Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/21 1:36:13 Insiders say Lee is not a confession， confession and trial with the parent call no contradiction
People's daily Beijing, November 21 (Xinhua and Li Jing), 19th, rape appeal by Lee and four other people at the Beijing Municipal Intermediate People's Court of juvenile Chambers without public hearing, the trial for more than 12 hours. Reporters contacted trial after several twists and turns in the portion of the Insider recalls the case of court trials, the insider said, Lee was not a confession, a final statement touching. Mother Dove repeatedly choked the dream.
Meng Ge repeatedly choked
According to insiders, Meng Ge in court has stood up to pay tribute to the Court three times. She said caring for the children, and lack of education, and expressed thanks to the investigative judge, and wants the Court to grant Lee an opportunity, to certain mitigating Li, school of education. In the trial, Meng Ge had repeatedly choked.
It is understood that Lee's last statement was last night stayed up all night writing. He was again in court, said their sorry parents, bowed three times and that I'm wrong. After the trial, pigeons and dreams with a brief meeting with Lee.
In addition, in the case of another defendant, Wang said, his family had difficulty, my father laid off. Family doing its utmost to raise 30,000 compensation, but the victims did not take the case. Another defendant in the case, Wei an, for compensation of 150,000 victims access to each other's understanding, were sentenced to probation. Wang had asked in court, "because my family was poor, unable to obtain a lenient sentence was excused, please? "Wang is the only one of five defendants in the case of adults, was sentenced to 12 years.
Lawyers provided no new evidence
Earlier, media reported that Lee's new Defender Zhang Qi Huai acts submitted new evidence to the Court, but was rejected by the Court. According to insiders, this is not the case. Zhang Qi Huai acts have not submitted new evidence to the Court, called homemade videos of the crime scene is not submitted by Zhang Qi Huai acts.
Zhang Qi Huai acts 24 pieces of new evidence submitted to the Court the evidence leads, the lead reflect a surveillance camera positions at the time of, apply to the Court for access to these cameras surveillance video to prove that at the time of injury to the victim, whether or not brought under control. Among them, front and 8,917 Hubei building, is the most important room in front of the surveillance video. But has failed to win court approval.
Lee so no estoppel
There are media reports, Lee a confession in court. This claim also denied by insiders, it was said that Li said he was sleeping in the first instance there is no crime. In the second instance, Lee insisted on a trial. But Defender found his mother and he had phone records, Lee admitted to having to stairwell dream bird calls, does not contradict this confession and trial.
Advocates said the facts of the case is unclear, insufficient evidence
In court, Lee's lawyer Zhang Qi Huai acts do is "skeptical debate", Li Xiaolin lawyers did was "not guilty".
First, counsel believes that public prosecution service main conviction based on the testimony of a witness, testimony which has many contradictions. Victim statements alone, there are more than 100 multiple contradictions.
Secondly, the victims initiative to follow Li and his party for more than seven hours, and talk about price and payment behavior. Cannot be excluded that the nature of the case is "whoring".
Third, the wounds on the victim's identification of injuries two days later, there are no traces of semen identification. Not enough to prove that at the time of physical and sexual relationships.
人民网北京11月21日 (记者 李婧)19日上午9时许，李某某等五人强奸上诉一案在北京市一中院少年庭不公开开庭审理，该案审理超过12个小时。记者几经波折联系了庭审中的知情人回忆了案件的部分庭审情况，该知情人表示，李某某未翻供，最后陈述令人动容。其母梦鸽多次哽咽。
梦鸽多次哽咽
据知情人透露，梦鸽在法庭上曾三次站起来向法庭致意。她表示自己对孩子关爱有加，但教育有缺失，并向侦查审判人员表示感谢，并希望法庭给予李某某机会，对李某某从轻处罚，教育感化为主。在庭审中，梦鸽曾多次哽咽。
据了解，李某某的最后陈述是前晚熬夜写就的。他再次在法庭上表示，自己对不起父母，并三次鞠躬认错。庭审后，梦鸽和李某某进行了短暂的会见。
此外，该案的另一名被告人王某表示，自己家庭困难，父亲下岗。全家竭尽全力筹集了三万赔偿金，但是该案的被害人没有接受。而该案的另一名被告人魏某，因赔偿了被害人十五万获得对方谅解，被判处缓刑。王某法庭上曾发问，“难道因为我家穷，就不能得到原谅获得轻判吗？”王某是该案五名被告人中唯一的成年人，被判处有期徒刑12年。
律师没有提供新证据
此前，有媒体报道李某某的新任辩护人张起淮向法庭递交了新证据，但是被法院驳回。据知情人透露，这不是事实。张起淮当庭未递交新证据，所谓案发现场的自制视频并不是张起淮递交的。
张起淮当庭提交的是24份调取新证据的证据线索，这些线索反映了案发时的数个监控摄像头的位置，张申请法院调取这些摄像头的监控视频，以证明案发时被害人是否受伤、是否被控制。其中，最重要的是湖北大厦门前和8917房门前的监控视频。但是未获得法庭的批准。
李某某没有翻供
有媒体报道，李某某当庭翻供。这一说法也被知情人否认，据称，李某某一审说自己当时睡觉没有犯罪行为。在二审中，李某某坚持一审的说法。但辩护人发现其母亲和他有通话记录，李某某承认曾经到楼道里接听过梦鸽的电话，这个供述与一审并不矛盾。
辩护人认为：案件事实不清，证据不足
在法庭上，李某某的辩护律师张起淮做的是“存疑之辩”，李肖霖律师做的是“无罪辩护”。
首先，辩护律师认为，公诉机关的主要定罪依据是证人证言，而这些证言有多处矛盾。仅被害人的陈述就有一百多处矛盾。
第二，被害人主动追随李某某一行长达七个小时，又有谈价格和收钱的行为。不能排除该案的性质是“嫖娼”。
第三，被害人身上的伤是在两天以后鉴定的，目前没有精液痕迹的鉴定。不足以证明案发时有殴打和性关系发生。
赞