Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2014/1/23 8:56:30 Land disputes for more than 6 years， fantastic Executive to leave the land “certificates“ to “right“
Because land prices are soaring in recent years, is located in Zhuozhou City, two pieces of land of the same size were involved in a land dispute for over 6 years. Now, regarding the determination of ownership of two pieces of land, cases of mediation-related content, as well as certain details of the conciliation statement is executed, we can debate
Rule of law the weekend gaoxin ceramal compound
To end the knots that Qiao Baoxian anguish for 6 years, still not to understand.
Qiao Baoxian in Zhuozhou City, Hebei province had run a stainless steel processing plant. In 2007, due to appreciation of the land, he was the transfer of land use right of the company to court and ask them to return, but it's another piece of land use right certificate.
The following year, after 3 trials, Qiao Baoxian is received from the Baoding municipal intermediate people's Court of Hebei province (hereinafter referred to as "Baoding") civil conciliation, demanded Qiao Baoxian conciliation will be another land use right certificate to the plaintiff. Does not endorse the contents, he did not sign.
And by 2010, the civil conciliation was Zhuozhou City people's Court (hereinafter referred to as "cities of the Court"), and practice inconsistent with the conciliation.
Today, Qiao Baoxian introduced to the blue Court, the execution of the notice of opposition, the result, he's still waiting.
Real estate prices, "get in trouble"
Also dates back to the year 1997. That year, Qiao Baoxian 43, do brisk business. To expand business, he paid 940,000 dollars, in Zhuozhou City, take two pieces of an area of 9 acres 3-point land. Two pieces of land, 470,000 yuan apiece, a "buy" to "borrow".
"Buy" status in Zhuozhou City, Dongxing Street (hereinafter referred to as "a piece of land"), which finished at the time of the 470,000 dollar amounts, Qiao Baoxian got the land from the land use right certificate.
"Borrowed" (hereinafter referred to as "b block") close to a piece of land from Zhuozhou qingliangsi widget factory (hereinafter referred to as "widget factory") for Qiao Baoxian produced a 470,000-dollar receipts as well as a promissory note. Component factory commitments if the loan cannot be returned, the land over to Qiao Baoxian. But up to now, Qiao Baoxian neither recovered loans, also didn't get to.
Reporters get information shows that a fact is also obtained from the component factory, the widget factory as a piece of land the same Qiao Baoxian produced a 470,000-dollar receipts, but Qiao Baoxian get a piece of land when land use rights certificates showing the right artificial Zhuozhou qingliangsi sixth engineering construction company (hereinafter referred to as "the sixth agency").
Blink of an eye a decade past. In 2007, the widget factory director Li Fuchun found Qiao Baoxian, asked him for money.
"He (Li Fuchun) told me at that time, itself economically more difficult, now go up, so I gave him some money. He wants two hundred thousand or three hundred thousand dollars. "Qiao Baoxian on rule of law told reporters over the weekend:" I was also nervous, ask him what about 470,000 yuan loans. At that time, my mother had cerebral thrombosis and his wife need money doctor, nanny. ”
From 1997 to the present, as Beijing's "satellite" line went through the roof of the Zhuozhou City, premium, an acre more than 40,000 yuan from the initial surge to millions of Yuan.
Qiao Baoxian refused Li Fuchun's request. Which Qiao Baoxian v to the blue Court, requesting its return a block of land-use rights certificates.
"I consulted the blue Court. Court said, because a block land transfer shown on the land use right certificates for the sixth Agency, the widget factory does not have standing. Unless the widget factory can prove his relationship with sixth Agency. "Qiao Baoxian, told reporters.
In anger, he made counterclaims against component factory.
Weekend reporters attempted to contact Li Fuchun of rule of law to understand the relevant circumstances of the case, but as of press time ago have not contacted Li Fuchun himself.
"Confusion" of the two lands
On September 20, 2007, Zhuozhou judgement of first instance court, sentence Qiao Baoxian returned a piece of land use right certificates, widget factory widget factory to pay 470,000 yuan Qiao Baoxian borrowing plus interest. Judgment for two reasons: first, in connection with the land in the process of handling land use rights certificates, payment of taxes and fines by the component factory, the Court accordingly finds that, all land component factory second Qiao Baoxian counterclaims provides in connection with land-related receipts and IOUs, the courts to support their claims.
Not satisfied with returning land judgment Qiao Baoxian, to Baoding intermediate people's Court of appeal. In February 2008, Baoding intermediate people's Court made the civil order, and remanded the case. 5 months later, blue Court judgment again, same as the last time.
Qiao Baoxian Appeal appeal again. On September 24 of that year, he waited from Baoding intermediate people's court civil mediation. Mediation shall remain largely maintain the Zhuozhou City Court's decision.
"I still don't approve the conciliation statement demanded return of land use right certificates. This card in my hand is the sixth card of the Agency, not to say is the card widget factory. And this card is not Li Fuchun mortgaged land in order to borrow. "Qiao Baoxian believes that Li Fuchun demanded return of land use right certificate as well as the final judgments of the Court of Li Fuchun 470,000 yuan to return her loan, which is represented by two pieces of land," just a few "confused the two pieces of land of the Court.
The reason for this is Qiao Baoxian no sign for the conciliation, which he has not yet reason for land use right certificate with a block away.
"No security procedures at that time. "Qiao Baoxian said.
Cui Qi Qiao Baoxian lawyer: "the Court is not always clear, the two pieces of land and two two-what is going on. ”
"Later, Li Fuchun and didn't get the b plots, it was back to do the development, of course, this land is also impossible for me, giving my money to the pit. "Qiao Baoxian says with exasperation.
Another key subject of the land dispute was the sixth Agency.
In an earlier trial, the widget factory has stated: "the sixth Agency is a fictional land in connection with people, in order to escape the land of approval. Widget factory provides information to the public security organs handling the chop. ”
As already mentioned, the Court after investigations found in connection with the land in the process of handling land use rights certificates, payments are paid by component factory and finds that all land component factory.
But Cui Qi, the evidence is insufficient to directly confirm fabricator is a land use right of people.
"If the sixth Agency is valid in connection with the land, the fabricator as plaintiff clearly does not apply. If the fabricator think land use rights in connection with its manufacturing, changes should apply to the local land administration authority. "Cui Qi told reporters.
Conciliation can take effect
In 2010, Qiao Baoxian mothers and wives have died. Apart from the grief, he'll still be the case going. This he did not recognize civil conciliation, is then performed by the cities of court.
Qiao Baoxian said: "mediation received no court had asked me before, I received it. Court to consider mediation entered into force as well served. ”
"In fact, is signed for mediation is key to the entry into force of the book. Court should check out files, check, instead of simply asking the parties. "Cui Qi lawyer said.
On November 25, 2013, the rule of law and Zhuozhou Baoding intermediate people's Court court reporters respectively over the weekend and submit interview requests.
At a press relations department several times, January 7, 2014, which hosted Baoding intermediate people's Court judge Zhang responded to this. He told reporters that: "Qiao Baoxian have mediation. Since there is proof of mediation has come into effect. ”
On the mediation provided by Qiao Baoxian copies of transcripts, the reporter saw many deletions and illegible. In this regard, zhangfeng judge explained: "then there are now printing device, altered parts are hand-written, and then press print. Books is not a form of mediation, and conciliation agreements are also exactly the same. I see no problem. ”
Conciliation body of the transcripts last sentence: "these agreements do not contravene the law, signed by both parties that the force of law. "In this regard, Qiao Baoxian," said that when the signed statement, lines of text are not. ”
On January 16, cities of Chen, Director of the political Department of the Court, told reporters: "we reviewed service has entered into force, no problem. "Reporter" review whether the conciliation entered into force before the implementation of a concrete basis ", cities of the Court did not answer.
"If Qiao Baoxian think it is illegal (place), you can take the creation of this. "Host judge Zhang feng had said.
From the decision date, Qiao Baoxian and his lawyers have repeatedly mentioned the question of mediation shall have effect, and numerous requests related to court attention, these did not get any clear answer.
"We have tried to write to Baoding intermediate people's Court of a Dean, reflecting this was ' own case ', also incorporated Baoding intermediate people's Court of business chambers, Chambers, few people in charge of many sectors such as Dean, has remained a dead letter. "Qiao Baoxian said.
About implementation
Qiao Baoxian implementation has also raised an objection to the blue Court.
In November 2010, Zhuozhou, Zhuozhou City, administration of land and resources to assist in the implementation of the court notice requesting cancellation a block to the original land use rights certificates, and go through it again. Notice of application for enforcement of the Chronicle anthropogenic component factory.
A year later, courts of the cities of Zhuozhou notice in assisting in the implementation of land and resource management Council and requested that the land in connection with a plot of land use changes to the personal name Li Fuchun. Application for enforcement of this notice records human Li Fuchun.
And Cui Qi Qiao Baoxian, if civil conciliation effect, cities of court as the sole legal basis, shall be civil conciliation which States: "Qiao Baoxian from the conciliation statement after the entry into force in the 10th, loan mortgage agreement on both sides involved in the original card for 1995-030149, the land use right certificate returned to the fabricator of Zhuozhou cool Temple. ”
Cui Qi believed that blue courts actually perform the content, implemented through change request, requirement change, such as land, this should return the documents Act, implementing change land-use practices, Li Fuchun moments make outsiders netted tens of millions of dollars (premium based on blue).
"In accordance with the content of the civil mediation, only to return land certificate original, does not empower the Court cancelled the original, again for land use right certificate of authority, but did not give the Court apply to holders through deliberately vague name, alter the land use right, foreign powers of the land use right certificate for Li Fuchun. "Cui Qi said.
On November 5, 2013, Qiao Baoxian notice of opposition of implementation submitted to the blue Court, requests the Court to legally revoke the award and related assistance for the implementation of civil enforcement notices and rejected applicants, namely Zhuzhou qingliangsi component factory application.
In this regard, the blue Court Director, Chen told reporters: "Qiao Baoxian contested the conciliation statement is, blue Court Executive Board to review and hearing procedures. Is only available for answers to this degree. ”
For the implementation of a concrete basis, blue courts also have no clear answers.
And Cui Qi Qiao Baoxian separately told reporters that he has not yet received any information on the hearing. Component factory morning due to no annual renewal and business license has been revoked for two consecutive years. This causes disputes stemming from the land, still floating in the air.
Author: rule the weekend gaoxin ceramal compound
由于近年来地价飞涨，位于涿州市区的、两块面积一样的土地牵涉进了一桩长达6年的土地纠纷案。至今，关于两块土地权属的厘定、案件调解书的相关内容以及调解书执行时的部分细节，都存在争议
法治周末记者 高欣
又至岁末，那个让乔宝仙苦闷了6年的心结，仍未解开。
乔宝仙在河北省涿州市经营着一家不锈钢加工厂。2007年，因土地升值，他被其公司的土地使用权转让方告上法庭，要求其返还的，却是另一块土地的使用权证。
次年，经过3次审理，乔宝仙收到来自河北省保定市中级人民法院(以下简称“保定中院”)的民事调解书，调解书中要求乔宝仙将另一块土地的使用权证还给原告。因不认可其中内容，他没有签收。
而到了2010年，该民事调解书却被涿州市人民法院(以下简称“涿州法院”)执行，且实际执行的内容与调解书内容颇有不符。
如今，乔宝仙已向涿州法院提交《执行异议申请书》，至于结果，他还在等。
地价上涨“惹的祸”
事情还需追溯到1997年。那一年，乔宝仙43岁，生意做得红红火火。为扩大业务，他花了94万元，在涿州市区拿到两块面积均为9亩3分的土地。两块土地每块47万元，一“买”一“借”。
“买”来的地位于涿州市东兴北街(以下称“A块地”)，在交完47万元款项后，乔宝仙就拿到了该块地的土地使用权证。
“借”来的地(以下称“B块地”)紧邻A块地，由涿州市清凉寺构件厂(以下简称“构件厂”)为乔宝仙出具了一张47万元的地款收据以及一张借条。构件厂承诺，若借款不能返还，则将土地使用权交给乔宝仙。但至今，乔宝仙既没有收回借款，也没有拿到地。
记者拿到的资料显示，A块地事实也是从构件厂获得，构件厂为A块地同样给乔宝仙出具了一张47万元的收据，不过当乔宝仙拿到A块地的土地使用权证时，上面显示的使用权人为涿州市清凉寺建筑公司第六工程处(以下简称“第六工程处”)。
一眨眼十年过去。2007年，构件厂厂长李福春找到乔宝仙，向他要钱。
“他(李福春)当时跟我说，自己经济上比较困难，地现在涨价了，让我给他点儿钱。他要二三十万元。”乔宝仙对法治周末记者说：“我当时经济也紧张，正找他要那47万元借款呢。当时，我的母亲和妻子都得了脑血栓，需要钱看病、请保姆。”
从1997年至今，作为北京“卫星城”的涿州市地价直线疯涨，从最初的一亩四万多元飙升至几百万元。
乔宝仙拒绝了李福春的要求。后者将乔宝仙诉至涿州法院，要求其返还A块地的土地使用权证原件。
“我咨询过涿州法院工作人员。法院的人说，因为A块地土地使用权证上显示的土地转让方为第六工程处，构件厂不具备起诉资格。除非构件厂能证明自己与第六工程处的关系。”乔宝仙对记者说。
出于气愤，他对构件厂提出了反诉。
法治周末记者试图联系李福春了解案件的相关情况，但截至发稿前，仍未联系上李福春本人。
被“混淆”的两块地
2007年9月20日，涿州法院作出一审判决，判决乔宝仙返还A块地土地使用权证给构件厂、构件厂给付乔宝仙借款47万元及利息。判决理由有两个：一是涉案土地在办理土地使用权证过程中，税费及罚款都由构件厂缴纳，法院据此认定，土地使用权归构件厂所有；二是乔宝仙反诉时提供了涉案土地相关收据和借条，法院对其诉求予以支持。
乔宝仙不服返还土地证的判决，上诉至保定中院。2008年2月，保定中院作出民事裁定，对此案发回重审。5个月后，涿州法院再次作出判决，内容与上次基本相同。
乔宝仙不服，再次上诉。当年9月24日，他等到了来自保定中院的民事调解书。调解书依然基本维持了涿州法院的判决。
“我依然不认可调解书中要求返还土地使用权证的内容。我手里的这个证是第六工程处的证，没说是构件厂的证。而且这证也不是李福春为了借款而抵押的那块土地的。”乔宝仙认为，李福春要求返还的土地使用权证以及法院最终判决李福春归还自己的47万元借款，这二者所代表的是两块土地，“只是亩数一样”，法院混淆了两块地的情况。
这是乔宝仙没有签收调解书的原因，也是他至今未将A块地土地使用权证交出去的理由。
“当时没办抵押手续。”乔宝仙说。
在乔宝仙的律师崔麒看来：“法院始终都没讲清楚，这两块地和两个47万元到底是怎么回事。”
“后来李福春也没拿到B块地，就被重新收回做开发了，当然这块地也不可能给我，还把我的钱给坑了。”乔宝仙无奈地说。
这场土地纠纷的另一个关键主体，是第六工程处。
之前庭审中，构件厂曾陈述：“涉案土地使用权人第六工程处是虚构的，为了逃避土地的审批。但构件厂向公安机关提供了资料办理公章。”
如前所述，法院经调查发现涉案土地在办理土地使用权证过程中，相关款项都由构件厂缴纳，并认定土地使用权归构件厂所有。
但崔麒看来，这些证据不足以直接证实构件厂就是A块地的使用权人。
“如果第六工程处是合法的涉案土地使用权人，那构件厂作为原告提起诉讼显然不适格。如果构件厂认为涉案土地使用权归其所有，应当向当地土地管理部门申请变更。”崔麒对记者说。
调解书能否生效
2010年，乔宝仙的母亲和妻子相继去世。悲痛之余，他依然为官司奔走。这份他并不认可的民事调解书，却在当年由涿州法院执行。
乔宝仙说：“之前法院只是问我调解书收到没有，我答收到了。法院以此认为调解书生效并送达。”
“实际上，是否签收才是调解书是否生效的关键。法院应当查阅卷宗，进行核实，而非单纯询问当事人。”崔麒律师说。
2013年11月25日，法治周末记者分别赴保定中院和涿州法院，提出采访要求。
在记者数次联系相关部门后，2014年1月7日，该案保定中院主办法官张峰先对此作出答复。他对记者说：“乔宝仙手里有调解书。既然有，就证明调解书已经生效了。”
在由乔宝仙提供的调解笔录复印件上，记者看到有多处删改且字迹模糊。对此，张峰先法官解释道：“当时没有现在的打印设备，改动的部分都是手写，然后摁手印。调解书不是一次形成的，和调解协议的内容也完全一致。我认为没有问题。”
调解笔录正文最后一句话为：“以上协议不违反法律规定，双方签字即生法律效力。”对此，乔宝仙表示：“当时签笔录时，并没有这行文字。”
1月16日，涿州法院政治处主任陈雷对记者表示：“我们经过审查，送达已经生效，没有问题。”而对于记者提出“执行前审查调解书是否生效的具体依据”，涿州法院并未回答。
“如果乔宝仙认为有不合法(之处)，可以走申诉的途径。”主办法官张峰先说。
从判决至今，乔宝仙及其律师已反复多次提及调解书有没有生效的问题，并数次请求相关法院予以重视，均未得到任何明确的答复。
“我们还曾经尝试给保定中院某位院长写信，反映这是一起‘乌龙案件’，也跟保定中院的业务庭、立案庭、分管院长等多部门的数人反映，都石沉大海。”乔宝仙说。
被质疑的执行
乔宝仙对涿州法院的执行也提出了异议。
2010年11月，涿州法院向涿州市国土资源管理局发出协助执行通知，要求注销A块地原土地使用权证，并重新办理。通知书记载的申请执行人为构件厂。
一年后，涿州法院又向涿州市国土资源管理局发出协助执行通知，要求将涉案土地A块地的土地使用权变更到李福春个人名下。这次通知书记载的申请执行人为李福春。
在乔宝仙和崔麒看来，若民事调解书生效，涿州法院执行的唯一合法依据，应当是民事调解书载明的：“乔宝仙自调解书生效后十日内，将双方借款抵押协议所涉及的证号为1995—030149号土地使用权证原件返还给涿州市清凉寺构件厂。”
崔麒认为，涿州法院的实际执行内容，通过变更申请执行人、要求变更土地使用权人等方式，将本应返还证件的行为，执行成变更土地使用权的做法，使案外人李福春瞬间获利数千万元(基于当时涿州的地价)。
“按照民事调解书的执行内容，只能是返还土地证原件，并没有赋予执行法院注销原件、重新办理土地使用权证的权力，更没有赋予执行法院通过故意模糊申请执行人名称、擅自变更土地使用权人、为李福春个人办理土地使用权证的权力。”崔麒分析称。
2013年11月5日，乔宝仙向涿州法院提交《执行异议申请书》，请求法院依法撤销民事执行裁定书及相关协助执行通知书，并驳回被申请人、即涿州市清凉寺构件厂的执行申请。
对此，涿州法院陈雷主任对记者表示：“乔宝仙对调解书的内容已经提出异议，涿州法院执行局要进行审查，走听证会的程序。目前只能回答到这个地步。”
对于执行的具体依据，涿州法院方面亦无明确回答。
乔宝仙和崔麒分别告诉记者，自己目前尚未接到任何关于听证会的消息。而构件厂早因连续两年没有年审而被吊销营业执照。这起因土地而起的纠纷，仍飘在空中。
作者：法治周末记者 高欣
赞