Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)hpmailerpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/19 11:47:11 Judicial interpretation of the criminal case of seizing this effect
According to the China News Agency yesterday, Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate, disclosed the agreement on several issues concerning the application of law handling Rob criminal cases. The judicial interpretation will be effective as of today. Judicial interpretation clearly, plunder of public and private property worth more than 1000 Yuan to 3,000 yuan, more than 30,000 yuan to 80,000 yuan, more than 200,000 to 400,000 yuan, should be separately identified as section No. 267 of the Penal Code "large amounts", "large", "particularly large amounts."
According to Justice explained, has including has due to Rob, and Rob or mob looting trained criminal punishment; a years within has due to Rob or looting trained administrative punishment of; organization, and control minor people Rob; in hospital Rob patients or its relatives property; Rob relief, and rescue, and flood, and special care and, and pro-poor, and immigrants, and relief paragraph property, case one of, "amounts larger" of standard according to 50% determines.
Judicial interpretation said that robbing public or private property, causing serious injury or suicide, should be identified as section No. 267 of the Penal Code, "other serious circumstances." Robbing public or private property, causing death, it should be identified as section No. 267 of the Penal Code "in other especially serious circumstances."
Justice explained that the driving motor vehicles, non-motorized vehicle seizure of property, with one of the following circumstances, shall be convicted and punished for robbery: when captured his forcibly seized because the victim does not let go; driving vehicle forced to squeeze, strike, or forcing others to plunder forcibly; knowingly causing human casualties caused by forcible seizure and allow slightly above the consequences of property holders.
(Original title: Rob explained the purpose of the judiciary in criminal cases)
据中新社电 昨日，最高人民法院、最高人民检察院对外公布《关于办理抢夺刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》。该司法解释将于今日起施行。司法解释明确，抢夺公私财物价值1000元至3000元以上、3万元至8万元以上、20万元至40万元以上的，应当分别认定为刑法第267条规定的“数额较大”、“数额巨大”、“数额特别巨大”。
根据司法解释，具有包括曾因抢劫、抢夺或者聚众哄抢受过刑事处罚；一年内曾因抢夺或者哄抢受过行政处罚的；组织、控制未成年人抢夺；在医院抢夺病人或者其亲友财物；抢夺救灾、抢险、防汛、优抚、扶贫、移民、救济款物等情形之一的，“数额较大”的标准按照50%确定。
司法解释指出，抢夺公私财物，导致他人重伤或自杀的，应认定为刑法第267条规定的“其他严重情节”。抢夺公私财物，导致他人死亡，应当认定为刑法第267条规定的“其他特别严重情节”。
司法解释指出，驾驶机动车、非机动车夺取他人财物，具有下列情形之一的，应当以抢劫罪定罪处罚：夺取他人财物时因被害人不放手而强行夺取的；驾驶车辆逼挤、撞击或者强行逼倒他人夺取财物的；明知会致人伤亡仍然强行夺取并放任造成财物持有人轻伤以上后果的。
(原标题：抢夺刑事案件司法解释今起施行)
赞