Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)delvpublished in(发表于) 2014/1/27 8:55:42 Environmental science experts wrote to Shanghai citizens call for ban of fireworks
A letter of appeal to the interdiction "Fireworks haze" letter
People:
How do you do! 2014 year Spring Festival is approaching, in order to reduce haze pollution, more and more people actively respond to the advocacy, select do not drop or put less Fireworks and firecrackers.
Chinese New Year Fireworks effects on air quality, it shouldn't be banned?
First, let we see a group data: according to 2013 Shanghai City in Spring Festival during on new year's Eve to early six holiday 7 days of air quality monitoring results, February 9 on new year's eve day, city air, is excellent level; but from night at 8 o'clock discharge fireworks firecrackers up, PM2.5 hours concentration quickly rose, February 10 lunar new year's day at 2 o'clock in the morning reached peak 523.7 μ g/m3, until junior of at 5 o'clock in the afternoon only dropped national standards 75 μ g/m3 following. High pollution day of the lunar new year's day, Shanghai daily average PM2.5 concentration reached 183.1 μ g/m3,AQI value of 233, reaching high levels of pollution. February 14, and 2:00, to welcome the God of wealth, the PM2.5 concentration suddenly increased to 269 and 279 hours μg/M3, resulting in five days in early air quality slightly polluted level is reached.
Second, analyze causes and harms of pollution: one is from the perspective of internal, as national central during the Lunar New Year holiday, builders largely ceased operations, apart from very few companies, most of the factories are on holiday break. So in 2013 on new year's Eve and Chinese new year evening respectively in these two days of air pollution, its sources of pollution and genetic mechanism ought to be very clear, was due to focus on a large fireworks due to pollution, to be called "Fireworks haze". "Fireworks haze" in the form of, each discharge is a maker of pollution and contributors.
Is the second from the perspective of external causes, 2013 Spring Festival focused on holiday for 7 days, in addition to earlier lunar new year and 52 days away from heavy pollution and light pollution, air quality in Shanghai are benign and indicate adverse meteorological conditions does not occur this time, today is a typical example of anthropogenic pollution.
Three levels from pollution, 2 Day Fireworks caused the lunar new year and the new year and reached severe levels of pollution and light pollution. Although only 2 days of pollution, but in 2013 pollution days 124 days a year, they have accounted for 1.6%; 7-day, even more than as much as 28%, full description of "Fireworks haze" is no small matter, has become a pollution "bads". To eliminate Fireworks haze this "pollution", it is up to society as a United to restore "public morals"!
Professor-level senior engineer, air branch of municipal environmental science Association Deputy Director Wei Haiping
On January 26, 2014
(With slight derogation)
(Original title: a letter of appeal to the interdiction "Fireworks haze" letters)
一封呼吁阻击“烟花霾”的来信
市民：
你们好！眼看2014马年春节将近，为了减少雾霾污染，越来越多的市民积极响应倡导，选择不放或少放烟花爆竹。
那么，春节燃放烟花爆竹对空气质量的影响究竟多大，该不该禁放呢？
首先，让我们看一组数据：根据2013年上海市在春节期间除夕到年初六放假7天的空气质量监测结果，2月9日除夕白天，全市空气，处于优良级别；但从晚上8时燃放烟花爆竹起，PM2.5小时浓度迅速上升，2月10日大年初一凌晨2时达到峰值523.7μg/m3，直到初一的下午5时才降至国家标准75μg/m3以下。高污染导致大年初一当天上海市PM2.5日均浓度达到183.1μg/m3，AQI值为233，达到重度污染。2月14日1:00和2:00，为迎财神时段，PM2.5小时浓度突然增高至269和279μg/m3，导致年初五这天空气质量达到轻度污染级别。
其次，分析一下污染成因和危害：一是从内因看，由于春节期间全国集中放假，建筑工地基本停止作业；除了极少数企业，大部分工厂也放假休息。因此，2013年春节除夕和初五这两天的空气污染，其污染来源和成因机制应该是十分清楚的，是由于集中大规模燃放烟花爆竹污染所致，可称之为“烟花霾”。在“烟花霾”的形成中，每个燃放者都是污染的制造者和贡献者。
二是从外因看，2013年春节集中放假的7天里，除了年初一和年初五2天分别为重污染和轻度污染以外，上海的空气质量均为良，说明这段时间未出现不利气象条件，是属于典型的人为污染日。
三是从污染程度看，2天燃放烟花爆竹造成年初一和年初五分别达到重度污染和轻度污染级别。虽说仅2天污染，但在2013年全年124天污染天里，却已占了1.6%；在放假7天里，更是占比28%之多，充分说明“烟花霾”绝非小事，已经成为一种污染“公害”。而要消除烟花霾这一“公害”，就要靠全社会拧成一股绳，重塑“公德”！
教授级高级工程师、市环境科学学会大气分会副主任魏海萍
2014年1月26日
(略有删减)
(原标题：一封呼吁阻击“烟花霾”的来信)
赞