Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/27 9:20:11 Li Tianyi five rape cases such as the Court of Final Appeal upheld
Five rape cases such as Lee today, the Court of final appeal judgement
The morning of November 27, 2013, the Beijing Municipal first intermediate people's Court (hereinafter referred to as the Beijing intermediate people's Court) in the West Court rape appeal to Lee and four other people in a two-sentence, the Court of final appeal ruling rejected an appeal and upheld.
Five rape cases such as Li, Beijing Haidian District people's Court in the judgement of first instance September 26, 2013, or his legal representative and co-accused Lee Wang appealed against the appeal. Beijing intermediate people's Court on October 11, 2013 accepted the case according to the law, because the part of the appellant and the trial of the accused is under 18 years of age and personal, collegial panel composed of a Beijing intermediate people's Court according to law on November 19, the court case was closed. Attorneys, the appellant, the trial of the accused, legal representatives, advocates and solicitors in Court of the victims took part in the proceedings and fully expressed their views. In the course of the trial, the Beijing intermediate people's Court in strict accordance with the law, adequately protect the litigation rights of the participants in the proceedings.
On November 27, 2013, the Beijing intermediate people's Court in the case law of the Court in the West open to the second sentence. For part of the trial in the present case the defendant's criminal record should be sealed according to the law, so the Court under the Supreme People's Court on the application < People's Republic of China criminal law > explain the relevant provisions of Article No. 487 of, failing to organize the workers attending the sentencing.
The plenum reviewed the entire case file material, cited in the judgment of the first instance found five guilty of the crime of rape evidence such as audited to confirm, that judgments of first instance found that the facts are clear, the evidence is true and sufficient, according to the second referee.
Intermediate people's Court in Beijing believed that appellant, Wang and the trial the defendant Wei Lee (brother), x, Wei Zhang (younger brother) against women will, using violent means, forced sexual relations with women, grave violations of women's human rights, their acts constitute the crime of rape and gang rape, shall be punished according to law.
A trial court around Lee x, five people whether and victims occurred has sexual relationship, and whether on victims implementation has violence acts, and and victims occurred sexual relationship whether contrary to victims wishes, and crime facts is closely related to of problem for has strictly of review, in determines not exists illegal evidence, program sexual illegal problem of based Shang, integrated five people clear specific and mutual confirms of guilty for referred to and the victims statement, and witnesses testimony, and exhibits identification views, and monitoring video, evidence material formed of full evidence chain, can excluded reasonable suspected. A trial court according to Lee x, five people common implementation rape crime of facts, and nature and the for social of against degree, integrated consider full case situation and the Lee x, five people of specific crime plot, according to wide Yen phase Chai of criminal policy, spirit conducive to minor criminals of education and correction principles, made of sentences finds facts clearly, evidence does, and full, conviction and the applies legal correctly, sentencing appropriate, trial program legitimate, should to maintained. The appellant and counsel's presentation of the facts unclear, evidence insufficient, punishment is too heavy, the grounds of appeal and defence, the lack of factual and legal basis and legally inadmissible. In accordance with the People's Republic of China criminal procedure law No. 225, paragraph (a), of the Beijing intermediate people's Court rejected the appeal and upheld the Court of final appeal ruling. (NET by@ @ Beijing first intermediate people's Court of Beijing municipality)
Related news: rape trial Lee was sentenced to ten years
According to the Beijing court official Micro-Blog "Beijing-French Open" message, Beijing Haidian District Court on September 26 accused Lee and four other open sentencing on the rape case. Defendant Lee guilty of rape, sentenced to ten years.
李某某等五人强奸案今日终审宣判
2013年11月27日上午，北京市第一中级人民法院(以下简称北京一中院)在西中法庭对李某某等五人强奸上诉一案进行二审宣判，终审裁定驳回上诉，维持原判。
李某某等五人强奸一案，由北京市海淀区人民法院于2013年9月26日作出一审判决，李某某及其法定代理人和同案人王某不服提出上诉。北京一中院于2013年10月11日依法立案受理，因该案部分上诉人及原审被告人不满十八周岁且涉及个人隐私，北京一中院依法组成合议庭于11月19日对该案进行了不公开开庭审理。检察员、上诉人、原审被告人、法定代理人、辩护人及被害人的诉讼代理人等到庭参加了诉讼，并充分发表了意见。在案件审理过程中，北京一中院严格按照法律规定，充分保障了诉讼参与人的诉讼权利。
2013年11月27日，北京一中院在西中法庭依法对该案公开进行了二审宣判。因本案部分原审被告人的犯罪记录依法应予封存，故法院根据最高人民法院《关于适用<中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法>的解释》第487条的相关规定，未组织人员旁听宣判。
合议庭审查了全案卷宗材料，对一审判决中所列举的认定李某某等五人犯强奸罪的证据经审核予以确认，认为一审判决书认定的事实清楚，证据确实、充分，依法作出了二审裁判。
北京一中院认为，上诉人李某某、王某及原审被告人魏某某(兄)、张某某、魏某某(弟)违背妇女意志，采用暴力手段，强行与妇女发生性关系，严重侵犯了妇女的人身权利，其行为均已构成强奸罪，且系轮奸，依法均应惩处。
一审法院围绕李某某等五人是否与被害人发生了性关系、是否对被害人实施了暴力行为、与被害人发生性关系是否违背被害人意愿等与犯罪事实密切相关的问题进行了严格的审查，在确定不存在非法证据等程序性违法问题的基础上，综合五人明确具体且相互印证的有罪供述及被害人陈述、证人证言、物证鉴定意见、监控录像等证据材料形成的完整证据链条，能够排除合理怀疑。一审法院根据李某某等五人共同实施强奸犯罪的事实、性质及对于社会的危害程度，综合考虑全案情况及李某某等五人的具体犯罪情节，根据宽严相济的刑事政策，本着有利于未成年罪犯的教育和矫正原则，作出的刑事判决认定事实清楚，证据确实、充分，定罪及适用法律正确，量刑适当，审判程序合法，应予维持。上诉人及辩护人提出的事实不清、证据不足、量刑过重等上诉理由及辩护意见，缺乏事实及法律依据，依法不予采纳。依照《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第二百二十五条第一款第(一)项的规定，北京一中院作出了驳回上诉，维持原判的终审裁定。(@京法网事 by@北京市第一中级人民法院)
相关新闻：李某某犯强奸罪一审被判十年
据北京法院网官方微博“京法网事”消息，北京海淀法院9月26日上午对被告人李某某等五人强奸一案进行公开宣判。被告人李某某犯强奸罪，判处有期徒刑十年。
赞