Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2014/1/2 8:46:56 Shanghai owners for property brought conflict-induced 2 deaths
Change property owners met violent opposition: old properties drove hit a new property and 2 dead and many wounded
Post reporter He Yinghan Wu Yue Wei-Zang Ming
Yet another tragedy caused by the replacement of property by the landlord: the about zero hour 02 minutes yesterday, new year's Bell had just sounded, Datang shengshi Garden District, Pudong, the new and old weapons violation property companies transfer, sides are nearly 200 people involved in accidents resulting in 2 deaths and many injured.
Old property company (Tang properties) why would block new property company (del Lago property) settled in and raises conflicts?
Post reporter visited, the survey found at the beginning of the community building, garden community commissioned the developer Datang events Tang property management, the terms expressly agreed "from May 1, 2006 to the owners ' Committee is set up."
Community industry had record established on January 31, 2013, Tang properties have not entered into a new contract, but the community is still provided by Tang property services. On September 1 last year, community owners by vote of the General Assembly, decided to open tender selection of new properties. Final level quality properties in Shanghai with Lai company won the bid.
Both sides dispute tends to produce, Tang properties, Industry Authority tender selection procedures do not meet the requirements of new properties, and will take them to court.
On November 19, 2013, the Pudong new area people's Court of first instance judgment dismissing the appeal. For the resolutions of the general meeting program is legitimate and should be revoked, the Court held that "is within the community owners right of revocation, the plaintiff is not entitled to resolution requests continue to perform on the program illegal prior property management contracts". Plaintiff defendant continued property in the early implementation of the contract, no factual and legal basis, the Court "not supported".
But for the Court of first instance decision, Tang property Appeal appeal to the Shanghai number one intermediate people's Court. Court flyer shows outside the community, the second instance court date is January 14, 2014. Tang property December 30, 2013, community notices, "said some owners years of accumulated unpaid property charges by more than 6 million Yuan, is in litigation and reminders, in front of the financial accounts of the settlement, we cannot be transferred. Yet to confirm the termination of the Realty service contract subject to your (Commission) forcibly settled community organizations with the property company Lai is an illegal act. ”
Party, party moved in, resulting in a conflict. At present, the accident is under further investigation.
Localities:
Booth glass going on duty was broken
Incident at Cherry Road, Pudong near yinxiao road, Datang shengshi Garden (phase II) District of Namdaemun.
Yesterday at 13 o'clock, at the scene, flourishing age garden phase II community remains a ballast of broken glass on the ground near the south entrance. Booth smashed thick glass is going to be on duty, the doors and Windows were destroyed, interior keep in a computer display rocks the size of bricks. In this case, booth still lives with two property officers on duty to maintain order. Interview was informed that they were older employees of property companies. And they said, stand up last post. In South Gate are dozens of who wears a helmet Center, flowers police presence. Cherry Blossom road, South entrance 5 metres away you can see blood.
Witnesses to shoot live video display,, December 31, 2013, new property nearly 90 employees in the flourishing age garden phase II community near the South Gate of the collection, holding shields or sticks, lined along Cherry Road, according to the contract, transferred on January 1, 2014 horizon Datang shengshi garden property management services. However, the original property company refused to evacuate, the face-off. South Gate of the old property company on duty nearly 70 people, holding the pipe, there is a bus carrying about 50 people parked outside the South Gate. South Gate, and sitting in a Land Rover cars, and a Santana car, blocking the doors to prevent new property company came in. January 1 and 02 hours, Range Rover to the South door exit followed old property company people.
Since then, Santana from the South Gate opened towards the new property company up and turn right heading west along Cherry Road, then turned around, came along the way forward in Sakura East high speed, after when new property company up, suddenly turned to shock the crowd. Nearby residents have witnessed the whole process, heard "BAM BAM" sound Santana car disappeared. Guy gets hit is a new property company, one victim died on the spot.
According to the live video, hit Santana in the Briar road, nearby parking, Limo driver to flee and hide. At this point, the new property management company piled on property companies dominate on-duty community South Gate of the original old sentry box smashed. About 5 minutes later, hiding the Santana driver was new property companies who discovered, being chased, but there is no catch.
Last night, the driver has to give himself up to the police of Santana.
Controversy:
Industry Authority will bidding was old property prosecution
It is understood that is located in the Pudong new area, Cherry Road 801 Datang shengshi Garden (phase I) by the developer Tang real estate development, building area of more than 220,000 square meters, owner of 1598, and the two communities with a property company.
Is responsible for the provision of property services in the early Tang property management Ltd, in accordance with the contract of the property in the early conventions, delegate management period from May 1, 2006, to the owners ' Committee is set up.
Yesterday afternoon, according to Datang shengshi Garden (phase I) Board named Director Choi, industry Commission was set up on January 31, 2013, for the record, but have not signed new services contracts and Tang property, but community is made up of Tang provides property services. On September 1 last year, community owners by vote of the General Assembly, decided to open tenders for selecting new property, legal proceedings only antagonise Tang property.
Director Choi said when participating in tenders there are 4 property companies, Shanghai Tong Lai final level quality property management company won the bid. Industry also has publicly invited Tang to property involved in competition, despite their lack of qualifications. "In accordance with the size of our community, property management companies should have a grade a, Tang only third-level qualification. ”
According to the Xinmin report, in September, Tang to buildings for owners ' meetings does not comply with the "double majority" provisions for the Commission to court. Plaintiffs think: accused organization of owners Assembly Conference "participate in of owners in proprietary area accounted for buildings total area Shang is not up half, number also is not up total number of half", "violation has legal provides of owners Assembly resolution of minimum standard, violations has plaintiffs of lawful rights and interests of, law should for invalid, accused should immediately stopped enrollment bid hiring property management enterprise acts", requests Court "Decree accused continues to fulfil early property management contract" and bear litigation costs.
Pudong new area people's Court court twice. After investigation, the delegate Tang of flourishing developer Datang Garden District real estate management the term expressly agreed "with effect from May 1, 2006 to the owners ' Committee was established". The Court found that "the term of the contract by the parties, right and obligation terminates upon the expiration of the term of the contract". In this connection, the original, the accused expressed no objections on both sides. Early contract agreement, "contract this contract dispute is the owners ' Committee or district, the natural termination of the contract."
After the establishment of owners ' Committee, through the issuance of resolutions of the general meeting, owners announced the voting result and send form letters, repeatedly expressed to plaintiffs no longer renewal, and make preparations for the transfer of meaning. General meeting resolution process is legitimate, should be revoked, the Court held that "is within the community owners right of revocation, the plaintiff is not entitled to resolution requests continue to perform on the program illegal prior property management contracts". Plaintiff defendant continued property in the early implementation of the contract, no factual and legal basis, the Court "not supported".
On November 19, 2013, the Pudong new area people's Court (2013) Pu Min (), early No. 33677 civil judgement of first instance judgement, dismissing the appeal, halving costs borne by the plaintiff.
Back:
Property does not do? Its destructive ends good?
Thought this Court down, smooth implementation of the handover. But only to zero yesterday just after Lai when lined up ready to enter the property in accordance with the contract, met with Tang property block, severe conflict parties occur.
Yesterday afternoon, with Lai property the relevant responsible person, meeting, held on December 23, 2013, as a representative of the property in Tang said: the handover may not be as smooth. "When our staff line-up settled with a shield. ”
Challenging property owners in Tang, Board Director, surnamed CAI, said yesterday, when on September 1, 2013 for convening owners ' meeting, they served a total of 1585 votes, recycle 670 votes, 910 is not recovered. In 670 valid votes, over more than 400 agree to replace the new property, more than more than 200 agree to renewal. In accordance with the relevant provisions, there is no vote or abstain from voting as agreed with the valid votes in the majority opinion. "We are a a knock, knock twice no answer is sent to the mailbox. ”
To replace a root cause of property company, Director Choi said many Tang property not as a place, virescence mess, residential home repair leaking not disposal, private industry had the chop as well as property losses would be parking fees, advertising fees and other public benefits funds spent, and so on. And, as early as in May 2013, the industry authority has commissioned a third-party audit firms to audit property accounts and eventually found that nearly 2 million yuan of funds does not make a entry in a account of book, when dealing with property has not been valid responses, thus rupture of bilateral relations.
Industry had to say, property of a security guard in Tang countered that because after the owners ' Committee was established to replace the property companies only take into account the interests, many owners did not know. And he had heard that the owners default on company property management fee of 6 million Yuan, Industry Committee set up after the company spent 800,000 yuan to buy Office supplies, such as computers, Tang did not promise to make each other angry.
According to the Secretary's assertion, yesterday a new property company to more than 200 people, took a meter long steel rod wears a helmet, and they only have twenty or thirty men, and come in after 50, post "older people". Except Lai property staff, and hiring security guards, and thugs out there, "came around the car a smashed, people were also wounded, some forehead 7 stitches. ”
However, when Tang community neighborhood Committee Secretary said in an interview, confirmed the Commission was set up by the absolute legitimacy, other details you do not want to answer any more.
Residents:
Dissatisfied why not buy
15:30, Datang shengshi garden phase II community near the South Gate, Lai property nearly 30 staff members paraded out, has entered a period of prosperous Tang Dynasty garden phase II, a community, and successfully completed the handover of the work. Community owners gathered at the South Gate was spontaneous clapping, others look strange. Shanghai Tang was on duty staff pick up the personal effects of the property management company to leave.
For the old and new property replacement, residents have different voices in the community: part of the population on weekdays is quite satisfied with the work of the old property, others are not so clear.
One owner said in an interview: "property management is a service contract, service not satisfied with why can't we replace? Now junk that no one in the community, in the stairwell was posted everywhere, order or security, how can we be satisfied? Our landlord is the owner of community, property must ride on us right now, Yes. ”
Some owners said they had no knowledge of replacement property from start to finish, Director Choi said the authority has no funds to construct a communications channel, often publicity post are being torn up, followed by Twitter and forums to figure out a way, but I still have many restrictions. He said industry had only 9 people, 1600, is difficult to do one by one tell it.
It is understood that after the incident, Lai property company official condolences to hospitals and the dead in the first House and started follow-up to appease. About 20 o'clock yesterday, Pudong new area of Shanghai Datang flourishing age garden part of the phase I and phase II Community owners gathered at the South Gate of the second phase of community, lit candles, praying for the injured employees in respect of property.
业主换物业遭暴力反对：老物业驾车撞新物业2人死多人伤
早报记者 何颖晗 吴跃伟 臧鸣
又一起因业主更换物业而引发的惨剧上演：昨日零时02分许，跨年的钟声刚刚敲响，浦东新区大唐盛世花园小区新老物业公司交接时发生大规模冲突，双方有近200人卷入，事故导致2人死亡，多人受伤。
老物业公司(盛唐物业)为何会阻拦新物业公司(同涞物业)入驻并引发冲突呢？
早报记者走访调查得知，该小区建立之初，开发商将大唐盛世花园小区委托盛唐物业管理，期限明确约定“自2006年5月1日起至业委会成立为止”。
小区业委会2013年1月31日备案成立，之后并未和盛唐物业签订新的服务合同，不过小区仍由盛唐物业提供事实服务。去年9月1日，小区业主大会通过投票，决定公开招标选聘新的物业。最终具备一级资质的上海同涞物业公司中标。
双方争议就此产生，盛唐物业称，业委会招标选聘新物业程序不符合规定，并将业委会告上法庭。
2013年11月19日，浦东新区人民法院一审判决，驳回原告的诉请。对于业主大会决议程序是否合法，应否予以撤销，法院认为“系属小区业主撤销权范围，原告无权以决议程序违法为由请求继续履行前期物业管理合同”。原告诉请被告继续履行前期物业合同，缺乏事实及法律依据，法院“不予支持”。
但对于法院的一审判决，盛唐物业不服，向上海市第一中级人民法院提起上诉。小区门外的法院传单显示，二审开庭时间是2014年1月14日9时。盛唐物业2013年12月30日在小区张贴告示称，“部分业主多年累计欠缴物业费达600余万元，现正在诉讼和催缴中，在财务账目结清前，我司无法移交。在法院尚未确认物业服务合同是否解除的前提下，贵会(业委会)组织同涞物业公司强行入驻小区的行为是违法行为。”
一方不走，一方要求进驻，结果一场冲突就此发生。目前，事故正在进一步调查中。
现场：
值班岗亭玻璃尽数被砸
事发地位于浦东樱花路近银霄路，大唐盛世花园(二期)小区的南大门。
昨日13时许，在事发现场，盛世花园二期小区的南门口仍然是满地的碎玻璃碴。值班岗亭厚厚的玻璃已尽数被砸碎，门窗被毁坏，室内一台电脑显示器中还留着砖块大小的石头。此时，岗亭附近仍有两位物业人员值班，维持秩序。采访得知，他们是老物业公司的员工。他们说，站好最后一班岗。在南门外是数十位戴着钢盔的联防队员，由花木派出所派驻。樱花路上，距离南门口5米处还可以看到斑斑血迹。
目击者拍下的现场视频显示，2013年12月31日22时许，新物业公司近90名员工在盛世花园二期小区的南门附近集合，持有盾牌或棍棒，沿樱花路排成一排，打算按照合同，于2014年1月1日零点接管大唐盛世花园小区的物业管理工作。然而，原物业公司不肯撤离，双方对峙。老物业公司一方在值班的南门集合近70人，手持钢管，还有一辆中巴车载有约50人停在南门外。而南门中停着一辆路虎汽车和一辆桑塔纳轿车，堵塞大门，以防新物业公司的人冲进来。1月1日零时02分许，路虎车向南门外驶出，其后跟随的是老物业公司的人。
此后，桑塔纳轿车从南门开出冲向新物业公司的人墙，并右拐向西沿樱花路行驶，而后掉头，沿樱花路向东高速冲过来，在经过新物业公司的人墙时，突然变向冲撞人群。附近小区居民目睹整个过程，听到“嘭嘭”几声，桑塔纳车就没影了。被撞的都是新物业公司的人，有一位伤者当场死亡。
根据现场视频，桑塔纳轿车撞人后在石楠路附近停车，轿车司机逃离并藏匿。此时，新物业公司的人一拥而上将小区南门原老物业公司占据的值班岗亭砸毁。约5分钟后，藏匿的桑塔纳轿车司机被新物业公司的人发现，被追打，但没有追上。
昨晚，桑塔纳轿车司机已经向警方投案自首。
争议：
业委会招标遭老物业起诉
据了解，位于浦东新区樱花路801弄的大唐盛世花园(一、二期)由开发商盛唐置业有限公司开发，建筑面积22万多平方米，有业主1598户，且两个小区为同一家物业公司。
负责提供前期物业服务的为盛唐物业管理有限公司，按照前期物业合同的约定，委托管理期限自2006年5月1日起至业委会成立为止。
昨日下午，据大唐盛世花园(一、二期)业委会蔡姓主任介绍，业委会于2013年1月31日备案成立，但之后并未和盛唐物业签订新的服务合同，不过小区仍由盛唐物业提供事实服务。去年9月1日，小区业主大会通过投票，决定公开招标选聘新的物业，却因此遭致盛唐物业的法律诉讼。
蔡主任称，当时参与投标的有4家物业公司，最终具备一级资质的上海同涞物业公司中标。而业委会还曾公开邀请过盛唐物业参与竞聘，尽管其资质不够。“按照我们小区的规模，物业管理公司应该具备一级资质，盛唐只有三级资质。”
据新民网报道，同年9月，盛唐物业以业主大会程序不符合“双过半”的规定为由，将业委会告上法庭。原告认为：被告组织的业主大会会议“参加的业主在专有面积占建筑物总面积上未达半数，人数也未达总人数的半数”， “违反了法律规定的业主大会决议的最低标准，侵犯了原告的合法权益，依法应为无效，被告应立即停止招投标选聘物业管理企业行为”，请求法院“判令被告继续履行前期物业管理合同”并承担诉讼费用。
浦东新区人民法院先后两次开庭。经调查，开发商将大唐盛世花园小区委托盛唐物业管理期限明确约定“自2006年5月1日起至业委会成立为止”。法院认为，“当事人约定合同期限的，期限届满时合同权利义务终止”。关于这一点，原、被告双方都表示无异议。前期合同还约定，“合同期满或小区业主委员会对此合同有异议时，本合同自然终止”。
业委会成立后，通过发布业主大会决议、公布业主表决结果以及发送信函等形式，多次向原告表达了不再续聘，并要求做好交接准备工作的意思。至于业主大会决议程序是否合法，应否予以撤销，法院认为“系属小区业主撤销权范围，原告无权以决议程序违法为由请求继续履行前期物业管理合同”。原告诉请被告继续履行前期物业合同，缺乏事实及法律依据，法院“不予支持”。
2013年11月19日，浦东新区人民法院(2013)浦民一(民)初字第33677号民事判决书作出一审判决，驳回原告的诉请，诉讼费减半由原告承担。
背后：
物业不作为？业委会谋私利？
本以为法院判决下来，交接事宜能够顺利进行。但不料昨日零点刚过，同涞物业按照合同列队准备进场时，却遭到盛唐物业的阻拦，双方进而发生剧烈冲突。
昨日下午，同涞物业相关负责人称，在2013年12月23日召开的房办会议上，作为盛唐物业的一名代表曾表示：双方交接时可能不会那么顺利。“为此我们列队的工作人员入驻时都拿着盾牌。”
针对盛唐物业对业主大会的质疑，业委会蔡姓主任昨日表示，2013年9月1日召开业主大会时，他们共送达1585票，回收670张选票，910张未能回收。在这670张有效选票里，400多张同意更换新物业，200多张同意续聘。根据相关规定，没有投票或者弃权的视为同意有效选票里多数人的意见。“我们是一家一家敲门，敲门两次后无人应答便送至信箱。”
而至于想要更换物业公司的根本原因，蔡主任说了许多盛唐物业不作为的地方，比如小区绿化搞得一塌糊涂，居民家里漏水报修不处理，私刻业委会公章以及物业称因为亏损将停车费、广告费等公共收益资金花光等。并且，早在2013年5月，业委会曾聘请第三方审计公司对物业账目进行审计，最终发现有近200万元资金对不上账，为此与物业交涉时也一直未得到有效答复，双方关系至此破裂。
面对业委会的说法，盛唐物业的一名保安反驳称，业委会成立后因为顾及一方私利才要更换物业公司，很多业主并不知情。而他此前听闻业主拖欠公司物业管理费等600万元，业委会成立后让公司动用80万元购买办公电脑等用品，盛唐未答应从而令对方耿耿于怀。
根据该名保安的说法，昨日凌晨新物业公司来了200多号人，拿着一米长的铁棍戴着钢盔，而他们只有二三十个人，且都是50后、60后的“老年人”。除了同涞物业的工作人员，还有外面雇佣的保安以及打手，“冲过来就围着车一顿打砸，我们也有多人受伤，有人额头缝了7针。”
不过，盛唐小区居委会书记在接受采访时，从旁证实了业委会的成立绝对合理合法，其他细节则不愿回答更多。
居民：
服务不满意为什么不能换
昨日15时30分，大唐盛世花园二期小区南门附近，同涞物业近30名工作人员列队走出，先后进入盛唐花园二期、一期小区，顺利地完成了工作交接。聚集在南门的小区业主有人自发鼓掌，也有人表情异样。而正在值班的上海盛唐物业管理公司的员工则收拾个人物品离开。
对于此次新老物业更换，小区里的居民也有不同声音：一部分居民表示平日对老物业的工作还是比较满意的，其他则不太清楚。
而有一位业主在采访中则说：“物业管理是服务性合同，服务不满意我们为什么不能更换？现在小区里垃圾没人倒，楼梯里到处有人张贴，治安也不安全，我们怎么会满意？本来我们业主是小区的主人，现在物业要骑到我们头上，不行。”
针对有业主称自己对更换物业公司从头到尾毫不知情，蔡主任表示，业委会的通信渠道一直没有资金建设，而每每张贴的公示都被人撕毁，其后在微博和论坛都想了办法，可还是有诸多限制。他说业委会目前只有9个人轮流工作，面对1600户，要做到一一告知实在有难度。
据了解，事件发生后，同涞物业公司相关负责人第一时间到医院和死者家中慰问，并开始后续安抚工作。昨日20时许，上海浦东新区大唐盛世花园一期、二期小区的部分业主自发聚集在二期小区南门，点亮蜡烛，为受伤的物业员工祈福。
赞