Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)hpmailerpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/30 9:36:48 Indian media said the Indian President’s visit Southern Tibet， Sino
"Global times reported" and "India-China relations had may again become sensitive." India newsletter 29th article says that India President Pranab Mukherjee, the day begins "Bruner Pradesh" (Southern Tibet) 's two-day trip, is likely to raise concerns about China, since this region also claimed by China, which perhaps just calm the waves from the India-China relations.
India press trust reported on 28th, India President Pranab Mukherjee from 29th visits "Bruner States". According to the schedule, 29th Minister in Iraq to "Al Bruner State" address the members of the Legislative Council, participated in the 12th, 30th, he will travel to the Rajiv Gandhi University Alumni Association. He had been in India since President first visit "Al Bruner State".
India express said on the 29th that it's within 5 years India second President to visit "Bruner, Chuck State", the incoming President Pratibha Patil in 2009, to the area. India in January 2008, the current Prime Minister Manmohan Singh visited the "Bruner State". Reports that according to Patil, and Singh's experience trip to Beijing, Mukherjee is likely to be voices of dissent. In 2008 and 2009, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs of India top go "Bruner, Chuck State" to protest. India media that the trip to the Mukherjee, remains in the one of the largest show India "Bruner, Chuck State" sovereignty Beijing flee.
China institutes of contemporary international relations in South Asia expert Fu xiaoqiang 29th on the global times reporters that India President visit to Sino-Indian dispute is a political declaration, with India trying to strengthen the line of actual control in the region. As most of the region in India under the de facto control, India President's visit should not be too violent a reaction caused by the Chinese side. But it should be pointed out is that regardless of India who, can't change the nature of this region is printed in the disputed areas. Political declarations do little to resolve the dispute, the two sides need to sit down and resolve the issue through negotiations.
Mukherjee, visiting the "Bruner, Chuck State" at the same time, India the mail on 29th today published an article titled, "Achor saiqin, goodbye! Arunachal Pradesh, Hi! "Articles that attracted outside attention. The article says that the newspaper got the India Foreign Ministry file contents are displayed on boundary negotiations, India has signaled that made clear to the Chinese side and prepared to Achor to saiqin regions remained in Chinese hands, in Exchange for Chinese authorized "Bruner State" as part of the Indian territory.
Analysts pointed out that India is now playing the "Bruner, Chuck State" this card, and the next year, India was not unrelated to the general election. Currently, India people's Party candidate MODI vehemence is aggressive, tight election of the Congress Party. In addition, India 2013-14 fiscal first quarter (April-June of this year) economic growth was only 4.4%, the lowest since 2008, while inflation continued to rise, people's living standards have been severely affected. India's austerity policies imposed by the Central Bank temporarily stopped the rupee banished to trends, but enthusiasm has hit the market, restricted India's economic recovery. Rapid economic growth created by the myth of the Congress Party have been shattered. At the same time, India's ruling coalition exposed the corruption case in recent years, Grande clean bragged the Manmohan Singh Government. In the hands of virtually no cards to play under the circumstances, India's ruling coalition would be looking at "Al Bruner State".
One involved in the India-China border talks India official told the mail today revealed that this programme was not New Delhi's official stance, but is considered to be a bargaining point. However, it's very difficult to get the implementation of the programme, unless the New Delhi Government has sufficient political will. India Express, Indian sides is currently focused on maintaining the "Bruner State" for peace and stability, rather than final solutions. However, as the two sides insist on sovereignty over this area, created tension among the area several times in India.
However, Fu xiaoqiang, Sino-Indian and Sino-Japanese territorial disputes the Diaoyu Island dispute entirely different in nature, China and India have held protracted negotiations on border issues, and established a mature mechanism of border bargaining, the two sides were willing to resolve the issue through peaceful negotiations. After package has been raised by the two countries to resolve border issues, but has not been received. India has said the programme showed that India's attitude, feasibility require the two countries to further negotiations. "China in global times India correspondent Reed global times, Lu Changyin Wang Xiaoxiong"
(Original title: print media: Indian President's surprise visit to Southern Tibet, Sino-Indian relations or other sensitive)
【环球时报综合报道】“印中关系有可能再度变得敏感起来”。《印度快报》29日的文章称，印度总统慕克吉当天开始“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”(即我国藏南地区)的两日之旅，很有可能会引起中国方面的关切，因为中国对这一地区也声称拥有主权，这或许让刚刚恢复平静的印中关系再起波澜。
印度报业托拉斯28日报道，印度总统慕克吉从29日开始访问“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”。按照日程，29日穆克吉在伊塔那噶向“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”立法会的议员发表演讲，30日他将前往拉吉夫·甘地大学参加第12届同学会。这将是他担任印度总统以来首次访问“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”。
《印度快报》29日称，这是5年内印度第二位总统到访“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”，上任总统帕蒂尔曾在2009年前往该地区。而印度现任总理辛格曾于2008年1月视察“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”。报道称，按照帕蒂尔和辛格的经历，北京很有可能会对慕克吉之行发出反对之声。因为2008年和2009年，中国外交部都对印度高层前往“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”表示抗议。印度媒体认为，此次慕克吉之行，一个最大的目的仍是显示印度对“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”拥有主权，让北京知难而退。
中国现代国际关系研究院南亚问题专家傅小强29日对《环球时报》记者表示，印度总统去中印争议地区访问是一种政治宣示，它与印方试图强化对该地区的实际控制一脉相承。由于该地区大部分在印度的实际控制下，印度总统前去访问应该不会引起中方太激烈的反应。不过需要强调的是，无论印度什么人去，都改变不了这一地区是中印争议地区的性质。政治宣示无助于解决争议，双方还需要坐下来通过谈判解决问题。
就在慕克吉前往“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”的同时，印度《今日邮报》29日发表一篇标题为“阿克赛钦，再见！阿鲁纳恰尔邦，你好！”的文章，引起外界关注。文章称，该报得到的印度外交部有关边界谈判的文件内容显示，印度已经发出信号，向中方表明准备让阿克赛钦地区留在中国人手中，以换取中方认可“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”为印方领土的一部分。
分析人士指出，印度现在打出“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”这张牌，与明年印度大选不无关系。当前，印度人民党候选人莫迪气势咄咄逼人，国大党选情吃紧。除此之外，印度2013-14财年第一季度(今年4月-6月)经济增速仅为4.4%，为2008年以来的最低，同时通货膨胀持续上升，民众生活水平受到严重影响。印度中央银行所实施的财政紧缩政策尽管暂时遏制住卢比狂贬的趋势，却又打击了市场积极性，制约了印度经济的复苏。国大党创造的经济高速发展神话已经破灭。同时，印度执政联盟近年来暴露出各种腐败案，重创以清廉自诩的辛格政府。在手中几乎无牌可打的情况之下，印度执政联盟便将目光瞄准了“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”。
参与印中边界谈判的一名印度官员对《今日邮报》透露，这一方案并非新德里的官方表态，但却被认为是一个议价点。然而，这一方案要想得到实施非常难，除非新德里政府拥有足够的政治意志。《印度快报》称，印中双方目前着眼于保持“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”的和平与稳定，而不是最终解决方案。然而，由于双方都坚持对这一地区拥有主权，使得该地区多次在印中之间造成关系紧张。
不过，在傅小强看来，中印领土争端与中日钓鱼岛争端的性质完全不同，中印已经就边界问题进行了长期谈判，并建立了成熟的边界谈判机制，双方都有通过和平谈判解决问题的愿望。此前两国也曾提出解决边界问题的一揽子方案，但并没有完全被对方接受。这次印度所说的方案表明印度的一种态度，是否可行还需要两国进一步谈判。【环球时报驻印度特约记者李德 环球时报记者卢长银 王晓雄】
(原标题：印媒：印总统突访藏南 中印关系或再度敏感)
赞