Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2014/4/29 9:33:06 Chongqing University teacher was a lecturer copy to Professor
A?university?teacher,?taught?21?10?papers?accused?of?copying,?in?the?course?of?the?title?from?the?lecturers?were?promoted?to?Professor,?and?tuned?into?another?college.?In?recent?days,?reports?Chongqing?Normal?University?Political?Sciences?Professor?Zhang?Shiyou?thesis?"from?Professor?Lecturer?copy?to"?network,?has?aroused?a?lot?of?attention?on?the?Internet.
China?Youth?daily?reporter?found,?10?accused?of?copying?papers,?at?least?8?articles?a?lot?of?"References"?references?at?the?end?of?the?text,?some?almost?full?formed?by?the?combination?of?multiple?references.?1?other?references?in?the?article?does?not?indicate?the?contents?but?almost?replicate?another?paper.
Zhang?Shiyou?said?in?an?interview?with?China?Youth?daily?report?said?"itself?is?erroneous."?He?believes?that?has?been?reported?for?articles?published?before?2005,?"refactoring?does?not?constitute?academic?plagiarism?and?academic?misconduct?alleged,?is?really?not?the?same?standard?a?decade?ago.?”
"When?the?copy?becomes?a?habit,?when?copying?you?can?easily?comment?on?the?Professor,?talent,?China?was?also?reassuring,?devote?themselves?to?an?academic,?research??"NET?posts?raised?doubts?aroused?a?lot?of?netizens?resonance.?Currently,?Chongqing?Normal?University?Research?Department?and?other?departments?have?been?involved?in?the?investigation,?the?person?responsible?is?expected?to?"51"?results?are?after?the?holidays.
Accused?of?copying?paper,?titled?the?integrity?and?people′s?ideological?and?moral?education?at?present
Zhang?Shiyou?former?teachers?of?the?Yangtze?Normal?University?School?of?politics?and?public?administration.?The?10?accused?of?copying?paper,?before?it?created?in?its?January?2010?transferred?to?the?Chongqing?Normal?University?to?teach.
Journal?of?Fuling?teachers?college?published?in?September?1998,?the?importance?of?college?students?′?self-education?is?nets?post?first?reported?plagiarized?papers,?accused?of?copying?the?article?since?1995?the?6th?issue?of?the?higher?agricultural?education.
Published?in?the?journal?of?Fuling?teachers?college?when?this?thesis,?Zhang?Shiyou?graduated?from?Sichuan?Normal?University?majoring?in?political?education?for?5?years.?Public?information?shows?that?from?July?1993?to?January?2010,?Zhang?Shiyou?teaches?at?the?teachers?′?College?of?the?Yangtze?River,?Fuling?Teachers?College?is?the?College?one?of?the?predecessors?of?the?Yangtze?River.
College?teaching?experience?in?the?period?from?July?2000?to?July?2003?of?the?Yangtze?River,?Zhang?Shiyou?got?master′s?degree?in?law?in?the?Southwest?Normal?University,?majoring?in?Marxist?theory?and?ideological?and?political?education.
His?dier、sanpian?accused?of?copying?papers?appeared?in?the?course?of?studying?for?a?master′s?degree.?These?two?topics?for?the?credit?and?the?current?people′s?ideological?and?moral?education,?the?"times"?is?a?cultural?materialist?dialectics?and?the?theses?of?the?condensation?of?the?spirit?of?the?times,?respectively,?published?in?the?journal?of?Sichuan?province,?extension?of?2002,?4th,?2003,?2nd?period.
In?2003,?Zhang?Shiyou?has?graduated?10?years,?whose?title?is?a?lecturer.
Also?in?December?2003,?has?obtained?a?master′s?degree,?Associate?Professor?Zhang?Shiyou?commentary?on.
After?that,?Zhang?Shiyou?has?published?several?articles?on?alleged?plagiarized?paper?today.?Nets?blast,?there?are?4?suspected?plagiarized?papers?appeared?in?2004,?and?3?articles?which?appeared?in?2005.?At?this?point,?Zhang?Shiyou?total?of?10?papers?were?reporting?plagiarism.
Zhang?Shiyou?honors?come?one?after?another.?In?August?2005,?he?took?part?in?the?articles?listed?in?"Chongqing′s?fourth?Award?for?outstanding?achievements?in?social?science"?in?October,?he?captures?the?fifth?journal?selection?of?good?literature?thesis?in?Chongqing?in?December,?he?received?the?Science?Award?for?the?fourth?time?in?Fuling?district?in?Chongqing.
In?September?2006,?the?teachers?′?College?of?Fuling?normal?university?changed?its?name?to?the?Yangtze?River.?In?November,?promoted?to?Professor?Zhang?Shiyou?break,?was?named?associate?professor?from?only?3?years.
In?January?2010,?Zhang?Shiyou?entered?the?College?of?Chongqing?Normal?University?political?lecturer.?At?present,?the?jury?he?wears?the?national?Chinese?core?journal?assessment?expert,?ethical?society?Executive?Director?of?Chongqing,?Chongqing?University?ideological?and?moral?cultivation?and?legal?based?society?such?as?social?roles.
10?papers?in?the?year?have?not?been?challenged,?did?not?block?its?title?from?the?lecturer?was?promoted?to?Professor,?nor?does?it?interfere?with?their?new?University?coaching?road.
"There?is?no?published,?does?not?constitute?a?copy?does?not?copy?problem"
10?papers?accused?of?copying,?the?net?post?has?said?is?true??China?Youth?daily?found?verbatim,?netizens?questioned?is?not?without?reason.
The?must?pay?attention?to?self-education?of?college?students?are?Zhang?Shiyou?netizens?questioned?the?first?essay?of?plagiarism.?This?paper?published?in?1998,?did?not?mark?any?references.?Netizens?said,?in?1995,?the?name?"South?China?Academy?of?tropical?crops?Cai?Heling"?who?has?published?papers?of?the?important?role?of?self-education?in?moral?education.
Journalists?noted?that?the?framework?of?these?two?papers?are?exactly?the?same.?In?1995,?Cai?Wen?4?subheadings?namely?"concept?and?characteristics?of?self-education",?"the?need?for?self-education",?"self-education?system?operating?conditions",?"feasibility?of?college?students?′?self-education."?Zhang?Wen?issued?after?3?years,?its?just?like?4?smaller?title?with?Cai?Wen,?and?match?the?order.
With?the?first?heading,?for?example,?summed?up?the?characteristics?of?Zhang?Wen?will?educate?themselves?"consciousness,?purpose,?control,?self,?social"?5?keywords.?In?1995,?Cai?Wen?had?listed?the?5?keywords,?sort?the?same?same.
In?the?first?key?word?"consciousness"?discussion,?Cai?Wen?a?total?of?128?characters,?Zhang?Wen?has?126?words?with?words?no?less.?Throughout?the?change?only?in?two?places,?one?reads?"self-education?of?a?student,?either?independently,?or?in?the?lower?independently?instructor?...?...",?Zhang?Wen,?"or"?and?replace?them?with?"or".
Another?reads,?"...?...?If?self-awareness?in?the?formation?of?primary?school?pupils?and?a?sense?of?self?is?not?yet?ripe?for?middle?school?students,?are?difficult?to?carry?out?effective?self-education?",?Zhang?Wen,"?difficult?"and?replace?them?with"?difficult?".
Discussion?of?the?remaining?4?keywords,?Zhang?Wen?Cai?Wen,?on?the?basis?of?adjustments?to?the?individual?words,?and?added?a?sentence?at?the?end?of?the?whole?section:?"the?above?five?aspects?constitute?a?close?contact?with?integral?organic?unity,?on?self-quality?education?in?the?provisions.?”
Contrast?to?journalists?found?that?Zhang?Wen?about?4600?words,?not?Cai?Wen?about?4000?words.?Zhang?Wen?90%?statements?at?least,?are?carried?out?on?the?basis?of?the?Cai?Wen?to?add,?delete?or?substitute?individual?words,?and?many?statements?are?exactly?the?same.
"I?would?not?publish?that?article,?it?was?an?internal?communication?of?our?magazine,?I?don′t?know?(whistleblower)?where?it?was?found.?"This?phenomenon,?Zhang?Shiyou?responded?that?articles?from?the?school′s?internal?communications,"?I?have?not?publicly?released,?was?in?any?case?a?copy?does?not?copy?the?problem.?”
"Because?at?the?time?was?still?young,?in?a?certain?sense,?might?write?things,?looking?for?something?to?deal?with?the?Exchange.?Then?they?may?have?to?gather?it?up.?"He?explained.
6000-Word?thesis,?about?1000?words?and?original
China?Youth?daily?found?that?Zhang?Shiyou?accused?of?copying?the?remaining?9?papers?are?more?devoted?"quoted"?references,?and?some?combination?of?full-text?articles?into.
Published?in?the?journal?of?Chongqing?Institute?of?technology?2005?1th?period?in?the?discussion?on?the?professional?ethics?of?college?students?in?"Shi"?and?"Guide",?is?10?paper?has?been?reported?from?the?more?recent?one.?3?references?in?the?article?are?noted?below,?of?which?the?first?article?was?published?in?2003?in?the?Hunan?sports?on?the?construction?of?professional?ethics?focuses?on?strengthening?of?ideological?and?moral?education,?author?Zhou?Chunguang.
Of?students?′?self-education?of?college?students?in?the?1998?creation?of?the?similar?modus?operandi,?Zhang?Shiyou?2005?again?appear?in?this?paper.?Zhang?Wen?the?first?part?of?the?"status?quo?of?college?students?′?ethic",?its?arguments?and?the?first?part?of?Zhou?Wen?"current?landslide?is?thought?mainly?of?professional?ethics"?argument?almost?unanimously.
Zhang?Wen?of?first?a?points?argument?is?"career?value?concept?upside?down?dislocation",?Zhou?Wen?is?is?"value?concept?occurred?dislocation";?thereafter,?Zhang?Wen?lists?"career?value?orientation?Babbitt?vulgar",?and?"ethics?judge?fudge?fuzzy",?and?"ethics?psychological?serious?imbalances"?3?a?points?argument,?Zhou?Wen?is?respectively?is?meaning?similar?of?"value?orientation?comparison?vulgar",?and?"moral?judge?appeared?deviation",?and?"social?moral?psychological?imbalances".
Reporters?found?that?in?the?above?4?points?of?discussion,?almost?reproduces?text?of?Zhou?Wen?Zhang?Wen.
To?the?first?argument,?for?example,?Zhang?Wen?the?whole?paragraph?328?words?and?references?tags?are?indicated?at?the?end?of?the?paragraph,?"[1]".?In?fact,?almost?every?sentence?of?the?paragraph?could?find?sources?in?parts?of?Zhou?Wen,?the?difference?is?only?adjusted?the?individual?words.
Next?3?arguments?without?a?cite?tag.?However,?almost?every?sentence?is?still?origin?can?be?found?in?Zhou?Wen.?For?example,?the?2nd?argument?total?276?words,?up?to?220?words?identical?to?the?Zhou?Wen;?3rd?points,?4th-257?points?respectively,?423?words,?corresponding?to?about?210,?320?words?in?line?with?Zhou?Wen.
This?means,?Zhang?Wen?about?the?first?part?of?about?1200?words?about?letter?to?Zhou?Wen?65%?this?"reference"?documents?found?in?the?original?text.
Zhou?Wen′s?"shadow"?also?appears?in?part?two?of?Zhang?Wen?"ways?of?strengthening?students?′?ethic?education?in?colleges?and?universities".?This?section?is?divided?into?"red?line?throughout?the?Marxism?theory,?strengthen?the?concept?of?professional?ethics?of?college?students",?three?points.?Among?them,?the?first?two?points?of?the?argument?can?be?found?in?the?week?mean?the?same?argument.
Dier、Sange?argument,?there?is?a?lot?of?content?from?the?second?article?"References".?The?literature?published?in?2002?the?6th?Edition?of?the?Chinese?vocational?and?technical?education?of?the?higher?vocational?students?′?ethic?education?discovery,?Fang?Xiaohong?of?the?author.
Among?them,?Zhang?Wen,?"establish?a?correct?concept?of?careers?and?training?spirit?of?hard?working"?and?"establish?a?strict?sense?of?discipline,?develop?professionalism,"?Fang?and?such?arguments?are?not?bad,?and?specifically?address?only?individual?words?are?deleted.
According?to?reporters?a?preliminary?manual?matching,?overall,?this?6000-word?article,?and?references?are?completely?unrelated?to?the?original?content,?approximately?less?than?1000?words.
Zhang?Shiyou?remaining?8?papers?were?reported,?there?is?a?similar?phenomenon?of?more?references?in?the?references,?some?one-third,?roughly?half?the?length.
Chongqing?Normal?University?the?school?has?been?involved?in?the?investigation
Chongqing?Normal?University?Research?Department?a?head?surnamed?Luo?told?China?Youth?daily?reporter,?at?present,?the?school?is?first?mentioned?they?use?contrast?detection?system?of?academic?misconduct?and?artificial?compared?to?the?invited?experts.?Due?to?the?number?of?papers?that?has?been?reported?for?more?testing?was?not?completed?for?the?time?being.
Zhang?Shiyou?do?not?consider?themselves?to?be?copied,?"plagiarism?is?definitely?wrong.?Especially?the?knowledge,?even?more?wrong.?"He?thinks?the?reason?being?reported,?it?may?be?some"?malicious.?"
He?explained?to?reporters,?by?today′s?standards,?paper′s?far?from?standard?compositions?of?that?time,?but?as?far?as?frame?does?not?constitute?academic?plagiarism?and?academic?misconduct?alleged,?"it′s?10?years?ago,?the?standard?is?different."
Zhang?Shiyou?says,?as?requested?by?the?editorial?office?that?year,?some?references?simply?at?the?end?the?whole?list,?and?does?not?need?to?correspond?to?each?comment.?At?the?time,?some?articles?reference?someone?else′s?stuff,?and?behind?it?are?no?references,?"which?at?the?time?this?situation?a?lot."
"As?in?the?past,?reference?amount?one-third?cannot?be?overemphasized.?"He?said.
"The?times?are?different,?basic?requirements?and?standards?are?not?quite?the?same.?If?the?later?academic?standard?in?place,?I?wrote?there?problem,?I?haven′t?got?anything.?"Zhang?Shiyou?says,?more?than?10?years?ago,?the?phenomenon?of?academic?irregularities?in?many,"?to?tell?the?truth,?you?don′t?believe?you?can?find?a?previous?article,?check,?more?or?less?problematic.?”
However,?reporters?in?the?1984?book,?copyright?protection?of?journal?issued?by?the?pilot?of?the?implementing?rules?of?the?regulations,?which?the?15th?already?provides?that?"proper?references"?means?in?a?work,?the?author?refers?to?pieces?of?others?′?works,?works?that?reference?one?or?more?persons,?total?refers?to?total?no?more?than?my?creative?works?of?one-tenth.
Previous?head?surnamed?Luo?said,?in?addition?to?10?papers?reported,?Zhang?Shiyou?all?papers?they?test?it?again,?"otherwise,?solve?a?problem,?then?again?others?brought?up."
Staff?writer,?Beijing,?April?28-
一名大学教师，从教21年，10篇论文被指抄袭，其间职称从讲师晋升到了教授，并调入了另一所大学。近日，这则举报重庆师范大学政治学院教授张世友论文“从讲师一路抄袭到教授”的网帖，在互联网上引起了大量关注。
中国青年报记者比对发现，被指抄袭的10篇论文中，至少8篇大量“引用”了文末的参考文献，有的几乎全文由多篇参考文献组合而成。另有1篇未注明参考文献但内容几乎照搬另一论文。
张世友接受中国青年报采访时表示，举报者所言“本身好多就是子虚乌有”。他同时认为，被举报的论文多发表于2005年之前，“至于构不构成所谓的学术抄袭、学术不端，真是十年前的标准不一样。”
“当抄袭成为一种习惯，当抄袭可以轻松评上教授，成为人才，中国还有人安心、潜心做学术，搞研究吗？”网帖提出的质疑引起了不少网友共鸣。目前，重庆师范大学科研处等部门已介入调查，有关负责人预计“五一”假期后会有结果。
被指抄袭的论文中，有篇题为《诚信与当前人们的思想道德教育》
张世友原是长江师范学院政治与公共管理学院教师。此次10篇被指抄袭的论文，均创作于其2010年1月调入重庆师范大学任教之前。
发表于1998年9月《涪陵师专学报》的《必须重视大学生的自我教育》是网帖举报的第一篇抄袭论文，文章被指抄袭自1995年第6期的《高等农业教育》。
在《涪陵师专学报》上发表这篇论文时，张世友已从四川师范学院政治教育专业本科毕业5年。公开资料显示，1993年7月至2010年1月，张世友在长江师范学院任教，涪陵师范高等专科学校正是长江师范学院的前身之一。
长江师院任教期间的2000年7月至2003年7月，张世友在西南师范大学修得了法学硕士学位，专业是马克思主义理论与思想政治教育。
他的第二、三篇被指抄袭的论文就出现在攻读硕士学位期间。这两篇题目分别为《诚信与当前人们的思想道德教育》、《“与时俱进”是民族文化与唯物辩证法相凝结的时代精神》的论文，分别刊发于《四川省干部函授学院学报》的2002年第4期、2003年第2期。
2003年，张世友已本科毕业10年，其职称是讲师。
也正是2003年12月，已获得硕士学位的张世友评上了副教授。
此后，张世友发表了多篇在今天被指抄袭的论文。据网帖爆料，有4篇疑似抄袭的论文出现于2004年，3篇出现于2005年。至此，张世友共10篇论文被举报抄袭。
张世友的荣誉接踵而来。2005年8月，他参与的论文入选“重庆市第四次社会科学优秀成果奖”；10月，他斩获第五届重庆市期刊好作品评选论文一等奖；12月，他获重庆市涪陵区第四次社会科学优秀成果三等奖。
2006年9月，涪陵师院更名为长江师范学院。11月，张世友破格晋升为教授，这距其被评为副教授仅3年。
2010年1月，张世友进入重庆师范大学政治学院任教。目前，他身兼全国中文核心期刊评委会评审专家、重庆市伦理学会常务理事、重庆市高校思想道德修养与法律基础研究会副秘书长等社会角色。
这10篇论文在当年没有受到质疑，未阻挡其职称从讲师晋升到教授，也未妨碍其前往新大学的执教之路。
“没有公开发表，不构成抄不抄袭的问题”
10篇论文被指抄袭，网帖所言是否属实？中国青年报记者逐字比对发现，网友的质疑并非没有理由。
《必须重视大学生的自我教育》是张世友被网友质疑抄袭的第一篇论文。这篇刊发于1998年的论文中没有标注任何参考文献。网友称，1995年，一位署名为“华南热带作物学院?蔡鹤龄”的人已发表了论文《自我教育在德育中的重要作用》。
记者注意到，这两篇论文的框架完全一样。1995年，蔡文的4个小标题分别为“自我教育的概念与特征”、“自我教育的必要性”、“自我教育机制的运行条件”、“大学生自我教育的可行性”。3年后发表的张文，其4个小标题与蔡文一模一样，且顺序一致。
以第一个小标题为例，张文将自我教育的特征概括为“自觉性、目的性、有控性、自我性、社会性”5个关键词。而在1995年，蔡文已列出这5个关键词，排序同样相同。
在第一个关键词“自觉性”的论述中，蔡文共128字，张文有126字与其一字不差。整段仅改动了两处，一处原文是“一个学生的自我教育，无论是独立进行的，或是在教师指导下半独立进行的……”，张文将“或是”改成“还是”。
另一处的原文是“……如自我意识尚在形成中的小学生和自我意识尚未成熟的中学生，都难开展有效的自我教育”，张文将“难开展”改成“难以开展”。
其余4个关键词的论述，张文也在蔡文的基础上对个别字句作出调整，并在整部分末尾加了一句：“以上五个方面构成一个紧密联系，缺一不可的有机统一体，对自我教育作了质的规定。”
记者对比发现，张文含摘要在内约4600字，没有摘要的蔡文约4000字。张文至少九成的语句，都是在蔡文的基础上进行增加、删除或换用了个别字词，且多处语句完全相同。
“那篇文章我当时本来没有公开发表，那是一个我们内部交流的内刊，我也不知道(举报人)在什么地方找的。”对于上述现象，张世友回应称，文章来自学校的一次内部交流，“我没有公开发表，本来就不构成抄不抄袭的问题。”
“因为确实那个时候还年轻，从某种意义上来说，可能也写不来东西，就找个东西来应付一下交流。后来就可能把它搜集起来了。”他解释。
6000字论文，约1000字原创
中国青年报记者比对发现，张世友被指抄袭的其余9篇论文，均较多篇幅“引用”了参考文献，有的几乎全文由多篇文献组合而成。
刊发于《重庆工学院学报》2005年第1期的《论高校学生职业道德的“势”与“导”》，是10篇被举报的论文中距今较近的一篇。文末注明了3篇参考文献，其中第一篇是2003年发表于《湖南体育》上的《职业道德建设的重点是加强思想道德教育》，作者周春光。
1998年创作《必须重视大学生的自我教育》的类似手法，在张世友2005年的这篇论文中再次出现。张文的第一部分“高校学生职业道德的现状”，其分论点与周文第一部分“当前职业道德是思想滑坡的主要表现”的分论点几乎一致。
张文的第一个分论点是“职业价值观念颠倒错位”，周文则是“价值观念发生错位”；此后，张文列出“职业价值取向市侩庸俗”、“职业道德评判含混模糊”、“职业道德心理严重失衡”3个分论点，周文则分别是意思相近的“价值取向比较庸俗”、“道德评判出现偏差”、“社会道德心理失衡”。
记者发现，在上述4个分论点的具体论述中，张文几乎照搬了周文的原文。
以首个分论点为例，张文全段共328字，且在段尾注明了引用标记“[1]”。事实上，该段几乎每句话都能在周文的各个部分找到出处，区别在于仅调整了个别字词。
接下来的3个分论点没有再注明引用标记了。但是，几乎每句话依旧能在周文里找到出处。例如，第2个分论点共276字，近220字与周文相同；第3个分论点、第4个分论点分别257字、423字，对应约有210字、320字与周文一致。
这意味着，张文约1200字左右的第一部分，大约65%的文字可在周文这篇“参考文献”中找到原文。
周文的“影子”还出现在了张文的第二部分“强化高校学生职业道德教育的途径”。该部分分为“始终贯穿马克思主义理论红线，深入强化高校学生的职业道德理念”等三个论点。其中，第一个论点的两个分论点可以在周文中找到意思相同的分论点。
第二、三个论点，则有不少内容来自第二篇“参考文献”。该文献系发表于2002年第6期《中国职业技术教育》的《高职学生职业道德教育探索》，作者方晓红。
其中，张文“树立正确的择业观念，培养吃苦耐劳的精神”、“树立严格的纪律观念，培养良好的敬业精神”等分论点均与方文一字不差，且具体论述也仅删改了个别字句。
据记者初步人工比对，总体看来，这篇约6000字的论文，与参考文献完全无关的原创内容，大约不到1000字。
张世友其余被举报的8篇论文，也存在类似较多引用参考文献的现象，有的约占三分之一，有的大致占一半篇幅。
重庆师大校方已介入调查
重庆师范大学科研处一位罗姓负责人告诉中国青年报记者，目前，校方已经将前述论文用学术不端的检测系统进行对比，同时也邀请了专家进行人工比对。由于被举报的论文篇数较多，检测暂时没有完成。
张世友不认为自己是抄袭，“抄袭肯定是不对的了。尤其是明知故犯，就更不对了。”他认为，自己之所以被举报，可能是有些人“恶意打击”。
他向记者解释，用今天的标准来看，那个年代的论文肯定有不规范的成分，但至于构不构成所谓的学术抄袭、学术不端，“真是10年前标准不一样”。
张世友说，按照当年编辑部的要求，一些参考文献只需在文末整体罗列，而不需要逐一对应注释。而在当时，有的文章引用了别人的东西，后面却什么参考文献都没有，“那个时候这种情况多得很”。
“按照一般过去的说法，引用量三分之一都不过分。”他说。
“时代不同，基本要求和标准也不太一样。如果说后来学术规范出台了，我写的东西还出现问题，那我任何话都没有。”张世友说，10多年前，学术不规范的现象很多，“说实话，你不信可以随便找一篇之前的文章查查，多少都有问题的。”
不过，记者在1984年颁发的《图书、期刊版权保护试行条例实施细则》中看到，该细则第15条已经规定，“适当引用”指作者在一部作品中引用他人作品的片断，凡引用一人或多人的作品，所引用的总量不得超过本人创作作品总量的十分之一。
前述罗姓负责人表示，除了被举报的10篇论文，张世友发表的所有论文他们都要检测一遍，“不然，解决了一个问题，之后别人又提出来”。
本报北京4月28日电
赞