Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)qq
published in(发表于) 2013/11/27 9:20:02
Li Tian the second instance upheld the rape， their guardians or continue to complaint

Beijing authorities wide nets, November 27 (reporters Sun Ying), according to voice of the Yonge-Canton news, this morning in Beijing first intermediate people's Court sentenced Li and four other men raped in public according to law the appeal case.

French Open microblogging according to Beijing, the Beijing Municipal first intermediate people's Court in open court sentenced appellant in the 27th, at 9 o'clock in the morning in the West, Wang and the trial the defendant Wei Lee (brother), x, Wei Zhang (younger brother) appeal a case of rape. Lee and four other men rape appeal by dismissing the appellant's appeal of the second instance, maintaining the verdict of first instance sentenced to 10 years. Plenum at the end are combined with trial and sentencing verdict and trial of the accused juvenile appeals court education.

During the course of the second case, Lee appeals the applications submitted to the Tribunal to obtain evidence again at the trial have been dismissed by the Court of second instance. Maintenance after the verdict, defendant appellant Wang still to be executed to 2 years ' imprisonment and deprived of political rights for 2 years, Wei, sentenced to 4 years, 3 years of imprisonment suspended for 5 years, Wei, sentenced to 3 years probation 3 years, so Lee will perform to 10 years ' imprisonment.

Throughout the course of case reports, Lee's lawyer has also mentioned that if the second trial to maintain the first-instance judgment, verdict guilty, Lee, Lee guardians is likely to appeal. However, in accordance with the provisions of the criminal procedure law of our country, is the second Court of final appeal in criminal cases, but if the appellant has a new situation still appeals, legal rights.

For part of the trial in the present case the defendant's criminal record should be sealed according to the law, Beijing's first intermediate people's Court under the Supreme People's Court on the application of < People's Republic of China criminal law > interpretation of the relevant provisions of Article No. 487, failing to organize personnel to observe this sentence also did not disclose the relevant material.

(Original title: rape in second instance upheld Lee Meng Ge or continued complaints)

　　央广网北京11月27日消息(记者 孙莹) 据中国之声《央广新闻》报道，今天上午北京市第一中级人民法院依法公开宣判李某某等五人强奸上诉一案。

　　据京法网事微博，北京市第一中级人民法院于27日上午9时在西中法庭公开宣判上诉人李某某、王某及原审被告人魏某某(兄)、张某某、魏某某(弟)强奸上诉一案。李某某等五人强奸上诉一案二审裁定驳回上诉人的上诉，维持一审原判有期徒刑10年。宣判结束后合议庭正在结合审判情况及判决结果对未成年上诉人和原审被告人进行法庭教育。

　　在二审的案件审理整个过程中，李某某上诉方所提交法庭重新调取证据的申请在庭审时已被二审法院驳回。维持判决结果出来后，被告人即上诉人王某仍要执行有期徒刑2年，剥夺政治权利2年，魏某某有期徒刑4年，张某某有期徒刑3年缓期5年，魏某某有期徒刑3年，缓刑3年，李某某将执行有期徒刑10年。

　　在整个案件报道过程中，李某某的代理律师也曾提到如果二审维持一审判决，依然判决李某某有罪的话，李某某的监护人有可能还要进行申诉。但是按照我们国家的刑事诉讼法的规定，刑事案件是二审终审制，但是如果上诉人有新的情况还要继续申诉的，法律也是维护权利。

　　因本案部分原审被告人的犯罪记录依法应予封存，故北京市第一中级人民法院根据最高人民法院《关于适用<中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法>的解释》第487条的相关规定，未组织人员旁听本次宣判，也没有公布相关的材料。

(原标题：李某某强奸案二审维持原判 梦鸽或继续申诉)

赞