Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/21 1:38:53 State executive officers must also benefit “at both ends“
Zhang ping
A few days ago, led by the society for Central enterprises and State Executive income survey has been completed. Research found that enterprises and State-owned enterprise executives a large imbalance in income, a phenomenon more prominent performances of listed companies in the financial sector. Very few SOE executives will receive millions of dollars paid.
Meanwhile, 18 adopted at the third plenary session of the CPC Central Committee on several major issues of comprehensive reform decision states that "the employment of State-owned enterprises to reasonable increase in market share reasonably determined and strictly regulate the treatment of remuneration levels of the managers of State-owned enterprises, job, post consumer, business spending", the State enterprise executives have put on the agenda.
Over the years, it is often said that reducing State executive salaries, and so belongs to the State executive officials or businessmen? If it is official, it certainly shouldn't treat United States Wall Street entrepreneur's salary; if only merchants, you should not retain the same level of system, such as old-age retirement benefits. State-owned enterprise executives in business and the State, is actually official and Executive benefits "at both ends", nature be subjected to public discontent and criticism.
Authorities used to be governed the State Executive income high, SASAC is currently developed for Central enterprises executives, the average annual salary of 700,000 yuan. But SOE executives excessive pay issue is not precluded, as one Department the research found exemplified State executive close to millions of dollars of revenue.
The author believes that the State executive pay cuts, cannot regulate State Executive income, nor assuage the complaints about this.
First, SOEs executives huge salaries are not linked to performance and ensure stable yields despite drought or excessive rain, to a certain extent inseparable from the support of States and Governments. Some State-owned enterprises, yet enjoying all kinds of "policy." While some private enterprise engaged in the same trade, after more hard work, business profits and employee remuneration is far less rich in State-owned enterprises, which of course cannot be convinced.
Furthermore, the State Executive's salary is not openly opaque, most groups do not understand, it is well received by the public speculation and criticism. State-owned enterprises belong to the whole people, as people should know how much State executive pay. Therefore, State Executive to tighten the open transparency, State executive remuneration level, to be made public, subject to public supervision.
Finally, the promotion of SOE executives is not determined by market decisions. In many industries, State Executive though nominally corporate managers, but it also has a very high level of administration. A considerable number of people, was transferred by government officials. Some entrepreneurial private enterprise management personnel, even brilliant, and also impossible to find access to state-owned enterprises management channel, not getting well paid. In fact, this is not only a waste of human resources, is not conducive to the future development of State-owned enterprises. Generous salary and high standing, allowing state-owned enterprise executives to easily become elite, is also to a certain extent, suppressed private entrepreneurs entrepreneurship.
In this regard, 18 plenary session of special emphasis in the resolution "that State-owned enterprises and private enterprises will have more equal position in the market, a more benign environment for competition. Inevitably, SOEs executives improve themselves and enhance their competitiveness in the market. While, "State enterprise to reasonable increased marketing hiring proportion, reasonable determines and strictly specification State enterprise personnel pay level, and positions treatment, and positions consumption, and business consumption" of provides, through has SOE executives this article relative occlusion of talent competition channel, let in market Shang created performance of enterprises management personnel, has opportunities entered SOE, this undoubtedly will let more talent get opportunities, further release social of venture vitality.
In short, executive pay reforms of State enterprises in the future if you're still not complete "open competition", "performance-related income" and other major reforms, the so-called salary system reform of State-owned enterprises will also be an empty talk. Hope one Department's findings could eventually lead to standardization of State Executive income, transparent.
张平
日前，由人社部牵头进行的针对央企和国企高管收入的调研已经基本结束。调研发现，央企和国企高管收入存在较大的不平衡状况，这一现象在金融行业上市公司中表现较为突出。极个别国企高管甚至可以领取上千万元薪酬。
与此同时，十八届三中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》指出“国有企业要合理增加市场化选聘比例，合理确定并严格规范国有企业管理人员薪酬水平、职务待遇、职务消费、业务消费”，说明规范国企高管已经提上日程。
一直以来，人们常说要降低国企高管薪酬，那么国企高管到底是属于官员还是商人呢？如果是官员，那当然不应该享受美国华尔街企业家的薪资；如果只是商人，则不应保留同等级别的体制内养老退休等福利待遇。国企高管的亦官亦商状态，实际上是高官与高管的好处“两头占”，自然会遭到民众的不满和诟病。
有关部门曾经针对国企高管收入过高问题予以治理过，如国资委目前为央企高管制定的平均年薪为70万元。但是国企高管的薪酬过高问题还是没有杜绝，如人社部此次调研发现有国企高管收入接近千万元就是例证。
笔者认为，靠对国企高管降薪既不能规范国企高管的收入，也不能平息民众对此的抱怨。
首先，国企高管们的巨额薪金不与业绩挂钩，且旱涝保收，在某种程度上离不开国家和政府的扶植。更有一些国企，迄今还享受着种种“政策性利润”。而一些民企从事同样的行业，历经更多的辛劳，营业利润和员工薪酬却远不及财大气粗的国企，这当然不能让人服气。
再者，目前国企高管的薪资不公开不透明，一般群体不了解，故广受民众的猜测和诟病。国有企业属于全民所有，作为人民应该知道国企高管拿了多少薪酬。所以，国企高管要加大公开透明度，国企高管薪酬多少，要向社会公开，接受社会监督。
最后，国企高管的晋升不是由市场做主。在很多行业，国企高管虽然名义上是企业管理者，但其实也有着相当高的行政级别。其中相当一部分人，由政府官员调任而来。一些自主创业的民企管理人才，即便才华出众能力过人，也不可能找到进入国企管理层的通道，更拿不到丰厚的报酬。实际上，这不仅是对人才资源的浪费，更不利于国企的未来发展。丰厚的年薪和崇高的地位，让国企高管轻松成为精英人士，也在某种程度上，压抑了一些民营企业家的创业激情。
对此，十八届三中全会在决议中特别强调要“让国企和民企拥有更平等的市场地位，形成更良性的竞争环境。这势必要求国企高管们完善自我，提高自身的市场竞争能力。同时，“国有企业要合理增加市场化选聘比例，合理确定并严格规范国有企业管理人员薪酬水平、职务待遇、职务消费、业务消费”的规定，打通了国企高管这条相对闭塞的人才竞争通道，让在市场上创出业绩的民企管理人员，有机会进入国企，这无疑会让更多人才得到机会，进一步释放社会的创业活力。
总之，在未来国企高管薪资改革如果仍不完成“公开竞争上岗”、“收入与绩效挂钩”等重大改革措施，那么所谓的国企薪酬体系改革也将成为一句空话。希望人社部的调研结果能够最终促成国企高管收入的规范化、透明化。
赞