Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)hpmailerpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/28 8:40:02 Supreme Court： State before the transfer of the case sentenced to public to avoid the black
The CPC Central Committee on several major issues of comprehensive reform decision made: advancing the opening of the trial, procuratorial Affairs public, record and retain the full trial data. Enhanced legal instruments that rational to promote open court judgments and the entry into force.
Yesterday, the outgoing message on advancing public administration of Justice of the national court, courts across the country will establish and advance public, judgments and open trial procedure, implementation of information construction of the three platforms. The highest law official said, this is a major initiative of judicial court deepened public. It is understood that the pilot will choose the part of the Court, and batches according to law, in order to advance in the national courts, there are degrees. This version of the article/Beijing News reporter Xing Shiwei
"Open the trial process"
Sentencing trial mediation process will open
In criminal cases, civil and commercial cases and administrative cases and the general limitation of trial period and how long does it take? During the trial, judge the specific case has come to the stage? Previously, such ad litem, the court case without trial procedure information offered or disclosed to the parties and the public.
It is understood that, at present, Sichuan, Henan, Zhejiang and other provinces established an in-house trial procedure management system, process information in cases noted under that system, in order to avoid judges delay cases. But the trial process information on its own initiative, the parties and the general public, only a few court of Wuhan and other places, has not been widely implemented.
The Supreme Court yesterday revealed for the first time, court trial process open platform will be established at all levels. Office of court cases, trial, mediation, sentencing proceedings, shall be affixed to the parties and the general public. Zhou Qiang, President of the Supreme Court requirements, courts at all levels to be based on the Government Web site platform, via SMS, telephone systems, electronic touch, micro-blogging, micro-technical means such as letters, for the general public and clients with a full range, a wide range of legal services.
Supreme Law, courts at all levels to develop and improve unified trial process query system to facilitate client enquiry cases, increased transparency in the work of the trial. At the same time, to play an open platform in the remote office, the trial process bulletin, service, trial, hearings of accessibility and promote the lawsuit archives of electronic engineering, increase the efficiency.
"Judgments and open"
Judgement on the whole judgment document of China network
On July 1 the Supreme Law opened China judgments and network, all cases in the Supreme Court trial judgments and focus on Internet, at present publicly available in the Internet to municipalities, and regions of high court judge documents.
The Supreme Court said yesterday, the future will work with provincial and municipal intermediate people's Court, primary court judgment document interchange, which will query the national court judgments and information at all levels.
Zhou asked, coming in more than more than 3,000 court judgments and judgments and will focus on delivery to China network platform, which is a huge amount of work, progressive realization of four-level people's Court in accordance with the judgments of the public all the Internet public. "The principle of open, not open for exceptions, not allowed to artificial barriers. "Zhou Qiang said the forced Internet through promoting the judgment document formation mechanisms, improve the quality of instruments, upgrade judges judicial skills and business literacy, enhance public understanding of the judgments.
To prevent large-scale publication of judgments and potential privacy issues, Zhou urged all levels of the courts in specific operations, should focus on safeguarding citizens ' privacy and personal information security, client identification number, address, bank account number and other information technology to prevent misuse, more information on minors should be kept strictly confidential.
"The implementation of the open information"
"Deadbeats" information access
And adjudication process is similar to the work, execution information is mainly composed of a system of internal control in the past, is not disclosed to the parties and the public.
Luohu District Court is currently a pilot implementation of the open information. Last year, road, Luohu district, the Court has introduced real-time broadcast features an open mesh, in real time through the Web site reporting all cases of implementation of each of these nodes, steps and measures of implementation.
In addition to transfer property to prevent the person subjected to execution of individual cases, property query, Luohu district, the Court will all perform case flow, control, discipline, procedures and other basic information on-line for instant open to facilitate implementation of the client's case and specific inspection of property and disposition of information. As of October 30, the net cumulative report 5,543 cases were announced five more than the basic information of the person subjected to execution, more than 6,000 more than one property inspection node information.
In accordance with the "Lo Wu experience"-operation requires courts at all levels to establish a unified implementation of the open information platform, clients and the public abreast of court to bring the parties of the measures taken to comply with the prevailing interest, give full play to perform publicly corrosionproof protection function.
Supreme Court says information SMS platform will be developed to facilitate client inquiries, understanding cases of progress in the implementation. Courts at all levels will also provide information for all types of credit system, promote the implementation of the open information platform to interface with a social credibility system. Zhou stressed that "the timing of information disclosure and the node should publicly differ with the trial process, to avoid undue influence public performance. ”
■ 说法
Parties to a Protocol "to see clearly"
Renmin University law school Associate Professor Li Fenfei said justice "under the Sun" runs, is to raise the quality of trials, radical measures to prevent judicial corruption. The top three judicial public platform construction, is to systematically improve the level of judges ad litem and enhances social acceptance and credibility of the judiciary, to achieve win-win results.
China University University deputy principals Ma Huaide said, for referee instruments open, early regardless of is supreme law also is most provincial high homes are has in advance, this through China referee instruments network achieved supreme law and province high homes of networking, and and future and in the homes and grass-roots Court achieved interconnect, will greatly increased convenient public query, while for referee instruments of quality monitoring also will has unified standard.
Ma Huaide believes that open the trial process and implementation of information disclosure for judicial system reform is significant. The past, people went to the courts it is difficult to understand the trial procedure and relevant information, litigation process over to the passive, apparent asymmetry of information.
He also said that execution is the same, on enforcement procedures against ask because the implementation does not understand, when to perform, specific information Executive are unclear. Individual judges use this information asymmetry delay in handling cases, yet even the referee. Open the trial process and implementing procedures for information disclosure will allow parties to a case of "see, listen and touch clearly", both parties to a lawsuit, judges handling cases can also play a supervisory role.
■ 追访
Today the Supreme Court will release two Department of Justice public regulatory documents, guide around the Court building three platforms
-Operation: set up three platforms to avoid "black-box operation"
This year, Zhou long served as the Supreme Court since the Supreme Law was launched in the area of judicial disclosure, including microblogging trial of Bo Xilai, China opened the referee microblog micro-instrument network, opened the letter and a series of new initiatives. Today, the Supreme Court will release two Department of Justice public regulatory documents to guide national courts establishing three platforms such as public works.
Zhou said that by publishing a trial process, judgments and execution information, you can understand why cases sentenced, judicial process, is not a party in the eyes of "black box operation".
For three large open platform to advance the work of the judiciary, Zhou said, because of local economic conditions and varying degrees of development, advancing the work couldn't rush things through, much less duplication, waste of resources. Developed public demonstration in district courts and justice courts, should take the lead in completing construction. Qualified Court at the completed "compulsory" at the same time, in light of local conditions, "optional", and lessons-learned report in a timely manner.
Unified guidance of Supreme Law of the national courts of Justice public construction of the three platforms to develop guidance for, development software, develop evaluation criteria. The provincial High Court and Manpower, improve implementation details, coordinate and solve problems.
Sound
To be stressed to promote judicial openness and following the legal rules. Justice is not blind in public openly, according to law, orderly and strict observance of judicial law, judicial public shall have to Don. Courts at all levels should give full play to the Chief microblogging information dissemination in the first time, rid the rumor, the role of communication and public opinion, but also to regulate Twitter running, not free to conduct reviews, cannot make improper statements.
--President of the Supreme Court of Zhou
(Original title: Supreme Court: cases in State trial convicted of public modulation)
《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》提出：推进审判公开、检务公开，录制并保留全程庭审资料。增强法律文书说理性，推动公开法院生效裁判文书。
昨日，全国法院司法公开工作推进会上传出消息，全国各级法院将建立并推进审判流程公开、裁判文书公开、执行信息公开三大平台建设。最高法有关负责人表示，这是法院深化司法公开的一项重大举措。据了解，该项工作将选择部分法院开展试点，进而分批次依法、有序、有度地在全国法院推进。本版采写/新京报记者 邢世伟
【审判流程公开】
庭审调解宣判过程将全公开
刑事案件、民商事案件、行政案件一般的诉讼时效和审判期限需要多长时间？在审判过程中，法官的具体办案已经到了哪个阶段？以往，这类审判流程信息法院在审案办案时无需向当事人和公众主动提供或公开。
据了解，目前，四川、河南、浙江等多个省份建立了内部的审判流程管理系统，案件流程信息须在该系统下标注，以避免法官拖延办案。但审判流程信息主动对当事人和公众公开，只有武汉等地的少数法院做到了，还没有广泛推行。
最高法昨日首次透露，各级法院将建立审判流程公开平台。法院对案件的立案、庭审、调解、宣判等诉讼过程，都应当依法向当事人和社会公开。最高法院院长周强要求，各级法院要以政务网站为基础平台，通过手机短信、电话语音系统、电子触摸屏、微博、微信等技术手段，为公众和当事人提供全方位、多元化的司法服务。
最高法提出，各级法院要开发完善统一的审判流程查询系统，方便当事人查询案件进展，增加审判工作透明度。同时，要发挥审判流程公开平台在远程立案、公告、送达、庭审、听证方面的辅助功能，推进诉讼档案电子化工程，提升工作效率。
【裁判文书公开】
判决书未来全上中国裁判文书网
7月1日，最高法开通中国裁判文书网，所有由最高法审理案件的裁判文书集中上网，目前公众可在该网上查询到各省市区高院的裁判文书。
最高法昨日称，未来将与各省市地方中院、基层法院的裁判文书联通，届时将可查询全国各级法院的裁判文书信息。
周强要求，未来全国3000多个法院的裁判文书将集中传送到中国裁判文书网平台，这是一项浩大工程，逐步实现四级人民法院依法能够公开的裁判文书全部上网公开。“要以公开为原则，不公开为例外，不得人为设置任何障碍。”周强表示，要通过推动裁判文书上网形成倒逼机制，提高文书质量，提升法官的司法技能和业务素养，增进公众对裁判文书的理解。
为防止大规模公布裁判文书可能造成的隐私泄露问题，周强要求各级法院在具体操作时，应当注重维护公民隐私和个人信息安全，对当事人的身份证号码、个人住址、银行账号等信息进行技术处理，防止被不当利用，对未成年人的信息更应当严格保密。
【执行信息公开】
“老赖”信息即时查阅
与审判流程工作相似的是，以往执行信息主要由法院系统内部掌握，并未向当事人和公众公开。
目前深圳市罗湖区法院正在试点执行信息公开。去年，罗湖区法院推出了具有实时播报功能的执行公开网，通过网站实时播报所有执行案件的每一个节点、步骤和执行措施。
除了为防止被执行人转移财产等个别案件外，罗湖区法院将所有执行案件的财产查询、控制、处分、程序流转等基本情况都在网上即时公开，方便当事人了解案件执行情况和具体的财产查控、处分信息。截至今年10月30日，该网累计播报案件5543宗，公布了6000多名被执行人的基本信息、47700多个财产查控节点的信息。
按照“罗湖经验”，周强要求各级法院建立统一的执行信息公开平台，让当事人和公众及时了解法院为实现当事人的胜诉权益所采取的执行措施，充分发挥执行公开的防腐功能。
最高法表示，将开发执行信息短信发送平台，方便当事人随时查询、了解执行案件进展。各级法院还将为各类征信系统提供信息，推进执行信息公开平台与社会诚信体系对接。周强强调：“执行信息公开的时机和节点应当与审判流程公开有所区别，避免因不当公开影响执行效果。”
让当事人对办案程序“看得见听得清”
人民大学法学院副教授李奋飞表示，让司法在“阳光下”运行，是提升审判质量、防止司法腐败的根本措施。此次最高法提出三大司法公开平台建设，是从制度上提升法官审案水平，并提升社会认同度和司法公信力，将取得双赢的效果。
中国政法大学副校长马怀德称，对于裁判文书公开，前期无论是最高法还是多数省级高院都已经在推进，此次通过中国裁判文书网实现最高法与省高院的联网、乃至今后与中院和基层法院实现互联，将大大增加方便公众查询，同时对于裁判文书的质量监控也会有统一标准。
马怀德认为，审判流程公开和执行信息公开对于司法体制改革来讲意义重大。以往，老百姓去法院打官司很难了解到审判流程的相关信息，打官司过程中多为被动，信息明显不对称。
他还表示，执行也是一样，执行诉求人因为对执行程序不了解，对何时执行、如何执行的具体信息都不清楚。个别法官利用这种信息不对称拖延办案、甚至枉法裁判。审判流程公开和执行信息公开将让当事人对办案的程序“看得见、听得清、摸得着”，既方便当事人打官司，对法官办案也能起到监督作用。
今日最高法将发布两部司法公开规范性文件，指导各地法院建设三大平台
周强：建三大平台避免“暗箱操作”
今年，周强出任最高法院长以来，最高法在司法公开方面推出了包括微博庭审直播薄熙来案、开通中国裁判文书网、开通官方微博微信等一系列新举措。今日，最高法又将发布两部司法公开规范性文件，用于指导全国法院建立三大平台等司法公开工作。
周强表示，通过公布审判流程、裁判文书和执行信息，就能够明白案件为什么这样判，司法过程就不再是当事人心目中的“暗箱操作”。
对于三大司法公开平台的推进工作，周强称，由于各地经济条件和发展程度不一，推进工作不能急躁冒进，更不能重复建设、浪费资源。经济发达地区法院和司法公开示范法院，应当率先完成建设任务。具备条件的法院可以在完成“规定动作”的同时，结合本地实际做好“自选动作”，及时总结经验上报。
最高法将统一指导全国法院司法公开三大平台建设，制定指导意见，开发配套软件，制定评估标准。各省高院统筹，完善实施细则，协调解决问题。
■ 声音
要把握好推进司法公开与遵循司法规律的关系。司法公开不是盲目公开，应当依法、有序、有度，严格遵循司法规律，司法公开还应当做到有所为有所不为。各级法院要充分发挥政务微博在第一时间发布资讯、破除谣言、沟通民意的作用，但也要规范微博运行，不得随意对个案进行点评，不能发表不当言论。
——最高法院院长周强
（原标题：最高法：案件立审调判全公开）
赞