Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)hpmailerpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/19 11:27:33 55-day Lanzhou implementation danshuanghao the limit line controversy
"New year" limit line complained there was support
Western Gansu daily excursions, daily (Chief Reporter Ding Weina) starting from yesterday, decided on the central urban area of Lanzhou city in small and micro-bus implementation of danshuanghao measures to limit line, lasted for nearly two months. Measures to face up to 55 days of vehicle restrictions, understand public support showed their frustration in Lanzhou. China Environmental Science Research Institute of motor vehicle fuel emissions Laboratory Director Yue Xin and Lanzhou Jiaotong University Transportation Institute teacher Zhang Xiaohong said, should raise the costs of vehicle use at the same time, optimizing the urban public transportation, for the trip to see the need to compare the cost and convenience of the two.
Public policy limits support complaints
That implementation of the motor vehicle danshuanghao since yesterday after news of the restrictions, said teacher Tang Xiaoru, as a member of living in this city, who are the victims of air pollution, if there was a way to reduce atmospheric pollution, implementation limit is not unreasonable. Lanzhou public son started kindergarten Chen Pin, need to drive their children every day. "When buying a car to transport their children, the restrictions have forced me not to leave their children. "Chen Pin is helpless:" it took a taxi the next day nor realistic, child is still small, crowded bus stand in the morning. I had intended to buy a cheaper car, switch over. ”
Some drivers say, is not just caused by automobile exhaust air pollution in Lanzhou, should also speed up the progress on highly polluting enterprises out of the City Park. Many users have expressed since the limit line, vehicles of government departments cannot be excluded.
Private car owners complained Yang Lin danshuanghao restrictions: "one-third time of year be able to drive every day to pay travel tax, car insurance can not be less. "Yang Lin gave reporters a Bill:" my car's engine is 2.4, annual insurance and tax and fee to about 8,000 yuan. Equivalent to 22 Yuan per day, plus the usual tail number limit line throughout the year, there are more than 110 days do not travel properly, there are 2,400 Yuan a bleach. There is parking fees in each of the four months do not have to find parking on the road, parking is about 500 Yuan a month, which in turn is 2000 Yuan. Shuang Hao restrictions brought to life not only inconvenience, let me afford $ 4,400 worth of damage each year, who is going to compensate for this loss? ”
Expert optimization of urban public transport
In January 2013, the Beijing air pollution prevention and control regulations (draft draft) published in, which made the atmosphere when the heavily polluted, Government has the right to stop part of the motor vehicle. On October 31, the Beijing air pollution emergency plan in place, predicting the future three-day danshuanghao will be exercised when there is a serious pollution restrictions. But this suffers from air pollution of Lanzhou city's measures to more powerful, in Lanzhou city ambient air quality index exceeds 101 for three consecutive days, reaching slightly polluted, the PM2.5 concentrations exceeding 0.075 mg per cubic metre, begun in Lanzhou city danshuanghao measures.
Restrictions and limited, has been controversial. Many people worry that in Lanzhou after the limit line, whether to follow the lead of cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, private car purchase is not far from the?
Chinese research Academy of environmental sciences vehicle emissions Laboratory Director Yue Xin believes that oil should be simultaneously with the raising costs of motor vehicle use, optimization of urban public transport. Transportation and Yue Xin aspect similar to Lanzhou Jiaotong University College teacher Zhang Xiaohong said: "limiting the Guild increased stimulation of all cars of a comparably to pursue after a period of time, people will be buying second cars, practical cars on the road will not be significantly reduced. Therefore, restrictions must be imposed and restriction of both will have any effect. If you want to enforce the limit line, the Government must also introduce complementary measures, such as vehicular access to the city limit line, citizens have convenient public transport options? ”
(Original title: Lanzhou "new year" limit line complained there was support)
“跨年”限行有人抱怨有人支持
每日甘肃网-西部商报讯(首席记者丁炜娜)从昨日开始，兰州市决定对中心城区的小型及微型客车实施单双号限行措施，持续时间近两个月。面对长达55天的机动车限行措施，兰州市民有的表示理解支持有的表示十分无奈。中国环境科学研究院车用油品排放实验室主任岳欣以及兰州交通大学交通运输学院老师张晓红等表示，应该在提高机动车使用成本的同时，优化城市公共交通出行，让出行者自觉去比对二者的成本和便捷度。
市民 限行政策有人支持有人抱怨
得知从昨天开始实施机动车单双号限行的消息后，教师唐晓茹表示，作为生活在这个城市里的一员，谁都是大气污染的受害者，如果有办法减少大气污染，实施限行无可厚非。兰州市民陈品的儿子刚上幼儿园，每天都需要开车接送孩子。“当初买车也是为了方便接送孩子，这一限行就逼得我非给孩子请假了。”陈品对此很无奈：“这隔天打车也不现实啊，孩子还小，早上挤公交受不了啊。我不得不打算再买一部便宜点的车，换着开了。”
部分有车族表示，兰州的大气污染不仅仅是汽车尾气造成的，还应加快对高污染企业出城入园的进度。很多网友也表示既然要限行，政府部门车辆也不能排除在外。
私家车主杨琳对单双号限行颇有微词：“一年1/3的时间不能开车，每年都要缴纳的车船税、汽车保险一天也不能少。”杨琳给记者算了一笔账：“我的车排量是2.4的，每年的税费保险加到一起大概是8000元左右。折合到每天就是22元，一年当中加上平时尾号限行，就有超过110天不能正常行驶，就有2400元打了水漂。还有停车费，每年四个月不能上路得找停车场，停车费每月大约500元，这又是2000元。单双号限行不仅给生活带来不便，还让我每年承受4400元的损失，这损失谁来弥补？”
专家 优化城市公共交通出行
2013年1月，《北京市大气污染防治条例(草案送审稿)》公布，其中提出大气受到严重污染时，政府有权停驶部分机动车。10月31日，《北京市空气重污染应急预案》出台，预测未来持续三天出现严重污染时将实行单双号限行。而兰州这个饱受空气污染之害的城市出台的措施要更有力度，兰州市区环境空气质量综合指数连续三天超过101，达到轻度污染，PM2.5日浓度均超过每立方米0.075毫克，兰州市即开始实行单双号措施。
限行和限购，一直饱受争议。很多市民担心，兰州限行后，是否将效仿北京、上海等城市，私家车限购是否已经不远了？
中国环境科学研究院车用油品排放实验室主任岳欣认为，应该在提高机动车使用成本的同时，优化城市公共交通出行。和岳欣观点类似的兰州交通大学交通运输学院张晓红老师认为：“限行会刺激机动车保有总量的增加，推行一段时间后，人们会想法购置第二辆，实际在路上的汽车并不会明显减少。因此，限行必须和限购同时实行才会有效果。如果要实施限行，政府还必须出台配套措施，比如车辆进入市中心限行，市民是否有便捷的公交可以选择？”
(原标题：兰州“跨年”限行 有人抱怨有人支持)
赞