Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2014/2/3 8:14:20 Lawyers questioned rewarded Li Na of Hubei 800，000 yuan based on
Authorities wide nets in Beijing, February 3 (Xinhua Zhang Mian cotton) according to the voice of the news aspect of the report, the 25th of last month, Li won the Australian Open champion's news is very exciting. This is Li Na after 2011, the French top once again won the "Grand Slam" champion, who won the Australian Open singles champion for the first time in Asia. But just returned with honors, Li has continued in a variety of disputes: "full black teacher Li Na return home", "mobile 800,000 120,000 DHL package cold to Hubei Provincial Government Award", "slap head" reported disapproving.
A couple of days ago, had questioned whether the high iron and free mineral water "tricky" Pang Kun Shenzhen lawyers targeted again sent to Li Na of Hubei provincial government $ 800,000 prize. This bonus that shouldn't be sent to Li Na? What is the legal basis? Is there a legitimate approval procedures? Pang Kun say he was seeking information from the Hubei Provincial Government made public.
"What is the legal basis for 800,000, as it is an executive pay, the second is to say that if the 800,000 budgetary expenditure if the budget expenditure, of which 800,000 characters do not meet budget expenditure range, there is no legal approvals. "
After the Australian Open, access to slam Li, became the first Australian centenary history in China and Asia's singles champions. Cheers still ringing, but the "Hubei Sports Bureau, Li Na returning black received $ 800,000 prize" message, suddenly let a smile frozen on his face in the media, which is why, lawyers challenging Pang Kun, Hubei provincial government issues concern, what should the player Li Na bonus? Bonuses are there standards?
Pang Kun: returned to personal of this athletes of nature or is essentially surface, itself is to this for career, if you according to this logic words, that I if I is workers, that I do have good has, you is also to award I, if I is police or I is sanitation workers, so I do have good has you is award I 500,000, and 1 million, and 10 million, that you this award standard why put in athletes body, not put to other industries body.
In this regard, the Sports Bureau in Hubei Province Hu Dechun clarified that rewarded Li Na of Hubei province's 800,000 yuan is not to waste money, to reward the champions, there is a policy basis. From this bonus amount Li, is the implementation of last year's National Games champion award criteria. However, this raises a second question, even for athletes ' bonuses, and policy basis, is a reward for suicide, but Li Na is a professional athlete, is to go to the game, also need to reward it?
Pang Kun: even if it is in accordance with the standards of or reference to the champion's award, we believe that Li Na, first of all, she is not the provincial funding, the provincial culture or call sent to the game, but Li Na himself to the game.
Hubei provincial sports Bureau's reply was, Li Na, this time in the Australian Open champion, was a high gold content of world champion, champion award criteria to Li Na of Hubei Province, in accordance with the bonus, no question of violation. Not only was Li Na, either a World Championships or National Games Championship, will receive Government incentives. But for this story, Pang Kun was not good enough, "this vacations champions", Li Na is not a national team, she won at the international level, bonus points without will be handed over the national, why put taxpayer money to subsidize her?
Pang Kun: Li Na is a commercial player she identified as professional athletes, would be tantamount to taking everyone's money to reward a businessman or a reward individual budget expenditure should be paid for public interest, this prize breaks budgets or spending requirements are not met, I think it is hard to argue over.
At the same time, Li Na from the Championship to the bonus issue, only one day's time, Pang Kun say procedures may also have problems:
Pang Kun: on her first day in Australia to get the Championship, and the next day returned to Guangzhou, this prize has been marked out, is consistent with such a fast approval process, 800,000 of fiscal spending is not in accordance with the Executive order, or is in accordance with the approval, approval step by step down, again, these are all we need to know.
From the 25th to the Hubei Provincial Government made the information public, according to the rules, should get a reply within 15 days, but so far, Pang Kun is still waiting.
Li Na is ranked third in the world. After quitting the national team, she mainly depend on match bonuses and sponsor's sponsorship of individual team operations. In Europe and America people in mainstream tennis, Li Na personal glory, but also for the Chinese people, and Asians gain a seat.
Li said and did, maybe we should give her more inclusive, but lawyers questioned Pang Kun did make a lot of confusion. For the $ 800,000 prize the ins and outs of Hubei Province, we look forward to the relevant departments to give an answer as soon as possible.
How more open and more transparent to the athletes of the future? Government expenditures related to approval procedures on how to run according to law? A more standard system, perhaps when he faced the home crowd again, Li Na smile would be more sincere, bright.
(Original title: Li Na Australian Open win national award-winning 800,000 lawyers questioned the Hubei provincial government incentives based on)
央广网北京2月3日消息(记者张棉棉) 据中国之声《新闻纵横》报道，上个月25号，李娜夺得澳网冠军的消息很是让人振奋。这是李娜继2011年法网登顶后再次夺得"大满贯赛"冠军，也是亚洲人首次夺得澳网单打冠军。不过刚刚载誉归来的李娜却不断陷入各种争议："李娜回国全程黑脸见恩师"、"手提12万豪包冷对湖北省政府80万奖励"、"掴掌门"等报道，让人大跌眼镜。
前两天，曾质疑高铁免费矿泉水是否存在"猫腻"的深圳律师庞琨又将矛头对准了湖北省政府发给李娜的80万奖金。这笔奖金该不该发给李娜？法律依据是什么？有没有合法的审批手续？庞琨表示，他已经向湖北省政府申请信息公开。
"80万的法律依据是什么，因为它是一个行政给付，第二个就是说这80万是不是财政预算里边的支出，如果有这个预算支出，那这80万符不符合预算支出的范围，有没有合法的审批手续。"
澳网公开赛后，获得大满贯的李娜，成为澳网百年历史上第一个中国乃至亚洲的单打冠军。欢呼声言犹在耳，但一则"李娜回国黑脸接受湖北体育局80万奖金"的消息，顿时让笑容在媒体们的脸上速冻，也正因此，律师庞琨对湖北省政府的质疑问题颇为惹人关注，究竟该不该给运动员李娜发奖金？发放奖金是否有标准？
庞琨：回到个人的这种运动员的性质或者是本质上面，本身是以这个为职业，如果你按照这个逻辑的话，那我如果我是工人，那我做得好了，你是不是也要奖励我，如果我是警察或者我是环卫工人，那么我做得好了你是不是奖励我50万、100万、1000万，那你这个奖励标准为什么放在运动员身上，不放到其他各行各业身上。
对此，湖北省体育局局长胡德春澄清，湖北省奖励李娜的80万元并不是乱花钱，对冠军进行奖励，这是有政策依据的。从这次奖励李娜的金额来说，是执行去年全运会冠军的奖励标准。然而，这又引发了第二个问题，即便是给运动员发放奖金，有政策依据，是奖励为国争光，可是，李娜是职业运动员，是自己去比赛的，也需要奖励吗？
庞琨：即使它是依照或者是参照冠军的奖励标准，我们认为李娜，首先她并不是省出经费，省培养，或者是省召集再送去比赛的，而是李娜自己去比赛的。
湖北省体育局的回复是，李娜这次在澳网夺冠，是含金量很高的世界冠军，依照湖北省的冠军奖励标准给李娜发奖金，没有任何违规的问题。不光是李娜，任何一个世界冠军或全运会冠军，都会得到政府奖励。但对于这个说法，庞琨并不满意，"此冠军非彼冠军"，李娜并不是国家队，她在国际上拿了冠军，奖金分毫不会上缴国家，为什么要拿纳税人的钱再去补贴她？
庞琨：李娜如果把她认定为是一个商业运动员职业运动员的话，就等于是拿大家的钱去奖励一个商人或者说奖励一个个体，财政预算支出应该是为公共利益付出，这个奖励符不符合预算或者是财政支出的要求，我觉得这个就很难说得过去了。
同时，李娜从获得冠军到奖金发出，只有一天的时间，庞琨认为从程序上或许也存在问题：
庞琨：第一天她在澳大利亚就拿到冠军，第二天回到广州，这边的奖金就已经划出来了，是不是符合这么快的审批程序，80万的财政支出是不是按照行政命令给的，还是说按照审批，报批一步一步批下来，再定的，这些都是我们想知道的。
从25日向湖北省政府提出信息公开，按照规定，15天内应该会得到回复，但目前为止，庞琨依然在等待。
李娜现排名世界第三。在退出国家队以后，她主要依靠比赛的奖金和赞助商的赞助维持个人团队的运作。在以欧美人为主流的网球运动中，李娜个人的荣耀，也为中国人，乃至亚洲人争得了一席之地。
对于李娜的言行，或许我们应该给她更多的包容，不过律师庞琨的质疑也的确道出了许多人的困惑。对于此次80万奖金的来龙去脉，我们期待湖北省相关部门尽快给出答案。
未来如何更公开、更透明地激励运动员？政府财政支出的相关审批程序如何依法运行？有了更为规范的奖励机制，或许再次面对家乡父老时，李娜的笑容，也会更加真诚、灿烂。
(原标题：李娜澳网夺冠国内获奖80万 律师质疑湖北省政府奖励依据)
赞