Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2014/1/20 9:19:12 Zou Heng fu North against its infringement case in absentia， lawyers said it saw
Twitter says "North Whore too much" infringement complained the defence argued Yuen Restaurant more than 20 times to dream see
Zou Heng fu: North minority professors
Twitter says "North Whore is too much," Zou Heng fu, an economist at Peking University were former unit prosecuted violated the right to honour, the case today at 9 o'clock in the morning, Fuxing Road Haidian District Court trial, Zou Heng fu does not appear, but rather by its attorneys appear in court.
Trial site
Plaintiffs: Zou Heng fu cease and desist making amends
This morning, the Taoyuan company agents appear in court at Peking University and a dream.
Complains of Peking University, Peking University Department of century-old institution, North Zou Heng fu to insult, libel is a flagrant harm reputation and triggered media and public attention at home and abroad and a large number of comments. Many of them blind faith move, therefore, plaintiff's public image suffered serious damage.
North requests the Court to order the defendants to cease the infringement and an apology.
Dream peach catering company lawyer said Zou Heng fu weibo released news of nothing, there is no basis in fact, attributed the cause of plaintiff's busy event of improper and a violation of due to its reputation,, which has a negative impact on, cause a decrease in the public assessment of the plaintiff or related inappropriate speculation.
Dream Taoyuan company requested the Court to sentence the defendant violated the text deleted, Sohu, NetEase, night and other media an apology prominently exposed.
Defence: freedom of expression only to the North a few professors
Zou Heng fu's lawyer, said the defendant, Beijing University's claim must fail. Is not a proper subject of Peking University, Zou Heng Fu criticized the style of life issues for natural persons and unincorporated. Even if the North were proper subjects, does not enjoy the right of reputation of Peking University, because the North is not subject of civil law, does not have a private right in civil law the right to reputation.
Peach dream of claim, Zou Heng fu's lawyer argued, the defendant only for individual staff, there is no subjective intent of undermining business, Taoyuan no proof of its decline and Zou Heng fu dream behavior there exists a causal relationship. "Our microblog of the defendant published the fact that no objection, user comments against the North, does not mean that the defendant's comments against the North, the defendant is only for the North minority professors. "
Asked in court, Zou Heng fu's lawyer said the accused, defendant Zou Heng fu dream has been to more than 20 times to Yuen Restaurant, Twitter comments so far have been seen, heard with my own ears listening. But when asked whether there is any evidence for court, Zou Heng fu by the defendant's lawyer said, "the evidence is not available. "
In addition, for the reasons for release microblog, Zou Heng fu by the defendant's lawyer said, "it is out of concern for higher education, fears of a style of style. "
As of press, trial continues.
Case back
Weibo said too many North Whore Zou Heng fu complained against copyright infringement
August 21, 2012 or so, Zou Heng fu real, an economist and Professor at Peking University in a piece of content published on SINA weibo, "dreams of Taoyuan, President of Peking University PKU clinic whenever you see a beautiful dinner staff is bound to start raping them. North Professor Dean is no exception ... ... In addition to Zou Heng fu, North Whore too. "Subsequently, Peking University and the Beijing dream peach food co sued Zou Heng fu infringement.
As of 24th of the month when preservation of evidence the notarial plaintiffs in just three or four days, the microblogging content have been forwarded nearly 70,000.
Beijing University believes that Zou Heng fu caused very bad social influence to the North, Sue Zou Heng fu to cease the infringement and a public apology. Dream peach believes that Zou Heng fu attempted to portray bright lights, jazz venues are completely inconsistent with the facts, as well as Zou Heng fu remove infringing content.
Is limited to the United States an exit application to lift the border control denied
On December 25, 2013, Zou Heng fu is Peking University application due to overdue response to border control. According to reporter was informed that Zou Heng fu's lawyer, and Zou Heng fu long United States wife lifting border control applications submitted to the Court was denied.
Reporter called Zou Heng fu, he said, on December 15, 2013, he as usual was prepared to fly to United States Shi, at the Beijing Capital International Airport Customs, border prevented their departure.
He, together with a lawyer the next day to the Haidian District Court informed, didn't know it was submitted to the Court of Haidian of Beijing University border controls to restrict their exit applications approved by the Beijing high people's Court in the Frontier Corps carried out border control, he failed to leave the country. His lawyers applied to the Haidian District Court to lift border control have been turned down.
Denied North grudges saying "fight the lawsuit"
Yesterday, would show up in court under the auspices of mediation of Peking University, Zou Heng fu said on the phone, "fight the lawsuit". His answer, is equivalent to denying his lawyer had previously said it did not rule out mediation may say.
Zou Heng fu said the two plaintiffs said in the complaint that he slandered, elements he said were unfounded.
Zou Heng fu denied he was "unlawful dismissal by North" with Twitter dispatch from North grudges, which calls itself Twitter blast, due to "know about this scandal".
Yesterday, the North has not responded. His spokesman has previously said cases to the stage of the proceedings, in accordance with legal procedures.
Site visits
Dream staff of Taoyuan unwilling to comment
This morning, the reporters came to Beida dreaming Yuen Restaurant visits. Waiter told reporters, restaurant manager was not in Beijing now, and without his contacts. For that matter, a number of staff were reluctant to give their opinions on the case.
Then, on North campus to interview. Said one student of the school of journalism and communication, things has already passed such a long time, concerned after a series of investigations, what the hell, believe that the law will give a statement, he said he was ready to believe the North. But there are also students, did not rule out Zou Heng fu was telling the truth.
Text/journalist intern Zhang Lei Wei Ming
January 20, 2014 Legal evening news(邹恒甫缺席北大诉其侵权案 律师称其言论系亲见|北京大学|邹恒甫|侵权案_新闻资讯
微博称"北大淫棍太多"被诉侵权 被告方辩称20多次去梦桃源餐厅 言论亲眼所见
邹恒甫：针对北大少数教授
发微博称"北大淫棍太多"，经济学家邹恒甫被原单位北京大学起诉侵犯名誉权，该案今天上午9时，在海淀法院复兴路法庭开庭审理，邹恒甫并未出庭，而是由其代理律师出庭应诉。
庭审现场
原告方：邹恒甫停止侵权赔礼道歉
今天上午，北京大学及梦桃源公司的代理人出庭应诉。
北大方面诉称，北京大学系百年学府，邹恒甫以侮辱、诽谤方式公然损害北大名誉，引发国内外媒体和公众的高度关注和大量评论。其中不乏盲从之举，原告的社会形象因此遭到严重损害。
北大请求法院判令被告停止侵权并赔礼道歉。
梦桃源餐饮公司代理律师表示，邹恒甫微博发布消息无中生有、毫无事实依据，将原告生意火爆的原因归因于不正当的事件和原因是对其名誉权的侵害，对其造成了不良影响，导致公众对原告评价降低或与此相关的不恰当猜想。
梦桃源公司请求法院判决被告删除侵犯文字，在搜狐、网易、法晚等媒体显著位置公开赔礼道歉。
被告方：言论只针对北大少数教授
被告方邹恒甫的代理律师表示，北京大学的诉讼请求不能成立。北京大学不是适格主体，邹恒甫批评的生活作风问题针对自然人而非法人。即使北大是适格主体，北大也不享有名誉权，因为北大不是民事主体，不具有民法上的私权利即名誉权。
对于梦桃源的诉讼请求，邹恒甫的律师辩称，被告言论仅仅针对个别服务员，不存在破坏企业经营的主观故意，梦桃源没有证据证明其营业额下降与邹恒甫的行为存在因果关系。"我们对被告发表的微博言论这一事实无异议，网友的评论针对北大，并不表示被告的言论针对北大，被告言论只是针对北大少数教授。"
在法庭询问中，被告邹恒甫的代理律师表示，被告邹恒甫曾去过20多次梦桃源餐厅，在微博中的言论都是亲眼所见、亲耳所听。但对于法院询问其是否有证据提供时，被告邹恒甫的律师表示，"有证据，但不提供。"
另外，对于发布微博的原因，被告邹恒甫的律师表示，"是出于对高等教育的担忧，对师风学风的担忧。"
截至记者发稿，庭审仍在继续。
案件回放
微博称北大淫棍太多邹恒甫被诉侵权
2012年8月21日上午9点20分左右，北京大学教授、经济学家邹恒甫实名在新浪微博上发表一段内容，"北大院长在梦桃源北大医疗室吃饭时只要看到漂亮服务员就必然下手把她们奸淫。北大教授系主任也不例外……除了邹恒甫，北大淫棍太多。"随后，北京大学和北京梦桃源餐饮有限公司起诉邹恒甫侵权。
截至当月24日原告作保全证据公证时，短短三四天，该微博内容已被转发近7万条。
北京大学认为，邹恒甫的行为给北大造成了非常恶劣的社会影响，起诉邹恒甫停止侵权并公开道歉。而梦桃源公司认为，邹恒甫试图将其描绘成灯红酒绿、声色犬马的场所与事实完全不符，也要求邹恒甫删除侵权内容。
赴美被限制出境申请解除边控被拒
2013年12月25日，邹恒甫因逾期未应诉而被北京大学申请边境控制。据本报记者获悉，邹恒甫的律师及邹恒甫远在美国的妻子向法院提交的解除边控的申请被拒。
记者致电邹恒甫，他说，2013年12月15日，他像往年一样准备飞往美国时，在首都机场海关，边检人员阻止其出境。
次日他与律师一起到海淀法院了解情况后，才知道是北京大学向海淀法院提交了限制其出境的边境控制申请，经过北京市高院的审批，边境总队执行了边控，他未能成功出境。他的代理律师向海淀法院申请解除边控被拒。
否认与北大结怨称"打官司要打到底"
昨日，针对是否会在法院主持下跟北大调解，邹恒甫在电话中表示"打官司要打到底"。他的回答，相当于否定了其律师此前表态不排除调解可能的说法。
邹恒甫称，对于两名原告在起诉状中称他诽谤，他表示所说的内容都有根有据。
邹恒甫否认自己是因为"被北大非法开除"而跟北大结怨才发布微博的，称自己之所以发微博爆料，全因"知道这个丑闻"。
昨日，北大方面未就此回应。其发言人此前表示，案件进入诉讼阶段，一切遵照法律程序。
实地探访
梦桃源服务员不愿发表看法
今天上午，记者来到北大梦桃源餐厅实地探访。服务员告诉记者，餐厅经理现在不在北京，且没有他的联系方式。对于此事，多名服务员均不愿对案件发表看法。
随后，记者在北大校园进行随机采访。一名新闻与传播学院的大三学生表示，事情已经过了这么长时间，有关部门也经过了一系列的调查，究竟是个什么情况，相信法律会给一个说法，他表示他愿意相信北大。但也有学生认为，不排除邹恒甫说的是真话。
文/记者张雷实习生魏明
赞