Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2014/3/20 6:25:55 Civil claims against Japan， China standing on a new starting point
CNS, Beijing, March 19-problem: China civil lawsuit moved back home to Japan's claim to a new beginning
Author: Bai Hu
On March 18, the abducted Chinese workers and survivors of World War II sued Japan in the Beijing first intermediate people's Court in the case of enterprise officially, this is the first time a Chinese court accepted labour cases against Japanese companies into captivity. In this regard, analysts believe that the abducted Chinese workers in China against Japan lawsuits hurt business in compliance with the law, will start to appear in future similar lawsuits.
Civil claim without a win against Japan Beijing, China Court into new beginnings
The end of World War II, Japan get carried away captive, some 40,000 Chinese from China, for transport to Japan 135 operating 35 domestic enterprises, engaged in slave labor. To the end of the war in a long time, there are nearly 7,000 people had been tortured to death. More than 30,000 workers were able to return to China after the war, a considerable portion of his being devastated, long lived in a lot of pain.
On February 26 this year, 37 former Chinese laborers and survivors ' representatives submitted to the Beijing Municipal Intermediate People's Court complaint, sued Japan Coke industries (formerly Mitsui mining) integrated and Mitsubishi Materials Corporation (former Mitsubishi Mining Corporation), requested the second defendant abducted Chinese workers during World War II in the media, public apology, and per labour compensation of 1 million Yuan.
On March 18, the Beijing Municipal Intermediate People's Court informed the plaintiff in writing the Court formally accepted this. The Chinese Court of first abduction of Chinese laborers against Japanese companies.
In fact, China civil claims against Japan is not an easy road.
Starting from 1995, China launched by the civil society organizations to claim nearly 20 years have elapsed since the date. However, Japan's invasion of China Chinese victims in Japan filed nearly 30 claims against Japan, to date there is no ultimate win.
In this regard, the civil claims against Japan, President of the Federation, China Tong Zeng told Xinhua reporters that China civil claims against Japan in the midst of a long "in the Japanese action road" without losing a single win, Japan is even based on the Supreme Court, "70 's Government renounced war compensation means simultaneously giving up civil compensation" from closed in Japan the door to judicial settlement of this issue.
"Since then, we've been advocating in the domestic court. Beginning in 2006, once had, such as Shandong, Hebei, Zhejiang, Chongqing, litigation materials submitted to local courts for victims of World War II, but have not been accepted. "Tong Zeng said," Beijing Municipal Intermediate People's Court accepted the case, China's civil claims against Japan a landmark event on the road, but also a new beginning. ”
Abducted Chinese workers legal basis for prosecution in China
Child abduction case of Chinese laborers against Japanese companies in China after a court rejected, sparking concern.
Tong Zeng said that currently Japan signs rise of right-wing forces, Chinese courts have accepted the case to prevent Japan rise again of militarism, have a positive role in safeguarding world peace.
"In addition, Japan's leaders have recently repeatedly denied the history of the war of aggression against China, we need to counter Japan acts of right wing attempts to distort history. "Tong Zeng said.
While this lawsuit is in compliance with legal problems, Tong Zeng pointed out that the plaintiffs filed lawsuits in both international law and domestic law has been followed.
Tong Zeng said the 1972 Sino-Japanese joint statement signed, only the Chinese Government renounced compensation claims, and the Chinese Government and the Chinese folk is two different subjects of law. Therefore, China civil victims to Japan Government or Japan compensation for businesses, have a basis in international law.
"From a domestic law, China was the Japanese army of aggression during World War II, labour was taken away from China, now that injured workers are based in China, domestic law has jurisdiction over this, therefore, China 37 plaintiffs in proceedings before a court to be incorporated is not a problem. "Tong Zeng said.
Similar lawsuits or start to appear after the implementation concerns
After China launched by the civil society organizations claim no win against Japan, therefore, the Beijing Municipal Intermediate People's Court accepted this does not come easily.
Tong Zeng, on China's civil claims against Japan, the Court accepted the case is "a good chance" he expects similar action will start to appear.
"In future, similar lawsuits would be at home start to appear, during World War II, Japan aggressors brought harm to the Chinese people untold misery, I think there will be more victims took up legal weapons, Japan victims seek justice. "Tong Zeng said.
Tong Zeng said, Japan's invasion of China Chinese victims in Japan Sue has a dozen years of experience, victims are still evolving their own litigation materials. In addition, many war victims are elderly, many of them through the notary, so that their descendants inherited to Japan's claim.
"Beijing Municipal Intermediate People's Court accepted this is a great opportunity, and can even be said that this is China's civil claims against Japan's last chance, we must not lose this opportunity. Japan Government's public rejection of war responsibility, the practice of denying the history of aggression against China, in order to maintain world peace, China's choice of Court's admissibility is a very meaningful thing to look forward to. "Tong Zeng said.
China's implementation of the Court ruling, has received wide public attention. In this regard, the healthy, told reporters "without worry".
Health analysts said, Japan the two defendants are centuries-old history of the company, have the general corporate culture and philosophy, "if accused of major human rights violations was ruled to be liable, but they refused to take responsibility, I think, their credibility will be greatly reduced. ”
"If the accused refuses to perform, the plaintiff can apply for enforcement, the two companies have offices in China, should be available for the implementation of the property. "Promotion of said. (End text)
(Original title: China civil lawsuit moved back home to Japan's claim to a new beginning)
中新网北京3月19日电 题：官司搬回国内打 中国民间对日索赔站上新起点
作者：白琥
3月18日，二战掳日中国劳工及遗属状告日本企业一案在北京市第一中级人民法院正式立案，这也是中国法院首次受理掳日劳工诉日企案。对此，分析认为，掳日中国劳工在华发起对日本加害企业的诉讼有法律依据，日后料将陆续出现类似诉讼。
中国民间对日索赔无一胜诉 北京法院受理成新起点
二次大战末期，日本从中国抓掳了约四万多名中国人，押送到日本国内35家企业的135个作业所，从事奴隶劳动。到战争结束的不长时间里，就有近七千人被折磨致死。而战后得以返回中国的三万余名劳工中，也有相当一部分因为身心受到严重摧残，长期生活在痛苦之中。
今年2月26日，37名原中国劳工及遗属的代表向北京市一中院递交起诉状，状告日本焦炭工业株式会社(原三井矿山)和三菱综合材料株式会社(原三菱矿业株式会社)，要求二被告就二战期间掳走中国劳工在媒体上公开谢罪，同时赔偿每位劳工100万元人民币。
3月18日，北京市一中院以书面的形式通知上述原告：该法院正式受理此案。这也是中国法院受理的首起掳日中国劳工诉日企案。
其实，中国民间对日索赔之路并非一条坦途。
从1995年开始，中国民间组织发起的对日索赔诉讼至今已持续近20年。然而，日本侵华战争的中国受害人在日本提起的近30起对日索赔诉讼，至今尚无一起取得最终胜诉。
对此，中国民间对日索赔联合会会长童增告诉中新网记者，中国民间对日索赔经历了漫长的“在日诉讼路”却无一胜诉，日本最高法院更是以“七十年代中国政府放弃战争赔偿意味着同时放弃民间赔偿”为由，关闭了在日本司法解决这一问题的大门。
“此后，我们一直倡导在国内打官司。2006年开始，也曾有山东、河北、重庆、浙江等地的二战受害者将诉讼材料递交给当地法院，但均未获受理。”童增说，“北京市一中院对此案的受理，是中国民间对日索赔路上的一个标志性事件，也是一个新的起点。”
掳日中国劳工在华起诉有法律依据
掳日中国劳工诉日企案在中国法院首获受理之后，引发各界关注。
童增对此指出，目前日本右翼势力有抬头的迹象，中国法院受理该案，对防止日本军国主义再次抬头、维护世界和平有积极作用。
“此外，日本领导人近来多次否认侵华战争历史，我们要反制日本右翼分子试图篡改历史的行径。”童增说。
而对于此次诉讼是否合乎法律的问题，童增则指出，原告提起的诉讼在国际法和国内法中均有据可循。
童增表示，1972年中日签订的联合声明，只是中国政府宣布放弃赔偿要求，而中国政府和中国民间是两个不同的法律主体。因此，中国的民间受害者向日本政府或日本企业提出赔偿，有国际法依据。
“从国内法来讲，中国是日军二战时的侵略地，劳工是从中国抓走的，现在的受害劳工也身在中国，国内法对此有管辖权，因此，中国法院对37名原告的诉讼予以立案是没有问题的。”童增说。
类似诉讼或陆续出现 判决后执行问题引关注
此前中国民间组织发起的对日索赔诉讼无一胜诉，因此，此次北京市一中院受理此案，显得来之不易。
在童增看来，对中国民间对日索赔来说，该法院受理此案则是“一个很好的机会”，他预计类似的诉讼会陆续出现。
“今后，类似诉讼肯定会在国内陆续出现，二战时期，日本侵略者给中国人民带来的的伤害罄竹难书，我想会有更多受害者拿起法律武器，向日本加害方讨公道。”童增说。
童增还分析称，日本侵华战争的中国受害者在日本打官司已有十几年的经验，受害者都在不断完善自己的诉讼材料。此外，很多战争受害者已是高龄，其中不少人通过公证，让自己的后代把对日索赔诉讼继承下去。
“北京市一中院受理此案是一个很好的机会，甚至可以说，这是中国民间对日索赔的最后一个机会，我们不能失掉这个机会。针对日本政府公开否定战争责任、否定侵华历史的做法，为了维护世界和平，中国法院选择受理此案是件非常有意义的事情，值得期待。”童增说。
中国法院判决后的执行问题，亦广获舆论关注。对此，康健则向记者表示“丝毫不担心”。
康健分析称，日本这两家被告都是有着百年历史的公司，都有基本的企业文化和理念，“若两被告做出的重大人权侵害事件被法院判决要承担责任，但它们选择拒不承担责任，我认为他们的信誉将会大打折扣。”
“如果被告拒不执行，原告可以申请强制执行，两公司在中国本土都有办事处，应该有可供执行的财产。”康健说。(完)
(原标题：官司搬回国内打 中国民间对日索赔站上新起点)
赞