Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2013/12/29 7:09:16 Lawyers called the Henan authorities no one even Johns Hopkins bridge collapse accident responsible：
The day before yesterday, the Henan provincial work safety supervision Bureau Web site published Lian Huo Expressway in sanmenxia Yoshimasa bridge "2." major transport fireworks explosion accident investigation reports, disclosure of the official findings, and said 20 had been responsible to take judicial measures, and recommends on 23 related responsibility of party and Government disciplines disposition. Yesterday, the judicial measures taken by Hebei Shi Jia Zhuang Kaida transport company 3 the person responsible, the lawyer for the South reporter, official accident investigation report disclosed, did not address the responsibilities of the departments concerned in Henan province, is unfair.
Collapsed bridge 76.32 million dollars of losses
Two days ago, Henan provincial work safety supervision Bureau's website said Yoshimasa bridge major transport fireworks explosion accident investigation report has provincial approval. The survey report said, the accident was a production safety accident. February 1 this year with this accident, resulting in Lian-Huo Expressway in sanmenxia of Henan Duan Yichang bridge partially collapsed, and vehicles fall under the bridge, leaving 13 people dead, 9 injured, 76.32 million yuan of direct economic losses.
Investigation report analysis accident occurred of directly causes for, accident vehicles driver Shi Yanfei, and shippers Leary party, people using not has dangerous goods transport qualification of JI a, No. 70380, van, not according to provides for mount, long-distance transport illegal production of fireworks pharmacy explosion property (land Ray) and Fireworks firecrackers (opened days Ray), en route emergency brake, led to compartments within explosion property occurred impact, and friction raised explosion. Also, the report analyses the causes of bridge collapsing and the indirect cause of the accident.
Report cites record data, in October 2011, Yoshimasa bridge inspection ratings for technical condition of bridge grade II, is good. Explosive experts after tests show that has good dynamic characteristics of the bridge, vertical dynamic stiffness to meet the design requirements, indicating that overall carrying capacity of bridge to meet the design requirements.
Found when the indirect cause of the accident, anchored by the survey reports that a vehicle transport company Shi Jia Zhuang Kaida, Shaanxi Pucheng County Hongsheng Fireworks manufacturing company limited, little Kuo in Pucheng County Department of transportation and freight Department of nothing, as well as the Transportation Management Office of Shijiazhuang city, 12 responsibility for neglect of duty, the absence of regulation of these responsibilities.
Of the 12 units, enterprise has over 20 people after the incident to take judicial measures, including arrest and detention after release on bail. Shi Jia Zhuang Kaida transport company legal representative and Manager Zhang Zhidong, Zhang Bingkuan, Director of the Office and security staff Peng Yongqing, on February 6, was authorized to arrest for alleged illegal transport of explosives offences.
Attorneys questioned the responsibility
Yesterday, the South of Zhang Zhidong's lawyer Wang Zhi-Rong told a press conference, Kaida transport company responsible for the remaining two Peng Yongqing and Zhang Bingkuan has been released on bail pending trial. In the investigation in the case, three volumes twice for supplementary investigation cases investigation, prosecutors to extend the review period was January 7 next year, nearly 11 months after the crime was committed in this case, not to the trial stage.
On several occasions, to the investigation of Henan Wang Zhi-Rong said, according to his investigations on the ground, the time of the incident, Lian-Huo Expressway Yoshimasa bridge in fog and mist, drivers were not able to see the vehicle's license plate number, causes jams with Yoshimasa bridge, which suffered heavy losses after the explosion. "Investigative reports that 3,000 m, which 9:44 to there fog and visibility of 300 meters. "Wang Zhi-Rong said," the highway Management Department is not at the required time off road, and grooming vehicle. ”
Media reports suggest that 4 months before the incident, on September 13, 2012, Zhan Hongfang, Deputy Secretary General on behalf of the provincial Government of Henan province, sanmenxia frequent traffic accidents that year, interviewed in sanmenxia city government official. Among them, the interviewing was informed of Lian-Huo Expressway "8·31" serious traffic accidents, killing 11 people were killed and 14 others were injured in the accident. Interviewed mentioned that Lian-Huo Expressway in sanmenxia section risks have not been eliminated, pavement management and control are not in place, high-speed traffic police force is inadequate.
"Yoshimasa bridge when the explosion occurred, these problems have been fixed? "Wang Zhi-Rong said that the information provided by the authorities are hard to convince. "The accident investigation group led by Henan provincial safety supervision Bureau and other departments involved in, directly responsible to the provincial government, in the area of responsibility does not relate to any Department of Henan province and the person responsible, the existence of local protectionism? ”
According to investigative journalist in the South, the day of the accident, Kaida transportation company was informed that vehicle affiliated to the company. That night, the transport management office sent people to Kaida in Shijiazhuang city transportation company, guide people on supplementary instruments to keep materials such as Zhang Zhidong, including safety rules and regulations, institutions, inspection records and emergency plans. Which has a list of safety organizations dated June 15, 2007, Zhang Bingkuan Office of the safety officer, Peng Yongqing to security workers, two persons were quickly arrested. Lawyer Wang Zhi-Rong said that he had asked police to bring these materials subsequently removed from the evidence, but did not do so.
Survey in the three game
Investigative journalist found South, the Henan provincial safety supervision Bureau of accident investigation report released yesterday, the main content comes from the end of May a written technical report of the accident. On the nature of the cause of the accident, the accident and the measures and recommendations, the technical report states that a transport company, Fireworks manufacturers, freight corporate liability, did not deal with relevant departments of Shaanxi and Hebei.
In fact, as early as a few days after the explosion, authorities in Henan province on the convening of an expert seminar, and form a consensus and demonstrated in more than a month after refinement. But because the case involves Henan, Hebei and Shanxi provinces, and involves multi-sectoral accountability, so after a lot of consultation with the parties. Xinhua News Agency, reported on March 26, the Henan provincial work safety supervision Bureau draft technical report of the accident investigation team has been formed, and Hebei, Shaanxi, related departments in "final discussions."
The end of May, the Henan provincial work safety supervision Bureau investigations branch staff told the South reporter, until the beginning of May, "concludes with a discussion of" is not over. Took part in the survey, an official of the Hebei provincial work safety supervision system revealed that Hebei has requested technical identification of the architectural quality of the collapsed bridge.
The South reporter Sun Xuyang
(Original title: bridge collapse of Lian-Huo Expressway in Henan without accountability? ）
前日，河南省安监局网站公布了《连霍高速三门峡义昌大桥“2 .1”重大运输烟花爆竹爆炸事故调查报告》，披露了官方调查结论，并表示已对20名相关责任人采取司法措施，并建议对23名相关责任人给予党纪政纪处分。昨日，被采取司法措施的河北石家庄凯达运输公司3名责任人的代理律师对南都记者表示，官方披露的事故调查报告，没有涉及河南省有关部门的责任，有失公平。
垮桥损失7632万元
前日，河南省安监局网站表示，义昌大桥重大运输烟花爆竹爆炸事故的调查报告，已经河南省政府批复。该调查报告称，该事故是一起生产安全责任事故。今年2月1日8时57分发生的这起事故，导致连霍高速河南三门峡段义昌大桥部分坍塌，车辆坠落桥下，造成13人死亡，9人受伤，直接经济损失7632万元。
调查报告分析事故发生的直接原因为，肇事车辆司机石彦飞、货主李瑞党等人使用不具有危险货物运输资质的冀A 70380号货车，不按照规定进行装载，长途运输违法生产的烟火药剂爆炸物(土地雷)和烟花爆竹(开天雷)，途中紧急刹车，导致车厢内爆炸物发生撞击、摩擦引发爆炸。同时，报告分析了桥梁坍塌原因及事故发生的间接原因。
报告援引相关记录数据称，2011年10月，义昌大桥检查评定结果为桥梁技术状况等级二类，属于良好。爆炸后的专家测试显示，该桥具有较好的动力特性，竖向动刚度满足设计要求，表明桥梁整体承载能力满足设计要求。
在认定事故的间接原因时，该调查报告指出了肇事车辆所挂靠的石家庄凯达运输公司、陕西省蒲城县宏盛花炮制造有限公司、蒲城县小郭货运部和虎子货运部，以及石家庄市运管处等12家责任单位疏于职守、监管缺位等责任。
在上述12家单位中，企业方面有20人在事发后被采取司法措施，包括逮捕和刑事拘留后取保。石家庄凯达运输公司法人代表、经理张志栋，办公室主任张兵宽和安全员彭永清，都在2月6日因涉嫌非法运输爆炸物罪被批准逮捕。
代理律师质疑追责
昨日，张志栋的代理律师王志荣告诉南都记者，凯达运输公司其余两名责任人张兵宽和彭永清都已取保候审。在此案的侦办中，三人被合卷侦办的案件曾经两次补充侦查，检察机关审查起诉期限被延至明年1月7日，所以该案在案发近11个月之后，仍未进入审判阶段。
曾数次到河南调查取证的王志荣说，根据他在当地的调查，事发时，连霍高速义昌大桥段大雾弥漫，司机都无法看清楚前车的车牌号，导致义昌大桥上发生拥堵，致使爆炸发生后损失惨重。“调查报告说当时能见度3000米，其中9时44分至14时52分，出现大雾，能见度300米。”王志荣说，“高速路管理部门没有按规定及时关闭道路，并疏导车辆。”
媒体报道显示，事发前4个多月，2012年9月13日，河南省政府副秘书长詹洪方代表省政府，就该年度三门峡交通事故频发，约谈三门峡市政府有关负责人。其中，约谈会通报了连霍高速“8·31”特大交通事故，该事故造成11人死亡、14人受伤。约谈提到，连霍高速三门峡段隐患未得到根本消除，路面管控不到位，高速交警警力不足。
“在义昌大桥爆炸事故发生时，这些问题都得到了解决吗？”王志荣说，有关部门目前提供的信息难以让人信服。“事故调查组由河南省安全监管局牵头，其他部门参与，直接对河南省政府负责，在追责方面没有涉及河南任何一个部门和责任人，是否存在地方保护？”
根据南都记者调查，事故发生当天，凯达运输公司就获悉肇事车辆挂靠在该公司。当晚，石家庄市运管处派人到凯达运输公司，指导张志栋等人连夜补充各种文书材料，包括安全生产的规章制度、机构组成、检查记录和应急预案等。其中，有一张签署日期为2007年6月15日的安全生产组织机构的名单，将张兵宽设为安全生产办公室主任，彭永清设为安全员，导致两人很快被逮捕。代理律师王志荣表示，他曾要求警方将这些事后补做的材料从证据中剔除，但并未如愿。
调查报告三省博弈
南都记者调查发现，河南省安监局前日公布的事故调查报告，主要内容来自5月底成文的该事故的技术报告。在事故原因、事故性质及措施和建议中，该技术报告指出了运输公司、烟花制造企业和货运部等企业的法律责任，并未涉及陕西和河北的有关部门。
事实上，早在爆炸后数日，河南省有关部门就召开专家研讨会，并形成了一致意见，并在一个多月后细化了论证。但因为该案涉及河南、河北和陕西三省，涉及多部门的责任追究，因此各方经过多次会商。新华社3月26日报道称，河南省安监局事故调查组的技术报告初稿已经形成，但要与河北、陕西相关部门进行“最后讨论”。
5月底，河南省安监局调查处工作人员告诉南都记者，直到5月初，“最后讨论”仍未结束。参与调查的河北省安监系统一位官员透露，河北方面曾要求对垮塌桥面的建筑质量进行技术鉴定。
南都记者 孙旭阳
（原标题：连霍高速塌桥 河南无人担责？）
赞