Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)hpmailerpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/28 8:39:36 Starting next year， court judgments and will have full Internet access， the parties dealing with public
November 28 the Supreme Judicial public regulatory documents Conference held today, the Supreme People's Court spokesman Sun Jungong briefing, from January 1 next year, qualified judgments in 7th after the entry into force, by the previous provisions "may" to "shall" posting. And stressed that the parties dealing with the public, not on-line public approval, and set up a strict modified, replaced conditions and withdrawal procedures.
Supreme Court has issued the Supreme People's Court on advancing the opening of judicial opinions of the construction of the three platforms (hereinafter referred to as the views) and the Supreme People's Court on the Court's Internet publication of judgments and regulations (hereinafter referred to as the regulations). Among them, the regulations shall enter into force on January 1, 2014.
Sun military introduced, and 2010 provides under compared to, provides under of 15 a provisions main has following changes: a is will meet conditions of referee instruments Internet requires by "can" to "should"; II is will entered into force referee instruments "Internet approval" to "not Internet approval"; three is stressed party real open; four is requires Internet instruments in principle shall not modified, and replaced and withdrawn; five is clear China referee instruments network as levels Court instruments Internet of unified platform, should provides convenient of system, Easy access by public access and Internet access judgments.
Sun introduced military, mainly includes:
(A) ensure the comprehensiveness of court judgments released in Internet. Judgment documents is to host all trial activities, reflecting results of the trial, "justice." Ensure that the comprehensive judgment document released in Internet, contribute to meeting the public's legal right to, accept public supervision of Justice. To avoid selective announced the judgment document, article fourth of the rules expressly requested, in addition to 4 case, entry into force of the Court judgment documents should be published on the Internet.
(B) ensure the authenticity of judgment documents released by the people's Court on the Internet. The provisions of the sixth, tenth and 11th to ensure the authenticity of the judgment document published on the Internet explicitly requested: it was stressed that the parties dealing with the public. In addition to some specific cases, in the judgment document published on the Internet should be kept the real name or names of the parties, to meet the needs of public access to the real information. Second, to the consistency of the judgments and make a positive request. In accordance with the requirements of the provisions for the technical handling of content, publication of judgment documents should be served on the Internet. Third, lays down strict conditions of modification, replacement and withdrawal procedures. Apart from judgments and published on the Internet due to technical reasons outside of inconsistencies and served, and shall not be modified or replaced; there is no statutory grounds or for other special reasons shall not be withdrawn. Is really necessary to withdraw must be above the higher people's Court is responsible for the Internet publish the specialized review of judgments and decisions and judgments and network in China for withdrawal, and registration formalities.
(C) the effective protection of individual privacy rights and other personal information. For balance public informed right and party and he litigation participation people privacy and other personal information security Zhijian of interests relationship, provides under clear has for anonymous processing of three species situation: a is marriage family, and inherited disputes cases in the of party and statutory agent; II is criminal cases in the victims and statutory agent, and witnesses, and identification people; three is was sentenced three years prison following penalty and from criminal punishment, and not belonging to recidivism or recidivism of accused. Recidivists or habitual offenders accused of relatively large risk, real announced their name, to enhance public awareness.
The regulation also requires, to the home address of a natural person, means of communication, social security number, bank account number, personal information, such as health, information on minors, the bank accounts of legal persons and other organizations, trade secrets, and other appropriate public content, delete it to fully protect the lawful rights and interests, national interests and public interests.
Sun described military court judgments and the entry into force 4 kinds of situations that are not published on the Internet is: 1, involving State secrets or private affairs of individuals; 2, involving juvenile delinquency; 3, closed by mediation; 4, others should not be published on the Internet. "Others should not be published on the Internet" judgments and validation procedures, the Nineth clear requirements of the regulations, or a single judge collegial Panel considered judgments to be fourth, this provision should not be published on the Internet, you must submit written observations and reasons for, after Vice President of head of department heads review the audit determined.
(Original title: starting next year, court judgments and full Internet access parties real name published)
中新网11月28日电 最高法今日举行推进司法公开规范性文件发布会，最高人民法院新闻发言人孙军工在会上介绍，明年1月1日起，符合条件的裁判文书生效后7日内，由以前规定的“可以”改为“应当”上网公布。并强调当事人实名公开，不上网公开的要经过审批，并设立了严格的修改、更换条件和撤回程序。
最高法日前发布《最高人民法院关于推进司法公开三大平台建设的若干意见》(以下简称《意见》)和《最高人民法院关于人民法院在互联网公布裁判文书的规定》(以下简称《规定》)。其中，《规定》自2014年1月1日起施行。
孙军工介绍，与2010年《规定》相比，《规定》的15个条文主要有以下变化：一是将符合条件的裁判文书上网要求由“可以”改为“应当”；二是将生效裁判文书“上网审批”改为“不上网审批”；三是强调当事人实名公开；四是要求上网文书原则上不得修改、更换和撤回；五是明确中国裁判文书网作为各级人民法院文书上网的统一平台，应当提供便捷的系统，方便公众检索和查阅上网裁判文书。
孙军工介绍，变化的主要内容包括：
(一)确保人民法院在互联网公布裁判文书的全面性。裁判文书是承载全部审判活动、体现审判结果的“司法产品”。确保在互联网公布裁判文书的全面性，有助于满足公众对司法的知情权，接受公众对司法的监督。为避免对裁判文书的选择性公布，《规定》第四条明确要求，除4种情形外，人民法院的生效裁判文书均应当在互联网公布。
(二)确保人民法院在互联网公布的裁判文书的真实性。《规定》第六条、第十条和第十一条对于确保在互联网公布的裁判文书的真实性做出明确要求：一是强调当事人实名公开。除一些特定案件外，在互联网公布的裁判文书应当保留当事人的真实姓名或者名称，以满足公众获取真实信息的需要。二是对裁判文书的一致性做出明确要求。除依照《规定》的要求进行技术处理的内容以外，在互联网公布的裁判文书应当与送达当事人的一致。三是规定了严格的修改、更换条件和撤回程序。除因技术原因造成在互联网公布的裁判文书与送达当事人的不一致以外，不得进行修改或者更换；没有法定理由或者其他特殊原因不得撤回。确需撤回的，必须由高级人民法院以上负责互联网公布裁判文书的专门机构审查决定，并在中国裁判文书网办理撤回及登记备案手续。
(三)切实保护个人隐私权利和其他个人信息安全。为平衡公众知情权与当事人及其他诉讼参与人隐私权和其他个人信息安全之间的利益关系，《规定》明确了进行匿名处理的三种情况：一是婚姻家庭、继承纠纷案件中的当事人及其法定代理人；二是刑事案件中被害人及其法定代理人、证人、鉴定人；三是被判处三年有期徒刑以下刑罚以及免予刑事处罚，且不属于累犯或者惯犯的被告人。累犯或者惯犯被告人的危险性相对较大，实名公布其姓名，能够增强公众的防范意识。
《规定》还要求，对自然人的家庭住址、通讯方式、身份证号码、银行账号、健康状况等个人信息，未成年人的相关信息，法人以及其他组织的银行账号，商业秘密以及其他不宜公开的内容，进行删除处理，充分保护相关个人的合法权益、国家利益和社会公共利益。
孙军工介绍，人民法院生效裁判文书不在互联网公布的4种情形是：1、涉及国家秘密、个人隐私的；2、涉及未成年人违法犯罪的；3、以调解方式结案的；4、其他不宜在互联网公布的。对于“其他不宜在互联网公布的”裁判文书的审定程序方面，《规定》第九条明确要求，独任法官或者合议庭认为裁判文书具有本规定第四条第四项不宜在互联网公布情形的，必须提出书面意见及理由，经过部门负责人审查后报主管副院长审核确定。
(原标题：明年起法院裁判文书将全面上网 当事人实名公开)
赞