Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)hpmailer
published in(发表于) 2013/12/2 9:51:52
88 acres of the Homestead built villas in Dongguan, Guangdong, the Government issuing Hong Kong businessmen trading

Guangdong Dongguan 88 acres of land for building House the Government issuing Hong Kong businessmen trading | | Guangdong Dongguan Homestead | Villa _ news

According to China's related laws and regulations, the acquirement of exclusively members of the rural collective economic organizations shall not sell, transfer, and others not entitled to right of the homestead. However, in Dongguan city, Guangdong Province, a Hong Kong businessman was not only the local area of 88 acres of residential land use rights, have been built and 49 villas, the local government but for Villa "green light" to formalities such as issuance of title deed, and makes it available in the market.


  Homestead villas are built on non-local household registration can be traded


On April 17, 1993, shazhou village signed a contract with Hong Kong businessman Tang Baijiang agree sandbar enclosing the old homestead to "show long limited" use, transfer costs 3.3 million Yuan, for a period of 60, until April 15, 2053. Old Wai is located at Shijie binjiang West Road, facing East River, location is excellent.


The next 3 years, Tang Baijiang 49 villas built one after another in the old wall, called the "Cape". At that time, the tangbaijiangjian villa for sale, some villagers have a problem, but later covered by a supporter's voice. "Because, after all, has been agreed in the contract how land use. "Sandbank villager Lu Juncheng said.


Villagers didn't know is, after more than 10 years, "the Cape" sale of the Villa changed hands many times, there have been third and fourth hand owners. "We find it strange, where the land is in our village, they have no evidence, why are there so many people buy it? "The Sha Chau Tsuen villagers Liu Zhiqi said.


Even more curious is that village residents to the local housing authority was informed that villas not only have the title deed, and land titles. Tang Baijiang villas of the lands in the collective construction land use permits showed that the land registered on April 29, 1996, by the seal of the Dongguan Bureau of land and resources. Real estate Evaluator shows good also in 1996, floor space of 320.12 square meters, a total of three layers, nature of ownership is private, and stamped with "the people's Government of Dongguan city property warrants."


Under our laws, and rural Homestead built by the housing and property rights may be transferred, but the assignee must be members of the housing location of rural collective economic organizations. However, the journalist with Guangzhou residents ' identities to the buyer upon purchase intent by, each other's claims, no problem, when the title deed and land certificates can be Villa was renamed.


Going back to the land, local villagers for land departments to withdraw warrants of Dongguan, but has yet to receive a reply.


 Officials said historical approving excessive indiscriminate


According to villagers to reflect, Tang Baijiang expanded gradually in the process of building area, at present "the Cape" actually covers an area of King Mu.


"The Cape" community tree-lined environment well. According to reports, involved small 49 villas covers more than 100 square meters, covers an area of more than 1000 square meters. Few villas were built by the 90 's of the last century, most of the villas have been pushed to rebuild.


Shijie, Chinese businessmen in Hong Kong why can get Homestead? Land and Ye Shao焜, Secretary of Dongguan city, said for the last century 90 's investment needs and Dongguan Bureau of land and House delegation of approval authority. To arouse the enthusiasm of village, town level economic development, the town government granting full autonomy at the village level, disposable village land, developing collective economy. Against this background, Hong Kong Tang Baijiang "housing problem" has been made by the 88 acres of residential land use rights.


Ye Shao焜 said, according to the 1991 revision of the Guangdong provincial land management measures for the implementation of the relevant provisions of article 20th, 21st, and overseas Chinese, compatriots and Taiwan compatriots are entitled to apply for Homestead residential to local authorities and increase the amount to take care of 20%.


However, the survey found, according to the Guangdong provincial land management measures for the implementation of provisions of the housing land use standards, Tang Baijiang 88 acres of residential land made clear more than "20% care" that limit, suspected of "excess" transfers.


"I have to admit, Homestead decentralized approval process, approving excessive indiscriminate we found. "Ye Shao焜 said that historical conditions at the time of the historical legacies, you can't use the legal system to decide now not standard land management act for more than 20 years ago.


 Villa into a small historical debt of property rights is


Beijing Pacific Century (Guangzhou) law firm Zhou Yuzhong said that even if obtained through the transfer of land use rights the final certificates of title and land, but due to fundamental changes in the nature of their land had not happened, the "property" attribute remains unchanged.


However, the "property" three characters living in "the Cape," owners, didn't seem to be the problem. Some tenants said, "our houses have a Government-issued proof of ownership, is legal, owners here are similar and we are not afraid. ”


Local Government is facing a dilemma: one is how to respond to Sha Chau villagers want Government revoke warrants strong demand for villas, and on the other is how to treat the 49 villas "legitimate" a fait accompli.


When a press interview in Dongguan Bureau of land and resources, could not get a clear answer. The authority to "issue left over by history" for the story, and gives two major reasons: first, Dongguan in the land policy has been to try second breakthrough was the economic development of the original homestead housing needs.


In this regard, Guangdong southern law firm Gan Guigeng believes that no matter how special Dongguan housing policy, housing land use rights should be collective members, and is to meet their needs. He said that "the law has long had rules, when the investment promotion policy must not and contrary to national laws. "According to the Xinhua News


(Original title: Hong Kong 88-acre homestead built villas in Dongguan Government issuing its trading)

December 02, 2013 The Beijing times
(
广东东莞88亩宅基地建别墅 政府发证任港商买卖|宅基地|别墅|广东东莞_新闻资讯

  根据我国相关法律法规,宅基地使用权专属于农村集体经济组织成员享有,不得出让、转让,其他人员无权取得宅基地使用权。然而,在广东东莞,一位香港籍商人不仅取得了当地一块面积达88亩的宅基地使用权,还建起了49栋别墅,当地政府更是为别墅“开绿灯”发放房产证等手续,使其可在市场交易。


  宅基地上建别墅非当地户籍可买卖


  1993年4月17日,沙洲村民与香港籍商人唐柏江签订合同,约定沙洲村将旧围一块宅基地转给“展隆有限公司”使用,转让费用330万元,使用期限为60年,至2053年4月15日止。旧围位于石碣滨江西路旁,面临东江,地段极佳。


  接下来3年,唐柏江陆续在旧围建起49栋别墅,起名叫“好望角”。当时,对于唐柏江建别墅出售的行为,有些村民有意见,但被支持者的声音盖过去了。“因为合同中毕竟没有约定怎么使用土地。”沙洲村村民卢俊成说。


  让村民们没想到的是,随后10余年间,“好望角”的别墅被多次转手买卖,已出现第三、第四手业主。“我们觉得奇怪,这里的土地是我们村的,他们没有房产证,怎么会有那么多人买?”沙洲村村民刘志奇说。


  更为蹊跷的是,有村民到当地房管部门查询得知,这些别墅不仅有房产证,还有土地证。唐柏江别墅的《集体土地建设用地使用证》显示,该宅基地1996年4月29日登记,由东莞市国土局盖章。其房产证显示也是在1996年办好,建筑面积为320.12平方米,共三层,房屋所有权性质为私有,并盖有“东莞市人民政府房地产权证”。


  根据我国法律,农村宅基地所建房屋产权可以转让,但受让人必须是房屋所在地农村集体经济组织成员。然而,记者以广州居民身份向房屋中介提出购买意向时,对方声称,没有问题,到时别墅的房产证和土地证都可以更名。


  为要回土地,当地村民要求东莞国土部门撤销相关权证,但至今仍未得到答复。


  官方称历史遗留审批过度过滥


  据村民反映,唐柏江在建设过程中逐步扩大使用面积,目前“好望角”实际占地已超百亩。


  “好望角”小区绿树成荫,环境颇佳。据介绍,涉事的49栋别墅小则占地100多平方米,大则占地超过1000平方米。少数别墅是上世纪90年代所建,大部分别墅已经推倒重建。


  香港籍商人为何可以拿到石碣的宅基地?东莞市国土局副局长叶绍焜表示,出于上世纪90年代招商引资的需要,东莞市国土局将宅基地审批权下放。为调动村、镇两级经济发展的积极性,镇政府给予村一级充分的自主权,村可支配土地,发展集体经济。在此背景下,港商唐柏江以“住房困难”为由取得了88亩宅基地的使用权。


  叶绍焜说,根据1991年修订的《广东省土地管理实施办法》第二十条、第二十一条相关规定,华侨、港澳同胞和台湾同胞有权向当地政府申请宅基地建住宅,并可给予增加20%的额度照顾。


  然而记者调查发现,根据《广东省土地管理实施办法》规定的宅基地使用标准,唐柏江取得的88亩宅基地明显超过“20%照顾”这一限度,涉嫌“超标”转让。


  “不得不承认,宅基地审批权下放过程中,我们发现过审批过度过滥情况。”叶绍焜表示,这是当时历史条件下产生的历史遗留问题,不能用现在的法律制度去判定20多年前不规范的用地管理行为。


  别墅成小产权历史欠账难算


  北京盈科(广州)律师事务所周玉忠表示,即使通过转让宅基地使用权最终办理了产权证和土地证,但由于其集体土地性质并未发生根本改变,其“小产权房”的属性依然未变。


  然而,“小产权”三字对于居住在“好望角”的业主来说,似乎不是问题。一些住户说:“我们房子有政府颁发的权属证明,就是合法的,这里的业主都差不多,我们也不怕。”


  当地政府正面临两难抉择:一面是如何应对沙洲村民希望政府部门撤销这些别墅相关权证的强烈诉求,另一面是如何对待这49栋别墅的“合法”既成事实。


  记者在采访东莞市国土局方面时,未能得到明确答复。该局以“历史遗留问题”为说辞,并给出两大理由:一是东莞在土地政策方面可以先行先试;二是当时经济发展突破了宅基地原有的住房需求。


  对此,广东南日律师事务所律师甘贵庚认为,无论东莞的房产政策怎么特殊,宅基地的使用权人应该是集体经济组织成员,并且是满足自己居住的需要。他说:“土地法早就有了相关规定,当时招商引资的一些政策无论如何也不能和国家法律相违背。”据新华社电


(原标题:港商88亩宅基地建别墅东莞政府发证任其买卖)


2013年12月02日04:34
京华时报
)


If you have any requirements, please contact webmaster。(如果有什么要求,请联系站长)





QQ:154298438
QQ:417480759