Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)归海一刀published in(发表于) 2014/5/3 9:47:49 Nanchang administration head mingaoguan reply to the Court of first instance
April 25, 9:30, clerk Hu Wenjuan took the Court after a disciplined, presiding judge, xihu district, Nanchang city, Jiangxi province people's Court Vice President Li Liang Guang-rung law mallet Court announced. At this point, the West Lake District Administration for industry and Commerce Secretary Li Fumin sat in the dock, and court appearances. The legal daily reporter learned that, this is the first case before the xihu District Court of administrative cases reply to executive heads to appear, first case of Nanchang city.
Court of Twitter to broadcast the
Plaintiffs on behalf of individual industrial and commercial households apply for the establishment of a hotel because of bad business, entrusted to the West Lake District Administration for industry and commerce to handle hotel name change procedures. After the name change is poor management at the hotel, to court by creditors.
To prove a relationship with the debt was not in the hotel business, Zhang administrative litigation in the courts, said they could not trust others to apply against the defendant hotel name changes, and called for the revocation of the Registration Act.
The trial, the Court made the factual and legal basis for registration of changes the defendant undertook a comprehensive review and enforcement procedures, and pleadings both parties built around individual name change debate is a formal examination or substantive examination.
Court hearing ruled that, in accordance with the administrative licensing law and the provisions of the individual measures for Administration of registration, the defendant at the time of registration with the hotel name change just for formality examination that meets the relevant legal provisions. This case in the, even authorized Attorney in the of signature not plaintiffs I writing, but delegate agent to accused applications handle change registration Shi, submitted has complete of material, accused on this also be review, including plaintiffs of ID copies, and delegate agent ID of original, and copies, and business license of original, material, meet forms review of elements, do has carefully review obligations, meet related legal provides.
Accordingly, the Court recognizes defendant Reregistration specific administrative act undertaken by legitimate, final judgment sustaining defendants xihu district administration for industry and commerce registration decisions.
National moral exemplars, Qiu Eguo Xiong Diru, NPC Deputy Xu Guifen, Jiangxi provincial people's Congress representatives of more than 40 people attend. Trial court Twitter broadcast.
Reluctant to appear in court because a variety
"In recent years, increasing administrative cases, but Chief Administrative Officer appear in court litigation rate remains very low. "Lei Hong, President of the xihu District Court told reporters in court, for example, the administrative litigation case in recent 10 years a total of more than 200 pieces, without a Chief Administrative Officer appear in court proceedings.
"The Chief Executive would not appear in court litigation, for a number of reasons. "Lei Hong analysis said, some administrative heads on administrative litigation of awareness insufficient, worried do accused lossy Government image, fear lost lawsuit effects itself achievements, on administrative litigation holding misunderstanding and subject mood; some administrative heads exists bureaucrat thought, lack litigation both status equal concept, think and people Court, has lost identity; given administrative law enforcement of reality, some administrative heads does not is understanding specific administrative acts situation, on legal knowledge, and litigation program not familiar, fear appear Hou effects litigation and led to loses, Resulting concerns.
"There are many executive heads of administrative services, other corporate activity and court time conflicts, cannot be present to participate in the proceedings. "Lei Hong said that in addition, the existing law does not expressly provide that executive heads should appear himself, even if not appearing without adverse consequences. On some of the Chief Executives Board by virtue of their functions, rank in the ascendancy, not used to means to resolve the dispute, but rather on out-of-court work, hopes, including through administrative dispute resolution leaders intervened.
Attendance promotion of judicial authority
Lei Hong believed that Chief Administrative Officer appear in court litigation is significant.
First, can let heads understanding to this sector administrative law enforcement of reality, found administrative law enforcement personnel in entity and program aspects of insufficient, thereby has pointed to be improved, promotion law administrative level of improve; second, conducive to advance responsibility Government of image shaping, administrative heads face-to-face and relative people debate, and communication, is on relative people of respecting, in trial in the as can smell had and modified, also will won masses of understands and support; last, administrative heads appear conducive to optimization administrative trial environment, upgrade justice authority.
"Executive heads take the lead in responding to court embodies the principle of equality before the law, conducive to the manifestation of judicial authority, dignity of upholding the law. "Lei Hong said.
For, xihu District Court recommends, modified administrative procedure Shi, increased in this area within has major effects, and merits complex, and group disputes or on administrative relative people interests produces major effects of administrative cases, administrative organ heads should appear participate in litigation of provides, makes administrative heads appear appearances law; will administrative heads appear appearances into local government performance examination range, on administrative heads should appear and is not appear or illegal loses cases, in examination in the, as appropriate, be buckle points, canceled year discuss qualification , And people's courts at all levels should strengthen the linkage with the Government legal departments for special cases should be jointly recommended that Executive Heads of court litigation, promote administrative officer appear in court appearances as a long-term mechanism.
(Original title: Nanchang mingaoguan reply to first-hand case)
4月25日9时30分，书记员胡文娟宣读法庭纪律后，审判长、江西省南昌市西湖区人民法院副院长李良广敲响法槌，宣布开庭。此时，西湖区工商行政管理局局长李福民坐在被告席上，出庭应诉。《法制日报》记者了解到，这是西湖区法院审理的第一例行政机关一把手出庭应诉行政案件，也是南昌市首例。
法院微博同步直播
原告张某以个体工商户的名义申请成立一家酒店，由于生意不好，委托他人到西湖区工商行政管理局办理酒店名称变更手续。变更名称后的酒店还是经营不善，被债主诉至法院。
为证明自己与酒店经营中的债务没有关系，张某向法院提起行政诉讼，称自己没有委托他人向被告申请办理酒店名称变更登记，并要求撤销这一登记行为。
庭审中，法庭对被告作出变更登记的事实和法律依据及执法程序进行了全面审查，诉辩双方围绕个体工商户名称变更登记是形式审查还是实质审查展开辩论。
法庭经审理认为，依照行政许可法以及《个体工商户登记管理办法》的规定，被告在办理酒店名称变更登记时，只需作形式上的审查即符合相关法律规定。本案中，即使授权委托书中的签名不是原告本人书写，但委托代理人向被告申请办理变更登记时，提交了齐全的材料，被告对此也予以审查，包括原告的身份证复印件、委托代理人身份证的原件、复印件、工商营业执照的原件等材料，符合形式审查的要件，尽到了审慎审查义务，符合相关法律规定。
据此，法院确认被告作出的变更登记具体行政行为合法，最终判决维持被告西湖区工商行政管理局作出的工商登记决定。
全国道德模范邱娥国、全国人大代表徐桂芬、江西省人大代表熊迪如等40余人参加旁听。庭审过程西湖区法院微博同步直播。
不愿出庭原因多样
“近年来，行政案件逐年增多，但行政首长出庭应诉率仍然很低。”西湖区法院院长雷虹告诉记者，以西湖区法院为例，该院近10年行政诉讼案件总数为200多件，却没有一例行政首长出庭应诉。
“行政首长不愿出庭应诉，有多种原因。”雷虹分析说，有的行政首长对行政诉讼的认识不足，担心做被告有损政府形象，害怕输官司影响自身政绩，对行政诉讼持误解和抵触情绪；有的行政首长存在官本位思想，缺乏诉讼双方地位平等观念，认为与老百姓对簿公堂，有失身份；鉴于行政执法的现实，有些行政首长并不十分了解具体行政行为情况，对法律知识、诉讼程序不熟悉，怕出庭后影响诉讼而导致败诉，因此产生顾虑。
“还有的行政首长行政事务繁多，其他公务活动容易与开庭时间冲突，不能到庭参加诉讼。”雷虹说，此外，现行法律没有明确规定行政机关首长应当出庭应诉，即使不出庭也无需承担不利后果。而有些行政首长因其职务、职级上处于优势地位，不习惯用诉讼手段解决纠纷，而是注重庭外工作，寄希望通过领导出面干预等途径解决行政争议。
出庭提升司法权威
雷虹认为，行政首长出庭应诉意义重大。
首先，能够让负责人了解到本部门行政执法的实际情况，发现行政执法人员在实体和程序方面的不足，从而有针对性地加以改进，促进依法行政水平的提高；其次，有利于推进责任政府的形象塑造，行政首长面对面与相对人辩论、沟通，是对相对人的尊重，在庭审中如能闻过而改，也会赢得群众的理解和支持；最后，行政首长出庭有利于优化行政审判环境，提升司法权威。
“行政首长带头出庭应诉，体现了法律面前人人平等的原则，有利于彰显司法权威，维护法律尊严。”雷虹说。
为此，西湖区法院建议，修改行政诉讼法时，增加在本辖区内有重大影响、案情复杂、群体性纠纷或者对行政相对人权益产生重大影响的行政案件，行政机关负责人应当到庭参加诉讼的规定，使行政首长出庭应诉有法可依；将行政首长出庭应诉纳入当地政府绩效考核范围，对行政首长应当出庭而未到庭或者违法败诉案件，在考核中酌情予以扣分，取消当年评优资格；各级人民法院与政府法制部门应加强联动，对于特殊案件应共同建议行政机关负责人出庭应诉，推动行政首长出庭应诉成为长效机制。
（原标题：南昌首审一把手应诉民告官案）
赞