Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)delv
published in(发表于) 2014/1/2 7:51:55
Don’t always eat shit on the Customs head buckle

Don't always eat shit head buckle to the Customs-Customs, tariffs, and iPad-IT information Don't always eat shit on the Customs head buckle

Today morning, better media are forward has South are a article entitled Guangzhou visitors European lost iPad foreigners at their own expense sent to China was levy tariff under of articles, said of probably is "a Guangzhou visitors in European lost has a iPad, was kind of international friends since cut postage sent back, is was Guangzhou Customs told to levy 200 block tariff" of news, forward language are is in highlight "foreigners creditthat, customs forced tax" of theme, in this opinion oriented Xia, Editor can foresee this modest blog comments area how many netizens berate unsympathetic, Guangzhou Customs money, three character classic and curse each other is to be expected.

After two years of bogong known influence of wind, a lot of people have grown accustomed to replace truth with position: If the event is the main body of a weak and a strong body, not to reason why, must be based on bullying and bullying story. In the face of such public events, brain cells is redundant, just moving the spine nerve center can easily arrive at a conclusion of bullying, as well as to public response. More many pacing the layout of the media whom is to provoke this kind of disputes, today's events but is practiced.

For this murder caused by 200 friends @ black white (like the one above) evaluation of the phrase: " Chinese is like some public opinion, quoted out of context, feel that their campaign was successful, poor heart! Customs acted, how you say ' older machine ' free of tariffs? Since tax evasion is also too simple, can directly put into the lane old no? Besides, customs position, come up with this machine purchasing invoice tax free, this is right, what is wrong with it? ”

Yes, customs tax exceed the import and export of goods, what's wrong with it?

The Chinese customs, the 2010 (on adjustment of management measures related to inbound and outbound mail items) under "personal mail or goods sent to Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions, time limits for 800 RMB for sending items from or sent to other countries and regions, every time limit is 1000 Yuan. "More than 1000 limit, levied taxes are very reasonable and lawful, and customs is only a law-enforcement agencies, secondary schools on the politically-" follow and go by "sending should be taxed without taxation, Customs would be a catastrophe.

But some people are like, you talk to him one, he talk to you about the rule of law; you tell him that the rule of law, he told you that one. Tax on a consumption of the old machine, some people say, "Guangzhou is not humane at all. ”

200 tariff-what is it? 2000*10%. Xiao bian had the chance to read the Customs General Administration of the entry clearance Guide and the People's Republic of China imported goods customs value form, the iPad belongs in the category, have not found lower than the 2000 customs tax and lower tax rates than 10%. Guangzhou Customs said in the extent permitted by the powers and responsibilities to give the greatest degree of "humanity" .

And, if carefully see South are of original reported, inside has is clearly to mentioned if "party provides related proved, proved the items is in domestic purchased of or is exit Shi carrying of, like merchandise purchased invoice and exit items declarations, Customs aspects only will giving corresponding tax reductions or exemptions", customs also not micro-Bo Shang spread of "forced tax" (this claims itself with is strong of emotional tendencies), but according to process to, as long as you also according to foot process go, didn't people so has empty hot you. Exit when the parties have neither completed declaration form, did not provide purchase invoices for iPad. In other words, for the iPad can't prove ownership .

What photo in iPad? Come on, even if you haven't been working in large companies, departments, or at least should have understanding of how they work. This unstructured, it could not copy as a document authentication method, don't give them the Customs staff, he gave you has been spared his superior if he spared? Family mother.

Moreover, such a precedent is set, mass-market whipped it up behind the smuggling and tax evasion are, "space" here would only become eggs cracking in the eyes of a fly. You need not to recognize, confront a need volume repetitive motion rules is the most efficient way.

Party miss no invoices in the report, together with Guangzhou of "geography", did not rule out holding are "Hong Kong version of" suspicion of iPad, of course this is just a less well-intentioned guesses. Another editor has learned from informed sources, the event was able to mount a $ 200 South wave – if it 's--it would be because "Miss" itself and the South have a number of sources. Links to a couple of days ago in my circle of friends to circulate comments on an article Why don't some media in the South of the dead, set aside as a day of shame article, hehe ... ...

Of course, it is possible to "what I said was wrong," more important than the truth itself is the way we tell the truth, not to be led by the nose. The thing itself is unremarkable, but can also become a hot news, it's worth it in practice.

别总把屎盆子往海关脑袋上扣 - 海关,关税,iPad - IT资讯
别总把屎盆子往海关脑袋上扣

今天早上，好些媒体都转发了南都一篇题为《广州游客欧洲丢iPad老外自费寄至中国被征关税》的文章，说的大概是“一个广州游客在欧洲丢失了一个iPad，被好心的国际友人自掏邮费寄回来，却被广州海关告知要征收200块关税”的新闻，转发语都是在突出“老外拾金不昧，海关强行征税”的主题，在这种舆论导向下，小编也能预见这些微博的评论区会有多少网友斥责广州海关不近人情、见钱眼开，三字经和国骂也在意料之中。

经过这两年微博公知风的熏陶，很多人已经习惯了用立场代替真相：如果事件的主体是一个弱小的人和一个强大的机构，不用问原因，一定是以大欺小、恃强凌弱的故事。在这种公众事件面前，脑细胞都是多余的，只消动动脊椎神经中枢就可以很轻易地得出一个恃强凌弱的结论，并且能够得到舆论的响应。很多搏版面的媒体更是对于挑起这样的争端乐此不疲，今天的事件不过又是故伎重演。

对于这个200块引发的血案，网友@黑人白药（如上图）的评价一语中的：“中国人就是喜欢搞点激起民愤的舆论，断章取义，觉得自己的造势很成功，用心不良！海关是依法办事，怎么凭你一句‘旧机子’就免收关税？那以后逃税也太简单了，直接把进关物品弄旧不就可以了？再说，海关也有表态，拿出这机子的购买发票就免税，这事处理的很正确，有何不妥？ ”

是啊，海关依法对超过规定的进出口物品征税，有什么问题呢？

《海关总署公告2010年第43号（关于调整进出境个人邮递物品管理措施有关事宜）》里有规定：“个人寄自或寄往港、澳、台地区的物品，每次限值为800元人民币；寄自或寄往其它国家和地区的物品，每次限值为1000元人民币。”超过1000块的限值，征收税收是十分合理合法的，而且海关只是一个执法部门，中学政治课本上的“有法可依，有法必依”言犹在耳，应该征税的时候不征税，海关会很大祸。

不过有的人就是这样，你跟他谈人情，他跟你谈法制；你跟他说法制，他跟你说人情。对一台自用的旧机器征税，有的人说“广州海关真的是一点都不人性化。”

200块的关税是怎么算的呢？2000*10%。小编翻了翻海关总署的《旅客入境通关指南》和《中华人民共和国进境物品完税价格表》，在iPad所属的品类里，已经找不到比2000更低的关税起征点和比10%更低的税率。广州海关应该说在权责允许的范围内给予了最大程度的“人性化”了。

而且，如果仔细看南都的原文报导，里面已经很清楚地提及如果“当事人提供相关证明，证明该物品是在国内购买的或者是出境时携带的，比如商品购买发票以及出境物品申报单，海关方面才会给予相应减免税”，海关也不是微博上流传的“强行征税”（这个说法本身带有很强的情感倾向），而是照流程来，只要你也照足流程走，没人那么有空刁难你。但是当事人出境的时候既没有填写申报单，也没能提供购买iPad的发票。也就是说，对于这台iPad的所有权没办法自证。

什么，iPad里的照片？算了吧，就算你没在大公司、机关单位里工作过，至少也应该对他们的工作方式有了解。这种非结构化、又没办法以文档形式留底的认证方式，别为难人家海关工作人员了，他给你网开一面，他的上级会不会对他网开一面？人家也是妈生的。

而且，这样的先河一开，后面依法炮制的走私、逃税就会纷至沓来，“弹性空间”在这里只会变成苍蝇眼里的蛋上的裂缝。你得不得承认，面对一个需要批量重复的动作，规则才是最具效率的方式。

报道中的当事人刘小姐拿不出发票，加上身处广州的“地利”，不排除持有的是“港版”iPad的嫌疑，当然这个只是个不太善意的猜测。另，小编还从知情人士处获知，一个200块的事件之所以能登上南都的大雅之堂——如果还算的话——是因为“刘小姐”本身和南都有一些渊源。联系到前两天在朋友圈里流传的一篇评述某南方系媒体的《何不当初死，留作今日羞》的文章，呵呵……

当然，有可能“我所说的都是错的”，比事件真相本身更重要的是我们辨别真相的方式，不要被人牵着鼻子走。这件事本身是很不值一提，但居然也能变成一个热点新闻，这很值得深究。

赞