Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/27 9:14:46 Court responses to “Li Tianyi said at the time his mother calls“ reasons
Upheld based on what? --The presiding judge in response to rapes five people five focus
Xinhuanet, Beijing, November 27 (reporter)-Beijing's first intermediate people's Court on 27th to rape cases such as Li to make the Court of Final Appeal ruled that decision dismissed the appeal and upheld the. After the sentencing, presiding judge in the case Li Jihong, ne bis in idem five focus questions of public concern, answered Xinhua's questions.
Focus: why are there no semen found that Lee can still finds rape?
Presiding judge: by trial identified, Lee x, five per capita has confessed themselves and victims occurred sexual relationship, in investigation organ has for referred to see other meanwhile people and victims occurred sexual relationship, and more name trial accused per capita stable for said, Lee x, and King a on victims implementation had fan hit, and kick kick, violence acts, above for referred to not only and victims of statement mutual confirms, and has witnesses Lee a, testimony, and Hubei building monitoring video, and exhibits identification views, put on supporting. Although forensic forensic does not detect semen, but whether ejaculation and semen was detected were not of rape only basis.
In addition, the confessions and other trial the defendant in court to testify, victim statements and witness Lee confirmed that Lee heard the facts and descriptions of evidence clearly and certainly proved that Lee first sexual relations with the victim.
Our criminal law clearly stated that rape refers to the violation of women will, using violence, threats or other means, acts of forced sex with women. Five people in the case of violation of the victim's wishes, using violent means to force sexual relations with the victim, clearly constitute rape, evidence is enough to identify.
Focus two: so why Yang has been the victim failed to appear in court, are you sure there is prostitution problem?
Presiding judge: on the question of Yang in court the victim in the case, by this notice, which clearly indicated that he did not appear in court, basis relating to the application of People's Republic of China criminal law interpretation of the 188th of the article provides that: "the victim, agent ad litem by summons or notice does not appear, do not affect the trial, the people's Court trial". Full view, victims Yang has made a number of stable State and to the judiciary has been transferred in the record, are notified by the Court but have not appeared, does not affect the trial, so you can continue to sit.
On the question of the existence of prostitution, a collegial Panel considered, in this case there was no evidence that the victim was active with Lee on a voluntary basis, such as sexual intercourse or prostitution to five people five people. As to whether the victim and the bar staff and Lee to contact his family, belonging to the subsequent conduct, does not affect the victims ' subjective intention at the time of the incident finds that.
Focus three: alleged, the appellant submitted a number of new evidence, including new video evidence, why have not found?
Presiding judge: according to the Supreme People's Court on the application of People's Republic of China criminal procedure law No. 203 of the interpretation of the provisions of articles: "the prosecution application for the attendance of witnesses to testify, present evidence, and shall specify the names, sources and evidence intended to prove that fact. The Court considers necessary, shall give its permission; the other objections, because the evidence is not relevant to the case or the apparent duplication, unnecessary, the court having examined all the objections set up, can refuse to permit. ”
The Court of second instance court trial, appellant's counsel to apply to the Court to produce multiple copies of the alleged video evidence, which prosecutors have objected, arguing that the case has no direct relevance. Full review by the law, the opposition set up, so the defenders applied for production of evidence shall not be permitted.
Focus four: Li called out to meet his mother when the crime was committed, but didn't participate in the rape, in this regard, the Court finds it?
Presiding judge: LEE mentioned in Hubei building, room phones, then go out and pick up the grounds for appeal, claimed in the Court of first instance in Hubei building, room "playing phone later fell asleep" confessions do not coincide, are incompatible with other confessions of co-accused, and has no opportunity and conditions could not be ruled out. So, no reason to deny the facts involved in common crime.
Focus five: why the second trial lasted 13 hours?
Presiding judge: the Court of second instance in this case lasted 13 hours, in the course of the collegiate bench listened carefully and fully to the appellant, the trial of the accused, the legal representative, advocates, attorneys, solicitors, on the basis of respect for the wishes of the participants in the proceedings, the timing of recess in the Middle, ensures that the appellant, the trial of the defendant and other participants in the proceedings a legitimate need. Trial duration is long, just goes to show the Court the attention and protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties.
维持原判依据何在？——审判长回应李某某等五人强奸案五大焦点
新华网北京11月27日电(记者 涂铭) 北京市第一中级人民法院27日对李某某等人强奸案作出终审宣判，裁定驳回上诉，维持原判。宣判结束后，该案审判长李纪红就社会关注的二审五个焦点问题，回答了新华社记者的提问。
焦点一：为什么没有发现李某某的精斑仍可以认定构成强奸？
审判长：经审理查明，李某某等五人均曾供认自己与被害人发生性关系，在侦查机关也曾供述看到其他同案人与被害人发生性关系，并且多名原审被告人均稳定供称，李某某、王某对被害人实施过扇打、踢踹等暴力行为，上述供述不仅与被害人的陈述相互印证，而且有证人李某等证言、湖北大厦监控录像、物证鉴定意见等在案佐证。虽然法医物证鉴定没有检测到李某某的精斑，但是否射精和检测出精斑并非认定强奸的唯一依据。
此外，综合其他原审被告人的供述及当庭指证，被害人陈述，以及证人李某证实事后从李某某口中听到的事实描述等证据，明确且稳定地证明了李某某第一个与被害人发生性关系的事实。
我国刑法明确规定，强奸是指违背妇女意志，使用暴力、胁迫或者其他手段，强行与妇女发生性关系的行为。李某某等五人在违背被害人意愿的情况下，使用暴力手段强行与被害人发生性关系，构成强奸罪的事实清楚，证据充分，足以认定。
焦点二：被害人杨某某为什么一直没能出庭，是否确实存在嫖娼问题？
审判长：关于本案被害人杨某某出庭问题，经本院通知，其明确表示不出庭，依据《关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》第188条第一款的规定：“被害人、诉讼代理人经传唤或者通知未到庭，不影响开庭审理的，人民法院可以开庭审理”。合议庭认为，被害人杨某某此前曾向司法机关做过多次稳定陈述且已移送在案，现经法院通知而未到庭，并不影响开庭审理，因此可以继续开庭。
关于是否存在卖淫嫖娼问题，合议庭认为，本案没有任何证据证明被害人是主动自愿地与李某某等五人发生性关系或向五人卖淫。至于被害人及酒吧人员是否与李某某家属联系，属于事后行为，不影响对事发时被害人主观意愿的认定。
焦点三：据称，上诉人提交了多项新证据，包括新的视频证据，为什么都没有认定？
审判长：根据最高人民法院《关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》第203条之规定：“控辩双方申请证人出庭作证，出示证据，应当说明证据的名称、来源和拟证明的事实。法庭认为有必要的，应当准许；对方提出异议，认为有关证据与案件无关或者明显重复、不必要，法庭经审查异议成立的，可以不予准许。”
二审法院庭审中，上诉人的辩护人向法庭申请出示多份所谓视频证据，对此检察员均提出异议，认为与本案不具有直接的关联性。合议庭经依法审查，认为异议成立，因此对辩护人申请出示上述证据，不予准许。
焦点四：李某某称在案发时出去接其母电话而没有参与强奸，对此，法院如何认定？
审判长：李某某所提其在湖北大厦房间里玩手机、后来出去接电话的上诉理由，与其在一审法院庭审中称自己在湖北大厦房间“玩手机后来就睡着了”的供述不相吻合，与其他同案人的供述不符，且不能排除其没有作案时间和条件。所以，不能因此而否定李某某参与共同犯罪的客观事实。
焦点五：为什么二审开庭持续了13个小时？
审判长：本案二审庭审前后持续了13个小时，其间合议庭认真、充分地听取了上诉人、原审被告人、法定代理人、辩护人、检察员、诉讼代理人的意见，在尊重诉讼参与人意愿的基础上，中途适时安排了休庭，保证了上诉人、原审被告人及其他诉讼参与人的正当需求。庭审持续时间较长，恰恰说明法院对当事人合法权益的重视与保障。
赞