Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)delv
published in(发表于) 2014/1/10 8:20:10
Anhui Province more than 10 years ago， homicide retrial， 3 defendants acquitted

Xinhuanet, Hefei, January 10 (reporter Liu Meizi)-January 10, 2014, the bozhou city intermediate people's Court in Anhui Province on daikemin, Li Baochun, Li Chao, homicide in the first instance publicly pronounced, believing that the public prosecution service charges daikemin, Li Baochun, killing daikejian, daikun and Li Chao daijingjing, trauma daichunliang, Hu Cairong unclear facts, insufficient evidence, judgment daikemin, Li Baochun, Li Chao, innocence.

August 4, 2002, in mengcheng County, Anhui Province haven daikun Abin former daikejian village villagers and their grandchildren, and great-granddaughter died daijingjing was killed, daichunliang, son of daikejian, daughter-in-law Hu Cairong was cut by serious injury. Mengcheng county police investigation, prosecute bozhou city, Anhui Province, people's Procuratorate, in October 2007. Bozhou city intermediate people's Court, November 25, 2009, and February 4, 2013 respectively to the three accused criminal with civil judgment, have identified three defendants constitute intentional homicide. The above three times after the verdict, three accused refuses, an appeal to the higher people's Court of Anhui Province, Anhui provincial higher people's Court upheld the facts unclear, evidence insufficient for the bozhou city intermediate people's Court is sent back for a retrial.

On December 25, 2013, the bozhou city intermediate people's Court in mengcheng County public hearing the case. Think upon hearing, the public prosecution service charges daikemin, Li Baochun, Li Chao, intentional killing does not do, is not sufficient evidence of the facts, contradictions between the evidence did not reasonably excluded, then, in accordance with the People's Republic of China criminal procedure law article 195th (c) provisions of unclear facts, insufficient evidence, acquittal of the accused of crimes cannot stand.

After the sentencing, bozhou city intermediate people's Court judicial recommendations to the public security organ, it is recommended that further increase the intensity of investigation by public security organs for the early detection, punish crime, in response to the concerns of victims and their close relatives and the community.

　　新华网合肥1月10日电 (记者 刘美子)2014年1月10日，安徽省亳州市中级人民法院对代克民、李保春、李超故意杀人案进行一审公开宣判，认为公诉机关指控代克民、李保春、李超杀害代克俭、代坤及代晶晶，重伤代春亮、胡彩荣的事实不清、证据不足，判决代克民、李保春、李超无罪。

　　2002年8月4日凌晨，安徽省蒙城县乐土镇双龙村前代庄村民代克俭及其孙子代坤、曾孙女代晶晶被害身亡，代克俭之子代春亮、儿媳胡彩荣被砍致重伤。经蒙城县公安机关侦查，安徽省亳州市人民检察院于2007年10月提起公诉。亳州市中级人民法院分别于2009年11月25日、2011年9月2日、2013年2月4日对三被告人作出刑事附带民事判决，均认定三被告人构成故意杀人罪。上述三次判决后，三被告人均不服，向安徽省高级人民法院提出上诉，安徽省高级人民法院均以原判认定事实不清、证据不足为由，发回亳州市中级人民法院重新审判。

　　2013年12月25日，亳州市中级人民法院在蒙城县公开开庭审理此案。经审理后认为，公诉机关指控代克民、李保春、李超故意杀人事实的证据不确实、不充分，证据之间的矛盾没有合理排除，遂依照《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百九十五条第(三)项的规定，作出事实不清、证据不足，指控犯罪事实不能成立的无罪判决。

　　宣判后，亳州市中级人民法院向公安机关提出司法建议，建议公安机关进一步加大侦查力度，争取早日破案，惩罚犯罪，以回应被害人及其近亲属和社会各界的关切。

赞