Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/23 17:24:55 Retired Prosecutor itself reported to the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of Anhui misjudged cases
Summary
Simple with civil disputes, but a criminal case was found not guilty of a noble instance of sanitation workers, people who eventually become sin.
In this article, have been one or two before the Prosecutor of the public prosecutor to show readers the case of mysterious forces stronger.
18 of the third plenary session of the CPC Central Committee's decision on deepen reform of major issues set out in the "right to ensure independent judicial power should be exercised in accordance with the public prosecutor's Office", "reform of the system of the Judicial Committee, perfect the trial judge, a new collegial panel investigation responsibility system, let the trial judges of referees responsible for" a reform in this regard a clear direction.
On November 1, 2013, Meng Xianjun took a large stack of materials by RER train to Beijing. He is a retired Prosecutor of Huaibei city, Anhui Province Xiangshan District people's Procuratorate, was to the Supreme People's Procuratorate of Beijing (hereinafter referred to as "the Supreme People's Procuratorate") reporting myself eight years ago he used to run a single.
Meng Xianjun spent two days in Beijing, the material submitted to the Supreme People's Procuratorate Deputy liaison office responsible. He's not too sure, with some bad back in Huaibei. In several interviews, he to the China Youth daily said more than once, decades of the Prosecutor, "this is the most useless I do a case".
The case occurred in 2005, he was the Prosecutor of cases of first instance and the second instance. Doer called noble, Huaibei city, Anhui province when the city authority environmental health management service (hereinafter referred to as "City Council sanitation Department") of an average worker, was convicted of "crime of misappropriation of funds" shall be sentenced to three years imprisonment, suspended for five years.
In addition to a year of prison life outside the ennobling contracted Dermatitis, the charge on the surface and there is not much material impact: he divided the money in the account does not move, sanitation work and wages to get back, he did not serve their sentences in prison.
However, Meng Xianjun before reporting to the Supreme People's Procuratorate, noble has appeal for 7 years, from Huaibei city intermediate people's Court until the Supreme Court, dismissed the complaint several times in the course of the case, noble looking for legal experts, representatives of the national people's Congress, people's supervisor as well as the media, in Beijing and Hefei, Huaibei, rushing back and forth between the number of "don't count".
Origin land financing housing construction
Noble has a plot of land, of his father's business friends in arrears, secured by land, but when land bureaux's consultation was informed that that cannot be mortgaged, only transferred. Because there is no money, noble friend, Liu Jia financed the transfer formalities and hung in his name. S1101 block covers an area of 17238.01 square meters, is located in Xiangshan District in Huaibei city Dong Fang South of the huaihe River.
Approval of arrest was found in Huaibei City Public Security Bureau, January 3, 2003, Liu received the parcel of land use permits, while the actual fund transfers the land is mined River coal limited Gong Chao (Liu Jiabao is its staff), the specific agent is a noble, meaning noble and the land is actually owned by Gong Chao, Liu just phantom.
The second half of 2003, when the City Council know this land of noble, noble agreed to buy land, built for workers from the housing.
Noble agreed to the sale of land, and on November 6 of that year and Liu Jia in Xiangshan District Notary Office handled the Attorney on, noble by the Liu family delegate Plenipotentiary to handle this "transfer of ownership or joint development, settlement, clearing and related matters connected therewith".
Zhihou, noble introduced a development company involved in building. January 8, 2004, he and Huaibei tunan real estate development co Ltd (hereinafter referred to as "tunan") signed a joint development agreement. Agreement stated that the proposed area of about 40,000 square metres, clear noble investment into land, tunan is fully financed by the company into the open construction. Noble as the land of all parties of the Convention into a scale of 30%, equivalent to RMB 8.4 million dollars.
A month later, the City Council and tunan signed the housing purchase and sale agreement, the purchase price includes civil engineering installation cost, land cost, it is the tax and profits of four, the City Council paid 5 million Yuan as deposit. One clear "a and b both sides set up a joint account, allocation of funds jointly managed by both parties".
City Council Committee will decide by Deputy Director Li Anxiang, Director of the sanitation Department is responsible for specific issues related to the financing housing construction, and the transfer of 4 people including noble in the sanitation Department Office of infrastructure, noble heads.
Sanitation workers totalling 148 households will raise to the sanitation Department unions 30,000 yuan per household, a total of 4.44 million Yuan, with special account. Seal of the Fund-raising has two special accounts, "the sanitation Union Executive" and "Li Anxiang" directly. In addition, one contacts paid 30,000 yuan, from the noble collection.
In this case, the noble of embezzlement charges and prosecuted by official embezzlement charges that centered around his 4.47 million Yuan on the disposition of the funds.
Which mainly include several cost transfer:
On March 26, 2004, Li Anxiang smoothen the noble land paid 500,000 yuan. Noble to remit the 500,000 yuan to history village, 6 groups of accounts.
On April 29, the sanitation service to 3.6 million dollars to the City Council of trade unions and condominium tunan company accounts tunan company then transferred noble paid 2.2 million dollars for the land. On May 26, tunan company 1.1 million dollars for land transferred to noble. On December 8, the sanitation Union written notice tunan company transferred all noble 3.6 million Yuan. A week later, 51,700 tunan company transferred to noble.
Noble palace was paid from the proceeds of over 2 million RMB to buy land, Jaco Bay Village $ 200,000 worth of land, Jaco Bay Village Committee member 49,000 yuan and tunan company 500,000 yuan to jointly develop expected profits. In addition to about 860,000 yuan Gao Ping account placed in his sister.
Under the normal procedure, from the housing construction, but the House has been started. Noble told the China Youth daily, during this period, the City Council leadership of the Party Committee to discuss part was friend sold by noble houses, part of the refund, part of the money.
On April 19, 2005, the City Council (party a) with a person names to Li Hui (b) entered into the purchase transfer agreement, called the "collective House staff agreed by the City Council, party a will original collective purchase transfer to party b". Which provided that the total housing fund of 9 million dollars, "party b prepaid by 500 Yuan/m2, included Wu Bai Yuan total advance, signed this agreement, party b deposit two millions, three fleet if the remaining balance within a month to the customer at rest house premises sold millions when they step by step paid off as noble House pays the remaining money. ”
At this point, the sanitation Department workers were told from the housing problem, find the captain want your money back. According to a leader of the City Council told China Youth daily reporter, "staff made a very aggressive." Party committees of the City Council finally found a noble, asked noble to return the funds. Noble believes that most of the money was used to buy land, no way back, can be built in separate rooms of the House.
Catch the arrested: enquiry date earlier than 1 month by criminal detention time
However the agreement signed a month later, on May 19, was noble in Huaibei City Public Security Bureau limited. About 8 o'clock in the morning, police to the sanitation Department to find greatness.
The then city Secretary Lv Jian told the China Youth daily reporter, request a refund with no fruit, the unity of the Party Committee of the Council so decides, and reported to the Public Security Bureau in noble appropriation of funds.
Opening in Huaibei city, investigators brought to noble hotel, noble China Youth daily reporter described, "they want me to renzhang, I diverted from 4.47 million Yuan. I do not recognize, just falling out. ”
The quarrel continued late into the night. Finally, Undertaker Xie Xudong cases appeared and took two materials, one interview transcripts, which is April 20; the other one is for approval of arrest, inscribe on May 13.
Noble recalled, when Xie Xudong told him, this is leadership arrangements, we have no means, does not lead us to do it? Is your most important preserved evidence and cooperate with us.
After hearing these words, noble has no further pleadings, "he let me where to sign, where do I sign. I will not support questioning the statement signed on May 20. ”
According to a China Youth daily reporter receive interrogation, on April 20, 2005, the stations are opening in Huaibei city hotel, questioned is Xie Xudong. In this statement, Xie Xudong asked mostly about workers from the City Council housing transfers and Li Anxiang presonal seal problems. Noble signed his name, and after the record time is May 20, 2005.
The prosecution stated in Huaibei City Public Security Bureau, reported the case of Huaibei City Council on May 18, 2005, case detection, criminal suspects at large and criminal detention time is May 19, 2005.
China Youth daily reporter's confirmed the matter to Xie Xudong, was denied, "How is it possible that I mentally handicapped. Do not say so, this case led by oppression or something, this is not the case at all. Waffle. ”
Huaibei City Public Security Bureau to "use their noble criminal suspects, embezzled 3,855,217 Yuan of funds, particularly large, its behavior has been found guilty of People's Republic of China Article No. 272 of the Penal Code, crimes alleged misappropriation of funds" to arrest.
In Huaibei City Public Security Bureau Economic Investigation Bureau, China Youth daily reporter inquired of Xie Xudong embezzled 3,855,217 Yuan amount is to identify, have not had a response, but he said "money back".
Studied in the approval of the arrest of Chen xingliang, a professor at Peking University law school said that its biggest flaw is that the body of the instrument States: "criminal suspects high on May 19, 2005, on suspicion of misappropriation of funds and was detained I." Inscribe the approval of arrest but the time was May 13, 2005. If it wasn't for the official written text in hand, can't believe there is such a time existed. Noble was on May 19, 2005 by arrest, then that's one week prior to their arrest on, drew the approval of the arrest of books have been written. To cast a shroud of mystery in the case, but leads me to believe that the noble referred to, this is indeed the case for leading cases of the intervention.
Noble was then transferred to a second detention center in Huaibei city, until the verdict is innocent released, noble spent 1 year and 4 months of time. While jailed in Huaibei city second detention center, noble kept protesting, "check, when protests and protest as long as someone comes by."
Meng Xianjun: "prosecution of innocence? ”
On June 1, 2005, Huaibei city, noble people's Procuratorate approved the arrest. On July 18, the municipal Public Security Bureau issued by the prosecution, compared to the attention of the approval of the arrest of book, expand financing for all submissions in connection with the amount for the "noble use their official suspects, diversion of capital of 4.44 million Yuan, took 30,000 yuan"; count has increased to "crime of misappropriation of funds, and unlawfully" two options.
Among them, the submissions by saying "noble Li Anxiang presonal seal", is one of the key points on the case.
Cases before the city prosecutor's Office after the September 14, City Procurator's Office directives Xiangshan District people's Procuratorate in charge of this case, Meng Xianjun is a former Chief of the public prosecutor's Office of public prosecution section, then stepped aside, and was chosen as the Prosecutor on the case.
On September 15, Meng Xianjun and upon indictment, prosecution Chief Zhu Handian high visiting the detention center to trial. "Chief, Zhu was first asked: ' do you plead guilty? ' "Meng Xianjun of China Youth daily reporter recalls," noble said nothing, he Pats the table, ' tell us, has happened to millions of dollars that you get? ’”
Noble pleaded not guilty, and Zhu Handian subsequently had a falling out. "No way, no longer we'll go back," says Meng Xianjun said. Meng Xianjun start thinking back, so tough why noble convinced of their innocence. So he carefully read the case files, the "first month I do not understand that brought at least three times more than I know."
After figuring out some agreement, Meng Xianjun noble innocence, "it looks just like him, he is legally available. "The huge amount of allegations, according to the Public Security Bureau, Meng Xianjun think hard, think back to the city prosecutor's Office," I personally don't want to do, and was already considered guilty, but must go through city Procurator's Office agreed with the acquittal, to release. ”
He replies with the city prosecutor's Office, still in his investigation, City Procurator's Office "hopes to have the case Digest in Huaibei". His innocent observations reported to the District Prosecutor's Office, district Procuratorate prosecution committees also agreed not guilty in charge after President and reported them to the municipal prosecutor's Office of the Chief, eventually agreed to not guilty.
Innocent programs when ready, suddenly one day, Meng Xianjun is the Attorney-General, said city prosecutor's Office calls, calls for noble case for prosecution.
"I said how to prosecute? Innocence, even if wrong huh? And it was the agreement of the inspection authority, how the prosecution? "Meng Xianjun of doubt, he was answered with a party leadership that innocence is also suing.
China Youth daily reporter to then-Attorney General and several members of the procuratorial Committee carried out when verified, several prosecutors said "age, remember."
After the preparation of an indictment, how to write indictments Meng Xianjun struggled, then others from prosecution by the Public Security Bureau for comments copy "copy is not, they are 4.4 million dollars, we can't be too far off, and Public Security Bureau to differ", and finally figure out 860,000 yuan did not recover, the indictment says, "there are still more than 860,000 yuan occupied by noble individuals".
Xiangshan District people's Procuratorate, on March 24, 2006, noble case for prosecution to Xiangshan District people's Court, by Prosecutor's Office arrested 10 months had passed before the noble.
Indictment fuzzy conclusions, and no clear high amount of crime, only a general accused of offences.
"Defendant noble positions, appropriation of large amounts of funds, misappropriated substantial amounts of funds, which allegedly breached the People's Republic of China Article No. 271, No. 272 of the Penal Code, criminal facts are clear, the evidence is true and sufficient, crime criminally unlawfully, misappropriation of funds. ”
In addition, the indictment suggested that "noble with privately engraved ' Li Anxiang ' seals and sanitation service administrative seal, established employees buying houses in City Bank funding private accounts. ”
Construction workers in the City Council with the noble Wang yunpeng monk seals have been denied for noble private claims.
Wang told the China Youth daily reporter, "' Li Anxiang ' stamp was in March 2004, Li Anxiang instructed me to hold on to his identity card to go with noble engraving. "Shang Yunpeng said," this chapter is above board appear, and in many places, has been legalized. Something so big that he could not know? ”
Not guilty, ne bis in idem is guilty
First instance court of final held 3 times, in the judgement of September 8, 2006. Noble status, collecting money for the qualitative judgement, personal seal and transfers made.
Judgement stated that "noble identity is not so much the City Council of trade unions, rather than financing housing construction in the economic activities of soil or land of agents. As noble, and financing civil subject of City Council is the equality of the two parties, there is no affiliation "and" 4.44 million dollars is building style, "noble act does not constitute a crime of misappropriation of funds, and unlawfully taking the final sentence of noble innocence.
Meng Xianjun and noble vividly recall the Court of first instance of the previous episodes, respectively, in the China Youth daily reporter described, they are referred to. Meng Xianjun said: "some contradictory evidence in court, the judge asked how these contradictory evidence excluded? I said I don't know. Judge asks how to 860,000, I say leadership. ”
After the Court acquitted, noble was released from custody.
After Court, Meng Xianjun relief, "a right to protest the verdict in the city prosecutor's Office, we have no right to file protest. We had was that even though the off court for sure. " He did not suspect City Procurator's Office will be asked to protest. "The 9th day after the decision, we are in charge of the Attorney-General called me, said city prosecutor's Office to protest, there's just a day, you get a grip. ”
After the mention of the protest, the second instance court. Meng Xianjun routine protest read it through first. Qi Dunquan of the presiding judge asked if there was any new evidence, Meng Xianjun answered no. Qi also asked not what evidence the prosecution, protested. Meng Xianjun did not speak.
Results of this trial are noble revision guilty, Huaibei city intermediate people's Court to imprisonment for noble counts of crime of misappropriation of funds imposed three years, suspended for five years.
Ne bis in idem is not new evidence, but based on facts and evidence from first instance concluded.
The judgement says, "noble during his tenure as head of Bureau of Huaibei city infrastructure, City Bureau in charge of private infrastructure Office Deputy Director Li Anxiang personal seal, post facilities, embezzlement of Bureau of Huaibei city and tunan company co-manage employee collective purchase 3.6 million Yuan, after the incident, recovered 2,889,216 Yuan, 710,784 Yuan fails to recover. The facts by the Court of first instance, examination of proof of evidence, this Court (in) to confirm. ”
Meng Xianjun the verdict puzzled, "High Court of second instance judgment guilty there is no evidence, judgment of 860,000 yuan 3.6 million dollars than we protest! ”
Noble case for differences in outcomes and the second result, Peking University Professor of criminal law, Chen xingliang has a point, "conviction without reason, an acquittal would only be reasonable. ”
Chen xingliang wrote notes on the case, he pointed out that the second instance verdict confirmed all of the original judgment of the first instance identified by the case, and that the facts are clear and sufficient evidence. Fully repeats the second instance verdict in front of the first-instance judgments found that in its judgement, the last page, with "identified" at the beginning, guilty identified to the noble. "Two noble guilty verdict commuted, there is no factual and legal basis, and there's no reason. ”
Chen xingliang, University College of criminal justice Professor Ruan qilin, and so 5 experts to discuss this, finally concluded: "this case involved the fact that economic disputes, should not be criminal sanctions. Noble act does not constitute a crime, should be corrected through the procedure for trial supervision. ”
When he was presiding judge of second instance Qi Dunquan said in an interview with China Youth daily Reporter: "everything is in accordance with due process, this judgment as to have the force of law. If there are objections, complaints through legal channels. "Another prosecutor said:" the case is being provincial people's Procuratorate the appeals phase, was handed over to the provincial prosecutor's Office, we have no right to comment on this. ”
In an interview with the relevant parties, Xie Xudong's attitude is most clear. Answer China Youth daily reporter's question, he cried: "if I don't think guilty not to arrest him, found guilty by the courts would not have convicted him. Our public security organ handling cases are cases in accordance with law. ”
Since then, he was more excited: "I tell you, judicial corruption, corruption here, a lot of people, the prosecutors with these, do not want to say, all mixed together with these criminals, guilty as being as innocent, do you know? ”
Meng Xianjun disdain for this, his relationship with the noble without any individual: "determining the noble diversion of capital of 3.6 million dollars annually, but applicable probation and keep their jobs, the original salary treatment and illegal beyond protest accused judgment, this is the judgment of the Court of second instance? ”
Staff writer, Anhui, Huaibei November 21-
Related articles:
Seven years of appeals road
After the second instance verdict, noble is not satisfied, the initiation of the appeals. Huaibei noble intermediate people's Court rejected the complaint.
He later appeal to the higher people's Court of Anhui Province. A few months later, the provincial high court notice shall not be registered.
During this period, noble found the reporters at a radius of the rule of law, head of the Supreme People's Procuratorate, Anhui Province high court reporter asked about reasons not incorporated. Province High Court after called noble, said Office the next day, and delegate to the intermediate people's Court of Huaibei review results.
Not surprisingly, the noble received another dismissal of complaints notification.
The radius of the rule of law also had an interview with Meng Xianjun. After this interview, noble Meng Xianjun attitudes have changed, "my original impression was he knows I'm innocent or do it on purpose. After the interview I know knows he is not guilty and did not deliberately trying to set me up, was the result of oppression of power ".
He found Meng Xianjun, saying, "you should do me justice. ”
Meng Xianjun attitude clear, noble said, "our prosecutors have always thought that you're guilty, I think you're not guilty, if you encounter any difficulties, my capacity as an old Prosecutor, one of the prosecutors involved identity and give you justice. ”
Since then, contact Meng Xianjun and noble noble, encountered difficulties in each complaint will tell Meng Xianjun, consult his opinion.
Noble was also seen in a newspaper called "sky Fu" prosecutors called Fu Yanhua, zaozhuang found so attracted to him. "I took its case to him, he did not believe that says you give me the material I research. ”
After some time, Fu Yanhua told noble that the case has been examined, "confirmed I have no facts of the crime". Fu Yanhua subsequently contacted the other 5 during the national people's Congress in March 2012 national meetings on application requirements, submitted to the Supreme People's Court on the high recommendations of the retrial of the case.
This proposal was then transferred to the Office of the Supreme People's court supervision. On May 4, 2012, the complaint material submitted to the Supreme People's Court of appeals case, on June 14, the Supreme Court reviewed the case. But noble end has received written notice of such dismissal.
Noble did not give up. The beginning of 2013, he to locate legal experts in Beijing, Peking University School of law professor Chen xingliang, he found the first legal expert, Chen xingliang noble conducted an intensive study of the case, noted that the second trial of the case was "without saying goodbye, and sentenced without trial."
Chen xingliang considered noble case "complaint was almost over, wants to reopen again from its difficult" because "the cases from the lower courts in the first instance, the intermediate people's Court of second instance, and then to the High Court dismissed and, finally, the Supreme Court dismissed the complaint, has come to the end of our nation's four level".
Ruan qilin, a professor at the University of politics and law in China not optimistic: "this case has a hangover, to found him not guilty, but also to how compensable losses, who dared to say what law, can ill afford. ”
Not only that, noble has also been found in Huaibei city people's Procuratorate of the people's supervisor, 9 case materials to the people's supervisor. Huaibei city, ancient sculpture art museum curator Marco, Huaibei city supervisor sign the famous philanthropist Peng Qingying 4 people to report a city prosecutor's Office, the provincial procuratorate and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, "suggest prosecutors perform oversight functions start reopening a retrial".
Marco told China Youth daily Reporter: "was noble, a large stack of materials to the Museum, I looked for a long time, think this case is civil disputes, criminal cases and has nothing to do. ”
High supervisor in Huaibei city, after studying the material invited some discussion on the legal profession, and interviewed the honorable and Meng Xianjun, and prepared a draft of the nobility is reflected in criminal cases and recommendations.
"I'm going to put some doubts and think is not the right place to report to leaders at all levels", said Marco.
Noble in jail 4 months a year, living in a big prison, generally very Seventeen-Eight people, many with more than 20 people. Is a cement block cells Chase shop, sleep gets people above, others sleeping on the floor. Noble says he's never slept on the floor, "may I go in a healthy atmosphere, everyone compared to me."
One morning prayer, being kept television broadcast Shenzhou sixth launch, floating in a cloud of white clouds over the detention center, the noble feeling particularly low, "the case itself is a single, is just not there, but I can't get out."
Probation period has expired, noble I could not give up the chance of each may be rehabilitated. "Why am I so attached to this case, stay the course? They said negotiations could help me get the land back, I won't accept it. Since it is a judicial system, that I will be resolved through the judicial system. ”
(Original title: retired Prosecutor reported to the Supreme People's Procuratorate itself unjustly)
核心提示
一起简单的民事纠纷，却成了刑事案件；环卫工高尚一审被判无罪，最终却成戴罪之人。
本文中，曾经担任一二审公诉人的检察官向读者展示了案外神秘力量之强大。
十八届三中全会作出的《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》中提出“确保依法独立公正行使审判权检察权”“改革审判委员会制度，完善主审法官、合议庭办案责任制，让审理者裁判、由裁判者负责”，在这方面明确了改革方向。
2013年11月1日，孟宪君带着一大摞材料乘高铁到北京。他是安徽省淮北市相山区人民检察院的一名退休检察官，到北京是向最高人民检察院(以下简称“最高检”)举报自己八年前曾经办过的一件错案。
孟宪君在北京待了两天，将材料递交给最高检人大代表联络处的相关负责人。他没有太大把握，带着些许沮丧回到淮北。在数次的采访中，他不止一次对中国青年报记者说，干了数十年的检察官，“这是我办的最窝囊的一个案件”。
这个案子发生在2005年，他是案件一审及二审的公诉人。案件当事人名叫高尚，时为安徽省淮北市市容管理局环境卫生管理处(以下简称“市容局环卫处”)的一名普通工人，被判“挪用资金罪”获有期徒刑三年，缓刑五年。
除一年多的看守所生活使高尚染上神经性皮炎外，这一罪名表面上并没有太大的实质性影响：他账户里的钱一分未动，环卫处的工作还在，工资照发，他也没有在监狱里服刑。
然而，在孟宪君举报到最高检之前，高尚已经申诉了7年，从淮北市中级人民法院一直到最高法，其间案件被驳回申诉数次，高尚找了法学专家、人大代表、人民监督员以及媒体，在淮北、合肥与北京之间来回奔波的次数“数不清”。
源起卖地集资建房
高尚手里有一块地，他父亲做生意的朋友欠款，想以土地抵押，但在土地局咨询时得知，该地不能抵押，只能转让。因为没有钱，高尚请朋友刘家保出资办理转让手续并挂在其名下。这宗S1101地块面积17238.01平方米，位于淮北市相山区相山路东淮坊路南。
淮北市公安局提请批准逮捕书也认定，2003年1月3日刘家保获得该宗地的土地使用证，而实际出资转让该宗土地都是雷河选煤有限公司宫超(刘家保是其职工)，具体经办人是高尚，也就是说该宗土地实际拥有者是宫超与高尚，刘家保只是挂名。
2003年下半年，当时市容局知道了高尚的这块地，跟高尚商量要买地，给职工建集资房。
高尚答应卖地，并于当年11月6日与刘家保在相山区公证处办理《授权委托书》，由刘家保委托高尚全权代表其办理这块地“权属转让、结算及相关事宜或联合开发、结算相关事宜”。
之后，高尚引进一家开发公司参与建房。2004年1月8日，他与淮北市图南房地产开发有限公司(以下简称“图南公司”)签订《联合开发协议书》。协议书中指出拟建面积约4万平方米；投资方式明确高尚投入土地，图南公司投入开设建设所需全部资金。高尚作为土地所有方的约定分成比例为30%，折合人民币840万元。
一个月后，市容局与图南公司签订《住房购销协议书》，购房价包括土建安装成本、土地费用、实交税费及利润四项，市容局支付500万元作为订金。其中一条明确“甲乙双方设立共同账户，资金调配由甲乙双方共同管理”。
市容局党委会决定由副局长兼环卫处处长李安祥负责集资建房的具体事务，并抽调了包括高尚在内的4人在环卫处成立基建办公室，其中高尚为具体负责人。
环卫处工人共148户集资，每户交给环卫处工会3万元，共计444万元，设有专户。集资专户有两枚专门印章，“环卫处工会行政章”和“李安祥”私章。此外，有一名关系户也交了3万元，由高尚代收。
在此案中，高尚所遭起诉的挪用资金罪名与职务侵占罪名即集中在他对447万元集资款的处置上。
其中主要包括几笔费用流转：
2004年3月26日，李安祥签批支付高尚土地款50万元。高尚将50万元汇入寇湾村6组账户。
4月29日，环卫处工会转款360万元到市容局和图南公司共管账户，随后图南公司转付高尚220万元作为土地款。5月26日，图南公司又转给高尚110万元作为土地款。12月8日，环卫处工会书面通知图南公司将360万元全部转给高尚。一周后，图南公司转给高尚51700元。
高尚从所得款项中支付了宫超200万元买地款，寇湾村20万元土地款，寇湾村村委会一委员4.9万元，以及图南公司50万元联合开发预计利润款。除此之外的约86万元存入其姐高萍账户。
按正常程序，集资房可以动工了，但房子一直没有动工。高尚告诉中国青年报记者，在此期间，市容局党委领导商量让高尚找朋友卖一部分房子，一部分款退钱，一部分还地钱。
2005年4月19日，市容局(甲方)与一名姓名为黎辉的人士(乙方)签订《购房转让协议》，称“经市容局集体购房职工同意，甲方将原集体购房有偿转让给乙方”。其中规定，900万元的总房款，“乙方按500元／m2预付，计总预付款人民币伍佰万元，签订本协议时乙方首付贰佰万元，余款叁佰万一月内付给甲方，剩余房款肆佰万元售房时逐步付清，剩余房款付给高尚作为地款。”
此时，环卫处的工人们听说集资房出问题，找到领导想退钱。据市容局的一位领导告诉中国青年报记者，“当时职工闹得很凶”。市容局党委最后找到高尚，要求高尚退回集资款。高尚则认为钱大多数都用来买地了，没办法退，可以等房子建好分房。
蹊跷被捕：询问笔录的日期早于被刑拘的时间1个月
然而这份协议签订的一个月后，即5月19日，高尚遭淮北市公安局传讯。当天上午8时左右，警察到环卫处找到高尚。
时任市容局局长吕剑告诉中国青年报记者，在索要退款无果的情况下，经该局党委会统一决定，向公安局报案高尚侵占集资款。
办案人员把高尚带到淮北市的口子宾馆，高尚对中国青年报记者讲述，“他们想让我认账，447万元是我挪用的。我不承认，就吵了起来。”
争吵一直持续到晚上。最后，案件承办人谢旭东出现，并拿出两份材料，一份是问话笔录，上面的时间是4月20日；另一份是提请批准逮捕书，落款时间为5月13日。
高尚回忆，当时谢旭东告诉他，这是领导安排的，我们也没办法，没有领导我们敢这么做吗？你最重要的是把证据保留下来，配合我们。
听了这些话后，高尚没有再申辩，“他让我在哪儿签字，我就在哪儿签字。我就一条没配合，当时问话的笔录我就签了5月20号。”
根据中国青年报记者得到的一份讯问笔录，时间为2005年4月20日，地点是淮北市口子宾馆，讯问人是谢旭东。这份笔录中，谢旭东主要询问了关于市容局职工集资建房的转款和李安祥的私章问题。高尚在笔录后签了名字和时间，为2005年5月20日。
淮北市公安局的《起诉意见书》载明，淮北市市容局的报案时间是2005年5月18日，立案进行侦查、犯罪嫌疑人归案和被刑拘时间均是2005年5月19日。
在中国青年报记者就此事向谢旭东进行证实时，遭他否认，“怎么可能，我弱智啊。你们不要这样说，这个案子受领导压迫什么的，根本没有这回事。胡扯。”
淮北市公安局以“犯罪嫌疑人高尚利用职务便利，挪用资金385.5217万元，特别巨大，其行为已触犯《中华人民共和国刑法》第272条第1款，涉嫌挪用资金罪”提请批捕。
在淮北市公安局经侦科，中国青年报记者向谢旭东询问挪用的385.5217万元数额是如何确认的，未得到回复，但他表示“钱都追回来了”。
仔细研究过《提请批准逮捕书》的北京大学法学院教授陈兴良说，其最大破绽在于该文书的正文载明：“犯罪嫌疑人高尚于2005年5月19日因涉嫌挪用资金罪被我局刑事拘留”。但该提请批准逮捕书的落款时间却是2005年5月13日。如果不是有官方的书面文本在手，简直不敢相信会有这种时间误差的存在。如果高尚确实是2005年5月19日被刑事拘留的，那么就是在其刑事拘留之前一周，提请批准逮捕书已经写好。这些情况给本案蒙上了一层神秘色彩，不由得使我相信高尚所述，本案确实是因为领导干预而做成的案件。
随后高尚被转到淮北市第二看守所，直到一审判决无罪当庭释放，高尚在这里度过了1年零4个月的时间。被拘在淮北市第二看守所的时候，高尚不停地提出抗议，“查号的时候抗议，只要有人经过就抗议”。
孟宪君：“无罪怎么起诉？”
2005年6月1日，淮北市人民检察院批准将高尚依法逮捕。7月18日，市公安局发出《起诉意见书》，相较《提请批准逮捕书》，意见书的涉案金额扩大为全部集资款，为“犯罪嫌疑人高尚利用职务之便，挪用资金444万元，侵占资金3万元”；罪名也增至“挪用资金罪、职务侵占罪”两项。
其中，意见书中一句“高尚刻了李安祥私章”，是此案的一个关键点。
案件提交市检察院后，9月14日，市检察院指令相山区人民检察院负责此案，孟宪君曾是公诉检察科科长，当时退居二线，被选为此案的公诉人。
9月15日，孟宪君和公诉检察科科长朱汉典前往看守所提审高尚。“朱科长当时首先问了一句‘你可认罪？’”孟宪君对中国青年报记者回忆，“高尚没说话，朱把桌子一拍，‘老实交代，你把那几百万元弄到哪里去了？’”
高尚不认罪，随后和朱汉典吵了起来。“没法审了，进行不下去，我们就回去了”，孟宪君说。孟宪君回去后开始考虑，为什么高尚那么强硬地认为自己无罪。于是他仔细翻阅案卷，“头一个月我看不明白，至少提审了三次以上我才弄明白”。
在弄清楚几个协议之后，孟宪君觉得高尚无罪，“地应该是他的，地款他是合法取的。”根据公安局提出的巨大数额的指控，孟宪君觉得难办，想交回市检察院办，“我个人也不想办，当时已经认为无罪，但必须经过市检察院同意无罪，才能放人。”
他得到市检察院的回复，依然由他查办，市检察院“希望把这个案件消化在淮北”。他将无罪的意见向区检察院汇报，区检察院检察委员会也一致认为无罪，之后由分管院长和科长向市检察院作了汇报，最终同意无罪意见。
无罪的程序准备好后，突然有一天，孟宪君被检察长叫去，说市检察院来电话，要求对高尚案件进行起诉。
“我说怎么起诉？无罪就算错案啊？而且这是我们检委会的一致意见，怎么起诉？”孟宪君存疑，他得到的回答是市委某领导说了无罪也要起诉。
中国青年报记者在向时任检察长与检察委员会的数名成员就此进行核实时，多名检察官均表示“年代久远，记不得了”。
准备起诉之后，怎么写起诉书让孟宪君犯难，当时其他人提意见按公安局的起诉意见书抄，“抄也不对，他们定的是440万元，我们也不能太离谱啊，和公安局要有区别”，最后算出有86万元没有追回，起诉书上写了个“尚有86万余元被高尚个人占用”。
相山区人民检察院于2006年3月24日将高尚案件起诉到相山区人民法院，此时距高尚遭检察院批捕已经过去了10个月。
起诉书结论模糊，并没明确高尚的犯罪数额，只笼统地指控了罪名。
“被告人高尚利用工作职务便利，侵占单位资金数额较大，挪用单位资金数额巨大，其行为涉嫌触犯《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百七十一条、第二百七十二条，犯罪事实清楚，证据确实、充分，应以职务侵占罪、挪用资金罪追究其刑事责任。”
此外，起诉书中提出，“高尚用其私下刻制的‘李安祥’印章和环卫处行政公章，在市建行设立职工购房集资款专用账户。”
与高尚同在市容局基建办的职工王毅和尚云鹏均否认了印章为高尚私刻的说法。
王毅告诉中国青年报记者，“‘李安祥’印章是2004年3月，李安祥指示我拿着他的身份证和高尚一起去刻制的。”尚云鹏则表示，“这个章是正大光明出现的，而且在很多地方都用了，已经合法化了。这么大的事情他能不知道吗？”
一审无罪，二审有罪
一审最终开了3次庭，于2006年9月8日作出判决。判决书就高尚的身份、集资款项的定性、私刻印章和转款行为作出说明。
判决书指出，“高尚的身份与其说是市容局的职工，不如说是集资建房这一经济活动中的土地方或土地方的代理人。高尚作为土地方，与集资方市容局是双方平等的民事主体，并不存在隶属关系”以及“444万元是建房款”，以高尚的行为不构成挪用资金罪和职务侵占罪最终判处高尚无罪。
孟宪君和高尚都清楚记得一审法庭的上一个情节，在分别对中国青年报记者的讲述中，他们均提到。孟宪君说：“在庭上有些矛盾的证据，法官问这些矛盾证据怎么排除？我说我不知道。法官问86万怎么来的，我说领导定的。”
法院宣判无罪后，高尚被当庭释放。
法院宣判后，孟宪君松了一口气，“一审判决的抗诉权在市检察院，我们无权提起抗诉。我们当时还说算过了这关了，法院把握得不错”。他没有料到市检察院会要求抗诉。“判决之后第9天，我们的分管检察长叫我过去，说市检察院要抗诉，就剩一天了，你抓紧。”
提起抗诉后，二审开庭。孟宪君首先例行公事将抗诉书念了一遍。审判长齐敦全问是不是有什么新的证据，孟宪君回答没有。齐又问，没有证据你起诉什么，抗诉什么。孟宪君没有讲话。
这次庭审的结果是高尚被改判有罪，淮北市中级人民法院以挪用资金罪的罪名判处高尚有期徒刑三年，缓刑五年。
二审没有新的证据，而是完全根据一审提供的事实与证据得出结论。
判决书显示：“高尚在担任淮北市市容局基建办负责人期间，私刻市容局分管基建办的副局长李安祥的个人印章，利用职务便利，挪用由淮北市市容局和图南公司的共同管理的职工集体购房款360万元，案发后，追回288.9216万元，尚有71.0784万元未能追回。该事实有经一审当庭举证、质证的证据证实，本院予(以)确认。”
孟宪君对判决结果不解，“二审法院判决高尚有罪根本没有证据，判决的360万元远超我们抗诉的86万元！”
对于高尚案一审结果与二审结果的差异，北京大学刑法学教授陈兴良有一个观点，“有罪判决无须讲理，无罪判决才需讲理。”
陈兴良为此案专门写了份手记，他指出，二审判决确认了原一审判决所认定的全部案情，并认为事实清楚，证据充分。二审判决书的前面部分完全重复了一审判决书的认定，只是在其判决的最后一页，以“另查明”开头，对高尚作出了有罪认定。“二审判决改判高尚有罪，并无事实与法律根据，而且也没有展开说理。”
陈兴良与中国政法大学刑事司法学院教授阮齐林等5位专家对此进行研讨，最后的结论是：“本案所涉事实属于经济纠纷，不应加以刑事制裁。高尚的行为不构成犯罪，应该通过审判监督程序加以纠正。”
时任二审审判长齐敦全在接受中国青年报记者采访时表示：“一切都是按照法定程序走的，这个判决既然作出了就具有法律效力。如果有异议，就通过法律渠道申诉。”另一位检察官则称：“案子正在省人民检察院申诉阶段，已经交给省检察院，我们没有权力对此发表意见。”
在接受采访的相关当事人中，谢旭东的态度最为明确。回答中国青年报记者的询问时，他高声说道：“我要是不认为有罪不会逮捕他，法院不认为有罪也不会判他。我们这个公安机关办案都是依法办案。”
此后，他又更加激动：“我跟你讲，司法腐败就腐败在这里，好多人，检察官都跟这些，不想说了，都跟这些犯罪分子混在一起了，本来有罪被说成无罪，知不知道？”
孟宪君对此不屑，他表示与高尚无任何个人利益关系：“判定高尚挪用资金360万元之巨，却可适用缓刑，并可保留工作、原工薪待遇，并且违法超越抗诉指控范围判决，这是二审法院应有的判决吗？”
本报安徽淮北11月21日电
相关文章：
七年申诉路
二审判决后，高尚不服，便开始申诉。淮北中院驳回了高尚的申诉。
随后他又申诉到安徽省高级人民法院。几个月后，省高院通知不予立案。
这期间，高尚找到最高人民检察院主管的《方圆法治》的记者，记者向安徽省高院询问不立案的原因。之后省高院打了电话给高尚，说第二天就立案，并委托淮北中院复查报结果。
不出意料，高尚得到的又是一个驳回申诉通知。
《方圆法治》还采访了孟宪君。这次采访后，高尚对孟宪君的态度发生了变化，“我原来的印象，是他明知我无罪还故意这样做。采访之后我知道他是明知无罪也没有要故意陷害我，是权力压迫的结果”。
他主动找到孟宪君，说：“你应该帮我主持正义。”
孟宪君态度鲜明，对高尚说：“我们检察院一直认为你无罪，我也是认为你无罪的，如果你遇到什么困难的话，我以一个老检察官的身份，一个当事公诉人的身份，给你主持正义。”
此后，孟宪君和高尚联系多了，高尚在每次申诉中遇到困难，都会告诉孟宪君，咨询他的意见。
高尚在报纸上还看到被称为“傅青天”的检察官，叫傅延华，于是慕名去枣庄找他。“我把案情介绍给他听，他不相信，说你把材料给我，我研究研究。”
过了一段时间，傅延华告诉高尚说案件已经审查完毕，“确认了我没有任何犯罪事实”。傅延华随后联络了其他5位全国人大代表在2012年3月全国两会期间向最高人民法院提出了《关于申请要求对高尚案件再审的建议》。
这份建议随后被转到最高人民法院办公厅督办。2012年5月4日，申诉材料交至最高人民法院申诉立案一庭，6月14日，最高法立案复查。但高尚最终收到了驳回通知书。
高尚仍没有放弃。2013年年初，他到北京找到法学专家，北京大学法学院陈兴良教授是他找到的第一个法学专家，陈兴良对高尚的案件进行了深入细致的研究，指出此案二审是“不告而理，不审而判”。
陈兴良认为高尚案件的“申诉几乎走到头了，再想翻案难乎其难”，因为“这个案件从基层法院的一审，到中级法院的二审，再到高级法院的申诉驳回，最后是最高法院的申诉驳回，已经走完了我们国家的四个审级”。
中国政法大学教授阮齐林同样不乐观：“这个案件有一个后遗症，要判他无罪的话还要还地，怎么赔损失，谁也不敢说什么法律了，承担不起。”
不仅如此，高尚还找到了淮北市人民检察院的人民监督员，把案件材料送给了9名人民监督员。淮北市古代雕塑艺术馆馆长马高、淮北市著名慈善家彭庆英等4位人民监督员签名将此事提报市检察院、省检察院与最高检，“建议检察院履行监督职能启动再审程序重新审理”。
马高告诉中国青年报记者：“当时高尚带了一大摞材料送到博物馆，我看了很久，觉得这起案件是民事纠纷，和刑事案件扯不上关系。”
马高等监督员在研究材料后邀请了一些淮北市的法律专业人士研讨，并约谈了高尚和孟宪君，然后起草了一份《高尚刑事案件情况反映及建议》。
“我要把一些疑点和认为不正确的地方报告给各级领导”，马高说。
高尚在看守所的一年零4个月里，住的是一间大监室，一般常有十七八人，多的时候有20多人。监室里是一张水泥砌的大通铺，上面能睡10来人，另外的人睡地板。高尚说他从来没睡过地板，“可能我进去一身正气，大家都比较让我”。
有一天早晨放风，监室的电视里正在播神舟六号发射，看守所的上空飘着一团团白色的云彩，高尚的心情尤其低落，“这个案子本身是个错案，根本不应该有，但是我迟迟出不去”。
如今缓刑期已过，高尚依旧不放弃每一个可能得到平反的机会。“我为什么对这个案件这么执着，坚持到底？中间他们说要谈判，可以帮我把土地追回来，我都不接受。既然是司法体制造成的，那我就要通过司法体制来解决。”
(原标题：退休检察官向最高检举报自己办错案)
赞