Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2014/1/2 8:33:19 50 million worth of Su Shi’s works are to be broad-minded， expert research report released
The Beijing News (Xinhua Li Jianya) previous Sotheby's auction, Su Shi of the Kung Fu Research Librarian by Shanghai Museum's Department of paintings and calligraphy, three questions after the remarks sparked considerable controversy. Yesterday, Silver Blue, Ling Lizhong, Dan Guolin two clock "academic studies" was published in the China cultural relics journal. In this regard, Liu Yiqian buyers told the Beijing News said, after you read a reprint of part of an article, that it would prefer three librarians personal academic papers, blog place instead, "academic contending is normal. ”
Recently, the blog on the three research librarian through textual criticism in the media, Liu Yiqian shoot back from New York of the Kung Fu is false. Liu Yiqian twice after many issue a statement hoping to publish scholarly articles related to the.
Which, Bell Silver Blue, and Ling Lizhong in "from Fateh in the hook"--analysis straddling Liu Xi Royal 〉 straddling power Andriy Shevchenko post 〉 ink hook examination of nature under in the pointed out that, on Liu Xi Royal under pseudo this of research, helps on power Andriy Shevchenko post under of identification, "this two pieces hundreds of years Qian on in together, and Republic of Shi and with for Xu Hanqing old hid of ink, its hook examination nature has mirrors. "While Dan Guolin articles from Weng Fanggang calligraphy, seal the authenticity of identification, and other point of view.
Buyers respond
Liu Yiqian told reporters that Bo on the three research librarian in academic articles published before you view the various pages, Bo, a public museum on its mistaken positions, is blogging on Dragon challenge the Museum shop. Liu Yiqian that academic report came out, believe that Sotheby's will come up with the report to respond. And once when two reports and uncompromising, he himself will be judged according to the various opinions whose arguments are more convincing.
(Original title: shangbo researchers published studies of the Kung Fu)
新京报讯 (记者 李健亚)此前有关苏富比拍品苏轼《功甫帖》被上海博物馆书画部三位研究馆员质疑为伪作后引发了极大争议。昨日，钟银兰、凌利中、单国霖将两份“学术研究报告”正式发表于《中国文物报》。对此，买家刘益谦告诉新京报记者称，看了转载的部分文章后，觉得这更偏向于三位研究馆员的个人学术论文，而不是上博的职务行为，“学术争鸣很正常。”
日前，上博三位研究馆员在媒体上称通过考证，刘益谦从纽约拍回的《功甫帖》是伪本。质疑声出后刘益谦两度发声明希望能尽快公布相关的学术文章。
其中，钟银兰、凌利中在《“从法帖中双钩”——析〈刘锡敕〉〈功甫帖〉墨迹钩摹的性质》中指出，对《刘锡敕》伪本的研究，有助于对《功甫帖》的鉴别，“这两件百余年前就在一起、民国时又同为许汉卿旧藏的墨迹，其钩摹性质竟如出一辙。”而单国霖的文章则从翁方纲书法、印章的真伪鉴别等角度出发。
■ 买家回应
刘益谦告诉记者，上博这三位研究馆员在发表学术文章之前先将观点发诸报端，让其误以为是上博这一公共博物馆的职务行为，是上博对龙美术馆所买东西提出质疑。刘益谦称学术报告出来后，相信苏富比也会出相应的报告来回应。而一旦两份报告各执一词时，自己也会根据各种意见来评判到底是谁的论据更有说服力。
(原标题：上博研究员公布《功甫帖》研究报告)
赞