Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)归海一刀
published in(发表于) 2014/3/25 23:05:36
General Administration of sport training by enterprises the prosecution claim 240 million,

Sports training by enterprises the prosecution claim 240 million sports Tin Shing and company headquarters | | | naming _ for the sports news

"The General Administration of sport training by enterprises claim 240 million" track


The Beijing News (reporters Liu Yang) yesterday, Tin Shing and Turpan in Xinjiang company (referred to as "Tin Shing and company") v Director of authority ("the authority") 240 million for litigation, in Beijing's second intermediate court. Tin Shing and asserted that authority after the prohibition made by the five ministries and documents is still empowered to use "State General Administration of sport training partner", "training of national athletes designated tomato juice" identity, leading products are all off the shelf (this newspaper reported on November 29, 2013). Training Authority in the trial said that five ministries and documents is a force majeure, the authority should escape, and denied that the Tiansheng acts of fraud and delay and company.


  Ban products "off the shelf"


Tin Shing and company claims, late 2011 to sponsored agreement, Tin Shing and provide the authority with the production of tomato juice and millions of Yuan funds. Tin Shing and training services to companies authorized for "General Administration of sport training partner"; awarded the company's production of "red drink" tomato juice "training of national athletes designated tomato juice" logo, used for commercial sale.


But on March 18, 2013, the State administration for industry and Commerce and four other ministries jointly issued, is prohibited to all departments of Central and State organs and their administrative units and authorize the making and selling as a "partner" or "designated" logo. On May 23 of the same year, Tiansheng paragraphs 1 million sponsorship for the coming year and remitted to the authority, the two sides renewed.


To June 25 that year. Training Council sent a letter informing the plaintiff company files for the five ministries, requested adjustments authorized title. On August 25, because of the title problem, Turpan, Tin Shing and related products were industrial and commercial Bureau ordered "off the shelf".


Tin Shing and the company believes that training Council from March 18, five ministries issued until June 25 to notify the plaintiff, apparent gross negligence and still hide five ministries files during the delay period, according to the original agreement signing and ask for sponsorship money, suspected of intentional fraud. Plaintiff claimed loss of product packaging and raw materials, sponsorship payments, costs of 240 million Yuan.


  Training Council challenge sponsor loss


Yesterday afternoon, training two agents appear in court, denied the existence of acts of deliberate fraud and malicious delay, and asked the Court to dismiss the claims. Reply believes that five ministries and documents belonging to a force majeure event, under the cooperation contract, force majeure is an escape clause, and therefore assumes no responsibility. Training Council on June 25, issued a letter of sponsorship by adjusting to plaintiffs as a sponsor, to perform "proposed solutions" obligations.


The trial, the defendant also questioned the plaintiff submitted proof of loss and a lot of delayed deposit. His agent said that has local access to the plaintiffs corporate financial statements and tax records, saying the plaintiffs only 1 million annual revenues, and is losing money, there is no brand damage.


"You can go stock scene, 82,000 boxes of goods, your caskets to inspection is not empty? "In this regard, Tin Shing and army responded in court.


The case was not adjudged.


(Original title: sky-high claims denied by the General Administration of Sport Training Council fraud)

(Edit: SN064)
02:59 March 25, 2014 The Beijing News
(
体育总局训练局遭企业起诉索赔2.4亿 |体育总局|天盛和公司|体育总局冠名_新闻资讯

  ■ “体育总局训练局遭企业索赔2.4亿”追踪


  新京报讯 (记者刘洋)昨日,新疆吐鲁番天盛和公司(简称“天盛和公司”)诉国家体育总局训练局(简称“训练局”)索赔2.4亿的诉讼,在北京市二中院开庭。天盛和公司称,训练局在五部委发禁止性文件后,仍授权其使用“国家体育总局训练局合作伙伴”、“训练局国家运动员指定番茄汁”标识,导致产品被全部下架(本报2013年11月29日报道)。训练局在庭审中表示,五部委文件属不可抗力,训练局应该免责,并否认对天盛和公司存在欺诈和拖延行为。


  禁令出台 产品“下架”


  天盛和公司诉称,2011年底双方达成赞助协议,天盛和向训练局提供其生产的番茄汁饮料及百万元人民币赞助金。训练局向天盛和公司授权为“国家体育总局训练局合作伙伴”;授予该公司生产的“赤饮”番茄汁饮料为“训练局国家运动员指定番茄汁”等标识,用于商业销售。


  但在2013年3月18日,国家工商总局等五部委联合发文,严禁中央和国家机关各部门及所属行政事业单位授权制售冠以“合作伙伴”、“指定”等标识。同年5月23日,天盛和将未来一年的100万赞助款汇给训练局,双方续约。


  至当年6月25日。训练局发函告知原告公司该五部委的文件,要求其调整授权称号。8月25日,因冠名问题,天盛和公司相关产品被吐鲁番市工商局勒令“下架”。


  天盛和公司认为,训练局从3月18日五部委发文至6月25日才告知原告,明显有重大过失,且在拖延期内仍隐瞒五部委文件,依原协议签约并索要赞助款,涉嫌故意欺诈。为此索赔原告产品包装及原辅材料损失、赞助款、诉讼费等2.4亿元。


  训练局质疑赞助商损失


  昨天下午,训练局两位代理人出庭,否认存在故意欺诈和恶意拖延行为,并要求法院驳回原告诉讼请求。其答辩认为,五部委文件属于不可抗力,根据双方的合作合同,不可抗力是免责条款,因此不承担责任。训练局还在6月25日向作为赞助商的原告发出了调整赞助函,履行“提出解决方案”的义务。


  庭审中,被告还质疑了原告提交的损失证明及产品大量滞存。其代理人表示,曾到当地调取原告企业的财务报表和税务记录,称原告年营业收入才100万,且呈亏损状态,不存在品牌损失。


  “你们可以亲自去库存现场看看,八万两千箱的货,你一箱箱来验是不是空的?”对此,天盛和老总当庭回应。


  此案未当庭宣判。


(原标题:体育总局训练局遭天价索赔 否认欺诈)


(编辑:SN064)
2014年03月25日02:59
新京报
)


If you have any requirements, please contact webmaster。(如果有什么要求,请联系站长)





QQ:154298438
QQ:417480759