Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)归海一刀
published in(发表于) 2014/3/20 6:24:55
Average wage of 210,000, Beijing Shijingshan in response to street: for the 66,000

Average wage of 210,000, Beijing Shijingshan in response to street: real wages 66,000 | | | welfare Shijingshan _ news

The Beijing News (reporters Wen Ru) this newspaper reported yesterday, according to the budgets of some government departments, Shijingshan district public reporting, babaoshan streets to calculate wages and benefits more than 210,000 yuan per capita. Yesterday, the Shijingshan District Government responded by saying this is a misreading of the data media. Shijingshan District contains only public sector funding sector strength and total expenditures for wages and benefits, but streets are all under the jurisdiction of the community and supervised by social workers, not counting the "strength", its wages and benefits expenditures are included in the Department's total expenditures for wages and benefits.


  Babaoshan streets there is staff of 313


Shijingshan District Government responded that funding standards of the street with the city's Street, Shijingshan district funding criteria are uniform. Babaoshan Street 20.782 million yuan in total expenditures for wages and benefits, including not only the street publicity 97 civil servants and institutions ' wages and welfare spending, and 216 of 17 communities, including street names and supervised by social workers of wages and benefits. Total expenditures for wages and benefits of the Jindingjie street of 21.51 million Yuan, which covers 109 serving personnel in the street, also includes 16 communes 210 social workers and supervised by staff. These social workers, supervised by outside publicity streets serving size range. Therefore, announced the "total expenditures for wages and benefits" and "strength" divides two data directly from the "per capita welfare spending" far outweigh the actual staff income.


If these social workers, supervised by crew, babaoshan real streets there were 313 people, received welfare spending should be 66,400 yen per capita in 2014; Jindingjie street there is staff for 319, 2014 wage per capita welfare spending should be to 67,400.


  Shijingshan sector budget announced the "temporary"


In this regard, the experts said, resulting in "misreading" reasons and responsibilities, is a budget report itself did not do a comprehensive specification. Exposed by the departmental budget process, for all personnel employed by the Government and involves a large amount of wages and benefits, should be released.


As of two days ago, in Beijing for 13 districts and counties will be available now 2014 budget report. Among them, according to a uniform format, multiple departments, street, Shijingshan district, was announced in the budget sector, including administrative information such as strength, series and series; in both the basic expenditure budget instructions, specifically listed expenditures for wages and benefits.


Reporters saw and, in fact, Shijingshan district is also part of the initiative announced the "temporary" number. For example, the Shijingshan district, the Red Cross said in its budget statement, the Department of "real toll 12 people serving 11 people, temporary workers and 1".


At the same time, municipal level in the public sector budget in recent days, many departments also did not shy away from "temporary" number. Statistics show that the Panel of 48 municipal units "temporary" more than 20,000 people.


Wages and benefits expenditures according to the Ministry of finance had previously explicitly listed provisions, budget unit paid to employees, outside the remuneration of permanent staff, such as basic wages, additional remuneration (allowance, overtime) and so on, should be classified as wages and welfare spending. Budget unit labour costs paid to temporary staffing, such as hourly wage, specialist consultation fees, are loaded into the purchased labour costs include expenditures on goods and services.


焦点



Government employment should be made public?


Zinc Wang Xi, Vice President of Peking University law school said that as government personnel system reform, many government departments have hired "casual workers", that is, signing labor contract personnel. He pointed out that with the promotion of employment, government sector the number of employed staff, the post will not be made public, will be difficult to subject to public supervision and legal constraints.


He said that under the current regulations, government departments in the budget publicly announced temporary workers employed, it is difficult to define as "illegal". However, in accordance with the requirements of the two lines of income and expenditure of government departments, these "temporary" in the appointment procedure of the use of public resources, "spending money" also relies on financial support from the normative sense, should be reflected in the budget. At the same time, based on the validity of Government oversight of the public, should be open "temporary" employment and wages welfare expenditure amounts.


  Budget publicly on how to avoid being misunderstood?


Exposed as a long-term concern budget expert, Deputy Director of the Hubei Provincial Bureau of statistics ye Qing said yesterday that was concerned about Beijing's recent government budget open manner. In his view, along with the number of incumbents and wages and welfare payments, and thereby able to calculate the "average wage and welfare", which itself was "very good".


"Street Office wages and welfare of 210,000 per capita" incident, the IEA pointed out that Government departments as a subject of public, if they did not release the actual number of complete information, in addition to Executive Board positions, Board staff how many people, temporary hiring of staff how many people, "would lead to public misunderstanding on the one hand, on the other hand also makes the wage entitlement spending figures meaningless. ”


"The Government spent more money which is dependant and what do, how many people, how much should be able to calculate. "The IEA believes that budgets must make sure consistent statements publicly, to facilitate public scrutiny to avoid misunderstanding.


The Beijing News reporter Wen Ru


(Original title: Shijingshan district responses to "per capita wages and welfare of 210,000 street")

(Edit: SN091)
02:39 March 20, 2014 The Beijing News
(
北京石景山回应街道人均工资21万:实为6.6万|工资|福利|石景山_新闻资讯

  新京报讯 (记者温薷)本报昨日报道,根据石景山区部分政府部门的预算公开报告,八宝山街道可计算出的人均工资福利超过21万元。昨天,石景山区政府回应称,这是媒体对数据的误读。石景山区公示的部门经费只包含部门在职人数和工资福利总支出情况,但街道管辖的所有社区的社工和协管员,不计算在“在职人数”内,其工资福利支出却包含在部门的工资福利总支出中。


  八宝山街道实有人员313人


  石景山区政府回应称,石景山区街道的经费标准跟全市街道办事处的经费标准是统一的。八宝山街道2078.2万元工资福利总支出中,不仅包括街道己公示的97名公务员和事业单位人员的工资福利支出,同时还包括街道17个社区的216名社工和协管员的工资福利。金顶街街道的工资福利总支出为2151万元,这其中覆盖了该街道办事处的109名在职人员,还包括16个社区的210名社工和协管员。上述社工、协管员不在公示的街道在职人数范围内。因此,用公布的“工资福利总支出”与“在职人数”两个数据直接相除得来的“人均福利支出数”,远远大于工作人员的实际所得。


  如果加上上述社工、协管员,八宝山街道实有人员应为313人,2014年人均工资福利支出应为6.64万元;金顶街街道实有人员应为319人,2014年人均工资福利支出应为6.74万元。


  石景山一部门预算公布“临时工”


  对此,专家认为,造成“误读”的原因和责任,是预算报告编制本身没有做到全面规范。在部门预算公开的过程中,对于政府聘用的所有人员数量和涉及的工资福利数额,都应当如实公布。


  截至前日,北京已有13个区县陆续公开了2014年的预算报告。其中,石景山区多个部门、街道按照统一的格式,在预算说明中公布了部门基本情况,包括行政编、事业编及在职人数等信息;同时在基本支出预算说明中,专门列示了工资福利支出情况。


  记者看到,实际上,石景山区也有部分单位主动公布了“临时工”人数。比如,石景山区红十字会即在预算说明中称,该部门“实有人数12人:在职11人,临时工1人”。


  同时,近日市级部门预算公开中,多个部门亦未回避“临时工”数量。统计显示,48个市级部门聘“临时工”超过了2万人。


  按照财政部此前明确的工资福利支出列示规定,凡预算单位支付给在职职工、编制外长期聘用人员的劳动报酬,如基本工资,额外劳动报酬(岗位津贴、加班工资)等,应归入工资福利支出。凡预算单位支付给临时聘用人员的劳务费用,如钟点工工资、专家咨询费等,都应作为外购劳务费用,列入商品和服务支出。


  ■ 焦点



  政府聘用人数是否应全公开?


  北京大学法学院副院长王锡锌表示,随着政府用人制度的改革发展,很多政府部门都聘用了“临时工”,即签订劳动合同的人员。他指出,随着聘用制的推广,政府部门如果对于聘用人员的数量、岗位不予公开,将难以受到公众监督和法律约束。


  他说,按照目前相关法规,政府部门在预算公开中未公布临时工聘用情况,很难被定义为“违法违规”。但是,按照政府部门收支两条线的要求,这些“临时工”在聘用过程中动用的是公共资源,“花钱”也是依靠财政支持,从规范的意义上来说,理应在财政预算中有所反映。同时,基于公众对政府监督的有效性,应该公开“临时工”聘用的情况以及工资福利支出的数额。


  预算公开如何避免被误读?


  作为长期关注预算公开的专家,湖北省统计局副局长叶青昨天表示,已关注到北京近期政府部门预算公开的情况。他认为,同时公布在职人员数量及工资福利支出,从而能够计算出“人均工资福利”,这个做法本身“非常好”。


  对于“街道办人均工资福利21万”事件,叶青指出,政府部门作为公开的主体,若没有公布实际人数的完整信息,比如除了行政在编人员职位,事业在编人员有多少人,临时聘用的工作人员有多少人等,“一方面会导致公众的误解,另一方面也使得工资福利支出的数字失去了意义。”


  “政府花的钱哪些是养人的,哪些是办事的,养了多少人,办了多少事,应该是能够计算的。”叶青认为,预算公开一定要做到口径一致,才能便于公众监督,避免误解。


  新京报记者 温薷


(原标题:石景山回应“街道人均工资福利21万”)


(编辑:SN091)
2014年03月20日02:39
新京报
)


If you have any requirements, please contact webmaster。(如果有什么要求,请联系站长)





QQ:154298438
QQ:417480759