Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/26 9:08:05 “Micro-Bo v“ Yu Jinyong committed contract fraud trial jailed 11
Xinhuanet, Beijing, November 26 (reporter)-Haidian District people's Court in Beijing on 26th morning to "micro-Bo v" Yu-Jin Yong contract fraud case judgment of the first instance found Yu Jinyong committed contract fraud, sentenced to 11 years ' imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 yuan, deprived of political rights for two years, and ordered restitution was killed 52 Yuan of economic loss. 20,000 yuan.
Identified by the hearing of the Court, in March 2003, defendant Yu Jinyong Kay loves investments limited on behalf of Beijing signed with the Liangshan County of Shandong province people's Government, Liang Shankai loves international high-tech industrial parks development and management contracts, according to contract, the County Government will provide land 1500 acres, Beijing loving company plans a total investment of 1 billion yuan of investment. In May of the same year, Yu Jinyong not implemented under funding sources, does not meet the tender conditions, the fictional Liang Shankai love industrial park project bidding, Beijing loving investments limited on behalf of the published tender notices and buy bids and a deposit is charged by Beijing zhongke soft science and technology company limited to RMB 52. 20,000 yuan.
Due to doubts on bidding and tendering procedures, repeatedly asked Yu Jinyong returned the said sum of zhongke soft AG, Yu Jinyong zhongke soft AG won the bid without formally constitutes a breach of the contract signed within the statutory time limit for informing China soft AG a deposit had been confiscated. In September 2004, soft stock company made a report to police. On July 13, 2012, the Yu-Yu Jinyong tiantongyuan in Changping District in Beijing shop was tracked him down, money is not restitution.
Court identified in Liangshan hi-tech industrial park project, the land covered by the project will not only of the seven connections and one leveling criteria were not met, even related to land expropriation procedures have failed to effectively implement, simply do not have the basis for further development of the project. Yu Jinyong is known as multiple sources are actually implemented. From the available evidence, Yu Jinyong and his defenders called the bidding, bid evaluation and calibration procedures do not exist.
The Court found that Yu Jinyong knowing themselves and their company does not have a corresponding investment capacity, and Liangshan County Government signed an investment agreement, under operation Liangshan hi-tech industrial park project in the name of fictitious bid by means of fraudulent claims being made bids and bid bond illegal for personal gain, which acts in full conformity with the constitutive elements of crime of contract fraud, made the above verdict according to the law.
新华网北京11月26电（记者涂铭）北京市海淀区人民法院26日上午对“微博大Ｖ”禹晋永合同诈骗一案作出一审判决，认定禹晋永犯合同诈骗罪，判处有期徒刑十一年、罚金人民币十万元、剥夺政治权利二年，并责令其退赔被害单位经济损失人民币52．2万元。
法院经审理查明，2003年3月，被告人禹晋永以北京凯爱投资有限公司名义与山东省梁山县人民政府签订《梁山凯爱国际高科技工业园区投资开发经营合同书》，根据合同约定，县政府提供土地使用权1500亩，北京凯爱投资有限公司计划总投资人民币10亿元。同年5月，禹晋永在没有落实资金来源、不符合招投标条件的情况下，虚构梁山凯爱工业园项目招投标的事实，以北京凯爱投资有限公司的名义发布招标公告，并以购买标书款和投标保证金为由收取北京中科软科技股份有限公司人民币52．2万元。
因对招标主体和招标程序产生怀疑，中科软股份公司多次要求禹晋永返还上述款项，禹晋永则以中科软股份公司中标后未在法定期限内签署正式合同构成违约为由，告知中科软股份公司投标保证金已被依法没收。2004年9月，中科软股份公司向公安机关报案。2012年7月13日，禹晋永在北京市昌平区天通苑中宇修理厂被抓获归案，现赃款未退赔。
法院同时查明，在梁山高科技工业园区项目中，项目所涉土地不但未达到七通一平的标准，就连相关土地的征收手续都未能有效落实，该项目根本不具备进一步开发的基础。禹晋永号称的多种资金来源也都没有实际落实。从现有证据看，禹晋永及其辩护人所谓的招标、评标、定标过程并不存在。
法院认为，禹晋永明知自己及其公司并不具有相应的投资能力，仍与梁山县政府签订投资协议，假借运作梁山高科技工业园区项目为名，采用虚构项目招标的手段骗取被害单位的标书款和投标保证金非法占为己有，其行为完全符合合同诈骗罪的犯罪构成，故依法作出上述判决。
赞