Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)hpmailer
published in(发表于) 2013/11/17 9:01:19
Yulin require paid 740 million compensation for soil and water loss in Changqing oilfield

Authorities wide nets, Beijing, November 17 (reporters Liu Nan) Yuyang District Court in Yulin city, Shaanxi Province, on October 10, 2013, to the Changqing oilfield has served on the Executive of award, asked to pay during the July 2009 in Changqing oilfield in Shaanxi Yulin mining oil, gas compensation fees for soil and water loss of 740 million Yuan, as well as fines of 110 million Yuan, and had frozen 23 bank accounts in Changqing oilfield.

Dong Xiucheng, recalls Deputy Dean of Faculty of business administration at the University of petroleum, is levied in the petrochemical industry in the past, "compensation fees for soil and water loss in" entrepreneurial few and far between.

It was essentially an eco-compensation mechanism, like your local construction jobs, or carry out a particular activity, have some impact on the local ecology, as compensation, I think the theory is reasonable. But do not do this thing.

China promulgated the law on soil and water conservation on "soil and water loss control fees" and "compensation fees for water and soil conservation facilities" set out. Shaanxi Province "of soil and water loss compensation" is 2007 the Shaanxi Provincial people's Congress agreed by the competent administrative Department of soil and water conservation in Shanxi province together with related departments such as finance, prices.

According to the regulations, within the administrative area of Shaanxi Province, where the enterprise engaged in mining coal, oil and natural gas resources, is required to pay compensation fees for soil and water loss in Shaanxi Province. Crude oil for 30 yuan/ton, 0.008 Yuan/cubic metres of natural gas. At the same time it also provides that payment of compensation fees for water and soil erosion on a monthly basis.

And one in the central region of water supplies for many years in the telecommunications industry, told reporters that he had never heard in accordance with capacity to pay compensation fees for water and soil erosion in.

Fees were arrived at in accordance with an area of soil and water conservation, and production capacity doesn't matter. It causes soil erosion within a year charged by compensation, is a one-time membership fee. Count by area, can be a lump-sum payment.

It is understood that the cost of soil and water conservation, the soil and water conservation Act, is "who damage, whose compensation", and is in accordance with 1.2 Yuan per sq m a one-off levy. Standard in Shaanxi Province is much higher than the soil and water conservation Act. That's why Changqing oilfield in Shaanxi Province "soil and water loss in compensation fees" has been questioned.

The immense demand notes in Yulin city of Shaanxi Province, told reporters a person close to the local government, and local governments also have their own considerations.

The reason for this is two-fold: first, is nonrenewable mined resources, Yulin, wished to have a sustainable growth. Cannot remove inside, I will have nothing. Second, the importance of the environment, State policy has been on the increase, local governments will also increase, and this for two reasons.

Local practices, University Faculty of business administration of Dong Xiucheng, Vice President hopes both for enterprises, State-owned enterprises, private enterprises and foreign-invested enterprises, levying compensation fees for water and soil erosion should be treated equally, otherwise policy biases. Zhou Dadi says China energy research society, for specific projects also need to be treated differently.

Where he was drilling, or repairing the pipeline will cause soil erosion, this project is not exactly the same. But all oil and gas products are levying compensation fees for water and soil erosion, like taxes, this could not simply determined by the local government. If it did produce soil erosion, and then to compensate, I think this can bring up.

(Original title: PetroChina owed to soil and water loss in Shaanxi Yulin up big ticket questions)

　　央广网北京 11月17日消息 (记者 刘楠)陕西省榆林市榆阳区法院于2013年10月10日，向长庆油田送达了《执行裁定书》，要求长庆油田缴纳2009年7月至2012年3月期间在陕西榆林境内开采石油、天然气水土流失补偿费7.4亿元，以及1.1亿元的罚款，并且冻结了长庆油田23个银行账户。

　　石油大学工商管理学院副院长董秀成回忆说，过去在石化行业被征收“水土流失补偿费”的企业少之又少。

　　它实际上就是一个生态补偿机制，比如说你在当地由于施工作业、或进行某项活动，对当地生态产生一定影响，作为补偿，我认为从理论上讲还是合理的。但是过去确实没有做这个事情。

　　我国颁布的《水土保持法》中确实有关于 “水土流失防治费”和“水土保持设施补偿费”的阐述。而陕西省的“水土流失补偿费”则是2007年经陕西省人大同意由陕西省水土保持行政主管部门会同财政、物价等有关部门制定的。

　　根据规定，凡在陕西省行政区域内从事煤炭、石油、天然气资源开采的企业，都需要向陕西省缴纳水土流失补偿费。其中原油为30元/吨，天然气为0.008元/立方米。同时该文件还规定，水土流失补偿费按月缴纳。

　　而在中部地区一位从事水务工作多年的业内人士对记者表示，他从没听说按照生产能力缴纳水土流失补偿费的。

　　水土保持费是按照占地面积算的，应该和生产能力没关系。它收取的是一年之内造成水土流失的补偿费，是一次性收取的。按面积算、一次性缴纳就可以了。

　　据了解，对于水土保持的费用，《水土保持法》规定的是“谁损害，谁补偿”，且是按照1.2元/平方米一次性征收。陕西省的征收标准要远远高于《水土保持法》。这也是长庆油田为什么对陕西省的“水土流失补偿费”一直存在质疑。

　　对于陕西省榆林市开出的巨额缴费单，一位接近当地政府的人士向记者透露，其实地方政府也有自己的考虑。

　　这个东西有两方面的原因，第一，开采出来的都是不可再生资源，榆林也是想有一个可持续的增长。不能把里面挖空了就什么都没了。第二，对于环境的重视程度，国家政策一直在增加，地方政府也会增加，就这两个原因。

　　对于当地的做法，石油大学工商管理学院副院长董秀成希望无论是对央企、国企、民企还是外资企业，如果要征收水土流失补偿费就应该一视同仁，否则政策存在倾向性。而中国能源研究会副理事长周大地则表示，对于具体的工程还要区别对待。

　　他在哪儿钻井，或者是修管线，会不会造成水土流失，这个具体工程不完全一样。但是对所有的石油产品和天然气产品都征收水土流失补偿费，就像收税一样，这个还不能随便由地方政府决定。如果它确实产生水土流失，那么就应该进行补偿，我觉得这个还是可以提出来的。

(原标题：中石油欠水土流失费 陕西榆林开巨额罚单引质疑)

赞