Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2014/1/20 9:14:13 Dream Taoyuan company of Zou Heng fu
People's daily Beijing, January 20 (Li Nannan) this morning, Beijing University and the Beijing dream peach food co Zou Heng fu reputation dispute cases against the accused in Court of Haidian, Beijing public hearing. Scene court investigation Shi, plaintiffs dream Taoyuan company requires Zou Heng fu accused continuous three days in Sohu network, and SINA network, and NetEase, and people, and Tencent network, and Yahoo network of Home Shang published apologized content, and in Beijing evening, and Beijing Youth reported, and Beijing News, and Jinghua times, and legal evening, and Guangming daily, and China Youth reported, legal daily Shang of significantly location open apologized many Yu three times, related costs by accused themselves bear.
Dream company of Taoyuan prosecution requests and reasons stated:
Defendant published in the August 21, 2012 in their Sina weibo real-name authentication messages, called "dreams of Taoyuan, President of Peking University Peking University medical room whenever you see a beautiful dinner staff is bound to start raping them. Department of Beijing University Professor is no exception. So busy dreaming Taoyuan. ……” "Those staff Ministers responsible for women also like to North Dean Director Professor toasted haha. Invoice open as much as to how much ". "Taoyuan Zhili Director, Dean of this by always dream big bream eat drink pretty waitress development lustful relationships."
Defendant on August 22, 2012 in his Sina weibo real-name authentication, post a message, saying that "Director, Dean of this through Taoyuan Zhili always dream big bream eat drink pretty waitress lecherous relations development. Those attendants charge, women also like to drank a toast, Minister, Director, President of Peking University. Opened as much as invoices, invoices as well. Some say it was love, not seduction, using currency swap to another woman. Professor took the money meat "and so on.
Defendant on August 30, 2012 in his Sina weibo real-name authentication, publishing news, said "I generally write Dean the Dean of Peking University in Taoyuan lascivious dreams, of course, is too exaggerated, and I am referring, of course, I learned a few Dean Associate Dean Professor fornication". "Dream of Taoyuan, it shouldn't be in the North to set up shop. City Hall and big bream eat Super pricey hotels in Zhili Province, as soon as you move it. These three hotels to discredit the academic atmosphere of the North ".
Defendants on September 1, 2012 release messages in their Sina weibo real-name authentication, called "dream Yuen Xiang Yue hotel, please send someone to pick up throughout the day you looked out on a drunken Lees clean food. Because every time I eat, I'm not down the toilet ". "The supervision unit also had a chance to look at all of the North of Peking University Guanghua School of management, school of Economics and in the dream, Taoyuan hotels in Hunan and Guangdong people who frequently drink and hotel invoices for reimbursement. Do not worry, this range is very small. " The above content is the infringement of the accused's 14 points.
, Plaintiff believes that the defendant in the above message at the presentation of nothing, without any factual basis. Plaintiff's business, it is not unusual to hot, the plaintiff's business activities have been very, very normal. Plaintiff attempted to be described as flashy, jazz venues, but it's totally inconsistent with the facts. Plaintiff has complied with legal provisions and general norms of catering. Defendant to plaintiff's so-called busy due to improper event or reason, business by unfair means to convey the plaintiff or the plaintiff's willingness to act as a defendant with ulterior purpose matters up to the media false information like this is entirely fabricated. Defendants in the above message posted on microblogging, also conveyed a plaintiff to public rumors of serious disregard for the interests of its employees, which is completely unfounded. In addition, the defendant through his above message posted on microblogging and wanton accusations outside the plaintiff's employees, plaintiff sells invoices in vain, vain plaintiff's toilet is not clean, plaintiffs in vain to discredit the academic atmosphere of the North, these are without any factual basis.
Second, the defendant in the news of the heavy damage caused by the plaintiff's reputation, the plaintiff caused great economic losses and the negative impact. Accused in its micro-Bo Shang released of above news to widely spread Hou, due to its content is vulgar, almost dirty, in community caused has is bad of impact, directly led to public to plaintiffs evaluation of reduced or and this related of not appropriate of guess, to plaintiffs of operating activities caused negative of impact, appeared has plaintiffs of passenger flow reduced, turnover and income declined of facts, and plaintiffs think this facts and accused of behavior Zhijian, exists causal relationship.
Third, the defendant should bear the corresponding legal responsibility for their actions. Pursuant to article 101th of the General principles of the Civil Code stipulates that "citizens and legal persons enjoy the right to honour, the personal dignity of citizens shall be protected by law, prohibit the use of insults, defamation and other means to undermine the reputation of the citizens, legal persons". Established by the Supreme People's Court on several issues concerning the civil right infringement spirit damage compensate responsibility also clearly defined. For all brothers and sisters. Defendant as a person with full capacity for civil conduct, should know and comply with the provisions of the law and the moral bottom line, but in this case, the defendants for malicious reasons, completely the facts and the law and disregard for their own personal gains, fabricating rumors, create a sensation, to ignore the law, disregard or even deliberately sacrificed other people's legitimate rights and interests, unbridled, the degree of arbitrariness. To safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, to make ugly is not arrogant, to the homes in your proceedings and sentenced to uphold justice.
In addition, to safeguard their own legitimate rights and interests of the plaintiff, payment of notary fees of various currencies made Bai Yuan (￡ 2,200.00) and notarial material fees for photocopying, binding: vision Union Yuan (￡ 100), between those necessary expenses and accused of abuses, there exists a causal relationship to law decree should be borne by the defendant.
Prosecution requests:
1, we request the defendant should remove the violations of our text on SINA weibo, evidence submitted by the specific content of the text;
2, request the defendant for three consecutive days in Sohu, SINA and NetEase, the people's daily online, Tencent, Yahoo Network Home published an apology, and Beijing evening news, Beijing Youth daily and the Beijing News and Beijing times, the legal evening news, the Guangming daily, China Youth daily, prominently on the legal daily publicly apologized for not less than three times, and related costs borne by the defendant on its own;
3, requesting the defendant published an apology in its microblogging content;
4, requested the defendant should compensate us for rights incurred costs 2,300 yuan;
5, the defendant should bear the costs.
人民网北京1月20日电 （李楠楠）今日上午，北京大学及北京梦桃源餐饮有限公司诉被告邹恒甫名誉权纠纷两案在北京海淀法院公开开庭审理。现场法庭调查时，原告梦桃源公司要求邹恒甫被告连续三天在搜狐网、新浪网、网易、人民网、腾讯网、雅虎网的首页上刊登道歉内容，并在北京晚报、北京青年报、新京报、京华时报、法制晚报、光明日报、中国青年报，法制日报上的显著位置公开赔礼道歉不少于三次，相关费用由被告自行承担。
梦桃源公司陈述起诉的请求和事实理由称：
被告2012年8月21日在其新浪实名认证微博中发布消息，称“北大院长在梦桃源北大医疗室吃饭时只要看到漂亮服务员就必然下手把她们奸淫。北大教授系主任也不例外。所以，梦桃源生意火爆。……” “那些服务员主管女人也特喜欢给北大院长主任部长教授敬酒啊哈哈。发票要多少就开多少买多少”。“这种院长主任教授通过总在梦桃源直隶大膳鲂吃喝跟漂亮女服务员发展淫荡关系”。
被告2012年8月22日在其新浪实名认证微博中发布消息，称“这种院长主任教授通过总在梦桃源直隶大膳鲂吃喝跟漂亮女服务员发展淫荡关系。那些服务员主管女人也特喜欢给北大院长主任部长教授敬酒。发票要多少就开多少，要买发票也可以。有人说那是爱情，不是诱奸，使用货币换来换去的女人。拿了教授的钱就肉来还”等。
被告2012年8月30日在其新浪实名认证微博中发布消息，称“我笼统地写北大院长系主任在梦桃源淫乱当然是太夸大了，我当然是指我了解到的少数院长副院长教授如此淫乱”。 “梦桃源，它根本不应该在北大里面开店。直隶会馆和大膳鲂等超级昂贵酒店，你们尽快搬家吧。这三个酒店败坏了北大的学术气氛”。
被告2012年9月1日在其新浪实名认证微博中发布消息，称“梦桃源湘粤酒店，请全天派一个人把你们顾客喝醉后吐出来的酒糟食物清理干净。因为我每次吃饭，我不敢进厕所”。 “北大纪委监察室还根本没有来得及查北大经济学院和光华管理学院在梦桃源湘粤酒店经常吃喝和报销此酒店发票的人啊。不要急，这个范围已经很小了”。上述内容是被告侵权的14个点。
一、原告认为被告在上述消息中的表述无中生有，毫无事实方面的依据。原告的生意并非不正常的火爆，原告的经营活动一直都非常一般、非常正常。被告试图将原告描述成灯红酒绿、声色犬马的场所，但这与事实完全不符。原告一直都遵守法律的规定和餐饮业的一般规范。被告将原告的所谓生意火爆归因于不正当的事件或原因，向公众传达原告以不正当的手段经营或原告乐于充当被告以不可告人的目的编造的事项的媒介这样的虚假信息，完全是无中生有。被告在其微博上发布的上述消息，也向公众传达了一种原告对其员工的权益严重漠视的谣言，这也是完全没有根据的。另外，被告通过在其微博上发布的上述消息肆意诬陷原告的员工之外，还妄称原告卖发票，妄称原告的厕所不干净，妄称原告败坏了北大的学术气氛，这些都是毫无事实方面的依据的。
二、被告在上述消息中的表述严重侵害了原告的名誉，给原告造成了极大的负面影响和经济损失。被告在其微博上发布的上述消息得以广泛传播后，由于其内容十分低俗，近乎下流，在社会上造成了很坏的影响，直接导致公众对原告评价的降低或与此相关的不恰当的猜想，给原告的经营活动造成负面的影响，出现了原告的客流减少，营业额和收入下降的事实，且原告认为此事实与被告人的行为之间，存在因果关系。
三、被告应当为其行为承担相应的法律责任。根据《民法通则》第一百零一条规定，“公民、法人享有名誉权，公民的人格尊严受法律保护，禁止用侮辱、诽谤等方式损害公民、法人的名誉”。《最高人民法院关于确定民事侵权精神损害赔偿责任若干问题的解释》中也有相关的明确的规定。人皆有兄弟姐妹。被告作为一名完全民事行为能力人，应当明知并遵守法律的规定和道德的底线，但在本案中，被告出于恶意，完全置事实与法律与不顾，为一己之私利，编造谣言，耸动视听，无视法律，漠视甚至故意牺牲他人的合法权益，到了肆无忌惮、恣意妄为的程度。为维护自身的合法权益，为使丑恶不可嚣张，特向贵院提起诉讼，并请判如所请，以维护正义。
另外，原告为维护自身的合法权益，支付了公证费人民币贰仟贰佰元(￥2，200.00)及公证材料的复印费、装订费人民币壹佰元(￥100.00)，这些必要的费用与被告的侵权行为之间，存在因果关系，依法应当判令由被告负担。
现起诉请求：
1、我方请求判令被告在其新浪微博上删除侵犯我公司的文字，具体文字内容见我方提交的证据；
2、请求判令被告连续三天在搜狐网、新浪网、网易、人民网、腾讯网、雅虎网的首页上刊登道歉内容，并在北京晚报、北京青年报、新京报、京华时报、法制晚报、光明日报、中国青年报，法制日报上的显著位置公开赔礼道歉不少于三次，相关费用由被告自行承担；
3、请求判令被告在其微博发布赔礼道歉内容；
4、请求判令被告赔偿我方维护权利支出费用2300元；
5、判令被告承担本案诉讼费。
赞