Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2014/1/10 8:27:13 “Containing radioactive substances and haze“ went viral networking， expert rumor
Beijing authorities wide nets, January 10 (reporter Du Ximeng) aspect ratio, according to voice of the news reports, in the past in 2013, "Haze" elected ten hot topics, and now "what is responsible for the haze," it makes people feel a little fog. But even though experts all have an opinion on the contribution rate, but at least still agree: "coal consumption, fumes, road dust," factors such as haze agreement. But recently an abrupt jump red NET post gives a completely different stories, "in the air of the radioactive element uranium is currently widespread haze causes".
As this story circulating on the Internet, a new term "exposed to nuclear fog" (haze fog) began to frequent tweets, appeared on the Forum; "nuclear pollution" "Haze" related to these two words nearly two days in the fast-growing search volume. But Chinese journalists after much proof only to find the sound of this sensational claim was only a "point horror, argument fuzzy demonstrated confusion" rumors.
Same as the general perception of the public, recently on the net heat transfer "nuclear fog dyed" article, the same haze of coal as the culprit, but the reason is not given by the experts of burning coal releases sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, but coal contains uranium radioactive material.
Random searches of journalists "nuclear fog" finds the word, all the saying of posts or articles from the same author, a man who claimed to be a Ma Kean in physics, at the end of last year, began to put on this in the Forum. Similar articles published early this year, then once again, perhaps because of the fog and haze topic is concerned, he proposed "nuclear fog" attracted the attention of some users, and also forward a message on Twitter. Although the Environmental Protection Department of nuclear and radiation safety centre of anonymity experts see in the beginning of the article, have asserted that this is a rumor, source may be in 2012 to a news story.
Expert: How do I understand this rumor, just before we found large uranium deposits in Ordos, also has coal mines in this area, coal and uranium is associated.
And this is indeed "nuclear haze" maker Ma Kean point mentioned in the article, he claims, Erdos produces so-called uranium coal, coal contains a large number of elements, by burning, coal, uranium and into the air, the evidence is, some high radiation area around the power plant in the North. These experts point out that, right here, the author made the first mistake.
Expert: all coal, were dug up from the ground, although very few of uranium, but other radioactive was definitely there, coal combustion process in coal-fired power plant in radiation-induced growth can also occur, but this and the uranium doesn't matter, because the element uranium itself was so heavy he is entered by this even if there is also a small amount of coal. Not like this, he said.
At the same time, these radioactive elements do not by burning into the air.
Expert: uranium is a strong element of its own, less likely to be oxidized, will not be turned into dust, plant has a dust removal, desulfurization and denitrification, it's true, should also be left in the combustion residue, into the air it was a very tiny amounts of it.
Not to mention, the author mentioned in the article "coal carrying 10% impurities in uranium" at the China Institute of Atomic Energy researcher Xia Yihua, was a joke.
Xia Yihua: don't believe this, this is nonsense, with 10% it's uranium deposits in a coal
In simple terms, for important nuclear materials, uranium are much more expensive than coal, if coal contains uranium, nobody wants to watermelons to pick up sesame seeds. Explanation of the Institute of atmospheric physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences researcher Wang Yue-si.
Wang Yue-si: these metal uranium are very precious, than gold also your, who may will put this took out burn has does, a found certainly on will put he collection up, even has one out of 10,000 does, will picked up up of, national didn't so silly, if has words that certainly is to put he collection up do nuclear power, do important of things, who may put he burn off has. Impossible.
After the uranium coal raised the specious reasons, "nuclear fog" gives the second of the dominant provider of evidence smart use of the public some doubts in the haze. He suggested that the fog of the past, lasted only a short time, typically after sunrise, the moisture evaporation, fog will dissipate, but the fog and haze will outlast never, sometimes, even under half of China is shrouded in mist and haze, which gives "no radioactive dust haze. "The conclusions of the Beijing public environment Research Center Director Ma June in this derivation tries to confuse the difference between fog and haze.
Ren Majun: fog and haze in itself is not the same as in the first place, fog formation fog is the high moisture content, but haze when humidity is less still be reduced visibility, this is because the particles increase the extinction was caused by. Haze now, because emissions in some areas too large to fine particulate matter concentration is relatively high, rendering the situation of the pollution, haze lasted no longer than previously estimated.
Institute of atmospheric physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences researcher Wang Yuesi admitted that the so-called physics PhD Ma Kean did not produce any valuable content, data and he was willing to hand their confrontation. For this recurring rumors across the network, must be defeated with facts.
Wang Yue-si: chemical constituents of haze, PM2.5, and particles that are one thing, where we do Institute of atmospheric chemical composition against haze the whole country station, I saw all these data, there is no abnormal radioactive elements, so he's such rumors have no scientific basis. Let him take out the facts, he'll have no evidence, you said that nuclear pollution, that can be measured, all this uranium-235 and uranium-238 did not rise without any change.
(Original title: "containing radioactive substances and haze" went viral rumor network experts: uranium than the expensive)
央广网北京1月10日消息 (记者杜希萌)据中国之声《新闻纵横》报道，在刚刚过去的2013年，“雾霾”当选十大健康热门话题，到现在“雾霾的元凶是什么”还让老百姓感觉有点雾里看花。不过专家们虽然对贡献率上各有观点，但好歹还是认同“煤炭消费，汽车尾气，道路扬尘”等因素导致雾霾共识。不过近日一个突然蹿红的网贴却给出了一个完全不同的说法，“空气中含有放射性元素铀是目前国内大范围雾霾的原因”。
随着这个说法在网上的流传，一个新名词“核雾染”(雾霾的雾)开始频频在一些微博，论坛上出现；“核污染”“雾霾”这两个词的相关搜索量近两天在快速增长。不过中国之声记者经过多方求证却发现，这个耸人听闻的说法只是一条“论点惊悚，论据模糊，论证混乱”的谣言。
与公众的一般认知相同，最近在网上热传的“核雾染”文章中，同样把煤炭列作雾霾的罪魁祸首，但理由却不是专家所给出的煤炭燃烧释放二氧化硫，氮氧化物，而是煤炭中含有放射性物质铀。
记者随机搜索“核雾”二字发现，所有的相关说法或文章都来自同一个作者的帖子，一个自称是马可安物理博士的人在去年年末就开始在论坛中就提出这个说法。此后在今年年初又再次发表相似文章，也许是因为雾霾话题实在备受关注，这次他提出的“核雾”说法引起了一些网友的注意，在微博上也出现转发信息。不过环保部核与辐射安全中心一位不愿透露姓名的专家初看文章，就断言这是一则谣言，源头可能是2012年的一则新闻报道。
专家：我理解这个谣言是怎来的呢，就是在之前我们在鄂尔多斯发现了大型铀矿，这个地区也有煤矿，煤矿和铀矿是伴生的。
而这也确实是“核雾霾”制造者马可安文章中重点提及的内容，他宣称，鄂尔多斯出产的所谓铀煤，煤中含有的大量铀元素，通过燃烧，煤炭中的铀进入到空气中，其证据是，北方一些电厂周围存在高辐射区域。上述专家指出，就在这里，作者制造了第一个错误。
专家：所有的煤，都是从地下挖出来的，虽然铀很少，但是其他的一些放射性肯定是会有的，燃煤电厂在煤炭燃烧过程中也会出现放射性增长，但是这和铀没关系，因为铀他是本身是很重的元素，进入到煤炭这个就算有也是很少的。不会像他说到这种情况。
同时，这些放射性元素无法通过燃烧进入到空气之中。
专家：铀元素它本身是很重的元素，不容易被氧化，不会变成粉尘，再一个电厂都有除尘，脱硫脱硝，就是真的有，也应该是留在燃烧残渣里，进入空气这个是很微量的。
更不要说，该作者在文章中提到的“煤炭中杂质携带了10%的铀矿石”，这在中国原子能科学研究院研究员夏益华看来，是个笑话。
夏益华：别信这个，这是胡说，煤炭里含铀10%那不就是铀矿了
简单来说，为重要的核原料，铀要比煤贵重的多，如果煤炭里含有铀，没有人愿意丢了西瓜捡芝麻。中科院大气物理研究所研究员王跃思做出解释。
王跃思：这些金属铀都非常珍贵，比金子还贵，谁可能会把这个拿出来烧了呢，一发现肯定就会把他收集起来，哪怕有万分之一呢，都会捡起来的，国家没那么傻，如果有的话那肯定是要把他收集起来做核发电，做重要的事情，谁可能把他烧掉了。不可能的。
在提出铀煤这个似是而非的理由后，“核雾”的炮制者给出的第二个证据聪明的利用了公众对雾霾的一些疑惑。他提出，以往的雾，只持续很短时间，一般日出后，水汽蒸发，雾就会自然消散，但是现在雾霾却会经久不散，有时，甚至大半个中国都会笼罩在雾霾之下，从而给出“放射性粉尘让雾霾散不了。”的结论，北京公众环境研究中心主任马军在这个推导过程试图混淆雾和霾的区别。
任马军：首先雾和霾本身就是不一样的，雾就是水汽含量高形成雾，但是霾是在湿度没有那么高的时候仍然会有能见度下降，这里面是因为颗粒物增加产生了消光性才导致的。霾现在因为有一些地区排放量太大，细颗粒物浓度比较高，确实呈现了这个污染的状况，霾持续的时间也比之前要多。
中科院大气物理研究所研究员王跃思坦言，这位所谓的物理博士马可安没有拿出任何有价值的内容，他愿意以手中的数据与其对峙。对于这个在网络上反复出现的谣言，必须用事实击溃。
王跃思：霾的化学成分，PM2.5，还有颗粒物这都是一回事，我们中科院大气所在全国都有对霾的化学成分的监测站，所有这些检测数据我都看了，没有任何放射性元素的异常，所以他这种谣传没有任何科学依据。让他把事实拿出来，他没有证据，你说的那个核的污染，那要得能够测出来，所有这个铀235和铀238都没有升高的情况，没有任何变动。
(原标题：“霾中含放射性物质”疯传网络 专家辟谣：铀比金贵)
赞