Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)hpmailerpublished in(发表于) 2013/11/30 9:40:22 Yichun plane crash pilot accused of direct responsibility
2010 "8·24" after the third anniversary of the Yichun plane crash, yesterday morning, the Northeast city of Yichun city, Heilongjiang province Yichun District Court, pilot, Qi Quanjun appeared in court on suspicion of crimes of major aircraft accidents. This is holding the pilot after the accident in China's first case of criminal responsibility, it is also the only one accident liability of access to justice program staff.
Captain was accused of direct responsibility
Accident investigation team under the State Council during the two-year investigation ultimately concluded that this was "accident" caused by numerous direct and indirect causes and recommended that responsibility for 20 person party, and Government disciplines, in which Captain Qi Quanjun suspected of criminal responsibility.
On June 29, 2012, accident investigation report released publicly. Report released the previous day, Qi Quanjun were detained, were arrested on July 10 of the same year, on October 10, transferred the case to the prosecution in investigation and prosecution.
Seized party accused, Qi Quanjun to crash occurred has directly responsibility, reason has three: in fly p airport Shi, align army violation provides, below company minimum run standard implementation into near; in aircraft into radiation fog not saw runway, and no established landing by needed of Visual reference Xia, unit violation provides still through minimum declined height implementation landing; in aircraft hit to Qian appeared radio height voice tips, and and not saw airport runway Shi, unit not take complex fly measures, continues to blind implementation landing, led to aircraft hit to.
In January 2013, the prosecution case for prosecution to the Yichun city Yichun District Court, decided after two meetings before hearing, the court hearing the case.
The defence stated that the accident was "cause an effect"
Yesterday morning's hearing, Qi Quanjun facts disputed the charges. He said he saw the runway lights when the minimum descent height, height error was that to hear the radio voice prompts, hesitated for a second go around after the action is not complete, so there is no time to pull the plane up. He also believed that the accident occurred mainly in Henan airlines run scheduled unreasonable, no safety guarantee aircraft, airport problems, and other factors.
In this case, Lan Peng Beijing law firm Hu Aijun and Zhang Qi Huai acts as the Qi army defenders. Defence counsel believe that the accident belonged to "cause an effect" caused by a variety of reasons, "'8 · 24' accident investigation report blamed all of the problems the defendants Qi Quanjun, and units of the relevant administrations, Henan airlines, airport of Yichun's problems is an understatement is not exposed. ”
Case case
Since the implementation of China's criminal law in this case, the pilot was first charged crimes of major aircraft accidents, how to hear and adjudicate such crimes will serve as a precedent-setting role.
The accident investigation team report released last year also found that Shenzhen Airlines (the parent company of Henan airlines--Editor's note) to Henan airlines, inadequate investment, poor management, and weak regulation of aviation safety in Henan; on civil aviation authority regulation is not in place; South-central air traffic management Bureau of civil aviation security vulnerabilities.
Several "8·24" Yichun plane crash victims who attend the trials, they said claims in consideration of the next plan.
November 24, 2004 baotou air crash occurred, its claims in the Beijing second intermediate people's Court at the end of last year entered the substantive stage of trials, families of the 32 victims sue China Eastern Airlines and China Eastern Airlines and aircraft makers, engine manufacturers, claims more than 132 million Yuan. According to press reports, after the case ended in conciliation.
August 24, 2010, Henan Airlines Ltd E190 B3130 carried from Harbin to Yichun VD8387 scheduled passenger flights, approaching landing at the airport in Yichun forest during the crash, killing 44 people on board, 52 people were injured and direct economic loss of 308.91 million Yuan.
(Original title: Yichun plane crash pilot for the first time by the criminal trial)
2010年“8·24”伊春空难三周年后，昨天上午，东北小城黑龙江省伊春市伊春区法院，飞行员齐全军因涉嫌重大飞行事故罪出庭受审。这是中国空难事故后追究飞行员刑责的首个案例，也是目前唯一一名进入司法审判程序的事故责任人员。
机长被指控负直接责任
国务院事故调查组在历时两年的调查后，最终认定这是“一起责任事故”，由诸多直接原因和间接原因造成，并建议对20名责任人党纪、政纪处理，其中机长齐全军涉嫌刑事责任。
2012年6月29日，事故调查报告对外公开发布。报告发布前一天，齐全军被刑事拘留，同年7月10日被逮捕，10月10日该案移送检方审查起诉。
检方指控，齐全军对空难发生负有直接责任，理由有三：在飞临机场时，齐全军违反规定，低于公司最低运行标准实施进近；在飞机进入辐射雾未看见跑道、没有建立着陆所需的目视参考下，机组违反规定仍然穿越最低下降高度实施着陆；在飞机撞地前出现无线电高度语音提示、且未看见机场跑道时，机组未采取复飞措施，继续盲目实施着陆，导致飞机撞地。
2013年1月，检方将此案起诉至伊春市伊春区法院，法院在经过两次庭前会议后决定开庭审理此案。
辩方指事故属“多因一果”
昨天上午的庭审中，齐全军对指控事实持有异议。他称，自己在最低下降高度时看到了跑道灯，错误在于听到无线电高度语音提示时，迟疑了一秒钟后做出的复飞动作不够完整，因此没有来得及将飞机拉起来。他还认为事故发生主要在于河南航空的运行计划不合理、飞机没有安全保障、机场存在问题等因素。
本案中，北京市蓝鹏律师事务所律师张起淮和胡爱军担任齐全军的辩护人。辩护律师认为，该起事故属于“多因一果”，由多种原因造成，“而‘8·24’事故调查报告将一切问题都归责于被告人齐全军及机组，对相关行政部门、河南航空、伊春机场的问题都是轻描淡写未暴露。”
案件判决起判例作用
本案是中国刑法实施以来，飞行员被首次指控涉嫌重大飞行事故罪，如何审理及作出判决，对此类犯罪将起到判例的作用。
去年公布的事故调查组的报告还认定，深圳航空(河南航空的母公司——编者注)对河南航空投入不足、管理不力；河南航空安全管理薄弱；有关民航管理机构监管不到位；民航中南地区空中交通管理局安全管理存在漏洞。
数名“8·24”伊春空难的伤者到庭旁听案件审理，他们表示索赔问题在下一步的考虑计划中。
2004年11月24日包头空难发生后，其索赔案去年底在北京市第二中级法院进入实质性审理阶段，32名遇难者的家属起诉东方航空公司和东航集团以及飞机制造商、发动机制造商，提出索赔1.32亿余元。据记者了解，该案后以调解告终。
2010年8月24日21时38分，河南航空有限公司E190机型B3130号飞机执行哈尔滨至伊春VD8387定期客运航班时，在伊春市林都机场进近着陆过程中失事，造成机上44人死亡、52人受伤，直接经济损失30891万元。
(原标题：伊春空难案开庭 飞行员首次被追刑责)
赞