Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2014/1/8 7:47:13 6.8 per capita parcel express annual standards you up yet？ ，
6.8 per capita parcel, express the annual standard, did you go?-Express, online shopping-IT information 6.8 per capita parcel, express the annual standard, did you go?
@ People's daily: 2013 our express business is done in 9.2 billion, measured by 1.35 billion people, with an average of about 6.8 packages, cost about 106 dollars per capita. Express annual standards, your "standards" yet?
User's answer is: in terms of per capita data, finally has a not in spite of it! As for the "serious excessive", "please cut hand" such as self-assessment, you may wish to open the "buy" page, look at you, what kind of it.
Maximum daily processing capacity of 65 million package
According to the China Post Office official website news, Director of the State Post Office Ma Junsheng presented at the national meeting of Postal Administration yesterday, in 2013, the postal service maintained a sustained and rapid development of the situation. Industry-wide business volume of 268 billion yuan, an increase of 32%; operating income of 253 billion yuan, an increase of 28%.
Among them, the express business is done in 9.2 billion, an increase of 60%, the highest daily handling capacity exceeded 65 million; express service income of 143 billion yuan, an increase of 36%. Express service satisfaction has grown steadily for 6 consecutive years.
According to this data, @ daily Bill and the annual volume of 9.2 billion pieces of mail, express, calculated at 1.35 billion people, on average, about 6.8 per person packages cost about 106 dollars per capita.
2013, your package, standard yet?
Marketing outlets, courier companies are almost in its entirety, "explosive cartridge"
Netizens Qi accidentally running over
In average salary, average housing, and even average height are perennial in spite of a large number of users, this time away. "SIS finally failed to drag on." "Whoops, accidentally catch for the first time, more than the per capita criterion myself." "This is really not ' was ' standard".
And the average room rate in previous years, average income, was always an exclamation "unattainable" compared to 6.8 per person package from "birth" was a variety of "contempt". In the Netizen's words, this is not a problem do not meet standards, and should ask "excessive" for a look. It was "proud" says control in less than 10 people, "twisted" and said it was "average" data science; it was said no word of "drifting" low-key "day, can't afford to kill someone for a year really hurt." Especially the network of young people who basically lives on online shopping. User @snowzoe "countless" how many packages are for last year, "home 80% everything is online."
Of course, there are many @ ink dash leaves so that "none" of people, or average with price as "kissing could catch up."
Package excessive packaging pollution
Online shopping spree, crazy packages as well as crazy garbage. While you are focused on the online shopping fast, convenient, user immediately is also concerned about the excessive packaging and a large amount of waste.
See piles of express delivery, user @ Thai Brook v feel, "those three stories outside the package, causing a lot of waste and pollution. "Indeed, in order to protect the mail-order items, or to reflect the corporate culture, we received a package, often just covered with plastic bags plastic bags plastic bags, carton carton carton ... ... Users @ JACK the Ripper says: "look at the domestic Express Logistics, I thought a little online shopping. "Friends @ little fat world wants to know:" having someone express industry rapid growth brings pollution statistics? ”
Reduce packaging waste, in addition to "cut the hand" reduced net purchases, more still need logistics enterprise in action. Of course, waste sorting and recycling can start from our own. Users @ Hagiwara nukin joked, so the amount of express, logistics and developed not only in the future "recycled cardboard shell can get rich, green industries and policy support."
For refreshments
@ Qingxi: never told you chopping hands the number of times a day. Love @ Hin Indus language: I finally have a per-capita index ahead of deeds ... ...
@ C Brook Trail: no sale, no harm!
@Siney_ LI: exceed the target, couriers, hard friends! @ East v the world: I am never buying, only to go to the mall to buy, will bring their own different types of shopping pleasure.
人均6.8个包裹，快递年度标准你达标了吗？ - 快递,网购 - IT资讯人均6.8个包裹，快递年度标准你达标了吗？
@人民日报：2013年我国快递业务量完成92亿件，按13.5亿人口计算，平均每人约6.8个包裹，人均费用约106元。快递年度标准，你“达标”了吗？
网友的回答是：在人均数据上，终于有一项不拖后腿了！至于“严重超标”，“求剁手”之类自我评价，大家不妨打开“已购买”页面，看看你是哪一类吧。
最高日处理6500万包裹
据中国邮政局官网消息，国家邮政局局长马军胜在昨日召开的全国邮政管理工作会议上介绍，在2013年，邮政业保持了持续快速发展的态势。全行业业务总量完成2680亿元，同比增长32%；业务收入完成2530亿元，同比增长28%。
其中，快递业务量完成92亿件，同比增长60%，最高日处理量突破6500万件；快递业务收入完成1430亿元，同比增长36%。快递服务满意度连续6年稳步提升。
根据这个数据，@人民日报算了一笔账，去年全年92亿件的快递量，按13.5亿人口计算，平均下来，每人约6.8个包裹，人均费用约106元。
2013，你的包裹，达标了吗？
每当电商促销时，各快递公司几乎全线"爆仓"
网友齐呼不小心超标了
在平均工资、平均住房，乃至平均身高上都常年拖后腿的大批网友，这回扬眉吐气了。“姐终于有个没能拖后腿的啦”。“哎呦，一不小心就头一次赶上，还超过人均标准喽”。“这次是真的没有‘被’达标”。
与以往的平均房价、平均收入之类，总被感叹“高不可攀”相比，人均6.8个包裹从“诞生起”就受到了各种“鄙视”。用网友的话说，这不是达不达标的问题，应该问“超标多少”才对啊。有人“自豪”地表示，控制在10个以内；有人“纠结”地表示，这是“月均”数据才科学啊；还有人默默不语的“飘过”，低调表示“一天干掉人家一年的量真心伤不起”。尤其是年轻一族的网络宅人，基本靠网购生活。网友@snowzoe都“数不清”去年收了多少个包裹，反正“家里80%的东西全是网购的”。
当然，也有很多@墨然几许红叶这样“一个也没有”的人，不然平均值就会跟房价一样“拍马也追不上了”。
包裹过度包装成污染
疯狂的网购，疯狂的包裹，也带来疯狂的垃圾。在关注网购快捷、方便的同时，网友也在关注随即而来的过度包装和大量垃圾。
看到成堆的快递，网友@泰溪散人V觉得，“那些里三层外三层的包装，造成了很多浪费和污染。”的确，为了保护邮购物品，或者为了体现企业文化，大家收到的包裹，往往是塑料袋包塑料袋再包塑料袋，纸盒套纸盒再套纸盒……网友@开膛手JACK表示：“看看现在国内快递的物流，我觉得还是少网购吧。”网友@小胖的大世界就想知道：“有木有人做快递行业迅速发展带来白色污染数据统计？”
减少包装垃圾，除了让“剁手族”们减少网购，更多的还需要物流企业行动起来。当然，垃圾分类和回收可以从自身做起。网友@秋原nukin就调侃说，这么大的快递量，不仅物流发达，以后“回收硬纸壳就能致富，环保产业还有政策扶植”。
■七嘴八舌
@清溪：绝不告诉你每天剁手的次数。@梧桐欣语Love：我终于有个比人均指标遥遥领先的事迹了……
@三溪径：没有买卖就没有伤害！
@siney_李：超额完成任务，快递员，辛苦啦！@东方V天下：我从来不网购，只有去商场选购，这样能为自己带来不同类型的购物乐趣。
赞