Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)hpmailerpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/28 8:38:27 Petition does not and cannot impede the judicial authority
Reform of the system for handling of the country's new Office held a press conference
Information Office of the State Council will be held on November 28, 2013 (Thursday) at 10 o'clock in the morning in the Office of the State Council information Office press release at a press conference, Deputy Director of the State Bureau for letters and calls Zhang Enxi, Deputy Director Li Gao introduction reform of the system for handling and answering a reporter's question.
China News Service Reporter:
Why should China establish a system of letters and calls? The petition system and what is the relationship of the judiciary? Letters and visits system will affect the judicial authority? How we intend to achieve integration into the petition system and judicial remedies? Thank you.
Zhang Enxi:
You have raised this question actually says the position and role of China's petition system problems. System is not unique to China, nor China, similar letters and visits system in ancient China, foreign as well. Korea nationals coming from the Commission, is that similar institutions reflect the petition dealing solely with the people of China; for example Japan Executive talk system is also true; in some countries of the European Union, the Ombudsman Commission, is also a system to do work; for example Russia, work of letters and calls Bureau of the Office of the President, but also to deal with letters from people. However, due to the different countries and different political systems, different ways of dealing with it. The petition system of our country, is from the 50 's of the last century building, the aim is to understand the people and the masses of party and Government provided an important window, also provide an important channel for the masses appeal. People have something to say, there are things to reflect to the Government, this is one way, of course, is not the only channel.
To effectively address the reasonable demands of the masses provides an important way, said the petition system is a democratic political system design of socialism with Chinese characteristics, reflected the rights of the people are the masters. Actually this system over the years in promoting democracy, understanding people and the masses and subject to supervision, the protection of interests has played an irreplaceable role, has become a basic work to promote social harmony and stability.
Meanwhile, the petition system of our country is integral part of the Socialist rule of law, the complaint reporting handling Office institutional settings, responsibilities, procedures, and rights and obligations of the complainant, are based on regulations for letters and calls, handling issues within the framework of the rule of law in accordance with the policy. Therefore, this is in line with the justice system. The difference is, with jurisdiction over the scope of acceptance and processing of letters and calls, legal effects are very different, especially after the reform of law-related work involved in a lawsuit petitioning, members are very concerned about this matter, and have asked a lot of questions, letters and complaints and judicial relationships more clearly. Deputy Director Li Gao specifically on reform of the law involved in a lawsuit, the petition system of work involved made it very clear. After the revolution the petition and judicial relations will become more clear. Overall, petition does not and cannot impede the judicial authority. Instead, by addressing the legitimate aspirations of the masses, both to resolve social conflicts and lessen pressure on the judiciary, but more conducive to establishing judicial authority.
Letters and calls are laws and judicial relief under channels, each with its own mandate, legal status, ways and means, the two go hand in hand in safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the masses, each plays an important role. Thank you.
(Edit: SN095)November 28, 2013 China NET(国家信访局:信访不会也不可能妨碍司法权威|信访|司法|权威_新闻资讯
国新办就信访工作制度改革情况举行新闻发布会
国务院新闻办公室定于2013年11月28日(星期四)上午10时在国务院新闻办新闻发布厅举行新闻发布会，请国家信访局副局长张恩玺、副局长李皋介绍信访工作制度改革情况，并答记者问。
中国新闻社记者：
中国为什么要建立信访制度？信访制度和司法的关系是什么？信访制度是否会影响到司法的权威？我们打算如何实现信访制度和司法救济的接轨？谢谢。
张恩玺：
你提出的这个问题实际上说的是中国信访制度的定位和作用的问题。其实信访制度不是中国独有的，也不是中国现在才有，类似的信访制度中国古代也有，外国也有。比如韩国就有国民苦衷委员会，就是类似中国专门受理群众信访反映问题的机构；比如日本有行政相谈制度，也是这样的；欧盟一些国家，有申诉专员委员会，也是一个制度，也是来做这些工作的；比如俄罗斯，有总统办公厅信访工作局，也是来处理民众的来信。不过由于国家不同，政治制度不同，处理的方式不同。至于我们国家的信访制度，是从上个世纪五十年代建立的，其目的就是为了党和政府了解民情、联系群众提供一个重要的窗口，也为群众反映诉求提供一个重要的渠道。民众有话要说，有事情要向政府反映，这就是一个渠道，当然不是唯一的渠道。
这就为有效解决群众合理诉求提供了一种重要的方式，可以说信访制度是具有中国特色社会主义的一项民主政治制度设计，体现了人民当家作主的权利。事实上这些年来这个制度在发扬民主、了解民情、联系群众、接受监督、维护权益等方面都发挥了不可替代的作用，已经成为促进社会和谐稳定的一项基础性工作。
同时，我们国家的信访制度也是社会主义法治的有机组成部分，信访工作机构的设置、职责、工作程序以及信访人的权利、义务等等，都是以信访条例为依据，信访问题的解决也是在法治的框架内依法按政策办事。因此，这与司法制度是一致的。不同的是，信访与司法在受理范围、办理方式、法律效果等方面有很大的不同，特别是在涉法涉诉信访工作改革之后，大家非常关心这件事情，也提了不少问题，信访与司法的关系就更加清晰。刚才李皋副局长专门就涉法涉诉、信访工作制度改革讲得很清楚。改革之后，信访和司法的关系会变得更加清晰。总的看，信访不会也不可能妨碍司法权威。相反，通过解决群众的合理诉求，既能化解社会矛盾，又能减轻司法压力，反而更有利于树立司法的权威。
信访与司法都是法律规定的救济渠道，各有各的职责任务，法律地位、方式方法，两者并行不悖，在维护群众合法权益方面，各自发挥着重要的作用。谢谢。
赞