Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2013/12/29 7:03:34 Audit Commission： 17 out of the 19 key poverty alleviation counties lie to funding more than 21.5 million
Yesterday, the Audit Commission Bulletin 19 key County finance poverty alleviation funding to the poverty alleviation and development of audit findings.
Reporter statistics found, 11 counties and there are corruption and embezzlement of funds for poverty reduction issues; 10 counties in violation hospitality for guests, gifts, travel and other expenditures, irregularities totalling nearly 11.1 million Yuan, 17 counties with facts of obtaining funds, a total of more than 21.5 million Yuan.
The audit reflects and exposes issues is alarming and we are deeply grieved deeply shoulders a big responsibility. Poverty alleviation Office of the State Council urged the change, State Audit state change, and seize the Treasury actively studying the reform of the management mechanism of special financial funds.
--The State Council poverty alleviation office party Jiang Xiaohua
2 sentenced to 78 persons punished 17 people criticized 26 admonishing talk
123 people being punished
11 counties
Corruption swallows over public funds
……
Audit announcement comb after reporters found that the changning County, Yunnan province, Yunnan Lancang Lahu nationality autonomous county, Zhenning buyi and Miao autonomous county, Guizhou province, LIBO, Guizhou province, Xunyang County, Shaanxi Province, Gansu province, Xihe County of Gulang County, Gansu province, jingxi County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Ningxia haiyuan County and other corruption issues arise, the persons had been transferred to the relevant departments.
Meanwhile, Guangxi Huanjiang County 2010 fiscal funds, there is a problem of individual public officials suspected of embezzlement of public funds, and have been transferred to the relevant authorities.
17 counties
Lying to poor gold over 21.5 million
In some people's eyes, the poverty alleviation fund has become not eat white don't eat "his flesh." Reporter statistics found the bulletin contents, and they exist in 17 counties of obtaining funds, a total of more than 21.5 million Yuan.
Xunyang County, Shaanxi Province obtaining 3.305 million yuan of funds for poverty alleviation of Hengshan County, Shaanxi Province obtaining funds five Yuan, guanghe County in Gansu province obtaining funds 3.2032 million.
10 counties
Breach expenditures treat gifts received
Reporter statistics show that a total of 10 counties in question of breach expenditures for hospitality, including drinks, gifts, hospitality, breach expenditures for meals, allowance subsidies to relevant personnel, tourist reception, the purchase of alcohol, tobacco and many other irregularities, irregularities totalling nearly 11.1 million dollars.
Among them, Luonan County, Shaanxi Province breach expenditures for hospitality 3.7585 million Yuan, Yunnan province, Funing County breach expenditures for hospitality, 1.9101 million 1.2271 million, breach expenditures for hospitality in Liping County, Guizhou province.
Other issues
Overcharging poor deposit public funds in personal accounts
Among them, Xihe County, Gansu province private deposit 12.5021 million yuan of public funds, and Longsheng County of Guangxi Autonomous Region receive $ 457,400 dollars on poverty, such as from 2009 to 2011, the County Office of the circulation of agricultural products using financial funds ordered boxes, per standard box 1 Yuan charge transport fees to the growers, 232,800 amounts higher than the actual cost.
In addition, Ningxia tongxin County poverty alleviation project actual losses from five Yuan, Yunnan province, Funing County funds 9.8581 million long stay idle, and so on.
-Official voices
Rectification of 214 million Yuan
Administrative auditing by the Audit Commission, Division
Systems management issues
By the end of October this year, the audit found breaches of discipline problems have solutions of 214 million Yuan. At the same time, by relocating the project, clean up digested the long-term balance of poverty relief funds of 145 million Yuan.
For problems, the person in charge believes that includes both system level management reasons. First of all is poverty alleviation funding channels for dispersing, integrated management is not enough. Central financial funds have 10 class special, involving a total of 7 departments, departments of special poverty alleviation project, between the same sector this sector has among other special supports cross-duplicates, the lack of effective communication links, often appear more funds into the same project, the same phenomenon results offset by multiple tasks.
Followed by poverty alleviation responsibility not enough coordination, supervision is missing. Borne of poverty alleviation and development authority and local government purse strings do not match, duties and responsibilities, non-led provincial government supervisory responsibility is not clear and specific enough, County and township government emphasis on applications for funding, organization, supervision and inspection light, resulting in poor regulation is not implemented.
Perfect structure and strengthen assessment
The audit recommends that the study on perfecting mechanism and financial investment in pro-poor expenditure structure. First of all, to rationalize and that Governments at all levels of poverty alleviation and development responsibilities and earmarked transfers on the central concerns of poverty alleviation and development projects for clean integration, centralized management and manpower arrangement and funding for projects, strengthening the powers and responsibilities of the County Government to enhance poverty reduction planning and funding arrangements for science and rationality. Second, adjusting the structure of financial funds ' expenditure, rural infrastructure construction in poor areas of focus, for competitive industrialization projects should be primarily through the formulation of tax preferential policies, such as efforts to increase financial support, encourage and guide social investment, effectively enhance hematopoiesis in poverty alleviation and development.
Performance evaluation also strengthen poverty reduction. Local governments at all levels should strengthen pro-poor upfront research and feasibility studies of the project implementation, increase the intensity of performance assessment, enhanced application assessment results. Completed but temporary project cannot be put to use, timely and perfect supporting facilities, project effectiveness as soon as possible to prevent a loss waste.
-Expert advice
Use of funds should be transparent
National School of administration, Professor, Department of public administration, public administration Director zhuli
Information disclosure supervision
Zhuli believes that this inspection reflects the lack of use of funds for poverty alleviation more stringent management, which led to the back door, watch face, Unitarian Church, there are no perfect relationship, leadership, and other factors affecting the normal use of funds. Some funds were idle and waste or corruption, or granted does not meet the criteria, eligible persons do not have access to their funds.
He proposed to consider to establish a sound mechanism for information disclosure of funds ' management uses, information disclosure of funds ' as the focus of public affairs content, size, support of special funds for scope, support, distribution based on the conditions and other information were made public, through community supervision so that a more equitable use of funds.
Since funds are a form of fiscal transfer payment, he suggested that the NPC sector funds must be strengthened in the future management, from the direction of use to allocate an object must be strong intervention, not only by the local government in charge.
Strict Declaration to strengthen oversight
At the same time, to enhance financial funds ' supervision and inspection, strictly responsible audit and discipline inspection and supervision departments should increase their financial supervision and inspection of the poverty alleviation fund.
Recent hot brains in some parts of society, the sharpening head when poor counties, when the counties even celebration of the General Assembly, zhuli analysis primarily interests battle. To him, are currently part of the counties of poverty alleviation fund, and can even account for about half of total local fiscal. Asking for money so easily, rather than spend much time and energy developing economy earning. With the advent of various benefits and poverty alleviation fund, individual leading cadres from the soup, which led to part of the poverty alleviation fund failed to actually go to the poor, "fat people thin" appears when.
He proposed more stringent conditions poor counties to declare on the basis of discipline inspection and supervision departments should strengthen "Tiger flies", attempted to take this corrupt and profit-seekers stealing chickens no longer corrosion meter. Only in this way, competition for declining heat poor counties will be rational.
Jinghua times, Peng
Wang Chun of Beijing times drawing
(Original title: 17 counties lie poverty alleviation fund than 21.5 million)
昨天，审计署公告了19个扶贫开发工作重点县财政扶贫资金审计结果。
记者统计发现，有11个县存在贪污侵占扶贫资金的问题；10个县违规支出招待费用于请客、送礼、旅游等，违规总金额接近1110万元；17个县存在各种骗取扶贫资金的事实，总额超过了2150万元。
这次审计反映和暴露出的问题，令人震惊，我们深感痛心，也深感肩上责任重大。国务院扶贫办督促边审边改、立审立改，并抓紧与财政部积极研究改革财政专项扶贫资金管理机制。
——国务院扶贫办党组成员蒋晓华
2人判刑 78人受处分 17人通报批评 26人诫勉谈话
共计123人受罚
11个县
贪污腐败 吞资金 占公款
对审计公告梳理后记者发现，云南省昌宁县、云南省澜沧拉祜族自治县、贵州省荔波县、贵州省镇宁布依族苗族自治县、陕西省旬阳县、甘肃省古浪县、甘肃省西和县、广西壮族自治区靖西县、宁夏回族自治区海原县等出现了贪污问题，相关人员已移送有关部门处理。
同时，广西壮族自治区环江毛南族自治县2010年至2012年的财政扶贫资金，则存在个别公职人员涉嫌侵占公款的问题，并已移送有关部门处理。
17个县
骗扶贫金超2150万
在一些人眼中，扶贫资金已然成为了不吃白不吃的“唐僧肉”。记者对公告内容进行统计发现，竟然有17个县都存在各种骗取扶贫资金的事实，总额超过了2150万元。
其中陕西省旬阳县骗取扶贫资金330.5万元、陕西省横山县骗取扶贫资金320.32万元、甘肃省广河县骗取扶贫资金252.57万元等。
10个县
违规支出请客送礼接待
记者统计显示，这次共有10个县存在违规支出招待费的问题，具体包括用于请客、送礼、接待、违规列支餐费、向相关人员发放津贴补贴、旅游接待、购买烟酒等诸多违规情况，违规总金额接近1110万元。
其中，陕西省洛南县违规支出招待费等375.85万元、云南省富宁县违规支出招待费等191.01万元、贵州省黎平县违规支出招待费等122.71万元等。
其他问题
多收扶贫对象款 公款私存
其中，甘肃省西和县公款私存1250.21万元、广西壮族自治区龙胜各族自治县多收扶贫对象45.74万元，如2009年至2011年，该县农产品流通办公室使用财政扶贫资金订购包装箱，按每箱1元标准向种植户收取运杂费，共计高出实际成本23.28万元。
此外，宁夏回族自治区同心县扶贫项目脱离实际损失985.81万元、云南省富宁县扶贫资金5598.82万元长期滞留闲置等。
□官方声音
已整改2.14亿元
审计署行政事业审计司负责人
制度管理均存问题
截至今年10月底，审计发现的违规违纪问题已整改2.14亿元。同时，通过重新调整项目等，清理消化长期结存扶贫款1.45亿元。
对于问题成因，该负责人认为既有制度层面也有管理层面的原因。首先是扶贫资金投入渠道分散，统筹管理不够。中央财政扶贫资金有10类专项，涉及7个主管部门，各部门专项之间、同一部门扶贫专项与本部门其他专项之间支持内容存在交叉重复，各环节缺乏有效沟通，经常出现多项资金投入同一项目、同一成果冲抵多项任务的现象。
其次是扶贫工作权责不够协调，相关监督管理缺失。地方政府承担的扶贫开发事权与财权不匹配，权责不对等，导致省级政府监管责任不够明确和具体，县乡政府重资金申请、轻组织实施和监督检查，造成扶贫工作监管责任不落实。
完善结构强化考核
这次审计建议研究完善财政扶贫投入机制和支出结构。首先，要理顺和明确各级政府扶贫开发职责，对中央涉及扶贫开发工作的专项转移支付项目进行清理整合，做到项目统筹安排和资金归口管理，强化县级政府权力和责任，提高扶贫工作规划和资金安排的科学性和合理性。其次，调整财政扶贫资金支出结构，重点投向贫困地区农村基础设施建设等方面，对于竞争性的产业化项目应主要通过制定税收优惠政策、加大金融扶持力度等方式，鼓励和引导社会力量投入，切实增强扶贫开发的造血功能。
此外还要强化扶贫工作绩效考核。各级地方政府要加强扶贫项目实施的前期调研和论证，加大绩效考核力度，强化考核结果运用。对已完工但暂时无法投入使用的项目，要及时完善配套设施，推动项目早日发挥效益，防止形成损失浪费。
□专家建言
资金使用应透明
国家行政学院公共管理教研部教授、公共行政教研室主任竹立家
信息公开社会监督
竹立家认为，这次检查反映出扶贫资金使用还缺乏更为严格的管理，这导致走后门、看面子，有无过硬关系、领导一言堂等因素都影响了资金正常使用。有些资金因此被闲置、浪费或者贪污，还有的发给了不符合条件者，符合条件者却得不到应有的资金。
他提议可考虑建立健全扶贫资金管理使用全过程的信息公开机制，将扶贫资金信息公开作为政务公开的重点内容，对专项资金的规模、扶持范围、扶持条件、分配依据等信息都予以公开，通过社会监督使资金使用更为公平合理。
由于扶贫资金属于财政转移支付的一种形式，他建议人大部门今后必须对扶贫资金加强管理，从使用方向到分配对象等都必须强势介入，不能仅由当地政府说了算。
严格申报加强监督
同时，加强财政扶贫资金监督检查，严格追究责任；审计和纪检监察部门也要加大对财政扶贫资金的监督检查力度。
对于近日社会热议的一些地区挖空心思、削尖脑袋要当贫困县，当了贫困县后甚至开大会热烈庆祝的情况，竹立家分析，这主要是利益之争。他介绍，目前部分贫困县获得的扶贫资金，甚至能占到当地财政总量的一半左右。要钱这么容易，很多地方就不愿花力气发展经济自己挣钱。而随着各种优惠和扶贫资金的到来，个别领导干部从中分羹，这导致部分扶贫资金没能真正用于扶贫，“官肥民瘦”时有出现。
他建议在进一步严格贫困县申报条件的基础上，纪检监察等有关部门应该加大“老虎苍蝇一起打”的力度，让企图借此腐败和逐利者偷鸡不成再蚀把米。只有这样，争夺贫困县的热度才会理性下降。
京华时报记者赵鹏
京华时报制图汪春才
(原标题：17个县骗扶贫资金超2150万)
赞