱团，聘请北京律师王令打行政官司。2012年7月17日，王懿伟等15人以征收程序违法为由，联名将镜湖区政府告上法庭，请求依法撤销其作出的（2011）6号房屋征收决定。
□诉讼
多起“民告官”无一例胜诉
这起15人联名诉讼案由芜湖中院指定三山区法院审理。镜湖区政府辩称，其征收目的、程序合法。法庭上，原告和被告各自出示证据，最终，2012年12月27日，法院一审宣判，驳回15名原告诉讼请求。
对于一审结果，王令律师称在意料之中。除了坚持认为政府程序违法，王令指出判案存在瑕疵。
此后15人选择上诉。在芜湖中院二审宣判之前，王令所在的律所邀请国内著名的行政法教授应松年、姜明安、余凌云、王锡锌、沈岿等5名专家，对王懿伟等15人的“民告官”案进行论证。最终，专家组给出“案涉征收决定违法”和“案涉征收补偿决定违法”两条法律意见，专家组意见被提交至法院。最终，二审维持原判。
上述案件审理的同时，另一起5人联名诉讼也在进行。代理此案的南京律师邱建军介绍，5名原告分别持有征收红线范围内2栋工业厂房的产权。法庭上，他们指出，芜湖市规划局的批复程序违法，要求法院判决其撤销发给芜湖市建设投资有限公司的《建设用地规划许可证》。
尽管一审、二审结果都支持芜湖市规划局，一审判决书还是指出了其行政行为上的“瑕疵”，称：“芜湖市发改委在没有被告核发《选址意见书》的前提下，即作出项目批复，进而被告向芜湖市建设投资有限公司核发《建设用地规划许可证》，被告的许可行为在时间顺序上存在瑕疵。”
据记者了解，除上述两案，还有其他征收对象打行政官司，截至目前，无一起胜诉案例。
□调查
红线图和面积存变化
官司虽然输了，王令却对“火车站规划范围究竟多大”穷追不舍，并向芜湖市规划局申请信息公开。
据芜湖媒体此前报道，火车站站区枢纽工程面积25万平方米。2011年，芜湖市发改委文号为发改投资（2011）436号的文件中也明确提到，总建筑面积约为25万平米。
今年5月3日，芜湖市规划局向王令作出答复。该局2012年2月10日核发的芜湖火车站站区枢纽工程的《建设用地规划许可证》显示，枢纽工程占地面积为32.2万平方米，并附有红线图。
11月4日，京华时报记者从镜湖区房屋征收办核实，站区枢纽工程征收总面积为44.3万平方米。与此相符的是镜湖区政府2011年9月28日的征收决定。该决定附红线图，落款时间为2010年9月20日，盖有芜湖市城乡规划局公章。征收办负责人宋陵生称，该图红线内面积即为44.3万平方米。
对比两张红线图，能看到显著差异：规划许可证所附图，比征收决定所附图，要少划一个“大方块”。在前一张图中，汽配城只有部分楼房被纳入，而后一张图中，汽配城整体被纳入红线范围。
一同被纳入“大方块”的，还有一栋4层的在建工程“旅游礼品大世界”，该楼还保持着4年前停工时未拆除脚手架的状态。投资人周仁杰是浙商。周仁杰称，他通过招商引资，办理正规手续拿下该地盖房，但2009年眼看就要完工时，政府突然通知停工。
“去年，政府下达征收补偿决定，补偿费2.05亿，但自始至终，我只见到评估结果，没见过详细的评估报告。”周仁杰说，公司自己评估应赔7亿多元，在行政复议无果后，公司起诉区政府请求撤销其征收补偿决定，一审败诉后，目前已进入二审。
多出的“大方块”如何理解？王令的分析是，政府在借助民生工程“搭车征收”。“如果用来搞商业开发，则完全没有理由征收。”他说。
在征收决定所附红线图上，芜湖市规划局有文字注明：“根据芜湖站站区规划，经研究，同意按图示红线范围办理一期工程拆迁相关手续。”
对于红线图的差异，宋陵生和镜湖区副区长许兰表示，他们严格按市规划局批准的征收红线范围征收，没有超规划红线。
市规划局鲍副局长则称，给镜湖区政府的图，是方便其调查摸底的，按相关法规，该图并非征收房屋的前提要件，因此，具体的征收行为与规划部门无关。
多征收的“大方块”今后如何规划，镜湖区政府和芜湖市规划局均未解释。
□质疑
是否搭车征收储地出让
事实上，关于芜湖站站区规划，还有一个“2.5平方公里（也即250万平方米）”的说法，它是站区枢纽工程原规划面积的10倍。
《芜湖日报》2009年12月25日的报道称：“市铁路项目建设领导小组对芜湖火车站站区的初步设计进行了评审……芜湖火车站站区规划面积为2.5平方公里。”2010年6月3日报道称，关于火车站扩建工程，“市发改委相关负责同志告诉记者，围绕新火车站还将打造一个2.5平方公里（即250万平方米）的核心商圈。”
芜湖市发改委2011年436号文件中也提及：“该项目以芜湖火车站站房为核心，东至弋江北路，南至赭山中路，西至九华中路，北至赤铸山东路，约2.5平方公里。”镜湖区房屋征收办2011年8月11日制定的《火车站站区枢纽工程项目征收补偿方案（征求意见稿）》，关于“征收范围”也明确提到这个“2.5平方公里”。
宋陵生解释，补偿方案并非正式文件，且文中所述2.5平方公里是马路的大致面积，并非实际征收范围。
芜湖市委宣传部相关负责人称：经与市规划局、市发改委沟通，两部门均未下发过关于“2.5平方公里”的正式文件。
尽管无明确规划，环火车站2.5平方公里范围内的经济业态，或多或少受政府控制。在此次征收红线之外，通过招商引资进入芜湖的浙商张黎明盖起一座商业广场，虽已完成大部分装修，但却无法招商。张黎明说，其商场在2009年被勒令停工，相关部门后来一直不发预售许可证和验收，致其进退维谷。
对此，副区长许兰表示，市里确实有所控制。
据了解，芜湖火车站站区枢纽工程（东广场）一期工程，在2012年即被确定为芜湖市一号重点工程。就“环火车站今后将如何规划”问题，记者先后接触镜湖区政府、芜湖市重点工程建设管理局和芜湖市规划局，均未得到答案。
王令质疑，芜湖市在利用火车站枢纽工程多征收土地用于储备，以待将来出让土地获利。在信息公开申请时，他曾问及火车站东广场周边土地的规划用途。芜湖市规划局回复：“今后我局将结合站区枢纽统一制定规划，目前无法提供。”
京华时报记者李显峰
（原标题：芜湖一号工程被指“搭车征收”）
赞