Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2014/1/30 6:32:37 Lawyers apply for publicly rewarded Li Na of Hubei 800，000 approval process
Xinhuanet, Beijing, January 29 (reporters Wang Haoming and and Li Li)-recently, Hubei Province rewards "he went home loaded with" Lena 800,000 yuan, sparking buzz. Many people questioned: 800,000 yuan teacher name? Use public financial incentives pro star is reasonable? What role Government should play in professional sports?
Public financial incentives for career stars controversy
The morning of 27th, get a second career Grand Slam trophies for the Li arrived in his hometown of Wuhan at midday and received a bonus of 800,000 yuan, Hubei Provincial Government sent spree, press once the exposure has caused strong concern and heated debate. This in a website survey, more than 60% say "use public money to reward seems to be wrong", but there were more than 10% Internet users that "Li Na made history for granted."
Guangdong mobile phone users said: "Li Na but not to play, she was playing for himself, 800,000 of taxpayers ' money to rescue the poor? "In a small number of supporters, the" worm 999 "do not think the Government incentives:" contribute shouldn't reward for you? State Supreme science and technology award also rewards cash it? "" Cottage into a dull fool "view more moderate:" local government awards who justifiably, the problem is that winning is too simple and uninspired. Transformed into positive energy campaign, or will better reflect the image of Madonna skill and strength, and lead to the positive energy of the community. ”
Had questioned whether the high iron and free mineral water "tricky" Pang Kun 28th Shenzhen lawyers applied to the Hubei provincial government information public, want to reward Li Na $ 800,000 worth of legal basis, sources of funding and approval processes.
"Fiscal expenditure's aim is for the livelihood of the people and the public interest, if the stay is not consistent with the principle of fiscal expenditure, so I hope that the Government can open legal basis for reward," Pang Kun say. He also questioned the reasonableness of the expenditures on bonuses "as a professional athlete, the rationality of this reward is not so great. Li Na Australian Open prize money of $ 2.6 million, she is not short of money. Would fiscal expenditure in line with the law, as well as with social ethics and values orientation. ”
Hubei Sports Bureau said the provisions policy
Head of Hubei Provincial Bureau of sports in a media interview responded: incentives for compliance with existing policies and incentives for Li Na standards. "The reward to the champions, there is a policy basis. From this bonus amount Li, our standard is the implementation of last year's National Games Champion Award. "The official said.
Hubei Provincial Government was not rewarded Li for the first time. 2011 Li Na won Roland Garros to become Asia's first Grand Slam champion, awarded as Li Na of Hubei, "Hubei across pioneer" title, and reward of 600,000 yuan. The award amount has improved.
Experts said that if there was a policy based on the Hubei provincial government rewarded Li Na, at least legally. Engaged in research on community sports of South China Normal University Professor Lu Yuanzhen said, "no problem as long as compliance with established regulations of Hubei Province, and, if required, past champions gave money, Hubei Provincial Government may have to pay this time. "Professional sports experts, enjoy special allowance of the State Council, Bao said," Lena brings government intentions may be taken into account in Wuhan, Hubei's international influence. From a publicity point of view of the city, Li Na, Wuhan, Hubei intangible capital gains a huge, larger than the Government spent heavily promotional effect. Let alone 800,000 of this value, 8 million more than. From this point of view, award the first place can't be wrong. ”
To encourage advanced also is robbing the rich?
Yes even if legitimate, mind, Bao noted that squeeze pro star out of government financial incentives for market-oriented, reasonable well worth exploring. "The Grand Slam champions is the natural result of Li Na, your own efforts, was not active for the glory to the country. While Li Na himself may also wish to self-development in accordance with the law of professional sports, so as not to affect the freedom of choice of professional sports. "He said that professional sports more through tax, Government subsidies of developed countries support the development of sport industry and rarely rewarding pro star," because the pro star is generally considered rich, and public finances are the people's money, Government incentives pro star is tantamount to taking poor money rich relief. "
In contrast, Lu Yuanzhen were of the view that regardless of the career service of the State by the stars themselves, but objectively as a quasi-public goods can bring a lot of positive social effects. "Li Na Australian Open finals of the CCTV's ratings go up when 10%, here with the people's livelihood. In other countries, some athletes are not the State 's, after countries to subsidize out of the match, which is the result of social effects of professional sports. "He said.
Reward Pro star caused similar controversy was not the first. After Xiong Chaozhong became China's first world champion last year, his home town, State-level poverty-stricken counties in maguan County, Yunnan province to give its $ 750,000 worth of incentives also led to Government the "gilding" or "bread" discussions. Now that any Government incentive of Lena, Pang Kun say: "spend some casual, Li Na is a professional athlete, took bonuses depending on the market, even better than a nice surprise, do some work on a universal basis, young talents. ”
新华网北京1月29日电（记者王浩明、李丽）近日，湖北省奖励“衣锦还乡”的李娜80万元，引发热议。不少人提出疑问：80万元师出何名？用公共财政奖励职业明星是否合理？政府在职业体育中又应当扮演什么角色？
公共财政奖励职业明星引争议
27日上午，拿到职业生涯第二座大满贯奖杯的李娜抵达家乡武汉，中午就收到了湖北省政府送来的80万元奖金大礼包，新闻一经曝光就引起了强烈关注和激烈争论。在某网站对此进行的调查中，6成以上的人表示“用公共财政的钱去奖励似有不妥”，但也有1成多的网民认为“李娜创造历史理所应当”。
广东一名手机用户说：“李娜又不是为国打球，她是在为自己打球，纳税人的80万可以救助多少穷人？”在少数支持者中，“捷足先登999”认为政府奖励没有问题：“对于有贡献的人难道不应该奖励么？国家最高科技奖不也是奖励的现金么？”“陋室庸愚”的看法比较温和：“地方政府嘉奖有成就的人无可非议，问题在于嘉奖的方式太简单生硬．如是转化成正能量广告宣传，或会更能体现娜姐技艺及力道形象，且引带出社会的积极能量。”
曾质疑高铁免费矿泉水是否存在“猫腻”的深圳律师庞琨28日向湖北省政府申请信息公开，希望公开奖励李娜80万元的法律依据、资金来源和审批流程。
“财政支出的宗旨是为民生和公共利益，如果不明不白就不符合财政支出的原则，所以我希望政府能够公开奖励的法律依据，”庞琨说。他还对奖金支出的合理性表示质疑：“作为职业运动员，这么奖励没有那么大的合理性。李娜澳网奖金260万美元，她并不缺钱。希望财政支出能符合法律，也符合社会伦理和价值导向。”
湖北体育局称符合政策规定
湖北省体育局负责人在接受媒体采访时回应称：对李娜的奖励符合现有政策和奖励标准。“对冠军进行奖励，这是有政策依据的。从这次奖励李娜的金额来说，我们是执行去年全运会冠军的奖励标准。”该负责人说。
湖北省政府并非第一次奖励李娜。2011年李娜法网夺冠成为亚洲第一个大满贯冠军后，湖北省政府授予李娜“湖北跨越先锋”称号，并奖励60万元。此次奖励金额又有所提升。
有专家表示，如果确有政策依据，湖北省政府奖励李娜至少是合法的。长期从事社会体育研究工作的华南师范大学教授卢元镇说：“只要符合湖北省既定的法规就没有问题，而且如有规定、过去拿过冠军的都给钱，那湖北省政府这次也必须给。”职业体育专家、享受国务院特殊津贴的鲍明晓则说：“政府初衷可能是考虑到李娜带给武汉、湖北的国际影响力。从城市宣传的角度，李娜让武汉、湖北的无形资产增值巨大，比政府花巨资宣传带来的效应更大。这个价值别说80万，800万也不止。从这个角度说，奖励的初衷不能算错。”
鼓励先进还是劫贫济富？
即使合法、初衷也没错，但鲍明晓指出，动用政府财政奖励市场化项目的职业明星，合理性值得探讨。“大满贯冠军是李娜自己努力的自然结果，并不是主动为国争光。而李娜本人可能也希望按照职业体育规律自我发展，以免影响职业体育的自由选择。”他表示，职业体育发达国家更多是通过减免税收、政府补贴扶持体育产业的发展，少见奖励职业明星个人，“因为普遍认为职业明星是富人，而公共财政是老百姓的钱，政府奖励职业明星，等于是拿穷人的钱救济富人”。
与之相反，卢元镇则认为，无论职业明星本身是否服务于国家，但客观上作为社会准公共产品能带来很多正面效应。“李娜澳网决赛的时候央视收视率是10％，这里面就有民生嘛。在国外，有些国家运动员都不是国家养的，比赛出成绩以后国家也要给奖金，这都是出于职业体育带来的社会效应。”他说。
奖励职业明星引发的类似争议并非首例。去年熊朝忠成为中国第一个世界职业拳王后，他的家乡、国家级贫困县云南省马关县给予其75万元的奖励，同样引发了政府该“锦上添花”还是“雪中送炭”的讨论。对如今李娜再受政府奖励的事，庞琨说：“钱花的有些随意了，李娜是职业运动员，依靠市场拿了高额奖金，这时候锦上添花不如雪中送炭，多在普及基础、青少年人才培养上做一些工作。”
赞