Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)归海一刀
published in(发表于) 2014/2/3 8:04:59
Beijing some of the provisions of the King is still in the restaurant, the business sector can raise

Beijing said some provisions of the King is still in the restaurant industry and Commerce departments can raise | overbearing clause Beijing _ | | Restaurant News

Legal evening news (reporter Ba Rui) on December 9, 2013, the Beijing Municipal industry and Commerce Bureau announced the Beijing catering industry often include "no BYOB," "restricted rooms minimum" 6, "overbearing clause", and called for the presence of these "overbearing clause" catering business shall be corrected within 1 month. Now 1 month time frame is long past, reporters only to find the great restaurants of "overbearing clause" still exists.


When Beijing Bureau of industry and commerce were halted in the catering trade with these 6 "provisions of the King", the newspaper for the city's dozens of upscale restaurants businesses making visits and found that two-thirds of the restaurants still do "terms". But is not corrective action to the industrial and commercial sector to give a 1 month time limit.


This time, ahead of the Spring Festival holiday period, this reporter once again visits and visits to these upscale restaurants, found "overbearing clause" does not resolve the problem.


Reporter visits


  Articles still BYOB but also for money


Positive values during the Spring Festival, the hotel business is hot, whether it is family reunion dinner emotional meal among friends, try to do things the easy way everyone directly out of "eating out". Yesterday was the second day of the new year, at about 5 o'clock in the evening, reporters in Zhong Guan Cun East to Shun and Conrad visits found inside the restaurant, both in the restaurant's lobby has long been filled with Diners, even it was allele.


A swanky boutique, a high-end chain stores in Hong Kong style tea Cafe, but visiting reporters found that both restaurants are "no BYOB" similar "overbearing clause" did not "sweep" clean.


Tung Lai Shun nautical shops in Zhongguancun, a waiter told reporters that meals are not BYOB, then reporters pointed out that industrial and commercial sectors have relevant provisions, you can bring your own, "which runs parallel to the provisions you bring, we can't steal. ”


And Conrad, which is not far from the restaurant, don't walk in the door, you can see the door glass printed on a series of "rules", which would include "eating take-out food and beverages is strictly prohibited". Waiter told reporters that if you BYOB corkage fee will be charged, 50 Yuan per bottle.


Jinyang silver Valley restaurant, to booking private rooms here, per capita consumption has more than 100 Yuan, drinks, staff said, "holiday it can be appropriate for two days with no more" when a reporter asked whether he would accept bottle fee, other staff replies impatiently: "you did it's not accept. ”


In the famous Quanjude Roast Duck Restaurant at peace, although drinks can bring, but also have rules, "white wine red wine can only take one." In addition, if you book a room in advance, it is full of food, the minimum is $ 360 per bit, plus a 15% service charge. Hall can be its own a la carte, but service fees are also a 10%.


And yummy take fancy in huajiayiyuan was neither a minimum nor restrict BYOB, just like room service charges 10%, "each room is equipped with a staff so that high labor costs. "The store staff explained to reporters.


  Diners slot


  Eat up "provisions of the King" of luck


Restaurant "overbearing clause", while irritating, but many consumers to reduce the trouble will select "subject". Public Lady Liu told reporters that if restaurants strongly urged not to bring your own, they can't, "How do you do, rice had to eat, to come. ”


But knowing drinks in the hotel are generally more expensive than outside, so if you go out to eat to drink, that it will bring. "The beverage does not matter, for a few dollars more expensive, but wine is not the same, some restaurants sell several times more expensive than outside it. "Liu said there is a bring your own wine to a restaurant, shop when the waitress saw, comes with an 80 percent discount on drinks cannot be.


People Miss Wang said they do not drink, go out with friends are also generally less wine, but if there is a demand that is directly in the shop, will not bring their own, because they might feel "a bit embarrassing".


  Business statement


Today morning reporter dial has Beijing city for Commerce and industry of consumers complaints reported phone 12,315, staff told reporter, if in restaurant dining Shi found restaurant has in menu, and notices, and publicity single or bills Shang indicate prohibited since with drinks, acts, the restaurant on obviously violation has business sector publishing of not fair format articles, consumers can call 12,315 consumers hotline for reported, platform registration Hou by location trade and industry for investigation processing. Text/reporter Ba Rui

(Edit: SN098)
February 02, 2014 Legal evening news
(
北京部分餐厅霸王条款依旧 工商部门称可举报|霸王条款|餐厅|北京_新闻资讯

  法制晚报讯(记者 巴芮) 2013年12月9日,北京市工商局公布了北京市餐饮行业常见的包括“禁止自带酒水”、“限包间最低消费”等在内的6种“霸王条款”,并要求存在以上“霸王条款”的餐饮企业须在1个月内纠正。现在1个月时限早已过去,记者却发现各大餐厅内的“霸王条款”依旧存在。


  此前当北京市工商局刚刚叫停餐饮行业中这6条“霸王条款”时,本报便对全市的数十家高档餐饮企业进行了探访,发现其中有三分之二的餐厅仍在按“条款”行事。但当时还并未到工商部门给出的1个月的整改时限。


  此次,赶在春节长假期间,本报记者再次对这些高档餐厅进行探访与回访,发现“霸王条款”问题仍存在。


  记者探访


  条款仍然有 自带酒水还要钱


  正值过年期间,又到了饭店生意的火爆时期,无论是家里面的团圆饭还是朋友间的感情饭,图省事儿大家都直接在外面“下馆子”。昨天是大年初二,傍晚5时许,记者在中关村的东来顺和港丽餐厅内探访发现,两处餐厅的大堂内早已坐满了食客,甚至还有人在外等位。


  一个是老字号名店,一个是中高端的连锁港式茶餐厅,但在探访中记者发现,这两家餐厅均“禁止自带酒水”,这类似的“霸王条款”还并未“清剿”干净。


  东来顺中关村海图店的一名服务员告诉记者,来用餐是不能自带酒水的,随后记者指出工商部门对此已有相关规定,可以自带,对方便表示“明面上就这规定,您要是偷着带来了我们也没办法。”


  而在与其相距不远的港丽餐厅中,还没进门就可以看到其门玻璃上印有的一系列“规矩”,其中便包括“严禁食用外带食品及饮料”。服务员告诉记者,如果自带酒水就要收取开瓶费,每瓶50元。


  晋阳饭庄银谷店,要想在这儿订包间,人均消费必须在100元以上,对于酒水,工作人员表示“过节这两天可以适当带点儿”,当记者问是否还会收开瓶费时,对方工作人员不耐烦地回复称:“让您带这不就不收了吗。”


  在位于和平门的老字号全聚德烤鸭店,虽然酒水可以自带,但也是有规矩的,“白酒红酒只能带一种”。除此以外,如果提前预订单间,便全是配餐,最低是360元一位,还要外加15%的服务费。大厅可以自己点菜,但服务费也是照收10%。


  而在簋街内的花家怡园倒是既没有最低消费也不限制自带酒水,只有一样,包间服务费10%,“每个包间配一个服务员,这样人力成本高啊。”该店的工作人员向记者解释道。


  食客吐槽


  吃饭还得来 遇“霸王条款”没辙


  对于餐厅的这些“霸王条款”,虽然招人讨厌但不少消费者为了减少麻烦都会选择“服从”。市民刘女士告诉记者,若是有餐厅强烈要求不可自带,他们也没辙,“那怎么办啊,饭还得吃啊,来都来了。”


  可是明明知道一般饭店中的酒水都比外面贵,所以若是出去吃饭的时候要喝酒,那就一定会自带。“饮料倒是无所谓,贵几块钱的事儿,但是酒不一样啊,有些饭店里面的比外面卖的贵好几倍呢。”刘女士称有一次自带酒水去饭店吃饭,被店内的服务员看到后称,自带了酒水就不能享受8折优惠。


  市民王小姐说自己平时不喝酒,和朋友出去一般也不怎么点酒,但是如果有需求那就在店里直接要,不会自带,因为会觉得“有点儿没面子”。


  工商说法


  今天上午记者拨通了北京市工商局的消费者投诉举报电话12315,工作人员告诉记者,如果在餐厅用餐时发现餐厅有在菜单、告示、宣传单或票据上注明禁止自带酒水等行为,该餐厅就明显违反了工商部门发布的不公平格式条款,消费者可以拨打12315消费者热线进行举报,平台登记后由所在地工商所进行调查处理。文/记者 巴芮


(编辑:SN098)
2014年02月02日19:47
法制晚报
)


If you have any requirements, please contact webmaster。(如果有什么要求,请联系站长)





QQ:154298438
QQ:417480759