Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)qqpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/27 9:24:59 Yu Jinyong project 1 billion paper operations， insisted on a court jailed 11 innocent
-Reporter Huang Jie
Knowing that they do not have investment capacity, has signed a 1 billion dollar investment agreement with local governments, and then under project a fictional project tendering, tender and bid bond cheat murdered. The morning of November 26, "micro-Bo v" Yu-Jin Yong contract fraud in Beijing's Haidian District people's Court of first instance sentencing, the Court found Yu Jinyong committed contract fraud, sentenced to 11 years ' imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 yuan, deprived of political rights for two years, and ordered restitution was killed 522,000 yuan economic losses.
Without the approval of the project tender
In March 2003, Yu Jinyong love investments limited on behalf of Beijing Kay signed with the Government of Liangshan County, Shandong province, Liang Shankai loves the international high-tech industrial parks development and management contracts, agreed by kaiai investment company invested RMB 1 billion yuan to develop Liangshan projects of high-tech industrial park, Liangshan County kaiai 1500 acres of land for the transfer of the Government investment company.
In May of the same year, in the above projects and land without legal approval, no follow-up funding, under conditions that do not comply with the tender conditions, Yu Jinyong kaiai published a tender notice on behalf of the investment firm, to Liangshan tenders for projects of high-tech industrial park.
China soft science and technology company limited was one of the bidders for this project, they participated in security monitoring, Internet Wi-Fi, and automated system with regard to the three bids, kaiai investment company three times into the tender and bid bond in the amount of 522,000 yuan. From June to July of the same year, the money was being raised are now available, and by August, Kay love investment company business license has been revoked without inspection.
Even so, Yu Jinyong did not stop the operation of the project. It did not fulfil its bid opening, bid assessment procedure cases, change to Beijing zhongke soft love Advisory Group Limited on behalf of the joint-stock company-winning notice is sent. Due to scepticism about the tender subjects and procedures, software companies have repeatedly asked Yu Jinyong returned payments, but Yu Jinyong's reply was, "because of the soft company won the bid after the statutory period to sign a formal contract already constitutes a breach of, bid security confiscated."
In September 2004, report to the public security authorities of China soft company. On July 13, 2012, Yu Jinyong was tracked him down.
1 billion paper-only operation of the project
"This is one of my projects have panned most incomplete. "The procuratorial organs on its allegations of contract fraud, Yu Jinyong challenged in court, has always said he was innocent.
Proceedings, the Court found that Yu Jinyong seemingly corresponds to one by one, offered by interlocking Liangshan hi-tech industrial park project files, but there are a lot of contradictions. For example, Kay love investment company file number and time reversal, partial file contents be inferred to Liangshan County approval report of the overall plan four months earlier than the overall plan itself. Not only that, but reply Liangshan county governments and subordinate departments, presenting the facts to the land clearance, construction land use planning permit for construction project planning permit for construction project for the card and, with the formal samples have a larger gap. What is more, Liangshan economic development zone Administrative Committee kaiai consultants for sale at bid price of the company's approval, even earlier than kaiai consultants was founded.
It can be seen that Yu Jinyong called Liangshan hi-tech industrial zone projects are just paper works. And signed a cooperation agreement, Yu Jinyong is going to Beijing registered companies by requiring economic development zone of Liangshan gave him authority to go through State-owned land use right certificates, and issued with a total amount of more than 193 million Yuan, Shandong province administrative fee invoice. But this invoice, Yu Jinyong does not pay only an IOU, until finally he had no money for investment. Receipts for this land and eventually Yu Jinyong in personal assets on behalf of the company's capital increase, so that its original Kay loves real estate company has invested 500,000 yuan billions worth of registered capital.
Court found that the lack of investment resources
It is understood that the so-called Liangshan projects of high-tech industrial park, covering the collection of land and related procedures have failed to effectively implement, there is no basis for further development. Yu Jin Yong is known as multiple sources are actually implemented, their personal and company assets investment totaling well below their commitments, or impossible to verify what it said were other financing methods, feasibility or not available at all.
In court, questioned for tendering procedures, Yu Jinyong had explained that "the project is discretionary agencies specifically responsible for", which will push all the responsibility to the Agency. But according to court on, Yu Jinyong and his defenders insisted that fulfilled the tendering procedures in accordance with law, it does not provide Kay love consultancy tenders, could not enumerate other units involved in the bid, cannot point out that specific time of bid opening, failed to specific members of the bid Committee and the bid award process. Even the defence important evidence that can prove that the bidding process – kaiai consultant company in October 2003 report to the economic development zone of Liangshan's bid for the record, the above issues were not clearly documented.
Therefore, the Court found that, from the perspective of existing evidence, Yu Jinyong and his defenders called the bidding, bid evaluation and calibration procedures do not exist. Yu Jinyong knowing themselves and their company does not have a corresponding investment capacity, and Liangshan County Government signed an investment agreement, under operation Liangshan hi-tech industrial park project in the name of fictitious bid by means of flat bids and bid bond cheat was killed illegally for himself, whose conduct has constituted the crime of contract fraud.
Beijing, November 26
(Original title: "the big v" Yu Jinyong for contract fraud trial sentenced)
□本报记者黄洁
明知自己不具有投资能力，仍与地方政府签订10亿元投资协议，然后假借项目运作虚构项目招标，骗取被害单位标书款和投标保证金。11月26日上午，“微博大V”禹晋永合同诈骗案在北京市海淀区人民法院一审宣判，法院认定禹晋永犯合同诈骗罪，判处其有期徒刑11年、罚金人民币10万元、剥夺政治权利两年，并责令其退赔被害单位经济损失人民币52.2万元。
项目未获审批即招标
2003年3月，禹晋永代表北京凯爱投资有限公司与山东省梁山县政府签订《梁山凯爱国际高科技工业园区投资开发经营合同书》，约定由凯爱投资公司投资人民币10亿元，用于开发梁山高科技工业园区项目，梁山县政府出让1500亩土地给凯爱投资公司使用。
同年5月，在上述项目及土地没有获得合法审批、没有落实资金来源，不符合招投标条件的情况下，禹晋永便以凯爱投资公司的名义发布了招标公告，对梁山高科技工业园区项目进行招标。
中科软科技股份有限公司是此项目招标的投标人之一，其参与了保安监控、Internet无线网络覆盖和楼宇自动系统等三个方面投标，为此向凯爱投资公司分三次汇入标书款和投标保证金共计人民币52.2万元。可同年6月至7月，上述钱款被陆续提现，而到了8月，凯爱投资公司因未年检而被吊销营业执照。
即使这样，禹晋永也没有停止项目的运作。其在根本没有履行开标、评标等程序的情况下，就换以北京凯爱投资顾问有限公司的名义向中科软股份公司发送了中标通知书。由于对招标主体和程序的怀疑，中科软公司多次要求禹晋永返还已付款项，可禹晋永的回复却是，“由于中科软公司中标后不在法定期限内签署正式合同，已经构成违约，投标保证金依法没收”。
2004年9月，中科软公司向公安机关报案。2012年7月13日，禹晋永被抓获归案。
10亿项目仅纸面运作
“这是我所经手的项目中手续最完备的一个。”对于检察机关对其合同诈骗的指控，禹晋永在法庭上表示异议，始终称自己无罪。
但是法院在审理过程中发现，禹晋永所提供的看似一一对应、环环相扣的梁山高科技工业园区项目文件，实则存在诸多矛盾。例如，凯爱投资公司的多份文件编号与时间颠倒，部分文件内容雷同，向梁山县报批总体规划方案的报告比总体规划方案本身还早了四个月。不仅如此，梁山县政府及下属部门的多份批复，对土地手续办理情况的表述与事实不符，建设用地规划许可证、建设工程规划许可证和建设工程开工证等均与正规样本有较大差距。更有甚者，梁山经济开发区管委会给凯爱顾问公司的关于对外发售标书价目表的批复，甚至比凯爱顾问公司的成立还要早。
由此可见，禹晋永所谓的梁山高科技工业园区项目仅仅是纸面运作。且签订合作协议后，禹晋永以要去北京注册公司为由，要求梁山经济开发区给他越权办理了国有土地使用权证，并为其开具了一张总金额为1.93亿余元的山东省行政事业性收费发票。但这张发票，禹晋永并未付款，只打了一张欠条，直到最后他也没有向开发区投资过一分钱。这个土地证和收据最终被禹晋永以个人资产的名义用于公司增资，从而使其原出资50万元的凯爱置业公司获得了上亿元的注册资本。
法院认定无投资能力
据了解，所谓的梁山高科技工业园区项目，所涉土地连相关的征收手续都未能有效落实，根本不具备进一步开发的基础。而禹晋永号称的多种资金来源也都没有实际落实，其个人及公司名下的资产总额远达不到其承诺的投资数额，其所称的其他融资方式要么无从查证，要么根本不具备可行性。
法庭上，对于招标程序的质疑，禹晋永曾解释说，“项目招标是全权委托代理公司具体负责的”，从而将责任全推给了代理公司。但据法院介绍，禹晋永及其辩护人虽坚称依法履行了招标程序，却无法提供凯爱顾问公司的标书、无法列举参与投标的其他单位、无法指出投标开标的具体时间、无法说明评标委员会的具体成员及评标决标的具体过程。即使是辩方认为能够证明招标过程的重要证据——凯爱顾问公司于2003年10月给梁山经济开发区的招投标备案报告，也没有对上述问题进行明确记载。
因此，法院认为，从现有证据看，禹晋永及其辩护人所谓的招标、评标、定标过程并不存在。禹晋永明知自己及其公司并不具有相应的投资能力，仍与梁山县政府签订投资协议，假借运作梁山高科技工业园区项目为名，采用虚构项目招标的手段骗取被害单位的标书款和投标保证金非法占为己有，其行为已经构成合同诈骗罪。
本报北京11月26日讯
(原标题：“大V”禹晋永因合同诈骗一审获刑)
赞