Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2014/1/16 12:25:50 Zou Heng fu denied because of grudges exposes North of frivolity， says lawsuit
The Beijing News (by Yuan Zhang) Zou Heng fu University economist "whore" by the North to court.
Yesterday, the Exchange organizations on both sides of the Haidian District Court evidence.
Allegedly the North did not mention additional compensation
Yesterday morning, Fuxing Road Haidian Court Tribunal held "North charged Zou Heng fu reputation infringement" Exchange of evidence before the Court, because not hearing open procedures, the media did not enter. Zou Heng fu has commissioned a lawyer to submit relevant evidence to the Court.
Last August, said Zou Heng fu weibo, North dream peach restaurant peach and said "North Whore too much." Zhihou, Beijing University, Beijing dream peach catering company sued Zou Heng fu violations of right of reputation.
According to Zou Heng fu disclosed two of the plaintiff's complaint, issued by the North think Zou Heng fu weibo as evidence preservation at the notary, has already been forwarded more than 10,000 times. North had enormous influence and popularity of the century-old institution at home and abroad, Zou Heng fu to blatant defamation, insults, defamation, sparked concern at home and abroad, resulting in serious harm to the public image of Peking University. Sue Zou Heng fu, require the stop the infringement, delete tweets, in an open and written apology. Dream peach believes that Zou Heng fu attempted to portray bright lights, jazz venues are completely inconsistent with the facts, ask for deleting tweets and more than five national newspapers issued a public apology.
In nature, the North, the dream suddenly raised no additional economic compensation, dream suddenly requested court Zou Heng fu bear the plaintiff "is necessary to safeguard their lawful rights and interests of spending costs 2,300 yuan."
Zou Heng fu denied North enemies
Yesterday, would show up in court under the auspices of mediation with Peking University, Zou Heng fu said on the phone, "lawsuits to fight." He answered, is equivalent to denying his lawyer previously indicated not ruled out mediation.
Zou Heng fu said the two plaintiffs said in the complaint that he slandered, elements he said were unfounded.
Zou Heng fu denied he was "unlawful dismissal by North", but with Twitter dispatch from North grudges, which calls itself Twitter blast, due to "know about this scandal".
Yesterday, the North has not responded. His spokesman has previously said cases to the stage of the proceedings, in accordance with legal procedures.
North told Zou Heng fu
August 21, 2012, says Zou Heng fu weibo, Northern Taoyuan restaurant peach dream event, "North Whore so much."
August 21-27th News Center of Peking University and Beijing University spokesman has said time and again, the school set up a special working group, Zou Heng fu cannot be found the greatest difficulty is the investigation.
On August 30 the North news statement, the investigation unit received Zou Heng fu first came calling, but Zou in calls and e-mails did not adduce any evidence.
The same day, admitted that he wrote North Zou Heng fu weibo Dean Dean fornication is "exaggerated."
On September 7, September 24 Court has entertained dreams of Beijing University, Beijing Haidian, Taoyuan catering Ltd against Zou Heng fu honorary rights violations case. Subsequently, the Court through a variety of delivery methods without success.
On August 19, 2013, the Court decided to CHOW from leaving the country.
December 16, Zou Heng fu lawyer to court to receive the prosecution material.
(Original title: Zou Heng fu: fight the lawsuit)
新京报讯 (记者张媛)经济学家邹恒甫称北大有“淫棍”，被北大告上法庭。
昨日，海淀法院组织双方进行证据交换。
据称北大未提额外赔偿
昨日上午，海淀法院复兴路法庭举行了“北大起诉邹恒甫名誉侵权案”庭前证据交换，由于并非庭审公开程序，媒体未进入。邹恒甫委托了律师，到法庭递交相关证据材料。
去年8月，邹恒甫发微博称，北大梦桃源餐厅有桃色事件，并称“北大淫棍太多”。之后，北大、北京梦桃源餐饮有限公司起诉邹恒甫侵犯名誉权。
根据邹恒甫披露的两名原告起诉状，北大认为邹恒甫所发微博被作为证据保全公证时，已经被转发1万多次。北大作为在海内外有着巨大影响力和知名度的百年学府，被邹恒甫以侮辱、诽谤的方式公然损害名誉，引发了海内外的高度关注，致使北大社会形象受到严重损害。因此起诉邹恒甫，要求对方停止侵害、删除微博，以公开、书面形式赔礼道歉。梦桃源公司认为，邹恒甫试图将其描绘成灯红酒绿、声色犬马的场所与事实完全不符，也要求对方删除微博并在五家以上全国性报纸上公开道歉。
在诉讼中，北大、梦桃源都没有提出额外的经济赔偿，梦桃源请求法院判令邹恒甫承担原告“为维护自身合法权益支出的必要费用2300元”。
邹恒甫否认与北大结怨
昨日，针对是否会在法院主持下跟北大调解，邹恒甫在电话中表示“打官司要打到底”。他的回答，相当于否定了其律师此前表态不排除调解可能的说法。
邹恒甫称，对于两名原告在起诉状中称他诽谤，他表示所说的内容都有根有据。
邹恒甫否认自己是因为“被北大非法开除”、而跟北大结怨才发布微博的，称自己之所以发微博爆料，全因“知道这个丑闻”。
昨日，北大方面未就此回应。其发言人此前表示，案件进入诉讼阶段，一切遵照法律程序。
■ 北大告邹恒甫案
●2012年8月21日 邹恒甫发微博称，北大梦桃源餐厅有桃色事件，“北大淫棍太多”。
●8月21日——27日 北大新闻中心、北大新闻发言人先后多次表示，学校成立专门工作小组，调查工作最大困难是找不到邹恒甫。
●8月30日 北大新闻中心声明，调查组接到邹恒甫首次打来电话，但邹在电话及电子邮件中均没有举出任何相关证据。
当日，邹恒甫发微博承认自己写北大院长系主任的淫乱是“夸大”。
●9月7日、9月24日 海淀法院先后受理了北大、北京梦桃源餐饮有限公司诉邹恒甫侵犯名誉权案。随后，法院通过多种送达方式未果。
●2013年8月19日 法院做出决定限制邹出境。
●12月16日 邹恒甫律师到法院领取了起诉材料。
(原标题：邹恒甫：打官司要打到底)
赞